Presidents including FDR, Reagan, Bush, and Trump have routinely hosted summits at their private properties


Well, so much for that. On Oct. 17, White House Chief of Staff and Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney announced that the U.S. will be hosting the G7 in 2020 at the Trump Doral Resort in Miami, Fla.—and President Donald Trump’s opponents in the White House press corps were apoplectic, with largely fallacious accusations of enriching himself or the Trump brand from his businesses.


By Oct. 19, President Trump had canceled the idea, writing on Twitter, “based on both Media & Democrat Crazed and Irrational Hostility, we will no longer consider Trump National Doral, Miami, as the Host Site for the G-7 in 2020. We will begin the search for another site, including the possibility of Camp David, immediately. Thank you!” But it might not have been such a big deal in the first place. Besides saving taxpayer money, Presidents including FDR, Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and most recently Donald Trump have all routinely hosted foreign leaders on their private properties while in office.


http://dailytorch.com/2019/10/presidents-including-fdr-reagan-bush-and-trump-have-routinely-hosted-summits-at-their-private-properties/

The lack of "due process" is what makes this attempted c**p a complete farce. Why is it you people on the Left don't understand this? Once again getting there is all that matters? The end result? This is not how America conducts judicial inner workings by any means. Oh, that's right I forget. This is just some political bulls**t move which by its bogus conduct proves what a joke it really is. It's like trying a minority for murder when the prosecutor knows full well the accused is innocent. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/rep-andy-biggs-the-pelosi-schiff-impeachment-farce-has-no-respect-for-due-process Because the process is so beneath anything imaginable in an American courtroom, I can imagine Trump suing for lack of due process and the entire case going up to the Supreme Court where it would be thrown out in a Trump New York moment.

Then why is it closed and behind doors and the minority has no rights? Guess the D's are still mad about losing and think we the people and any GOP members don't deserve equal rights or consideration. You guys just never play fair. That's why nobody attends your rallies and v**es for you anymore. But keep digging that hole and say hello to the Chinese when you get there. I'm sure you'll feel right at home after you pick up some of the lingo. Have a v**e or it isn't a real impeachment just an inquiry. I think inquiries are optional to attend since the Prez is one branch of government all by himself. But he's letting those that want to play along attend if they want to since he hasn't committed any crimes. San Fran Nan will never hold a v**e because she doesn't have enough of them and she would just look stupid again. GITMO just added 1,000 more cells, it seems they need a geriatric ward for all your old geezers. Warren proved again she isn't a real Indian, she only wants the government to have guns. You guys can't do anything right, not even by accident.

https://www.lifezette.com/2019/10/lindsey-graham-trump-optimistic-syria/ Sen. Graham is definitely in Trump's corner on 99% of the occasions. Was very impressed with the Senator at the Kav hearings when he was telling the Dems 'where to get off'. The Dems were so out of line and making usual fools of themselves and Graham tore them a new one. This is when I really understood what low-lives the Dems have turned into. They couldn't have acted more d********g. How could anybody be proud of the way they acted???? https://www.lifezette.com/2019/10/lindsey-graham-trump-optimistic-syria/

Our closet ally in the Middle East is Israel.

There's no telling what happened to you, why you turned a complete 180. Maybe it was the mush sloshing around in your skull, maybe it was loss of consciousness or a sudden lapse in reason, who the hell knows. In any case, your fickle brain has betrayed you.

Now you have your panties in a twist because president Trump is pulling American troops out of an increasingly dangerous situation, one that is in flux and under no one country's control.

Next time American troops are deployed into harm's way, next time they have to go fight, will you give them your support? Will you condemn the anti-war crowd? If not, then you'd best just STFU.

The bloodless c**p forges ahead…and here's a MUST-READ ARTICLE by someone who dislikes Trump
Mike Huckabee ~ October 16, 2019
Right before the Democrat debate Tuesday night, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that, for now, she would not be holding an official v**e on whether to begin formal impeachment proceedings against President Trump. “We’re not here to call bluffs,” she said. "We’re here to find the t***h to uphold the Constitution of the United States. This is not a game for us. This is deadly serious. And we are on a path that is, is getting –- taking us to a path to t***h and a timetable, uh, that respects, um...our Constitution.”

We get it: Nancy is all about the Constitution. (I’ll pause for a few moments while you fall to the floor laughing.) So, hey, if Democrats are for impeachment –- and the Democrat candidates in Tuesday’s debate said they were for it –- why isn’t Pelosi moving forward with formal proceedings? Aside from probably not having the v**es for it to pass, the answer is so obvious, I hardly feel the need to point it out, but I will anyway.

Right now, Pelosi is under a lot of pressure from the far-left “AOC branch” of Congress to impeach for any reason or no reason, but by skirting a formal inquiry with the bizarre sort of semi-inquiry they’re doing now, she also gets to run it as a “No-rules-for-me-my-rules-for-you” process. Official impeachment hearings have always been held in public, in front of the cameras, and congressional Republicans would have subpoena power and be able to call and cross-examine witnesses. Trump would actually have due process rights like other Americans! But when Democrats got their great “whistleblower” idea, they had no idea that Trump would opt for t***sparency and release the transcript with Ukrainian President Zelensky, showing the “whistleblower” to be full of beans and the whole plot to be as phony as Adam Schiff’s lying “parody” of their phone conversation. (In breaking news, 135 House Republicans have co-sponsored a resolution to censure Schiff for doing it. Good luck with that, but at least they made a statement.) And now, Schiff is saying the “whistleblower” won't be testifying.

No kidding --- he doesn’t DARE let this person be questioned. We'd demand to know exactly how he or she coordinated with Schiff’s office, especially before the complaint was filed, what this person was doing in the 18 days between that contact and the filing of the complaint, and why that contact was not disclosed on the official complaint form. According to Mark Meadows, “...What we’re finding is that Adam Schiff only wants to have witnesses who will give the response that he hopes that they will give, and even at that, it’s ‘a swing and a miss.’”

Brit Hume, talking with Tucker Carlson Tuesday night, said of Pelosi, “I frankly can’t think of a good reason from her point of view why [Pelosi] WOULD hold a v**e.” First, he said, it exposes vulnerable Democrats from districts that Trump carried in 2016. “This way, she gets to get all the fruits of this peculiar investigation...and none of the downside. They’re conducting a very unusual investigation –- you look back to the Nixon impeachment, which is the most widely accepted impeachment inquiry we’ve ever had –- it was overwhelmingly v**ed for, but in addition to that, the proceedings were very balanced, very fair...Nixon had his lawyers involved in the process...none of that is happening here. This is all being done behind closed doors...”

Brit pointed out how effective the “Ukraine” scenario has been for Democrats, at least up to this point. Since they piv**ed from “Russia” to “Ukraine,” the polls have shown much more public sentiment in favor of impeachment. It’s “a very effective thing that Pelosi and her colleagues have going in the House.” How ironic, then, that the REAL Ukraine scandal is not anything Trump did but rather what officials there did to help Hillary in 2016; for example, the leaking of former Trump campaign director Paul Manafort’s “black book” of payments for Ukrainian lobbying. Then we also have the extremely lucrative involvement of Joe Biden’s son H****r in Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma and Joe’s threat to cut off $1 billion in aid to Ukraine if the prosecutor investigating Burisma wasn’t fired. H****r definitely didn’t help his case when he went public Tuesday in an unfortunate appearance on GOOD MORNING AMERICA. Even in this puffball interview, it was pitifully obvious that the only reason he would have been put on the Burisma board was that he was the Vice President’s son.

In breaking news Tuesday night, FOX News’ chief congressional correspondent Mike Emanuel reported that the White House has opened an internal probe into the handling of the Zelensky phone call, with some expressing the concern, “it could be a search for a scapegoat.” Well, if he means finding the anonymous White House official who approached the anonymous “whistleblower” with off-the-rails “concerns” that turned out not to be true, they really should be looking for that person. But it seems to me that the person being targeted most right now by Trump’s adversaries is Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani is Trump’s personal attorney, but due process protections such as attorney-client privilege do not apply to this President or his associates because he's Donald Trump.

This is just the latest twist in what truly is a “bloodless c**p” to unseat the duly elected President of the United States. Anyone tempted to dismiss it as a right-wing conspiracy theory absolutely must read the article linked to below, by reporter Matt Taibbi, who (as you will see) doesn’t like or respect Donald Trump in the least but has an objective eye for power struggles and can see what is going on here. He says that while our nation has been spared this kind of mad intrigue until now, that is changing before our eyes. As much as Taibbi doesn’t like Trump, he believes that the people who've been pushing the hardest to get rid of him from the beginning are worse. “Many Americans don’t see this because they’re not used to waking up in a country where you’re not sure who the President will be by nightfall,” he says.

Taibbi sees, for the first time, a “full-blown schism” between the intelligence community and the White House. He goes through the whole chain of events, including the January 2017 meeting of the intel chiefs with the President-elect to brief him on the most salacious part of the (unverified) Steele “dossier.” He says the leaks from this meeting “without question damaged both the presidency and America’s standing abroad” and was “an unprecedented act of insubordination.” He explains how, by using a pattern of leaks and political pressure, the agencies have inserted themselves into domestic politics.

And now, with the Ukraine story, “it’s the same people beating the public drums, with the messaging run out of the same congressional committees, through the same Nadlers, Schiffs and Swalwells.” While he doesn’t give Trump enough credit for recognizing what’s been going in the “deep state,” and I think he’s shamefully wrong about what Trump would do if faced with his own ouster, Taibbi’s observations and warnings about this c**p are spot-on. THIS IS A MUST-READ.

https://republicanfreedom.com/2019/10/14/matt-taibbi-we-re-in-a-permanent-c**p/