JimMe wrote:
DemLibs have very big concerns regarding Pres Trump and the Supreme Court...
If Justice Ginsburg being in declining health at 86 years old is not bad enough, Lib Justice Breyer is 80 himself...
The Supreme Court may very well have a 6-3 More Conservative Majority before 2020, and if Pres Trump wins Ree******n, a 7-2 Conservative Supreme Court is a strong possibility...
When you think the Supreme Court may be More Conservative for the next 20-30 years, these are definitely 2 of the top concerns of the DemLib Leaders regarding Pres Trump...
DemLibs have very big concerns regarding Pres Trum... (
show quote)
Just a thought...maybe we should stop calling them "conservative" and "liberal" Supreme Court Judges and instead label them either "Constitutional" or "Progressive" judges.
Words matter, and isn't it better to show that Democrats are against SC justices that follow the Constitution in favor of those that don't and prefer to be "progressive"?
Weasel wrote:
I expect her to be the next cover of Time Magazine.
She is celebrating Amazons move against a New York Headquarters.
And I thought her constituents needed jobs.
Oh wait, her constituents don't want to work.
I expect her to be the next cover of Time Magazine... (
show quote)
Warren and AOC won't be happy until the government owns all the evil corporations and has all the millionaires and billionaires money. They want Cuba - free college, free medical care, equal "sustainable" income for all (in Cuba it's about $7.50 a week, but hey, they get free food allotments, so there's that). But I guess it's better than their Muslim comrades...they just want us dead.
😂😂 or as my Mom always says, "Would you rather get poked in the eye with a sharp stick, or a dull one?"
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>
I don’t care !
This pisses me off !
Hire Americans !
Hire What or B***k A******ns !
I’m sick n tired of scumbag i******s or legals coming here taking our jobs!
sick n tired of this Crap !
Indeed I did hear that Dem.s (Harris, Booker, et.al) and Rep.s were talking about increasing the amounts of workers from India.
However...he did have Betsy DeVos mentioned in the SOTU address saying they are pushing through school choice.
Part of their plan for Education is teaching trades in HS and after HS trade schools (I prefer they get taught starting in 10th grade myself) so maybe soon he'll be saying "well, we have to either bring in legal immigrants to fill these jobs, or start teaching those sk**ls in public school so this generation of graduates can fill those jobs".
OR....he's just saying what he said because Dem.s are saying he's anti-immigration and e******ns are next year🤷
PeterS wrote:
He doesn't really have a choice. He's the one who opened his mouth and said he was happy to take the blame for the shutdown and that didn't work out to good for him. I mean we were days away from a shutdown of a major airport and all hell would have occurred had that happened. So Trump can't shut down the government again and if he tries an executive action for a crisis that he's manufacturing than he will lose support in the Senate. As for you people, you're not going anywhere and he knows it. You're more terrified of liberals than you are Mexicans so you have no choice but to v**e for him simply because the alternative can't be tolerated.
As for 55 miles of border wall, I am shocked that Pelosi would agree to that much especially since she doesn't have to give him anything so if you are getting that much then I would take it in a heartbeat.
He doesn't really have a choice. He's the one who ... (
show quote)
He's already declared a national emergency at the border in an EO back in Dec. '17. No fanfare, no big announcements, just laying the foundation for what he's going to do. Between then and now, there has been enough evidence, through DHS investigations, to prove that human trafficking of children (85% that were separated from their non-relative traffickers), women being brutalized and raped (as well as the children) and major drug busts, is happening and that it is time to act on that EO regardless of what Pelosi thinks or wants.
The last time President Trump accepted a paltry amount of $ for border security to keep the government open he said he would never do it again. If I were a betting person, I'd bet that he isn't going to accept their slap in the face and will do what he's known he's going to have to do.
To read the EO, just Google EO December 2017 and read it.
PeterS wrote:
Then why aren't you fighting for the lives of the children separated at the border? You have accolades for one and try to ignore the other. Life is precious until it asks something from you...
Because 85% of those children are NOT with a parent or relative. We ARE fighting, to prevent coyotes and human traffickers from hauling babies and children thousands of miles on foot to be used as a means to cross the border illegally. How many sick and/or dehydrated children have to be raped or die to get you assholes to understand that some CULTURES don't value children's lives like American culture does? American mothers don't strap suicide vests on their kids and American mothers don't sell their kids so buyers can use them to claim asylum in another country (or just cross illegally). Sure, some American mothers sell their kids for drugs, and are judged severely for it, in court AND society.
Yeah, we ALL "bleed red", but other than that, some cultures are a WORLD apart in their customs, beliefs, traditions and social mores. If you can't understand that, get your passport out and TRAVEL, preferably to some 3rd world countries so you can see what your Party wants to turn our country into.
crazylibertarian wrote:
From Yahoo:
"Rep. Ilhan Omar has apologized after facing backlash over a series of tweets insinuating that Jewish money is the driving force behind the United States' support for Israel — a longstanding anti-Semitic trope. It's not the first time the Minnesota freshman lawmaker, who made history as one of the first Muslim women ever elected to Congress, has been accused of anti-Semitism.
On Sunday night, Omar replied to a tweet by journalist Glenn Greenwald that read: "GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy threatens punishment for @IlhanMN and @RashidaTlaib over their criticisms of Israel. It's stunning how much time US political leaders spend defending a foreign nation even if it means attacking free speech rights of Americans." Omar wrote: "It's all about the Benjamins baby," in reference to the 1997 song by P. Diddy and implying McCarthy only supported Israel in exchange for campaign donations."
Crazy Libertarian: This gets to the anti-Semitism that is at the heart of all Leftism. It is a very logical process. Whether progressivism, socialism, national socialism or revolutionary socialism (AKA c*******m), to replace the existing order with any of them, you must destroy the oldest of the orders and the oldest in Western Civilization is Judaism. All progressivism eventually becomes anti-semitic. And after they've destroyed Judaism, the next oldest is Catholicism, the dominant and original Christianity.
Socialisms all become anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic.
From Yahoo: br "Rep. Ilhan Omar has apologize... (
show quote)
You never really hear about how many Catholic priests Hitler sent to the concentration camps to be executed. Hitler Youth's primary objective was to replace youth groups/activities in predominantly Catholic Germany.
HOWEVER...I am going to disagree with you on the 3 Muslims in Congress right now...they are engaged in political jihad for Allah and just used the i***t Left to get them there. Make no mistake about it...if the nightmare ever comes true (as it did in Germany), it will be THEM (the resisting Left that helped them get there) that gets decapitated in the village square first...not the Jews or the Catholics.
2bltap wrote:
This video is on Martin Brodels channel on YouTube. Please go to about the 7:25 second mark and listen. This new deal sounds absolutely spot on. Hope you enjoy. If any of you here find fault with it please explain your issue or issues. As a reminder Mr. Brodel has only one eye to see with.
Semper Fi
Mike
https://youtu.be/DMum2dNZOS4 Now THAT is a New Deal I can get behind!!!❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️
Bcon wrote:
Who in the hell was she trying to rule with her beliefs? Maybe it should have been written slower so you could understand what is written.
Hey, I'm just being bipartisan here. For example - up until his last e******n, I v**ed for John McCain, as a majority of Republicans, with conservative values also did. The majority of Arizona citizens v**ed for President Trump. The majority of AZ citizens were against Obamacare and wanted it appealed. But McCain instead v**ed in the Senate AGAINST repeal because of a personal grudge.
All I'm saying is...if your religious beliefs prevent you from exercising a duty you chose to uphold, you don't belong in public office UNLESS THE PEOPLE WHO V**ED YOU IN AGREE WITH IT.
If college conservatives v**ed her in to represent their beliefs, the f*****t students need to shut the hell up and let her do her job. If the f*****t students v**ed her in, then she needs to step down and work at building a strong conservative base to become the majority.
woodguru wrote:
How is it that a stadium full of die hard supporters spells defeat? We know there are millions of people who will support him no matter what
We don't support him "no matter what" like libbots supported Obama and Hillary (you're projecting again) - we support him because he's accomplishing the objectives we elected him to achieve.
The pendulum has swung back (to the right), as it always does after an unsatisfactory 8 year term, regardless of it being Dem.s or Rep.s
Deal with it and I suppose when conservatives are finally tired of winning, I'm sure it'll swing back to center-left...and us conservatives will, as always, deal with it like adults.
bahmer wrote:
Yes it sounds like a wish list for a little child but an adult should look at that list and realize that dog don't hunt.
Well, when you elect someone who's only political experience was MAYBE high school government and who's life experience is listening to drunk liberals spewing their c*******t fantasies in a bar all night...this is what you get.
Bcon wrote:
A 9th grade student at a Moosejaw, Saskatchewan high school who wore a “Make America Great Again” hat to class was told that he should be “embarrassed” and “ashamed” for wearing the pro-Trump cap.
According to the boy’s father, who did a phone interview on AM980 with Gormley, his son is a fan of debating ideas, and enjoys conversation about American problems.
Apparently, an art teacher at the school told the boy that the hat was a symbol of r****m and sexism, and may have implied that the boy himself was supporting sexism and r****m by wearing it.
Later on during class, the teacher allegedly invited his class to boo the boy, publicly shaming him for wearing the hat, and said “that’s a face I’d like to punch,” a line that President Trump infamously stated to a protester at a rally of his, during his 2016 p**********l campaign.
A 9th grade student at a Moosejaw, Saskatchewan hi... (
show quote)
The teacher should be fired and all kids who participated made to wear #MAGA hats for a week.