One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: nwtk2007
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 ... 3821 next>>
Jan 27, 2020 16:44:46   #
trashbaum wrote:
It has been exposed that Lt Colonel Vindman has leaked to the news media, about Bolton's book. The leak to Lt. Colonel Vindman was by his twin brother who's office is just across the hall from Vindman. The twin brother Vindman's job is to review manuscripts that may contain classified material, including such as Bolton's book. Security clearance leaves a lot to be desired in the White House. The President is in dire need of a swamp cleaner


http://libertyunyielding.com/2020/01/27/alexander-vindmans-brother-in-charge-of-reviewing-all-nsc-publications-including-leaked-bolton-manuscript/

http://pjmedia.com/trending/wonder-how-the-nyt-got-the-leak-from-boltons-unpublished-book-look-whos-reportedly-vetting-it/

http://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/26/source-alexander-vindmans-brother-yevgeny-clears-publications-by-nsc-officials/

Which one do you suppose is the actual whistle blower???
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 16:40:54   #
trashbaum wrote:
It has been exposed that Lt Colonel Vindman has leaked to the news media, about Bolton's book. The leak to Lt. Colonel Vindman was by his twin brother who's office is just across the hall from Vindman. The twin brother Vindman's job is to review manuscripts that may contain classified material, including such as Bolton's book. Security clearance leaves a lot to be desired in the White House. The President is in dire need of a swamp cleaner


That makes me glad, if true. Vindman thought a favor was a demand and he now looks like an utter imbecile! I am sure his brother is just as stupid. The leaked portion now becomes a joke, the dem's look even more stupid, and we continue to win!
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 16:34:27   #
woodguru wrote:
Answer why the whistleblower is relevant, or simply stop with the rhetoric.

Everything the whistleblower has said has and is being looked at, it is what this impeachment in terms of withholding aid is all about. It doesn't matter if the whistleblower slept with Nadler or Schiff, if they put them up to it, if they got anything wrong that gets sorted out in the investigation, it's all good. All that matters is that the ICIG sees the report, looks into it, and says it is either credible or not. The origins of the whistleblower are irrelevant, end of subject. People who are seeing abuses of power talk amongst themselves, and the one with the guts to formally submit a report to the Intelligence Community's Inspector General has every right to do that in complete anonymity. A person's boss who someone who goes to their superior with a concern may not have the guts to go against the president, that person may tell the whistleblower the proper attorney or oversight entity to go to, or he might simply tell them to file a whistleblower report with the ICIG and let him take it from there.

If you want the relevant people in the chain that ran with the report you are looking at the ICIG, who would simply say there is nothing there if there were not, or the acting Intelligence director who is the one that passes it to the intelligence committees with his take on it after getting the ICIG report.

What does the whistleblower have to say that makes any difference? Can you not see that there is absolutely nothing no matter how scandalous that changes the evidence being looked at right now?
Answer why the whistleblower is relevant, or simpl... (show quote)


Lying on a whistle blower complaint is fraud and corrupt. Using that lie to start an investigation or impeachment proceeding is fraud and corrupt. Leaking to the press is fraud and corrupt. Leaking lies is fraud and corrupt. Running a totally partisan impeachment is corrupt. Hiding corruption via a fraudulent impeachment proceeding is fraud and corrupt. Claiming that due process and defense is obstruction is fraud and corrupt. Claiming the whistleblower has a statutory right to anonymity is fraud and corrupt.

Bottom line is the whole thing is a fraud and a corrupt political move on the part of the democrats, claiming wrong doing where there is none. The Congress is abusing it's power by forcing this impeachment based upon fraud and corruption not to mention hiding corruption which the president sought to uncover.

What the "whistleblower" said in his/her complaint is, indeed, relevant, not only for legal purposes but for political purposes as well. The American people are gradually siding up with the president as they see that the democrats are defrauding them, the American public.

So, make no mistake, if this doesn't go away, we will expose the whistleblower and his/her "insignificant" claims. We will rip the Biden's a new on on the stand under oath and sooner or later, take down the entirety of the democratic party, exposing the fraud not only of this but of the Mueller investigation and how it was conducted. We will expose the people who want to turn our government into a corrupt, banana republic regime and the people will v**e them out; those that aren't removed legally by law for illegal activities. We now have all the evidence we need for that. Do you want it ALL to come out or just enough to allow for this president to continue and you holding on to just a sliver of hop that you could win in 2020 or any other year after that for that matter??????

By the way woody, this post is not just for you, woody.
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 15:00:24   #
American Vet wrote:
And 'anonymous' leaks from the NYT for 2 years promised there was hard evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians.......


Not a goo source of info, for sure. They would leak to CNN but then no one would hear about it!
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 14:15:24   #
Peewee wrote:
Graduating from Harvard doesn't make you exempt from telling lies. Dems keep saying there were 17 witnesses, a lie, there were 18. But the 18th witness testimony blows the Dems out of the water. So they alter the t***h. The situation is the standard operating procedure for Dems, to lie, obfuscate, and misrepresent.


Correction, there were 17 witnesses they want to be heard. The other one, not so much!
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 14:12:45   #
This is what our media is all about. Look at all the headlines driven by an anonymous leak. They all seem to think it's automatically taken as gospel.


Impeachment Trial Day 6: Bolton revelations fuel fresh calls for testimony as Trump mounts defense

Leaked Bolton claims fuel fiery new clash over impeachment testimony

Leaked claims from former National Security Adviser John Bolton's forthcoming book are fueling a new confrontation between congressional Democrats and ...

The Utter Ridiculousness of the U.S. Senate

On the second day of President Donald Trump's Senate impeachment trial, Chief Justice John Roberts told a joke—though not intentionally. Presiding over the ...

Bolton's testimony would be devastating. Not even Republicans could look away.
Here's a witness who can tell us what the president, in a face-to-face conversation, said he wanted.

Trump's team gears up for rebuttal in Senate impeachment trial

Schiff says GOP senators must agree to Bolton testifying

Washington (CNN) Lead House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff argued Monday that Republican senators cannot say they want "a search for the t***h" ...

Bolton Leak Describes Trump Linking Ukraine Aid to Biden Probe

Bombshell book: What we know about John Bolton's allegations about Trump and Ukraine
In his upcoming book, former national security adviser John Bolton writes that President Donald Trump told him he did not wish to release military aid to Ukraine ...
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 14:04:46   #
moldyoldy wrote:
Everybody knows there is nothing there. Barr controls everything and yet, trump did not order him to get Biden. Rudy, like sheriff Joe will make fantastic claims and never produce anything. They learned to lie like trump.


Everybody? Uh, no.
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 13:44:46   #
Radiance3 wrote:
===================
The book was about gossip. Some dumb people believe that once a book is written it has to be the final judge to decide. That book must be proven by the writer in the Court of Law.

The Court's admissible evidence must be 1. The original transcript of the president's conversation with Ukraine president Zelensky. 2. The actual testimony of Zelensky.

Any other hearsay, innuendos, whispers, gossips could not be admissible. Those are not facts.

So many people are making money writing f**e stories about the impeachment trial of the president.

=================== br The book was about gossip. ... (show quote)


Nice thing about a book though, Bolton would have to use the exactly language of the book, if testifying under oath.

But other wise, you are totally correct.
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 13:41:07   #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Chuckle..

Evasive...

Love it...

The fact is that we in the West have allowed hordes of low educated, unsk**led, culturally conflicting, potential terrorists into our nations...

The fact that they are Muslims doesn't bother me...

But the odds of them assimilating are slim to nil...

And after twenty to fifty years of cultural indoctrination that includes hatred towards our nations and peoples, we are willfully ignorant to expect that there won't be serious consequences to "Islamic" immigration...

Is that clearer?
Chuckle.. br br Evasive... br br Love it... b... (show quote)


Fact is, in today's world, most terrorists are Muslim/Islamist's, although most Muslims/Islamist's are not terrorists. Sunni Muslim's do have, in theri good book and creed, the instructions to k**l those not like them. Even Shiites are infidels to Sunni's.

Islam is the number one religion in the world today. It might not be a threat but to me, it certainly appears that it could be.
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 13:33:36   #
American Vet wrote:
Now just convince the democrats that it is appropriate tp investigate corruption.....OYOH, they may be reluctant to do so.


To them it is only appropriate if the one being investigated is republican.
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 13:08:36   #
Noraa wrote:
What I would like to know is why he wrote this book now. He couldn't wait until after the impeachment?


It's all about exposure and cash. Bolton wants to be relevant; a pundit/opinion maker. I'd say cash, though, mainly!
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 13:01:20   #
waltmoreno wrote:
I hear he has the same book agent that Comey had. Whoda thunk? Birds of a feather ......


Yep, big surprise, right!?
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 12:57:30   #
moldyoldy wrote:
BS, he has not once asked the FBI or state department to investigate.


Oh, well we know he can trust them! LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No, he has asked Ukraine to look into it. He has Giuliani who now has evidence. He has statements by Ukraine officials. And yes, he even has Durham and Barr doing their part. But as for the FBI/CIA, there is nothing stopping them from investigating and I would bet that they have/are.
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 12:54:59   #
Liberty Tree wrote:
The longer it d**gs out the less people get to focus on his record.


Oh, I think he will remind them of that many times over. There will be debates with the eventual dem nominee. Trump will essentially laugh them and the impeachment off and folks will love it.
Go to
Jan 27, 2020 12:53:34   #
CarryOn wrote:
Agree with that. He's just another disgruntled employee like that weasel vindman who probably started this whole thing ...


Absolutely, I think Vindman not only started this whole charade with his claim that Trump "demanded" an investigation into the Biden's but that he, Vindman, is the actual whistle blower! Vindman is a slime and his fellow servicemen say so!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 ... 3821 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.