You asked for it Doc. This is just a small bit from ONE topic from September. This is pretty typical of your answers. There are many, many, many more of the same and worse from you. You're no victim so stop pretending to be one. As far as I know no one filed any complaints.
You claimed this person had
incestuous motives. All because he asked a question you refused to answer - which is a well established pattern of yours.
"karpenter,
Didn't you read my OPP Religious post article Protestant challenge ? Obviously not . . . . . .
Answer, My questions first.
You're not in control here, on this OPP Religious post thread.
Stay within the guidelines and writing parameters that I have set fourth in my original OPP Religious Forum Post.
...
karpenter, So why are you doing this ? What is your Protestant religious problem and dark personal incestuous motive's ?"
karpenter,
Didn't you read my OPP Religious post article Protestant challenge ? Obviously not . . . . . .
Answer, My questions first.
You're not in control here, on this OPP Religious post thread.
Stay within the guidelines and writing parameters that I have set fourth in my original OPP Religious Forum Post.
So don't even try to direct or divert attention from the question's that I've asked.
( "Here is the Protestant Challenge ? Lets talk Christian Theology ? And Christian History." )
karpenter, You just committed four written argument fallacies in this limited reply conversation of yours;
1. "Straw-Man,"
2. "Red-Herring,"
3. "Ad Hominem"
4. And a Non-Sequiter Idiom.
Do you even know what these fallacies mean, or do you need me to spell it out for you ?
karpenter, So why are you doing this ? What is your Protestant religious problem and dark personal incestuous motive's ?
karpenter, Didn't you read my Protestant challenge ? and the writing guidelines, Right now you look pretty immature from my perspective and many OPP readers perspectives.
karpenter, This is the same type of Protestant narrative game plan that you play with others; TexaCan, Zemirah, Jack sequim wa, karpenter, and others try to do, on the Religious OPP Forum.
You divert the attention from the tough religious questions at hand. And defiantly use tactics to underhandedly, are religiously demeaning and narrow-mindedness don't you think ?
I'm not playing by you're rules anymore, so stop being difficult and obtuse on this Protestant challenge and answer the questions.
And stop with these fallacy derailing questions of yours, that don't pertain to the questions, that I've asked on this post thread.
Later on and on a different OPP Religious post thread. We can get on a discussion on Mariology but not now karpenter, . . . So stay focused here Mentally . . .
"So stay historically religiously focused, and don't go Protestant ADHD on me . . . . I know this is hard for you to understand conceptually."
Are you mentally daft or are you a simpleton, karpenter, or can you "Not" read."
I told you in no uncertain terms that I am never going to play your Protestant games again.
karpenter, your sooooo, looney predictable.
Here is the problem karpenter, You have ( "Protestant Liberal Brain Derangement Syndrome" ) ? PLBDS Syndrome . . .
Very Similar to "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS)
You behave similarly to Liberal Socialist Democrats in America.
All they want to do is protest, and disrupt the normal political Status-Quo . . .
In you're case, your Protestant Liberal self-interpretation and anti-Catholic rhetoric and protestant diatribe.
karpenter, Are you playing the religious fool on the OPP Religious Forum ?
Do you even know what these fallacies mean, or do you need me to spell it out for you ?
There will be no more conjecture or bloviating, Protestant wind-bag comments and written sandbagging nonsense and BS compost . . . RHETORIC ! ! !
karpenter, . . . . Are you just a simpleton, ignorant religious Protestant ? or are obtuse ?
karpenter, You are a blowhard sandbagger to this article and on other Post articles.
You come on this OPP Religious thread post and do not read anything that was posted, or continue to post or even answer my nine question.
What is completely wrong with you, you have Protestant Liberal Brain Derangement Syndrome.
Duuuhhhhh can't you put two words together, where are your Protestant "Critical thinking skills" ?
Or is this one of your protestant childish game you're playing.
And then you to try and intimidate me and bully me into changing the subject to Mariology.
Duhhhh the subject is the ancient historical church. Do you get it now and not Catholic Mariology
Your pathetic.
You loose the argument.
I gave you three chances, you're a ignorant Protestant simpleton.
Maybe your Protestant counterparts Zemirah, Jack sequim wa, will fair better on the is Religious Christian subject.
You Loose . . . . . Two Protestant down, two to go . . .
This is so easy, stump the Protestant chumps . . . .
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-141628-1.html