These people are Mexican citizens. They should be protected by the Mexico government. But that would be a waste of time since the government has given in to the cartels.

So, then I guess, if one couldn't hear they should put their own interpretation of what is said, in the way you seem to think. I agree with the point it may not be verbatim. But with so many listening there are probably a number of interpretations of anything said by either person on the cal. That doesn't make it a fact. In the end the transcript was acknowledged by all that made a account to be recorded as the transcript. That means that anything other than the transcript isn't correct.

The hearings haven't been seen by the American people. Please tell me where it is so right for one, Schiff, to have the power to approve witness brought forward by the Republicans or Trump? Where is it so fair for Schiff has the right to approve of a question, by the Republicans, for a witness to answer? The radical Dems will not even give Trump the same rights the Republicans gave to Bill Clinton, is that fair? Your thinking is so radical it seems to be, like the Russia system of courts, that you seem so intensely against. So sad for the Dems to have fallen to such a low form of coercion. American sill see this investigation as nothing more than a sham and political perversion. Moving away from the fundamentals of our court system. So very, very sad.

I believe you are asking Mexican citizens to leave there homes of many years. Where is that fair.

It seems you are the only one that is jacked off about Trump.

I have read some of he Cohen documents and on the top of page 10 there is a reference to a payment to Clifford, the topless dancer, who had consensual sex with Trump. But only concluded that it may have been to help his campaign. No trial on that matter, so no crime as yet, to have been proven.
#2. The Mueller report! The Mueller report couldn't show prove any obstruction, so had no choice but to point out there may have been but no provable evidence.
The Manafort problem had nothing to do with Trump.
I have read the phone transcript, nothing points to any crime except in the eyes of some of those that have testified. We heard little pieces that Schiff put out to the media that were only his side accounting. Those that have testified about the phone call. Just portray there own version which isn't seen in the transcript.
The only one in jail at this time is Manafort, for tax evasion, I think.
The President has a right to have those in his cabinet, requested to testify, not testify because of the nature of the day to day business of the P**********l office.
With your post you show only the thoughts of some, of those who testified, only thinking something might not be approvable by some. Others say there was no "quid pro quo" fo any kind. One has to receive something for it to have been a "quid pro quo". You haven't shown any provable facts, just hyperbole from shifty Schiff and others that don't approve of Trump being elected President.
When you have facts that have been proven in a court to be true, then I will believe what you have posted.

It seems you can't tell the t***h. All you post are just allegations that you portray as the t***h without actual facts to substantiate your allegations. Just more hyperbole from a h**eful person.

That was a well stated piece of information for those on the left to read. Oh, sorry they won't read the whole article because it goes against their propagandized thoughts.

How about those on the left having a serious thought about what was actually said in the call. Read the transcript!

It may be silly to one with no capacity to have coherent thought but right on the point.

Both of you two have no retention of facts and statements from the Dems in Calif.. They have said that the fires are cased and helped by Trumps non conferment of c*****e c****e. You both need to acquaint yourselves with better retention of statements made by the progressives.

AS if Obama didn't get rid of many Generals and other top officers he disagreed with while he was in office. What is the difference? Gee I forgot it is now about the President many people in the first month of his administration said he should be impeached without even producing a crime he may have committed, while in office. The military criminals, as you put them, one was convicted a similar crimes that Hillary hadn't been charged with having committed. Yeh! Such equal justice.

They have Mexican citizenship and their families have been in Mexico for many decades if not for at least 100 years. Why should they leave if this has been the home for their families for years and years. They should be considered as legal citizens of Mexico and the government should protect them.

Tell us one thing. Does the Trump administration have the same rights as those given to the Clinton administration? During the impeachment process.

Please stop with the false accusations about Rudi making deals. He was attempting to obtain facts that involved the Dems having contacted the Ukrainian government about their last President making deals to implicate Trump associates. That is real collusion by government officials. This is a crime that may have been committed by some Democratic Senator's.