Liberty Tree wrote:
The Democrats got much of what they wanted and the Republicans got next to nothing. Spending will increase and more taxes will follow. Of course, the taxes will be called fees and anything else except what they are. Any spending "cuts", which are just decreases in proposed increases, are scheduled down the road and will never happen just like they did away with the sequester. The debt will continue to explode, except for the temporary lull we are experiencing. Even if the GOP wins the Senate and keeps the House do not expect anything to change. They will just run another RINO in 2016. We are standing on an economic house of cards and the wind is blowing harder. It will fall on the road our nation is on and that is exactly what Obama and his Marxist minions want. Do not believe the spin the GOP Congressional leaders try to put on it. This is a bad deal and was done because the GOP leaders are afraid to take a stand and risk another shutdown. They, like Obama and the Dems, just want to get by the 2014 e******n.
The Democrats got much of what they wanted and the... (
show quote)
Q1: Is our so-called national debt a serious debt, a burden that we must repay?
A1: No, It lacks both of those two essential qualities of a serious debt. Its a Debt In Name Only, a DINO -
1. A serious debt is a burden. OUR DINO IS NOT NOW AND NEVER WILL BE A TAXPAYERS BURDEN.
Our DINO is the total value of all issued and still maturing treasuries. By calling our DINO unsustainable, a h**x meant to privatize Social Security and Medicare, Wall Street con artists seeking a fortune in commissions have panicked the ignorant public, journalists, and Washington politicians. But, effectively, the taxpayers do NOT redeem mature treasuries. In a virtual rollover, it is the buyers of newly-issued treasuries who redeem the mature treasuries! In every auction, more bonds are demanded than are available from new issues. Auction winners get the safest, most liquid US dollar instruments; the losers are stuck with bank risk. If necessary, the Fed could even create a demand for treasuries by buying large quantities in the open market with cost-free keystrokes. The taxpayer is NEVER burdened!
Our Treasury does not borrow money like a home-buyer undertaking a mortgage. It is a custodian of funds, like a bank accepting money offered for certificates of deposit. While a bank with too many bad loans can certainly have too many maturing CDs, our non-lending Treasury cannot have too many maturing bonds unless its deficit spending is causing harmful inflation. And that happens ONLY in a war or emergency requiring rationing. It NEVER happens during a recession. During prosperity, banks are ALWAYS the main cause of inflation, creating over $6 of credit for every $1 of deficit spending. To curb inflation, lets regulate the banks before restricting spending on infrastructure.
2. A serious debt must be repaid. OUR DINO WILL NEVER BE REPAID AND SHOULD NEVER BE REPAID.
Only a budget surplus can reduce our DINO. Since dropping the gold standard in1971, we have had only four years of very modest surplus. None is now in sight. To supply enough treasuries, the ONLY risk-free instruments used for trade collateral, insurance, pensions, bank reserves, etc., OUR DINO MUST GROW WITH OUR ECONOMY. In fact, deflation and depression will hit us hard unless big budget deficits replace our cash now flowing into China.
Q2: Could savers make a run on Treasury bonds?
A2: Yes, when savers can get risk-free returns from the Wall Street casino or from GM bonds, Illinois bonds, or Detroit bonds. Safety is not everything. Safety is the ONLY thing! Thats why the whole world relies on US bonds.
Q3. Could savers stop buying Treasury bonds?
A3. Sure, when nobody needs risk-free interest for trade collateral, insurance, pensions, bank reserves, etc., etc.
Q4: Could savers prefer foreign sovereign bonds?
A4: Yes, indeed! So far, almost two thirds of the worlds reserve currencies are in US dollars and about half of all US Treasury bonds are held by foreigners. But if Chinas infrastructure and productivity become better than ours, its sovereign bonds could become safer than ours. But that could happen only if US v**ers worry more about our DINO than they worry about our falling bridges, failing schools, leaking sewers, aging power grids, etc., etc., etc.
Q5: Wont we need higher tax rates to pay for infrastructure?
A5: Taxes only counteract inflation. Congress never spends tax revenue. The IRS destroys all of its receipts, actually shredding cash payments and selling the pulp. For spending, Congress creates money out of thin air (just like your corner bank creates loans), deposits it in the Treasury, and writes checks. Then the Treasury auctions bonds to finance the deficit, which is limited only by Congress and NEVER by tax revenue. The only rational reason to restrict deficit spending is the onset of harmful inflation. Until then, Congress can and must spend freely on our DINOs annual debt interest and on much-needed infrastructure for the future. Every day, you fill your kitchen sink AND you stop it from overflowing. Why cant Congress fill our economy with money AND prevent inflation? Ask them!