Good Question.....
Nov 20, 2019 14:41:38 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
"I want nothing ! ! No Quid pro Quo!!"Why didn't Sondland put this important sentence in his Opening Statement???
Nov 20, 2019 14:44:18 #
proud republican wrote:
"I want nothing ! ! No Quid pro Quo!!"Why didn't Sondland put this important sentence in his Opening Statement???
Why, indeed? But I want to see Swalwell (otherwise known as Smallwell) go down, way down. He’s an upstart and a C*******t.
Nov 20, 2019 14:57:00 #
proud republican wrote:
"I want nothing ! ! No Quid pro Quo!!"Why didn't Sondland put this important sentence in his Opening Statement???
Perhaps he is not the one who wrote the opening statement.
Nov 20, 2019 15:00:24 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Liberty Tree wrote:
Perhaps he is not the one who wrote the opening statement.
Perhaps you are right,Tom!!
Nov 20, 2019 15:03:38 #
Nov 20, 2019 15:09:02 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
peg w wrote:
Apsrently, Trump was OK with Soundland testifying. Why not Rudy or Pompao?
I think they should testify!!!
Nov 20, 2019 15:20:38 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Carol Kelly wrote:
Why, indeed? But I want to see Swalwell (otherwise known as Smallwell) go down, way down. He’s an upstart and a C*******t.
He’s a no start. He actually polled at less than 1% as a Democrat candidate for President.
Nov 20, 2019 15:26:25 #
proud republican wrote:
"I want nothing ! ! No Quid pro Quo!!"Why didn't Sondland put this important sentence in his Opening Statement???
Trump only said this after he became aware of the whistleblower complaint and congressional investigation. It was not the t***h just a lame attempt to cover his crooked arse.
Nov 20, 2019 15:52:56 #
proud republican wrote:
I think they should testify!!!
I definitely think Giuliani should be allowed to testify to defend himself. His reputation is being smeared with no positive evidence
Nov 20, 2019 16:12:58 #
proud republican wrote:
"I want nothing ! ! No Quid pro Quo!!"Why didn't Sondland put this important sentence in his Opening Statement???
Cause it was a lie
Nov 20, 2019 16:14:25 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
I definitely think Giuliani should be allowed to testify to defend himself. His reputation is being smeared with no positive evidence
He can do so any time he wants but it will land him in jail
Nov 20, 2019 16:44:59 #
proud republican wrote:
I think they should testify!!!
I don't see why,All these people like wood and kevin spend all their time attacking people with no
reason just trying to hurt people.Now i see this as an attack on the presidency the leadership could see
Nancy as the president .I really think that would be an absolute disaster for America and the citizenship.
Nov 20, 2019 16:48:19 #
proud republican wrote:
"I want nothing ! ! No Quid pro Quo!!"Why didn't Sondland put this important sentence in his Opening Statement???
Do you even know where this quote was pulled from? It means nothing when put in it's conversation that took place. As a free standing statement it means nothing...so what if trump said no quid pro quo?
It came from the set of texts that went on between Taylor and Sondland.
Taylor spelled out his concerns and said he was going to quit because of the withholding aid, Sondland sounded very concerned and said call me, we need to talk. Taylor after that conversation made an obvious intended for the record that made reference to pressure on announcing investigations being tied to political favors. Sondland replied hours later and said that he talked to trump and trump said no quid pro quo, and also said no more in writing communication.
The context of trump telling Sondland there was no quid pro quo means as much as it did when trump said there was no affair with a pornstar, or later no payoff, or later he knew nothing about a payoff...
You see my point, that trump saying no quid pro quo has nothing to do with facts or reality?
Nov 20, 2019 16:49:27 #
vernon wrote:
I don't see why,All these people like wood and kevin spend all their time attacking people with no
reason just trying to hurt people.Now i see this as an attack on the presidency the leadership could see
Nancy as the president .I really think that would be an absolute disaster for America and the citizenship.
reason just trying to hurt people.Now i see this as an attack on the presidency the leadership could see
Nancy as the president .I really think that would be an absolute disaster for America and the citizenship.
The current occupant of the white house is hurting our country. He's the disaster.
Remember, all roads lead to Putin in regards to drumph
Nov 20, 2019 16:50:36 #
peg w wrote:
Apsrently, Trump was OK with Soundland testifying. Why not Rudy or Pompao?
Trump was absolutely not okay with Sondland testifying, he wisely responded to the subpoena rather than the order from the state department not to testify. Nobody who has testified has done it because trump said it was okay.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.