If Trump didn't care if it happened how could that have been a crime? So you just shot down Schiff's accusation's of bribery and quid pro quo.

There you go once again. Trump never said to tell Taylor there was no quid pro quo. The President told Sondland there was no quid pro quo. Sondland never said that Trump had told him to tell anyone else. Just like I have said many times before, you progressives hear things that were never said because it doesn't suit your appraisal of the situation. Taylor asked Sondland it there was a quid pro quo and Sondland stated there was no quid pro quo, time after time to Taylor, when asking that question. so once again you hear only what you want to hear not what was actually said. So sad to see many of the liberals that have gone to progressivism. By the way, how would Trump know Taylor was to ask Sondland that question?

I suppose you haven't heard Google has been giving the Chinese inventions that allow the Chinese to keep track on every person in their country. Have you ever made a post against that action by Google? I also don't think this country should ever allow Huawei to enter into any contract with any American company or our government.

I think his attorneys were the ones to compose the opening statement. I hear they have been critics of Trump from the start. That may or may not be the case. But they are solid Democratic backers.

We have heard plenty of proof, but none of it included a crime to have been committed by Trump. All os should be for the t***h! But with Schiff in charge, being a Trump h**er and having lied about having information on crime President Trump has committed. He has never shown any proof, that he claimed for three years, to have been right in plain sight. That leads one to speculate that he has been lying for three years and continues too do that this very day. So sad, that a party has rejected an e******n like the Dems have, for three long years. They wanted to impeach him even before he was sworn into office.

Many, but not all, can be recognized by their actions and speech. That in no way does that mean I condemn them, I state a fact I have seen when watching people. I have always liked to watch people and try to determine their likes, their moods and their traits. That isn't derogatory or being condescending. We have a niece that is in a gay relationship but don't condemn her since she has had filed relationships with men and all she wants is to have a loving and happy life she couldn't attain with men. I don't condemn any gay person in a personal relationship. That is their own personal need.

Yu seem to talk about Fox News talking points you always fail to talk about the MSM talking points that are almost exactly like the talking points of the Dems. The economy Trump gave us, was because of the executive orders by President Obama were removed and tax's were lowered for most Americans in the middle wage bracket and all of the people that were in the lower economic positions.

Isn't that the way the MSM promotes the Democratic party.

Your first sentence is a pure lie, no matter how it was put. So sad for this to be the way the Dems act when they lose a e******n.

For one thing the e*******l college is the v**es for the President by each state by their delegates who are supposed to v**e for the candidate that had the most v**es in their state. I think, these delegates are appointed by each county in each state. That is how the states decide what e*******l v**es go for each candidate. These counties v**ed for the person that won the most v**es in their county.
As for you final sentence, Please show proof by having been found guilty in a court of law. None of that has even come close to having been done. What is being done by Shifty Schiff and Nancy has nothing to do with having a legal prosecution that could be upheld by a court. If they finally have enough v**es to say Trump has committed a crime, which they are searching for at this time, Then it will go to the Senate and before the Chief Justice of the Supreme court, with Trump having the ability to have counsel and call witness's. That is what Schiff doesn't want to happened in this hearing on impeachment. This isn't a court hearing but that will happen later, with the full protection for the accused and the right to have the accuser or accuser's stand before him and testify. As of yet all of these witness's have stated they have seen no evidence of any crime. Just the twisted logic of the ultra left.
Please tell us all of the rules, Trump has broken. None of these witness's have seen or heard any such evidence. You seem to have been so enthralled with all of these supposed crimes where no evidence has been proven and provided that you have clearly lost sight of the t***h behind the accusations. The moment he was sworn in many said he should be impeached before he ever had done anything while in office. I guess the left just wants him disposed because they want their power back. It is so sad that you cast dispersions at other people simply because they oppose what you, sincerely believe. Your opinion is only one of millions and the others will count in the end, after the e******n. I hope those on the left won't have another breakdown win Trump wins once again. If he loses, I won't cry or wail, we lost because of some reason or another. I will simply move on and hope for the best until the next e******n, not like a bunch of l*****ts did when T***p w*n.

Trump had, I think, had 304 e*******l v**es to Clintons 227. That is why he is President.

Please let me know, by actual facts that have been proven, where I have gone astray. I would like to know what and where you think my thoughts were incorrect. Not just your assumptions and f**e accusations by the left. I think your talking points are not proven facts, but speculation of some sort. As of yet you haven't shown any proven facts about Trump while being President. Let us point out the fallacy's, you seem to point out. Number 1, Russia collusion, then Obstruction. If Mueller and his Trump hating investigators had found any positive t***h about obstruction they would have indicted him and forget about the main Dem talking point, "the President can't be indicted while in office. That is a lie and proven in the bill Clinton investigation, by the investigator of Clintons case.
My God has blessed me many times and hope I don't think I have unjustly made comments. I may have but don't think so. You on the other hand, keep throwing out unproven facts as proven facts, without hesitation. May the Lord forgive you for that sin. Have a great day and enjoy this weekend.

I meant Bill Clinton. We had been posting about Presidents being indicted. Hilary has never, thank the Lord, been the United States President.

Great post and very true for the Dem run cities and states that have been under the control of the Dems for decades if not multi decades.

If that is true then why was President charged with, I think there were 9 crimes Clinton had been indicted on. Get your story correct before posting. You keep insisting you are a great Christian but keep making false accusations about Trump with no proven facts. Just partisan talk over and over again and again. If I remember correctly at that time there were a number of other casinos going bankrupt at that time or had to try to use Chapter 11 to try to retain their properties.