not the ears. nobody bit his ear.

Mental illness comes in all forms. Yes, I know you are so pleased that that apparently she is a Christian' If she smothered them with Obama f**gs you would just say how sorry you were that some people are mentally ill. This way you can chortle "oh look at what Christians are doing"

This way only the poor dog is embarrassed . Next time put it on your pit bull, or let Zeus wear it. Nobody would dare laugh at him.

This was in reference to the Yorkie and the white sheep costume.

Just 2 funny!

Next line to that is "ow that hurts.

charmer

That definitely is AuntiE!!!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

generosity

Yes, I have one of those also. Why do you think she refers to herself as She Who Must Be Obeyed?

redundant

Same sex behavior between males has been considered part of accepted practice in pagan cultures throughout history. A number of African tribes believed that a boy must perform oral sex on a number of males in order to consume enough ejaculate to become a fertile male. The Greeks and Romans believed that adult males could, without criticism be the penetrating partner in a "relationship" with a boy or a servant or s***e, but that behavior was wrong between adults of the same caste. Being the recipient was forbidden for the upper caste males. Their cultures validated pederasts, but not adult same sex behavior. They had no concept of "orientation" but said that sexual preference is fluid and can and does change depending on the situation. That seems to be the belief of all groups that are used as examples of the acceptability of same sex relationships. I can find no examples of adult male to male sexual behavior being considered acceptable, except in small groups of people, primarily in Africa, where the requirement was that one of the two was owned or was the s***e of the other and was the receiver. There are many accounts of sailors seeking sex with 10 to 14 year old male prostitutes in the USA during the early years after the founding of the country so pederasty was obviously acceptable. In all cases, until recently, sexual interest was considered fluid and definitely not something you were "born with" It was the "research" by Dr. Kinsey using criminals and p*******es, plus children of any age, that claimed that children were born sexually responsive and wanted to have sex with adults. The concept of children by age four knew which sex they wanted to have sex with was an offshoot of this "information" Children by age four are trying to develop their g****r identity, and some boys may play with girls dolls rather than boys dolls like GI Joe, some girls may prefer Tonka trucks rather than jacks, but that is part of developing g****r identity. Girls can prefer Tonka toys and toy guns and still be heterosexual and fully aware that they are female. My wife is one of those, never did like girlie things, and became an excellent marksman before arthritis set in, much better than me. She is also capable of changing oil in a car and doing household wiring, and I am the better cook, but both of us are fully comfortable knowing which sex we are. The effort these days is to claim because girls are playing with trucks, and boys are cooking that these children really are homosexual. Thus the concept that children are homosexually oriented by four has become part of the L***Q idea. Children of 4 do not have defined sexual desires. If they seek love from someone of the same sex it is a different type of love they are generally seeking but it does make them vulnerable to p*******es attention. That vulnerability in early teen years often makes the victims of pederasts and if they are told that it was a voluntary"affair" they may act and believe accordingly. Those are often the children that my wife and I are involved in helping heal and be able to finish their journey into manhood. Most of them question their sexual preferences if they were not violently assaulted but "gently molested" as many pederasts choose to call it while justifying their despicable behavior. Your idea that if God made them they must be good would definitely be correct if environment had nothing to do with sexual preference, but there does not seem to be evidence that is the case. As is the case in all human behavior except for those behaviors caused by brain damage, both genetics and environment are involved, with the latter having the greater influence. Considering how many people change from being same sex attracted as teenagers to opposite sex attracted as adults, that obviously must be the case. No one can change from being oriental to being caucasian as they grow up, nor can their DNA change from male to female, no matter what superficial surgeries have been performed.

You are a reverend in a church that apparently does not consider same sex sexual activity as a sin. Do you consider heterosexual sex activity outside of marriage a sin, or "open marriages" whether homosexual or heterosexual in nature to be sinning? If neither one is considered a sin in your church, how do you define adultery as in "thou shall not commit adultery?
Thank you for reading this and I hope you can answer the last question with the same respect that I have given you in this post.

Out here in the boonies, where the polling place is miles away, we all get together and use one car for 6 people to get to the polling place to v**e. If need be we would use the same technique to get photo IDs for everyone.

You present a bunch of guys with HORNEY women and expect them to behave themselves? Just what do you think we are?

Rock,

Just what did you do to your dog to get him that angry? Threaten to give him to a sheep?