One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rafterman
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16 next>>
Aug 14, 2019 09:49:38   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
I searched it and I researched it and I researched it again. Several different versions of this list of "Clinton Body Bags" have circulated for over 20 years. Problem is, this "list" has more holes in it than a screen door. Until those holes are filled, it makes one hell of a fairy tale.


Even if only 10% of this list is true, that's 4 or 5 people DEAD on direct or tacit orders from the Clintoninsta's - Wild Willie and Horrible Hillary. Still a high number dude!! So you can search and search and do more searches to try to fill the holes all you want - explain the orders to have 4 or 5 k**led. Seems like the Clandestine Clinton Clan makes the New York/New Jersey Mafioso Bad Boys look like baby lambs in comparison.
Go to
Aug 12, 2019 07:51:02   #
Radiance3 wrote:
=============
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar said "our country should be more fearful of white men."

Aside from violation to INS Omar had other frauds committed.
1. The same immigration fraud scheme may have aided Mr. Elmi in obtaining federally-backed student loans for his attendance at North Dakota State University. Mr. Elmi and Rep. Omar simultaneously attended North Dakota State University and may have derived illicit benefits predicated on the immigration fraud scheme.

2.The State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board has already determined that Rep. Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds. She was forced to reimburse her campaign thousands of dollars.

3. The Board discovered that the federal tax returns submitted by Rep. Omar for 2014 and 2015 were filed as “joint” tax returns with a man who was not her husband, named Ahmed Hirsi, while she was actually married to Ahmed Elmi.


She was also arrested for not leaving a building when asked to leave.


This criminal is sitting in Congress with a salary of $174,000 per year, with Cadillac medical care. She is also provided for her staff in office of about $997,000 per year more or less, plus office supplies allowance.

In addition she could get 80% ($139,200)every year of her $174,000, if she at least 5 years of service at retirement age. plus TSP, 401K, SS,
============= br I b U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar said &... (show quote)


Where did you get all this information? You suggest it is public knowledge - but where? INS? IRS?
Go to
Aug 12, 2019 07:46:32   #
PeterS wrote:
In terms of participation, the United States ranks 122 worldwide.

1) Should we try to change it?

2) Initially, we were an agrarian society that had to travel to the county seat to v**e and for religious reasons couldn't travel on Sunday. That isn't the case today so wouldn't v****g on Saturday be better as it would make it easier to participate?

3) Should states be required to open more polls in order to shorten the waiting time?

4) Should we make v****g mandatory?
In terms of participation, the United States ranks... (show quote)


Should not make v****g mandatory. Not v****g is a form of v****g (I can never understand why people treat v****g so trivially). Opening more polls would be helpful, but do municipality's have the budget? Like most people, I don't like waiting in lines, so I have v**ed absentee b****t in every national or local e******n since 1968.) I'm afraid v****g on Saturday would only guarantee less people v****g - hey, its their day off. However, declaring a national holiday for all federal e******ns (essentially every two years) could be worth exploring. It might not increase v****g immediately, but would over time gather steam as the v****g public would be more apt to v**e when it becomes a true grass roots national spectacle rather than one solely mainstream media driven as it is today.
Go to
Aug 6, 2019 16:27:23   #
GmanTerry wrote:
I don't believe it will happen. The Constitution defines the E*******l College. It is not a State issue. State law can never trump Federal law. It will go to the Supreme Court where it will fall back to the original intent. The liberal/progressives want to ignore the Constitution but they don't yet have the ability to flush the United States Constitution down the toilet.

Semper Fi


I believe you are not totally correct. Fully overhauling the way the president is selected would take a Constitutional amendment, which would require the v**es of two-thirds of the U.S. House of Representatives, two-thirds of the Senate, and three-fourths of the states. The source of this information comes from https://tinyurl.com/abolish-e*******l-college. There is lots of info on abolishing the E*******l College at the following link - https://tinyurl.com/y4ckga2p - for over one-million hits from the search parameters "how can the e*******l college be abolished".

All those entities would have to v**e to change the way the president is elected. I don't see that ever happening. Think about it - two-thirds of The House AND The Senate; PLUS, three-fourths of the states? AIN'T NO WAY!! Even after all this, someone/something will challenge and ultimately the Supreme Court would decide (so yes you're correct). A very complicated problem.
Go to
Aug 6, 2019 02:21:23   #
rebob14 wrote:
Dare I say it again? Sure..............the U.S. is Not a democracy............it’s a Constitutional Republic.


Is the US a democracy or a constitutional republic?
A constitutional republic is a form of government where the rulers are elected, and the rules are set down in a written constitution. It is often simply called a "republic". The head of state and other representatives are elected but they do not have uncontrolled power. What they may do is written in the constitution.
Here's the link to the search results: https://tinyurl.com/Is-the-US-a-democracy-or-a-con
Go to
Aug 4, 2019 08:42:45   #
JimMe wrote:
As far as the Presidency and Vice-Presidency are concerned, the overall popular v**e has never been thought of... Congressional Representation of each Individual State is the key, as the P**********l/Vice-P**********l e******ns are won thru an E*******l College based on each States' Congressional Representation...

When State Legislatures force their State E*******l College Representatives to cast their v**es for anyone other than their State's P**********l/Vice-P**********l winners, they are disenfranchising their own State's Citizens' choice... And disenfranchisement is tyranny...
As far as the Presidency and Vice-Presidency are c... (show quote)


Here's the search result snippet from the web search "What are the flaws of the e*******l college" https://tinyurl.com/e*******l-college-flaws (This link is a good quick look at four flaws https://quizlet.com/106104246/flaws-in-the-e*******l-college-flash-cards/)

Here's the search results snippet from the web search "What Are the Advantages of the E*******l College" https://tinyurl.com/e*******l-college-strengths

Strengths
It requires a distribution of popular support. ...
It gives minority interests a say in the e******n. ...
It encourages political stability. ...
It maintains a system of national representation. ...
It creates the possibility of a minority president being elected.

More items...
5 Advantages and Disadvantages of E*******l College – Vittana.org
https://vittana.org/5-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-e*******l-college
Pros and Cons of E*******l College

Pros.
It protects minority interests. ...
It facilitates a two-party system. ...
It directs more power to the states. ...
Cons.
The person a majority of Americans favor may not win. ...
It's complicated and dissuades people from v****g. ...
Small states and swing states get more power.

Note: It would take a Constitutional Amendment to dissolve use of the E*******l College and go to direct v****g. That means it would take 38 state legislatures approving an amendment passed by Congress

It seems that, since they couldn't win the last p**********l e******n under the rules that have existed for almost 250 years, they want to change the rules. Below is an excellent explanation of why this is a very bad idea In their infinite wisdom, the United States’ Founders created the E*******l College to ensure the States were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?

The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the E*******l College makes sense. It needs to be widely known and understood.

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
T***p w*n 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
T***p w*n 46 of them.
Clinton won 16
Clinton won the popular v**e by approximately 1.5 million v**es.

In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan,Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more v**es that Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; T***p w*n Richmond).
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular v**e of the entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles. The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles. When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the v**e of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of
a national e******n.

Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country!
Go to
Aug 4, 2019 07:26:06   #
rumitoid wrote:
Few global trends have been as controversial as c*****e c****e and the Earth’s warming. The Earth has gone through many shifts in cooling and warming driven by natural factors like the sun’s energy or variations in its orbit, but the trend scientists have seen over the past 50 years is unmistakable.

Let’s take a closer look: globally, average surface temperatures increased 1.1—1.6 degrees Fahrenheit (0.6—0.9 degrees Celsius) between 1906 and 2005. However, it’s the rate of temperature change that’s especially troubling to scientists; temperatures have risen nearly twice as fast in the last 50 years alone.

What other ways has our climate system changed in the last century? How do we really know our climate is changing permanently, rather than just going through a normal period of flux? Between opinions from climate deniers and misinformation campaigns from the f****l f**l industry, it can be a challenge to get the unobstructed facts.

So to help set the record straight, we’re going to focus on 10 major changes scientists have seen in our climate system. Each indicator described below has been extensively studied over the past several decades, and was captured from many different data sets and technologies.

Unable to copy and paste the charts that clearly show g****l w*****g. Go here if you are really interested in the t***h about c*****e c****e: https://www.climaterealityproject.org/blog/10-indicators-that-show-c*****e-c****e

It’s difficult to argue against what’s happening once you’ve seen these 10 c*****e c****e indicators. That’s why it’s up to each and everyone one of us to do our part and help spread t***hful information about c*****e c****e to our networks of friends, peers, and family members.
Few global trends have been as controversial as c*... (show quote)


Remember, it's named c*****e c****e and not climate catastrophe. The earth's climate has been changing every day of its existence. I don't know what these numbers mean because I don't think this is enough data to understand the trends properly (this is only 50-60 years of data and the earth is billions of years old). And, just like all numbers they can be manipulated to suite your (as well as mine) needs. I want to see the numbers for these 10 items for more than the 50-60 years depicted (charted) before I go off the deep end or raise any out of control level of concern. No doubt these trends are worthy indicators. In other words, I believe these numbers are correct, but I want to compare them to other 50-60 year periods (if that data is available). NASA at https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/world-of-change/DecadalTemp indicates that "The world is getting warmer." (1.4° Fahrenheit since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975) And that the "cause is human activity or natural variability—and the preponderance of evidence says it’s humans" which means we have the opportunity to change current trends.

There are also some who question/criticize the science behind current computer models that must also be considered. C*****e c****e has a wide range and varying degree of viewpoints and levels of concern - all worthy trends and points to ponder.

C*****e c****e - or as discussed on a daily basis today called the Green New Deal (which calls for the United States to switch to 100% renewable energy in 10 years https://tinyurl.com/y655d5ov) - is going to be a politically charged subject for the next p**********l e******n. Here are two very interesting c*****e c****e videos that contain some riveting and noteworthy information:

1st) This is a very entertaining, one hour video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZlICdawHRA by conservative Steven F. Hayward for Hillsdale University in 2014 lecturing on the hysteria of g****l w*****g. On his blog it states, "Hayward concludes that the 97% consensus is inaccurate and that renewable energy such as wind and solar is not the answer.”

Hayward is a great speaker with lots of personality and KEEPS A DRY SUBJECT INTERESTING. He claims that climate models are inaccurate, and that g****l w*****g is in a pause state. He calls environmentalist “Climatistas”. Information on climate models can be found by clicking here.

2nd) In the following 14minute video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA5sGtj7QKQ Mark Levin interviews Dr. Patrick Michaels, director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute. Michaels provides insight into the debate over c*****e c****e and the political games played to create policy.

Dr. Michaels says that g****l w*****g cannot be caused by humans. Additionally, he also says that ALL climate computer models (there are 32) ARE WRONG, except for the Russian model - which according to Michaels is the model that should be used. He proclaims that all 31 are “fudged”. (In my day fudged would mean hide or lie about what really happened).

Dr. Michaels goes on to say that it's the SCIENTIST instead of science which is driving the models. (The scientist are inputing wrong parameters instead of real life, actual, i.e. measurable - parameters). So, assuming this is true, it would mean scientist are concealing or misleading us on the t***h of c*****e c****e - PURPOSELY. He says scientist cherry pick the data used which skews the results for their purposes, which, according to Michaels, is what the Obama Administration scientist did.
Go to
Aug 3, 2019 06:34:29   #
proud republican wrote:
Welcome to OPP,Bewbear....Nice story....You are from Chechoslovakia and im from former Soviet Union..We are kind of neighbors..lol


Welcome to both of you. Thank you for choosing the United States of America as your new homeland. I consider it an honor that you've done so.

I have been a world traveler to 35 country's during my 20-years Navy career and while traveling extensively with my wife. I love to see other places, eat the food and meet the people. But for my money, I'll never live anywhere else. There are many, many, many, many beautiful places in the world, and the USA has many of its own. We are are not perfect, but we try. On our worst day, we are better than most - that's fact. Hopefully, what you left behind will never be the norm here. Good luck to you both. Oh, and THANKS for coming here LEGALLY.
Go to
Aug 2, 2019 12:07:11   #
Airforceone wrote:
Well American greatest has reached another all time low.

We have a 19% tax cut to the upper 1%

We negotiated great Trade deals oh did Trump negotiate or did he run around the world slapping tariffs on any country he could find.

Now that brilliant POS in the Oval Office is now slapping an additional 10% tax on I-phones great move.

Trump has been running a budget in the red by over $1.2 trillion per year which goes directly to the deficit because of his wealthy tax cuts. So this i***t will do anything to raise revenue to offset his tax cuts so in true Trump and the Republican fashion they go after the middle class to pay for there wealthy tax cuts.

But we still have the r****t south and the Hypocrisy of the evangelicals that could care less as long as this country has a r****t in the White House they will support that lying POS
Well American greatest has reached another all tim... (show quote)


What is the tax rate for the top 1 percent?
The top 1 percent paid a greater share of individual income taxes (37.3 percent) than the bottom 90 percent combined (30.5 percent). The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid a 26.9 percent individual income tax rate, which is more than seven times higher than taxpayers in the bottom 50 percent (3.7 percent) Nov 13, 2018
Source is: https://tinyurl.com/y62cz6kp

What defines the 1 percent?
To be among the top 1 percent of U.S. earners, a family needs an income of $421,926, a new report from the Economic Policy Institute finds. However, the threshold varies significantly among states. In Connecticut, for example, you need an annual income of $700,800 to be in the 1 percent. Jul 27, 2018
Source is: https://tinyurl.com/y62cz6kp

What percent of taxes are paid by the 1 %?
In 2016, the top 1 percent of taxpayers accounted for more income taxes paid than the bottom 90 percent combined. The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid roughly $538 billion, or 37.3 percent of all income taxes, while the bottom 90 percent paid about $440 billion, or 30.5 percent of all income taxes. Nov 13, 2018
Source: https://tinyurl.com/top1-paid

These numbers are about 2-3 years old, however, they won't change by a large percentage for 2019. The chart at the link https://tinyurl.com/y3drzngl shows average tax rate for the Top 1% has increased by 4 points since 2006.

AND, if you really want to study good, factual (not fantasy) tax data, take a look at this report from the Tax Foundation, titled: "Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2018 Update".
Source is: https://tinyurl.com/2018TaxData

Here’s how much you have to earn to be in the top 1% in every US state -
Click this link: https://tinyurl.com/1percent-by-state

AF1 - These are FACTS not fantasy. So, get your facts straight and maybe you'll get a little respect and consideration instead of the disdain and disrespect you always get. And BTW, your racial epitaphs have become boring and do nothing any longer to even cause rise for any sort of retort.
Go to
Jul 28, 2019 16:49:59   #
Here's a young lady that should be running against the likes of Ilhan Omar, or AOC.

She says profoundly and IMHO, with an insight very rarely seen or heard even from people twice her age, "Destroying the free market will undo what millions of people have died to achieve."

https://fee.org/articles/college-student-my-generation-is-blind-to-the-prosperity-around-us/
Go to
Jul 25, 2019 09:46:30   #
proud republican wrote:
So now that this BS is over, how many of you think that this hearing moved a needle to Impeachment???


No way. No collusion! No conspiracy! No crimes! Done! Done aaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnd Done!
Go to
Jul 24, 2019 22:00:07   #
Lonewolf wrote:
I believe Trump when was told of the start of the investigation when He said my presidency is over I'm F K That is a statment of GUILT Imeditaly he started doung everything he could do to stop it!


If that was the case, then Trump would be undergoing impeachment proceedings right now. Today, instead of the Mueller hearings, there would have been The Trump Impeachment Hearings that I watched for 8 hours. Obviously, due to no collusion, no conspiracy and no crime (Done! Done and Done!), Trump is not being impeached - and he won't be. His "I'm f**k*d" statement should not interpreted as an admission of guilt, but should be thought of as- upon hearing that there was this group of 17 or 19 (or wh**ever the number was) prosecutors hired by Mueller who all previously worked for the Clinton's (Hillary mainly), you can bet your sweet ass that is exactly what he said. If it were me I would probably feel (as I lose my cool) "I'm f**k*d, I don't have a chance. The deck has been deliberately stacked against me". Obviously that's what happened to Trump.

However, as he has done over the years, Trump sat down, took a deep breadth, and meticulously analyzed the situation determining that there was very little to worry about. And, so goes the legend of Donald Trump. He turns the tables on the Washington deep swamp by reversing their own Washington, D.C. two-step against them. They h**e him even more now because he played the game better than they ever played it.

The Dems (since I got interested in U.S. politics in 1967) have always been the proud, nasty BIG BULLIES in D.C. - and like bullies, don't like it when someone finally fights back - gives them a bloody nose - outdoing them with far and away more exuberance and "bully-ness" then they could ever muster.

Poor Dems! Why don't you guys just play the game they way it's intended - You lost the e******n. So, bite your lip! Sit down! Count to 10! Stay seated! Cross your legs! Shut up - keep your mouth shut - don't move your lips. Then - cool it until 2020. Look, to their credit, The Dems outfoxed and outdid the Republicans in the 2018 e******ns with the takeover of the House. Just think about what you could have been doing for almost three years towards real movement POLITICALLY to remove Trump and maybe even take over the Senate, not to mention the real progress that might have been made towards eliminating the problems at the southern border. NOW, there will be more investigations - this time by the DOJ as they investigate the investigators. (Comey will get his comeuppance). The FISA procedure and the FISA judges will undergo a thorough (probably long over due anyway) investigation, as it may be in need of an overhauling since it was implemented in 1978 (https://tinyurl.com/FISA-1978). Plus, who knows what dirt might be turned up on the Clintonistas, Comey, Brennan, et al.

Also, take a look at this: https://tinyurl.com/No-Impeachment-Opinion. It is an opinion piece from the N.Y. Post that makes the case that Mueller's testimony is the end of any impeachment talk. Then to add insult to injury for Adam Scheff, the leader of his party, Nancy Pelosi is still resisting impeachment (although Rep Eric Swalwell says that the Mueller Hearing was just "Act 1" which sounds to me like grasping at straws. Given that Swalwell is from California, grasping at straws is a significant problem.)
Go to
Jul 24, 2019 14:00:09   #
Lonewolf wrote:
If the Republican Party don't stand up and call this President out for his crimes and stop trying to protect him. I'm pretty sure I'm 20 20 Democrats will hold all three branches of government in the whole it for a long time. Trump was unfit to serve and has shown he has no ability to learn his duties as president. By his actions has Shown his Love for bloody dictators around the world.
It's American people are watching Mueller testify I'll be amazed if they don't run out into the street and scream bloody murder
If the Republican Party don't stand up and call th... (show quote)


Obviously, you're not watching the hearings. Mueller gets asked questions and in return, Mueller refuses to speak on certain questions, and stumbles his way through or won't give speculative answers to others. Mostly this whole day is just an exercise in vomiting up what is already in "The Mueller Report" - no conspiracy, no collusion, no crimes. Done! Done, aaaaaaannnnnnd Done! That means no more fishing expeditions Dems. Everything being discussed by the Dems, especially the Committee Chairs Jerry Nadler and Adam Shaft (er Schiff) are all the crap we heard on nightly TV; that Mueller or the msm either investigated and found to be poop and dismissed it, or investigated and didn't even find so much as a Schiff of poop, (oops, that should be sniff of poop) so dismissed as well. So, all these Dems, they got their five minutes of fame on national TV which they would never have gotten without Mr. Mueller's report. I yield the rest of my time. Oh - and Mr. Mueller - Thank you for your service to our country. Oh, and Mr. Mueller may be, in one persons opinion, the greatest patriot in the room today, but he is probably the most dithering i***t of all of them too. Done! Done ..... AAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNND Done!
Go to
Jul 21, 2019 15:44:07   #
Ranger7374 wrote:
My friends and fellow colleagues from all sides of the political realm we have a very serious problem in America.

The problem is R****m, and in retrospect reverse R****m.

First let's establish a few rules for this debate.

1. Do not attack anyone personally. In this topic, and the reason I brought it up, is because I am disturbed at the way my fellow Americans are approaching this sensitive subject. You are free to attack the principles and thesis. But please do not attack anyone personally. Keep the status quo, and decorum of the OPP. I will also ask the administrator of this site to observe comments placed here and discipline members if their rhetoric becomes personal and take disciplinary action should the comments here be used against a member personally.

2. In keeping decorum, you are free to use as evidence to support your point as anything on the web. If needed use links to websites to show sources.

3. Keep this debate as a debate. We are learning from each other and trying, or at least I am trying to learn and mature even more to establish what r****m is, and what r****m is not. Please share your ideas do not attack anyone. Attack only the subject matter.

If we are agreed on the above then post, if you do not agree with the above please refrain from posting. In your first post please include, "I agree with these rules" or reply to this message.


Last Sunday Donald Trump tweeted this statement:

So interesting to see the "Progressive" Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don't they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how it is done. These places need your help badly, you can't leave fast enough. I'm sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements! Tweeted by Donald Trump, 7/12/2019

If that wasn't enough, Donald tweeted this later,

So sad to see the Democrats sticking up for people who speak so badly of our Country and who, in addition, h**e Israel with a true and unbridled passion. Whenever confronted, they call their adversaries, including Nancy Pelosi, "R****T". Their d********g language and many terrible things they say about the United States must not be allowed to go unchallenged. If the Democrat Party wants to continue to condone such disgraceful behavior, then we look even more forward to seeing you at the b****t box in 2020!

The following day he tweeted:
When will the Radical Left Congresswomen apologize to our Country, the people of Israel and even to the Office of the President for the foul language they have used, and the terrible things they have said. So many people are angry at them & their horrible & d********g actions.

If Democrats want to unite around the foul language & r****t hatred spewed from the mouths and actions of these very unpopular & unrepresentatives Congresswomen it will be interesting to see how it plays out. I can tell you that they have made Israel feel abandoned by the U.S.

Congress under the Democrat majority fought back. Nancy Pelosi also spoke for Resolution 489 condemning Donald Trump for R****t comments in the above tweets. The Republican minority fought back. Infact after Nancy's speech, the Republicans sought to "take down" Nancy's words because these words violated a long standing rule of the House of Representatives. The Democrats v**ed to keep Nancy's words and they were not taken down. Also they v**ed for the resolution and the resolution passed.

Now let's examine the question, "What is r****m?"

According to merriam-webster's dictionary, the definition of r****m is:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2a : a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of r****m and designed to execute its principles
b : a political or social system founded on r****m
3 : racial prejudice or discrimination


I assume the backlash on the reaction of the tweets appear to satisfy the 3rd, definition of the term. However, where in the above tweets does Donald Trump tell the members that based upon thier race, "Go back to your country..."

I ask this question because honestly, I am confused.
My friends and fellow colleagues from all sides of... (show quote)


People label others with something (r****t, misogynist, homophobia, etc.) when they have a very thin argument or no valid reply to a statement made - as is the example used above. President Trump told them to go home and fix your own house before coming here and telling us what is wrong with ours/mine. Simple and right to the heart of the matter. What could they reply? He spoke the t***h. Their countries are screwed up. So, without valid replies, they resorted to using a label. It was easier to label his comments as r****ts than to formulate a thoughtful response. I think the American public sees through the lack of any cogent response by the four female politicians - and I believe they resent it. I know I do.

Simple put, what Donald Trump said does not meet or come close to the Merriam-Webster definition. The four radical Congresswomen will never apologize for the misleading and mis-characterization of President Trump. Nor will Congressmen Elijah Cummings or Al Greene; or Nancy Pelosi who all have called President Trump a r****t.
Go to
Jul 21, 2019 15:11:25   #
Roller12 wrote:
Who really died at Auschwitz? What really died at Auschwitz? Here's
an interesting viewpoint. The following is a copy of an article
written by Spanish writer Sebastian Vilar Rodriguez and published in a
Spanish newspaper. It doesn't take much imagination to extrapolate
the message to the rest of Europe, and possibly to the rest of the
world.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I walked down the streets in Barcelona and suddenly discovered a
terrible t***h: Europe died in Auschwitz. We k**led six million Jews
and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a
group of people who represented culture, thought, creativity, talent.
We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced
great and wonderful people who made great contributions to the world,
and thus changed the world.

The contribution of today’s Jewish people is felt in all areas of
life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the
conscience of the world. Look at any donors’ board at any symphony,
art museum, theatre, art gallery, science center, etc. You will see
many, many, Jewish surnames.

These are the people who were burned. Of the 6,000,000 who died, how
many would have grown up to be gifted musicians, doctors, artists,
philanthropists?

And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to
ourselves that we were cured of the diseases of r****m and bigotry,
Europe opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us
stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance,
crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support their
families with p***e.

They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities
into the third world, drowning in filth and crime. Shut up in the
apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder
and destruction of their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical
hatred, creative sk**l for destructive sk**l, intelligence for
backwardness and superstition. We have exchanged the pursuit of peace
of the Jews of Europe and their talent for a better future for their
children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for
those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death
for themselves and others, for our children and theirs. What a
terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.

Recently, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust from its
school curriculum because it “offends” the Muslim population which
claims it never occurred. It is not removed as yet. However, this is
a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how
easily each country is giving in to it.

It is now approximately seventy years after the Second World War in
Europe ended. This email is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory
of the six million Jews, twenty million Russians, ten million
Christians, and nineteen-hundred Catholic priests who were murdered,
raped, burned, starved, beaten, experimented on and humiliated. Now,
more than ever, with Iran, among others, claiming The Holocaust to be
“a myth,” it is imperative to make sure the world "never forgets."

This email is intended to reach 400 million people. Be a link in the
memorial chain and help distribute this around the world.
How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center
“NEVER HAPPENED” because it offends some Muslim in the United States?
If our Judeo-Christian heritage is offensive to Muslims, they should
pack up and move to Iran, Iraq or some other Muslim country.
Please do not just delete this message; it will take only a minute to
pass this along. We must wake up America, England, Australia and
Europe before it's too late.

"If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government,
then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools.”
Who really died at Auschwitz? What really died at... (show quote)


I did a google search of the author, Sebastian Vilar Rodriguez and got some interesting results. T***horfiction.com at the following link https://tinyurl.com/yykfhuzk says this guy doesn't exist - or at least they couldn't find any evidence of him existing. Now t***horfiction.com occasionally will really get be p'od when there is always some funny unexplained "SOMETHING" found with anything that is close to being Conservative or pro-Jew, especially The Holocaust (as if The Holocaust was something out of the Marvel Cartoon Series). So, I did some more research - and lo' and behold, seems like Sebastian Vilar Rodriquez DOES EXIST (very much so) and has plenty to say. As well as more STUFF on non-complimentary (to say the least) of Jews. Check out the following links:
https://tinyurl.com/SebastianVillarRodriquez; and especially this link, https://the3rdword.wordpress.com/tag/sebastian-vilar-rodriguez/ and lastly -https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/1117994-ALL-EUROPEAN-LIFE-DIED-IN-AUSCHWITZ-By-Sebastian-Vilar-Rodrigez
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.