One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
The Most Active Discussions Today
 
NO OTHER PRESIDENT ; none but "THE DONALD"
"I'm from Missouri , Show Me"
none but the Donald has had to be as passionate in his enthusiasm in watching for his own ass so far as being the ultimate sycophant to adversaries of the country to pay off some debt probably incurred in the past

none but the Donald has such a blatant disregard by gathering not so enormous crowds while such a contagious virus such as the corona virus exist and not having the since to practice safe sex and advocate wearing a mask.

none but the Donald and no other president has had to fend off opposition other than the traditional opposing party opposition which was brought on by his narcissistic and vindictive nature which is vented against people that do not have the opinion of him that he has of his self.

none but the Donald and no other president has a total disregard of the media and the constitution [Freedom of the Press - the first amendment ] by not realizing that it is the cohesion that holds free societies together.

none but the Donald no other president has pulled such a politically expedient un-necessary act of establishing a commitment to the Jewish state that had been established years ago by putting in embassy in Jerusalem.

none but the Donald no other president has hyperbolized as much- especially regarding his helping of black people ;for instance taking credit for saving HBCU's, fact his he did sign a bill for their continued funding... but! ,he and the Republicans cut back on TRIO initiatives by forty percent.

none but the Donald no other president has asked blacks what have they got to lose by supporting him,but turned around supported Proud Boy antics by telling them to stand by regarding blacks protesting for their
literal existing from being discriminately gun downed by certain elements in law enforcement- what did they have to lose ? their lives !.

none but the Donald no other president was so stupid as to not realize that the disparity in trade with China lies not in malicious intent by China to want-in-ingly out due the U.S. in trade warfare but the disparity came about inherently due the disparity in value of each country's value of monetary denomination-The Yuan is of less value than the dollar bill -and his party in particular likes it it like that so that they can exploit it and increase their profits ,In order to have trade equity you would have to have one world currency such as Europe as the Euro.

none but the Donald, no other president has claimed to have rid the world of terrorism by focusing own the one specific ISIS group in which he did his adversary a favor Ahsaad of Syria and his ally Putin by fighting their battles with ISIS for them.

none but the Donald, and no other president has been so transparent and accessible that the NYT had to pry his tax returns out of him.

none but the Donald , no other president has alienated an ally to such a degree that he could conceivably have another Cuban missile crisis.

none but the Donald, no other president has spoke out vehemently against immigrants and brought the bride in C.O.D.

I could go on and on ..... but a picture is worth a thousand words.


...continue reading this topic >>
 
D J Trump is TOTALLY Insane.
Trump is paranoid and delusional. He's also a narcissistic, egotistical, megalomaniac with a borderline personality disorder. He thinks he's the Messiah, as do a lot of Jews in Israel. He is also always projecting. That is a psychological term that means saying something about someone else which is actually true about yourself. Usually something negative. He is going to get locked up, either in a mental hospital or in federal prison for a variety of crimes including tax evasion.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
The SCOTUS will end Roe v. Roe; you don't need Trump
For all you one-issue Evangelicals ignoring Trump's rancid, immoral character for what you perceive as a higher purpose of ending abortion, now you can re-open your eyes and ears to the truth of this president. He is not needed for your "higher purpose." He cares nothing about you nor the faith. If a pol taken today said that the majority of people would vote for him if he fiercely defended a woman's right to choose, that's what he would do. He has no empathy or ethics. Trump measures all things in existence by what benefits him or promotes his image. You have been warned.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
 
How can we have fewer deaths in the US if there is a pandemic?
We need to talk about deaths in the USA this year
Here are the last 10 years of total deaths in the US from all causes:

2010
Deaths: 2,468,435
Population: 309,346,863

2011
Deaths: 2,515,458
Population: 311,718,857

2012
Deaths: 2,543,279
Population: 314,102,623

2013
Deaths: 2,596,993
Population: 316,427,395

2014
Deaths: 2,626,418
Population: 318,907,401

2015
Deaths: 2,712,630
Population: 321,418,820

2016
Deaths: 2,744,248
Population: 323,071,342

2017
Deaths: 2,813,503
Population: 325,147,121

2018
Deaths: 2,839,205
Population: 327,167,439

2019
Deaths: 2,855,000
Population: 329,110,439

2020
As of September 24th, there are 2,033,736 total deaths in the US. That is a daily average of 7,588 deaths.
7,588 X 365 days= 2,769,620 is the total deaths we could expect in 2020 based on the numbers so far.

So the question is this: How can we have fewer deaths in the US if there is a pandemic going on?
For the last 100 years, there has never been a decrease in total deaths per year in the US.

If this were a normal year, with no pandemic, we should have around 2,875,000 deaths.
But this isn't a normal year so we should end up with around 3,200,000 deaths when you add in the Covid-19 deaths.

Someone isn't telling us the truth, someone is lying there ass off. (media and government).


...continue reading this topic >>
 
The latest Biden scandal
Let's see a well known drunk Giuliani and a Russian agent with the help of a future felon steve bannon just happened across this horrific crime 2 weeks before the election.
I have a hard time to keep from laughing my ass off .
...continue reading this topic >>
 
Ohhhhh Boy The Debate!
Any thoughts?
...continue reading this topic >>
 
Clint Eastwood Does It Again!
Preparing to Say Goodbye!



Clint Eastwood has always had a way with words…..………
...even though his below comments are unusually thoughtful, reflective, & cultured!



Preparing to say goodbye... a message from Clint Eastwood

My Twilight Years at 90.

If you realize each day is a gift, you may be near my age. As I enjoy my twilight years, I am often struck by the inevitability that the party must end.

There will come a clear, cold morning when there isn't any "more."

No more hugs, no more special moments to celebrate together, no more phone calls just to chat.

It seems to me that one of the important things to do before that morning comes, is to let everyone of your family and friends know that you care for them by finding simple ways to let them know your heartfelt beliefs and the guiding principles of your life so they can always say, "He was my friend, and I know where he stood."

So, just in case I'm gone tomorrow, please know this: I voted against, Biden, that incompetent, lying, flip-flopping, insincere, double-talking, radical socialist, terrorist excusing, bleeding heart, narcissistic, scientific and economic moron that spent eight years-in the White House with Obama trying to destroy our wonderful country and turn it into Muslim loving, socialist crap hole like he came from and I don’t mean Hawaii!

Participating in a gun buy-back program because you think criminals have too many guns is like having yourself castrated because you think your neighbors have too many kids.

Regards, Clint

Make My Day -- Pass it on !
...continue reading this topic >>
 
 
What's Wrong With Biden's Tax Plan?
Will it raise taxes on all of us?

According to Kayleigh McEnany it will, but I really don't find the cute little bimbo all that convincing. I need an rational argument not just the opinion of someone who looks and acts like she just graduated high school.

Biden himself says it won't. He says it will only raise taxes on those making over $400,000. The difference here is that I can actually see his proposal and that is exactly what it says.

Do we need to raise taxes at all?

I would say that depends on few variables... First, does our government have the money to cover its expenses? If not, can we cut those expenses? If not, can we get the money to cover those expenses without raising taxes?

The fact that our national deficit is continuing to rise tells me that the first answer is no, our government does NOT have the money to cover its expenses. The experience with post-recession budgets has shown a partisan impasse on cutting expenses where Democrats want to keep their spending programs and Republicans want to keep theirs, so I'm going to say the second answer is also no. That leaves the third question... can we get the money to cover those expenses without raising taxes? And the answer there is yes, we can.

Having said that, I want to explain something to my Republican friends. The government's ONLY source of revenue is tax. That is, unless we start allowing the government to run profit-driven services, but do we really want the government competing in the market? Isn't that what all the fuss over Obama's public option was about? Isn't that basically a step toward socialism? Let's just not even get into that.

So... if the only source of revenue is tax, then how else can we get money to cover expenses? Well, if we don't HAVE it we have to BORROW it and our colossal national debt indicates that we do in fact borrow a LOT of money.

Now I'm going to explain these two options in the context of our partisan history. Some of my Republican friends might get a little agitated but please hear me out.

A fundamental difference between parties is in the way each side spends money and another is in the way each side funds their spending. There's a common perception that Democrats just spend more money, so they need more money and that's why they are always raising taxes. But this perception will be corrected in the course of my explanation.

Indeed, Republicans actually spend as much as Democrats do, just on different things. The difference is Republicans promise lower taxes to get the votes then borrow whatever they need to make up the difference and that's why we have such a colossal national debt. If we funded all our spending with taxes we wouldn't even HAVE a national debt.

Now, the reason why people *think* Democrats spend more is because the approach Democrats take is transparent by virtue of the fact that they submit spending bills to our elected representatives who vote on the bill and the taxes required to fund it. This puts their spending in full view where we can watch our representatives argue about it.

Republican leaders on the other hand don't even talk to Congress, they prefer to use the office of the president to borrow money through the U.S.Treasury so there is no obligation to seek our approval or to even inform us that it's happening.

And THAT's why it "appears" as if the Democrats spend more. In reality they're just being more transparent.

Of course, both approaches are provisioned in the Constitution but raising taxes, a power given to Congress, is meant to be the standard practice and borrowing through the Treasury is supposed to be for emergencies only, not the standard practice that Republicans have turned it into.

But to give the Republicans credit, their approach has been very successful at keeping them in power, because nothing says "vote for me" like "No new taxes!"

But there's more to consider...

Not only are Republicans covertly spending borrowed money, the debts they incur from all that borrowing HAVE to be paid off eventually and since the government's only source of revenue is taxes that means the debt, sooner or later, has to be paid WITH taxes... So, not only are Republicans simply deferring the taxes for our children to pay, but they are actually increasing the taxes required to fund their spending because of added interest.

Sorry kids!

So, getting back to the main question... I think it's pretty clear... Yes, we can borrow but it's infinitely better to raise taxes to fund out expenses than it is to borrow. The last thing we want to do is force our children into debt servitude to the communists in Beijing, which is exactly what Republicans have been doing since Reagan and Trump... is NOT changing that.

But wait, there is another trick up the Republican sleeve; it's an interesting idea.

Can we raise revenue by lowering taxes?

Now, I *do* understand the theory that we can increase revenue by lowering taxes. The idea being that lower taxes allows business to divert the money they save to payrolls for more jobs, which means more incomes to tax. It's a neat idea that comes with fancy diagrams like the Laffer Curve. The only problem is that it doesn't seem to work anywhere but on paper.

The Laffer Curve depends on very strict parameters that can be illustrated on paper but they can't be guaranteed in the reality of a free economy. When Reagan implemented this theory in his supply-side economics many other factors came into play and economists to this day can't really determine the isolated impact of supply-side economic policies.

But the kitchen table math doesn't really support the theory either... If a company saves $200,000 in taxes and diverts that to payroll to support four $50,000 jobs. Each of those salaries would be taxed at around 20%, which means the revenue decreases from $200,000 to $40,000.

Sorry folks, but when I see Republicans with a handful of beans, I'm not expecting a beanstalk to lift us up to the clouds where geese lay golden eggs.

The last attempt to push supply-side magic into law was the 2017 tax cuts, which promised more jobs but failed to actually do it. I know Republicans will jump up and down about the jobs Trump created, but they will also ignore the greater number of jobs lost. And there isn't much evidence to suggest that the jobs that were created came from the tax cuts. Actually, we can SEE where a lot of the tax savings went. Millions of it went to stock buybacks which is great for stockholders but it doesn't leave much for those promised payrolls.

So, unless someone can show me what I'm missing, I'm just going to write that whole theory off as a fantasy. Which leaves me with the sobering conclusion that we DO need to raise taxes to increase the government revenue to fund our spending without indebting our children to those communists in China.

So...

Is it fair to tax the wealthy?

Let me ask you this... Is it fair that golf tees for women are closer to the hole? Is it fair that parking spots closest to the entrance are reserved for the disabled? Why would the question about taxing wealthy people more than poor people be any different?

In simple terms... wealthy people can afford bigger tax bills, most people in the middle class can't. That doesn't mean we want to take all the advantages of being wealthy away. We aren't trying to punish people for being rich or equalize people to benefit the lazy. There is a LOT of bandwidth between extremes here. A person with $100 in his pocket can give a starving person $5 to by lunch and STILL have $95 in his pocket and that's about all Biden's tax plan calls for. All he is really proposing with respect to individual income tax is that we repeal the 2017 tax cut for the wealthy who were doing just fine BEFORE the tax cut.

Besides wealth distribution is so extreme by this point that it's ridiculous to think the government can continue squeezing money out of the poorest people to pay for it's spending.

I mean, why tax the worker with a high school diploma at 22% leaving him with barely enough to pay rent and basic provisions for a measly $3,000 when we can tax the NFL athlete at 40%, giving us $800,000 and STILL leaving him with millions in spendable cash? It certainly doesn't take away MY incentive to work hard and make millions.

So in conclusion... I don't think there is ANYTHING wrong with Biden's tax plan. In fact, if anything I would say it's not enough. But then again, I'm a geolibertarian who thinks we shouldn't be taxing income at all. I think it's better to tax profits made from the ownership of property. In other words, don't tax the $10 wage earned by the worker laboring in the fields. Tax the $500,000 profit earned by the landlord sipping mojitos on his porch.

But alas, America isn't ready for something that logical. In the meantime, I think Biden's plan to fix the deficit caused by the 2017 cuts is a move in the right direction.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
two of my posts were deleated by OPP police yesterday.
I recognise that OPP Police are Dumo-rats. They disspise conservatives and sensure conservative thought. That's reality. Trump for 4 mo yrs.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
Biden maybe is winning the battle ....
But us Trump supporters WILL win the war !!! November will be RED!!
...continue reading this topic >>
 
For more, check out Active Topics page.
 
Forum Sections
 
Main
This is where we talk about politics, economics, and life in general.
Topics: 169187
Posts: 3124033
Subscribed users: 23294
 
Introduce Yourself
New to the forum? Jump in, say hello, and introduce yourself here.
Topics: 1068
Posts: 24267
Subscribed users: 23244
 
General Chit-Chat (non-political talk)
A place to talk about anything else (discussions not related to politics or the economy).
Topics: 18671
Posts: 291216
Subscribed users: 23295
 
All Sections
List of all sections on the forum.
 
Forum Statistics
 
Posts in the last 7 days: 9016
Posts in the last 24 hours: 1255
Top 5 users in the last 24 hours: Tug484(74)   Bad Bob(64)   drlarrygino(47)   Sicilianthing(37)   Seth(37)  
 
 
Today's Birthdays: Benjaminlyd   Bobby1   Dixiecrat   ekwnesimcbt   Laraico   Lottie   neidenbach84698   sameasitev  
(birthday users who are currently online are marked bold, feel free to click on their user name and send them a pm to wish them a happy birthday)
 
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2020 IDF International Technologies, Inc.