One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Slingblade68
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 26 next>>
Apr 6, 2014 07:28:55   #
It's been far too long since I have posted a word regarding the political landscape of this once great nation. However, I must weigh in on your opinion.

The dichotomy of "right and "Left" is dictated by conventional wisdom. Without one the other is non existing. In short, this is an absolute, or rather, a perfect discretionary methodology. While unfortunately, a sinister one. If both sides are fighting the spoils go to the victory party. Or in this case the leading one.

Americans must stand back and recognize their own individuality. A political party is not their friend. As Ronald Reagan once said " Maybe it's time to reinvent the republican Party. Or have another representative one for the people."

We are not a Democracy. We are a Republic! Too many have lost the true definition of a " representative" Republic. More Americans need to read the Constitution and recognize that "limited Government" is the best government. Simply put, enforce the borders . IE protect American citizens . Secondly enforce the laws that protect American citizens from fraud and theft etc.

Most have become a complacent bunch of government following Teat sucking wimps. Stand on your own two feet and make it on your own. Or you will fail. Sink or swim.
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 08:08:09   #
Constitutional libertarian wrote:
Bo you and I do not see eye to eye many topics but surely this web site was set up to have meaningful dialog on current political topics. Insulting and name calling is just a distraction and deterrent to finding resolution to our most pressing problems.

Let's try this again.

Do you believe that governmental corruption is a problem that should be addressed?


I have tried the objective approach with Bo. Unfortunately, I have failed to make dent in his armor. This individual appears to be incapable of have a reasonable correspondence on any issue without injecting some meaningless arbitrary rudeness. I would say I am sorry for him. However, I don't even know this individual. I appreciate your kindness towards him.
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 07:53:24   #
[quote=BoJester]The leadership of teaparty's are raking in millions of dollars from the faithful ignorant and stupid who make up the local chapters.

They spend these millions of dollars on themselves, other "adminsistrative" costs, promotion of their favorites like palin, cruz, fat limburg and the fools at faux, like hannuty and renting donor lists to beg for more money.

This leaves little money to support actual candidates or issues.

No wonder the real republican party has the support of the chamber of commerce and business interests as well as the K Street lobby boys.

The teaparty beatdown will be fun to watch in the midterms

Maybe darrell issa should conduct another investigation. He might actually find the greed, graft and corruption he wants so bad.

I am just curious. Rather than posting threads and web sights. Have you ever considered Oh! I don't know actually looking up the demographics on the tea party members. I am not even going to bother regurgitating your blatantly biased Opinion. What you lack is substance. Facts to back up your opinion. Better recognized as Qualitative, Quantitative, Empirical evidence.

If you are going to make blanket statements than please do your homework. I could simply say all progressive,Liberal, Tree hugging, Statist , Democrats are blindly following an Ideology.
However, that is sweeping with a rather broad brush. Although, this may be my sentiments exactly. I am objective enough to recognize that posting same is not prudent unless I am able to back that statement up. For example, I have researched, Greek, Italian and Frances economics.. They were a dismal failure. Hence the reason they inevitably collapsed. That is a fact not an opinion... If you want a arena to just b***h about something, than please go talk to your cat...
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 08:07:29   #
Nuclearian wrote:
Less than a week before the Nation observed Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday, The New Yorker published a story about President Barack Obama. Editor David Remnick asked the obvious question about Obama’s abysmal approval ratings. Sitting in the shadow of King’s dream of a color-blind society that is united in harmony, Obama played the race card: “There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black President.”

Of course Obama played the race card. Excepting those occasions when the target is someone like Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, world-renowned surgeon Ben Carson or some other black person who demonstrated the temerity to allow their accomplishments to speak for themselves, the Democrats default to spurious accusations of r****m faster than Texas State Senator Wendy “A******n Barbie” Davis can shriek “war on women!”

I almost feel bad for our poor President. Facing public approval that is folding faster than Vice President Joe Biden playing Jeopardy!, Obama assumes his detractors must be motivated by what he calls racial animus. It has never occurred to him that his detractors might be motivated by myriad scandals that have come to define his tenure. In Obama’s mind, the Obamacare debacle, the B******i murders, unfettered National Security Agency spying on private citizens, politically motivated Internal Revenue Service harassment of innocent taxpayers, Fast and Furious gunrunning to narcoterrorists, and/or the arming of al-Qaida-affiliated Syrians are insufficient to explain the increasing disaffection Obama endures from the e*****rate.

What a shame that is — not just because it’s dishonest and crass, but because Obama’s tendency to blame r****m for everything from political opposition to parking fines reveals a deeper (and actual) animus. This guy simply doesn’t like us.

And Obama is hardly alone. Late last week, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo fantasized about an Empire State free of people who believe in the sanctity of human life. “(C)onservatives who are right-to-life… have no place in the state of New York.” While New York, which has been hemorrhaging population to “red” States over the past few decades, has become increasingly inhospitable to non-liberals, it’s no California. In declaring pro-life citizens to be personae non gratae, Cuomo has essentially given the bum’s rush to the members of his e*****rate who recognize that there’s more to New York than Manhattan, the Hamptons and the Governor’s mansion. While Cuomo didn’t identify r****m as a factor, there’s no mistaking his clear distaste for the millions of people who think life begins before you’re eligible for union membership.

This liberal hatred for the overwhelming majority of their fellow countrymen and women begs a question. In the case of Obama: What kind of man ascends to the highest office in the land despite absolutely despising half the population? For that matter, what kind of man would want to spend the loftiest moments in his career — indeed, his life — in a job that requires he interact with 150 million people (more like 190 million of late) whom he h**es more than Martin Bashir (and pretty much every liberal) h**es Sarah Palin?

I expect I can add that question to the miles-long list of questions to which Obama will never provide a satisfactory answer. I expect I can add that question to the miles-long list of questions about which Obama doesn’t care.

–Ben Crystal
Less than a week before the Nation observed Martin... (show quote)


My observation is that MLK would find BO disappointing at best. Simply because he lacks the characteristics of a true leader. Ruling by fiat is exactly why we have three branches of government , and not one. The man did not receive this office because of the content of his character. He can play the race card all he wants. However, I deal with quantitative, qualitative , empirical evidence. Not the latest polls. The numbers simply don't add up. The unemployment rate is not even close to 6.6 % It's closer to 13% when you factor in how many Americans have dropped out of the work force.

The dollar is worth about 65 cents ..And now he wants to raise the minimum wadge ? While the price to produce and manufacture anything in America has sky rocketed. Not because of demand side economics. Because of union labor and regulations.

I recognize there are a lot of angry ,bitter individuals on this site. Most posses no free will. They would rather attack , than have a rational debate. I don't need a video or feed from a news organization to reach a conclusion. Roll up your collective sleeves and do the home work necessary to find out the t***h. Sift through all the information available. and through cognitive reasoning figure it out for yourself. Charles is an infinitely more intelligent man than most obnoxious individuals on this site. Why? .. Because he has secured his facts the old fashioned way through due diligence. I am not a wordsmith, so many will load up their barrels and take aim at my grammar etc.

Unfortunately, they are missing the point, moreover, not even close to the target. The bottom line is America is no longer respected internationally. No longer the Big dog on the porch. You can thank your Omnipotent ruler for that..Period.....
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 07:09:29   #
knownothing wrote:
A little info, in which I as a employee of a county sheriffs dept, I know as a fact that the state of tennesse's sheriffs armory's have received a pallet of ammo in the calibers fitting crowd control. Under the guise of it is surplus.
This has never happened before. Kentucky, Georgia, Florida, north Carolina andalabama are on this list. Best of my research shows there were 9000 pallets were or are being distributed as we speak.
Why? Not paranoid just curios. I love my country and served it proudly. This government is not my friend. We should all inquire to if this is surplus being distributed nation wide then why does our country still have ammunition being ordered from the suppliers and delivered to bases in Germany and other places of secondary fronts of confrontation. Are they going to impose martial law like the signs produced in mexico in 2012 stated. Look out and beware.
A little info, in which I as a employee of a count... (show quote)


How Sweet it is to finally see this brought up. This is the sole purpose of the right to bear arms. It never was about protecting yourself from animals. It was clearly put in the constitution to protect us from an out of control government. One that will stock pile ammunition. While simultaneously, deliberately shortening the supply to the citizenry. You are not paranoid my brethren. The authoritarian ruler has already circumvented the constitution by way of the UN on this issue. By v****g for ban in the small arms treaty. look out and beware is apropos at this juncture...
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 06:53:26   #
AuntiE wrote:
I can see both sides of this. My initial thought was, geez, your license plate looks out of place so we will stop you. Since when do you have to "look" in "place"? Looking from the other side, the area may have been encountering some type of issue from travelers from outside the area. It still irks me. :hunf:


Hear, Hear Auntie-

From a legal standpoint these officers need no probable cause to pull you over. What occurs after the stop is again left to interpretation. Any decent ,honest attorney (I use the phrase loosely) would say it's a clear violation of the individuals 4th amendment rights.. However, our omnipotent ruler tramples over that same right consistently. An smart Cop knows what he is looking for. He also, is aware of how to circumvent the law. It's the police officers that believe their position provides them unlimited power . Those are the ones you have to worry about..
Go to
Feb 3, 2014 11:58:54   #
TeaPartyCollegeBoy wrote:
I expected much more. I know there is a part 2 coming on the factor, but Bill promised to be tough, get answers and not let the c*******t in chief dance around his questions. He failed to accomplish any of that and Obama did what he does best and just blabbed on about loosely connected points until time was up. I'd like to get more views points and know if anyone else is as disappointed with Bill O'rielly as I am.


I agree. He accomplished nothing with his interview. On the contrary, he enabled the omnipotent one to successfully manipulate his audiences by reinforcing his lies. I am secure with my convictions. Mr O' rielly is not. If he had any resolve he would have taken the authoritarian ruler to task. He didn't.

A rising tied lifts all boats. That is what he should have made paramount...
Go to
Feb 3, 2014 09:30:42   #
Hungry Freaks wrote:
This is the type of bulls**t that drives me crazy-I asked Moose to back up his claim that Harry Reid stole his last e******n. I get no answer, just more unverified claims-Obama h**es America, he's lying and breaking the law although no criminal charges have been filed (unlike in the Reagan administration which still hold the record for the number of administration officials indicted for crimes committed in office-all of whom were pardoned by George HW Bush.)

So you greet a request to substantiate a claim with more unsbustantiated claims, like the idea that "Obama has let 30,000-50,000 Muslims into the country) something that's provably wrong. There are no clear records on the religion of those coming into the country, but immigration from Pakistan, Egypt and other Middle Eastern countries peaked in the 1990s, according to the Center for Immigration Studies. The Center's report said identifiying migrants by religion is highly unpredictable due to the various religions in India, one of the main sources of immigration into the Us during the last century.

So we got more bulls**t from Bulls**t Mountain rather than someone trying to clarify their statements with facts. Difficult to debate with folks like that, anal sphincters wrapped tightly around their necks.

"I say it, or I saw it on fox news, so it's true."
This is the type of bulls**t that drives me crazy-... (show quote)


ISSUE SUMMARY: The IRS has targeted and harassed conservative groups who are Obama's political enemies - including during the 2012 e******n year. Section 1, Article 2 of the Impeachment Articles of Richard Nixon stated:
"He has through his subordinates and agents endeavored to cause in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be initiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner."

SSUE SUMMARY: A Free Press is the foundation of representative government. Obama's Justice Department has used its power to seize the personal phone records of Associated Press journalists. This far-reaching 2 month , secret seizure of a major news outlet records a very dangerous precedent. If this goes unchallenged, there is no reason they can't do it again to anyone, at any time and for any reason.

SSUE SUMMARY: As more is coming out about the terrorist attack that k**led our Ambassador and 3 others in Libya, it is clear the American public was given false information about the attack. The C.I.A. knew immediately it was an Al-Quada associated, planned attack to mark 9/11, yet the official "talking points" were edited to take any mention of that out and keep that information away from the public during Obama's re-e******n campaign.


Just because criminal acts happened under the Reagan umbrella does not prove a thing. Those individuals were prosecuted and held responsible for same. Unfortunately , the Omnipotent ruler of America today has been provided a free pass. Not because of the content of his character. This entire Dictatorship holds all Americans culpable. We elected him to office, now he should be held accountable for IRS, EPA, NSA... Fox news has nothing to do with the issues listed above,. Just turn on the Telly and watch C-Span.. Those are the individuals we elected to represent us.

We are a Republic, Just v**e and old your elected officials feet to the fire. It's easy to Deny then Blame. I have qualitative, quantitative , empirical, evidence to support the claims for impeachment....Period .
Go to
Feb 2, 2014 16:17:32   #
oldroy wrote:
Ever is a very big word and I would have to say that most dogs don't do anything very wrong most of the time. I have been listening to a Great Dane bark for about 10 minutes and she is trying to tell me something but she just doesn't speak good English.


In my humble opinion, Americans revere dogs as if they were children. Even treating them better. Dogs are dogs. Yes they are great companions. Yes, children adore them. However, they are dogs ....not people. Too many are secured for the wrong reasons. Left alone in "Crates all day" and the "Humane Society considers this acceptable" I don't. Lock me up in a cage all day and see how I react when you arrive home.

A dog should be an asset, not a liability period. If he/she dose not bring significant reward to your life.. Give him/her away. You should not have a dog simply to have a dog. It may be that conventional wisdom dictates you have a dog. However, I will rule on the side of caution and merely say, If you are not home for 12 hours a day.. don't buy a dog. It's not fair to the dog or you.
Go to
Feb 2, 2014 15:14:55   #
Searching wrote:
So, do you think "awesome defense" has the capability of trumping offense, that even a mediocre offense coupled with extreme defense could make it a Seahawks win? My husband (he's normally a Cowboys fan) and I were discussing that earlier -- that sometimes it doesn't matter if you have a spectacular offense -- if your defense is spot on -- and you have a "reasonable" offense -- enough to make the game a close one to begin with.


I think JO PA said it best, your best offense , is a god defense. I gathered that if you are unable to score .... you are unable to win. Not taking anything away from these extraordinary athletes. However, If the sea-hawks are capable of closing down manning , they will win the game.

That is as far as I am willing to project on the game. I do not have a horse in this race.. However, if I did I would bet on Manning. Oh! Geeezum , now I am starting to sound like a politician..
Go to
Feb 2, 2014 14:03:03   #
AuntiE wrote:
Hey "dearie" how about trying to ask why parents, be they single mothers, fathers or couples, are not doing their jobs? Seems just a little easy to blame it on the courts and not the people the children live with who have abdicated their responsibility...dearie.


Hear, Hear , Auntie:)

This is another perfect example of a reactionary response. Rather than look at the poor parenting in America (If in fact that was the case ) this individual would rather blame the courts or worse, an ideology. The bottom line is Teach your children right from wrong. Provide them with consequences (When they are to young to speak up) My boy's never disrespected me after the age of three..Why? because they were aware of the consequences for doing same. And No! I never had to lay a hand on them "But Once" .. that was more than enough. After that , all I had to do was change the tone of my voice....
Go to
Feb 2, 2014 13:49:18   #
dukeofsc wrote:
Don't be so mean,
he cant help himself he's had too large
a dose of good old fashion
American capitalism for far too long,
being as old as I am
and having served my nation honorably
he's what I would consider to be this generations

"HANOI JANE"


There is no doubt about it. He made his fortune here in America , and then has the audacity to go over to a dictatorial country and condone the behavior. I certainly agree with his first amendment rights. However, let him live in a country that is not provided that same right. Seriously, the man is a buffoon and deserves no more acknowledgement.
Go to
Feb 2, 2014 12:57:25   #
Searching wrote:
:thumbup: Indeed Peyton is!! Enjoy!!


Just the mere fact that Peyton is capable of consistently preforming at the level he does is incredible. That is a term thrown around far to much in today's society for simple ordinary achievements. These athletes compete at levels not many in America can. All athletes, regardless of their professional sport. Deserve the money they earn.
Go to
Feb 2, 2014 12:50:28   #
AuntiE wrote:
A guy took his girlfriend to her first football game.

Afterward he asked her how she liked the game. "I liked it, but I couldn't understand why they were k*****g each other for 25 cents," she said.

"What do you mean?" he asked.

"Well, everyone kept yelling, 'Get the quarter back!'"


Oh! Auntie, you just brought a smile to my face. Thank you..
Go to
Feb 2, 2014 09:39:47   #
V***l wrote:
Leaving race entirely out of it, I have yet to see any definitive, verifiable, inarguable evidence warranting impeachment. If the Representative (or was it Senator?) believes he has grounds, then by all means, he should do what he believes is right. Should the motion pass, we'll get to see the trial unfold.


ISSUE SUMMARY: The IRS has targeted and harassed conservative groups who are Obama's political enemies - including during the 2012 e******n year. Section 1, Article 2 of the Impeachment Articles of Richard Nixon stated:
"He has through his subordinates and agents endeavored to cause in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be initiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner."

SSUE SUMMARY: A Free Press is the foundation of representative government. Obama's Justice Department has used its power to seize the personal phone records of Associated Press journalists. This far-reaching 2 month , secret seizure of a major news outlet records a very dangerous precedent. If this goes unchallenged, there is no reason they can't do it again to anyone, at any time and for any reason.

SSUE SUMMARY: As more is coming out about the terrorist attack that k**led our Ambassador and 3 others in Libya, it is clear the American public was given false information about the attack. The C.I.A. knew immediately it was an Al-Quada associated, planned attack to mark 9/11, yet the official "talking points" were edited to take any mention of that out and keep that information away from the public during Obama's re-e******n campaign.

SSUE SUMMARY: As more is coming out about the terrorist attack that k**led our Ambassador and 3 others in Libya, it is clear the American public was given false information about the attack. The C.I.A. knew immediately it was an Al-Quada associated, planned attack to mark 9/11, yet the official "talking points" were edited to take any mention of that out and keep that information away from the public during Obama's re-e******n campaign.


These are just a few of the reasons for impeachment. I recognize that there will never be enough v**es in the now (nuclear option) Senate ti actually impeach the Omnipotent ruler, Just as there weren't enough to impeach Clinton. However, Clinton was impeached. Just as Our authoritarian ruler should be today. You obviously have not read the definition of Due Process.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 26 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.