Posts for: bna42
Mar 26, 2014 15:20:01 #
(Main)
OldSchool wrote:
He's not up for re-e******n until 2016. And, if he runs, he'll be hard to beat. He controls Las Vegas (and Las Vegas controls the state), and the casinos/unions are behind him. Sharron Angle learned that the hard way.
But by giving the other party the majority in the Senate, his stupid ass can be sat down and taken out of the role as majority leader. Then he will be just another corrupt Democrat and most of his influence over the senate will be eliminated.
Mar 26, 2014 14:42:35 #
(Main)
lpnmajor wrote:
None of that has anything to do with fictional v***r f***d. The only thing I'm paranoid about, are people who make up conspiracies.
:thumbdown:
Your comment reminds me of what someone said when they talked about "ignorance gone to seed". There have been numerous reports about v***r f***d, people have gone to jail, because of it, ACORN was caught in the act of committing it on numerous occasions, and you have the gall to describe it as "FICTIONAL v***r f***d".
Mar 25, 2014 16:04:20 #
(Main)
"I have yet to see either of these poster comment with any substance, they mainly tear into others and then spend the rest of their time patting each other on the back."
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
It seems to be the same on every topic, nothing more than insults and name-calling. I came to this site to discuss issues, try to find common ground, but apparently the country is too divided for rational discussion.
I'm outta here!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
It seems to be the same on every topic, nothing more than insults and name-calling. I came to this site to discuss issues, try to find common ground, but apparently the country is too divided for rational discussion.
I'm outta here!
Mar 25, 2014 14:32:27 #
(Main)
"You, as a liberal, Democrat, do not get to define who the Republican leaders are. I demand that we conservatives define who Republican leaders will be."
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 24, 2014 22:08:04 #
(Main)
emarine, rather than name-calling and trying to criticize those who commented, why not prove the article isn't true? If you don't want to accept the message, you still don't have to try to humiliate those who are interested in this administration's extravagance. Maybe you're not one of the taxpayers who has to worry about it.
Mar 24, 2014 21:53:49 #
(Main)
I just wish someone could show me where anyone has a "constitutional right" to marry. I don't understand why the Supreme Court whose only legitimate function is to decide the constitutionality of a law would allow this trampling on our founding documents. I also don't understand why every state that had a law prohibiting sodomy was told by activist federal judges that their laws were unconstitutional. What part of the constitution allows same-sex marriage and addresses sodomy? The federal government has never issued a marriage license and should have no influence on an issue that is completely a state issue. The Supreme Court has severely damaged its credibility by becoming involved in political issues that are NOT addressed by the constitution.
Mar 24, 2014 21:34:53 #
(Main)
petertimber wrote:
What was the name of that Pennsylvania congressman or senator who gave obamacare the v**e it needed to pass into law. That person was retiring so they said but when that person who betrayed his constitutents with Pelosi piercing lies did retire he made a comeback a year later hoping nobody would remember....I hope his constituents remember the stab in the back for v****g for Obamacare... If anybody knows I would like to know his name to refresh our collective memory.
Actually every Democrat senator who v**ed for Obamcaare can be declared the one who gave the deciding v**e since it received just the exact number of v**es to pass. That's what happened to Blanche Lincoln from Arkansas. She mouthed off that she was proud to have cast the deciding v**e and she was shown the door. Now it's Mark Pryor's turn. He's up for ree******n in Arkansas and still supporting and lying about the greatness of Obamacare.
Mar 24, 2014 15:00:56 #
(Main)
migeli wrote:
My sources have told me that the Tea Patty is made up of Muslims, C*******ts, and t***sexuals, led by the Anti-christ Koch brothers(Bert+Ernie).They are out to destroy America.
I can say without reservation that you definitely need some new sources.
:roll:
Mar 24, 2014 14:53:01 #
(Main)
Glaucon wrote:
Patty,
I was citing research, not challenging your biases. You have the freedom to h**e whomever you choose and distort information to meet your needs. Go with my blessings.
I was citing research, not challenging your biases. You have the freedom to h**e whomever you choose and distort information to meet your needs. Go with my blessings.
What you cited was one study from one university. What Patty cited was a list of actual events that we have witnessed, so since you can't refute that, you call her "h**eful".
Mar 22, 2014 13:42:01 #
(Main)
"The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million"
Gringo, the Democrats can't accept the t***h. They talk about the Koch Brothers being the "dark money" because they are donating to the Republican party. But it's OK for Soros to be funding subversive organizations helping Democrats.
Gringo, the Democrats can't accept the t***h. They talk about the Koch Brothers being the "dark money" because they are donating to the Republican party. But it's OK for Soros to be funding subversive organizations helping Democrats.
Mar 22, 2014 13:36:53 #
(Main)
She Wolf wrote:
When I see Americans reduced to calling each other... (show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup:
You would think that intelligent, civilized people would have the ability to understand that. However, what things can everyone agree on? One group is controlled by emotions and refuses to base their opinions on facts. But they talk about "compromise".
Mar 22, 2014 13:31:09 #
(Main)
What is really disturbing is the fact that Democrat politicians would agree with him about destroying the Second Amendment.
Mar 22, 2014 13:23:17 #
(Main)
Steve700 wrote:
Islam needs to be Understood for what it is & ... (show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup:
The mistake that people make is the belief that Islam is only a religion while they use our own laws against us to bring us into submission. The Muslims are allowed several appeasements in order to not have them offended while they are laughing at our stupidity. Every country where they haven't been accepted is riddled with terrorist attacks, suicide bombers, and innocent people k**led because the thugs are outraged. So our government allows Muslims to get by with things that the rest of us would be jailed for. These photos were taken in New York City on Friday afternoon. Does anyone think any other religion would be allowed to get by with this public exhibition?
Mar 22, 2014 13:08:12 #
(Main)
poppabear42 wrote:
rex;
I hope you are not being stupid enough to threaten any harm happening to the president.
Because if it does, you will be among the first to suffer the to pay the price for it!!!
I hope you are not being stupid enough to threaten any harm happening to the president.
Because if it does, you will be among the first to suffer the to pay the price for it!!!
:thumbdown: :thumbdown:
Show me where anyone threatened any harm "happening to the president". The man makes a simple statement that impeachment isn't the only reason presidents do not serve their full terms, and your stupid remarks start flowing. There was NO threat to anyone in the comment. It was a statement of fact, something liberals can't tolerate. A president can die of a heart attack or any disease, he could succumb to an unexpected injury, he could become incapacitated and be required to step down, the plane he uses almost daily could go down, and any number of other things. If you think those are threatening the president, why don't you report my ass?
Mar 21, 2014 16:12:48 #
"The hot button Bill before the MO Legislature is SB613 Named the Second Amendment Protection Act plain English it is a Nullification of all anti Federal Gun Laws."
On the surface that bill sounds great, but I am wondering how the states are going to enforce those laws when the federal government will quickly remind us that federal law always supersedes state law.
It would seem that when a state goes up against the all-powerful federal government, they are wasting their resources. Look at the number of states that had laws against same-sex marriage only to have some activist federal judge come along and say their laws are thrown out.
Look at the number of states who refused to set up the exchanges for Obamacare only to have the federal government do it for them.
Look at the border states who have tried to regulate the illegal invasion into their states only to have the federal government tell them it's not their job and will not be allowed.
The Constitution gave 18 specific powers to the federal government and said that all the rest were reserved for the people and the states, but the feds have completely reversed that. It would seem that before any state can pass a law voiding federal law, the state is going to take back states' rights, and I don't think the feds will allow that without a war.
On the surface that bill sounds great, but I am wondering how the states are going to enforce those laws when the federal government will quickly remind us that federal law always supersedes state law.
It would seem that when a state goes up against the all-powerful federal government, they are wasting their resources. Look at the number of states that had laws against same-sex marriage only to have some activist federal judge come along and say their laws are thrown out.
Look at the number of states who refused to set up the exchanges for Obamacare only to have the federal government do it for them.
Look at the border states who have tried to regulate the illegal invasion into their states only to have the federal government tell them it's not their job and will not be allowed.
The Constitution gave 18 specific powers to the federal government and said that all the rest were reserved for the people and the states, but the feds have completely reversed that. It would seem that before any state can pass a law voiding federal law, the state is going to take back states' rights, and I don't think the feds will allow that without a war.