Bring it on. No incrementalism for me.

We have been trying that since 1989, and already proven that it is disastrous for Conservatives. Rush Limbaugh assured us for all those years that what is happening now wouldn't. Now is not the time to reiterate that false message. Now is the time to accept the reality that it will happen if we keep trying to reverse it with incrementalism.

You have to choose. It is laziness to do nothing and hope for the best. You have to choose - either conservativism, which means keeping America free as founded and defined by the Constitution, or changing America into a Soviet style c*******t state. Anything in the middle, is another step toward the latter.

you are dead wrong, and that strategy is k*****g the Republican party.

As I said before, they don't lose for being too conservative. They lose conservatives for being too liberal or moderate, or weak kneed, or compromising. When they lose conservatives, they lose e******ns.

Republicans don't need moderates to win. The moderates like democrats. Conservatives want a party to v**e for. If the Republicans don't go after the Conservatives, the Conservatives will not v**e Republican. It is as simple as that. How many e******ns are the Republicans going to win without the Conservatives? Answer: NONE

If you want to be a moderate, go join the Democrats. They are sure to promise you wh**ever you want. I want the Republicans to promise and deliver what Conservatives want. If they don't, what good are they to Conservatives?

There would be no Noels, no rump a pun pubs, and the string of things they would take away would be very long. Here is a very good song about what Christmas really is although many of the anti-Christian thoughts just don't ever understand. This little boy gets it and most of THEM don't really manage to do it. This song brings tears to my eyes every time I hear Beckey sing the words the little boy asked her. Can we have songs like this one after they destroy our time of year?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OExXItDyWEY

Paul Ryan and his pseudo-conservative cronies in the House have let us down. They pledged to the American people that if we elected them in 2010, they would work to reduce big government, cut spending, and balance the budget. But did anyone notice the budget "compromise" that Paul Ryan caved in to? The deal is just another Washington "gimmick" that does nothing to address the real issue: too much spending. They are hoping they can con us into believing that the budget they passed will cut spending and not raise taxes, but they are lying.

The budget goes back on the very moderate sequester cuts Congress promised us, and saddles the American people with $8.8 billion in "user fees" over five years.

But it gets worse! Paul Ryan, John Boehner, and the majority of the House Republicans who v**ed for this bloated budget agreed to $42.3 billion in spending over the next five years in exchange for just $16 billion in cuts tat will probably never happen.

We need to hold every single one of the RINO Republicans who v**ed for this bloated budget deal accountable or throw them out in 2014.

Here's an interesting little article on the REAL goals of the people who Obama has surrounded himself with:



President Obama’s new staff adviser, senior progressive strategist John Podesta, is a key player in an initiative seeking more government regulation of the oceans and the ceding of U.S. oceans to United Nations-based international law.

That background could inform Podesta’s agenda in the White House, where he is to serve for one year as a “counselor” to the president. The New York Times reported he will focus on executive orders and so-called c*****e c****e issues along with Obamacare.







Podesta, a former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton, is founder of the highly influential Center for American Progress.

He is also a member of the Joint Ocean Commission Initiative, which seeks to ratify U.S. laws and regulations governing the seas.

“I am delighted to be joining the Global Ocean Commission, which I see as one of the most dynamic initiatives developing commonsense ways to manage fully 45 percent of the globe that remains common property, outside any national jurisdiction,” said Podesta when he joined the commission.

Aaron Klein’s “Impeachable Offenses: The Case to Remove Barack Obama from Office” is available, autographed, at WND’s Superstore

The Joint Ocean Commission Initiative bills itself as a bipartisan, collaborative group that aims to “accelerate the pace of change that results in meaningful ocean policy reform.”

Among its main recommendations is that the U.S. should put its oceans up for regulation to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Other recommendations of Podesta’s Joint Ocean Commission Initiative include:
•The administration and Congress should establish a national ocean policy. The administration and Congress should support regional, ecosystem-based approaches to the management of ocean, coastal and Great Lakes.
•Congress should strengthen and reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act.
•Congress should strengthen the Clean Water Act.

Last year, Obama’s Interagency Ocean Policy Taskforce, created in 2010 also by executive order, recommended the U.S. join the U.N.’s Law of the Sea Convention.

The convention defines the rights and responsibilities of nations in their use of the world’s oceans, establishing guidelines for businesses, the environment and the management of marine natural resources.

Republican lawmakers mounted fierce opposition to the U.S. joining the U.N. law.

‘One world government’

Podesta’s Joint Ocean Commission Initiative, meanwhile, is a key partner of Citizens for Global Solutions, or CGS, which, according to its literature, envisions a “future in which nations work together to abolish war, protect our rights and freedoms and solve the problems facing humanity that no nation can solve alone.”

CGS states it works to “build the political will in the United States” to achieve this global vision.

The organization currently works on issues that fall into five general areas: U.S. global engagement; global health and environment; peace and security; international law and justice; and international institutions.


John Podesta was a chief of staff to President Bill Clinton

CGS is a member organization and supporter of the World Federalist Movement, which openly seeks a one-world government. The World Federalist Movement considers the CGS to be its U.S. branch.

The movement brings together organizations and individuals that support the establishment of a global federal system of strengthened and democratized global institutions with plenary constitutional power accountable to the citizens of the world and a division of international authority among separate global agencies.

The movement’s headquarters are located near the U.N. building in New York City. A second office is near the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands.

The locations are significant, since the movement heavily promotes the U.N. and is the coordinator of various international projects, such as the Coalition for the International Criminal Court and the Responsibility to Protect military doctrine. The doctrine formed the basis of Obama’s justification to launch NATO airstrikes in Libya.

In 2008, Podesta served as co-director of Obama’s t***sition into the White House.

A Time magazine article profiled the influence of Podesta’s Center for American Progress in the formation of the Obama administration, stating that “not since the Heritage Foundation helped guide Ronald Reagan’s t***sition in 1981 has a single outside group held so much sway.”

The center is funded by billionaire George Soros. Its board includes Van Jones, Obama’s former “green jobs” czar, who resigned in September 2009 after it was exposed he founded a c*******t revolutionary organization.

With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/new-obama-adviser-wants-to-cede-u-s-oceans-to-u-n/#dOTwfm7rPw4IpOML.99

It's pretty obvious to me that Broaddrick's story is true. The others I'm not so sure. Especially Paula Jones, who was paid by right-wing groups to say her consensual affair with Clinton was something else. Jennifer Flowers had a compelling story, but never said she was raped.

I stand corrected, even though Clinton had never been charged with rape. Broaddrick's story and the story of of Myers to back her up, is something most women wouldn't go through. Why she didn't file charges is something a man can question of a woman, but never really know what a woman goes into filing such charges, especially against a man in a powerful position such as state Attorney General.

It's a stretch to say that Clinton's behavior means the Democrats are unfit to represent women-the Republicans in Texas want to do a mechanical rape of a woman who wants an a******n. Besides, Clinton has never been charged. Until he is charged, he will always be an alleged rapist. I now believe he is, but that doesn't make it so, at least in the eyes of the law. .