The Census Citizenship Question (Page 5): And a guarantee that the information provided on the forms will not be used for any other purpose.

Mr. Rogers

And a guarantee that the information provided on the forms will not be used for any other purpose.

Owl32 Loc: ARK

maximus wrote:

I worked in a hotel turned section 8 housing that had a bit over 200 units. ALL of those people had a photo ID. It was no problem for them to get the ID. In fact, a visitor had to have a photo ID just to get into the building. So, what you say is just not true.

my question is if you are not a citizen do you have any rights to receive tax payer funds, for food, lodging, and health care. YOU cannot immigrate to Italy unless you can prove you have a source of income to support you and/or your family. I******s have no citizen rights and this does not make Americans evil or r****t.

Mr. Rogers

nwtk2007 wrote:

If it only asks for their name, no. If it wants more specific information, yes it could come back to bite them. The most specific it should be is to ask for zip code.

Census takers should be allotted diplomatic immunity to the answers they give to this specific question. There should be a guarantee that their response will not be used to incriminate them now or in the future and that their responses will not be used for any other purpose than getting an accurate count.

Mr. Rogers

The question still needs to be answered, whether through the census or other means. If it is not included in the census, it can be ascertained by other more costly and time consuming means.

Radiance3

JoyV wrote:

You wrote, "Adversely affected would be the b... (show quote)

================
Most important purpose of the Census taking is for policy making. Different kinds of programs are involved, I am aware of that. But I must insist that the "Citizenship Question" must be included. It has paramount need for the protection of e******n process and the redistricting. Omission of that is a gross violation of the Constitutional rights of the citizens. It is a mandate that must be enforced from the consent of the governed.

Abel

Reading through these comments has been interesting to say the least. IMHO the questioning of citizenship should be on the census; however, I'm not sure what difference it would make in these days of Progressive fraud, h**e and discontent? If an i*****l m*****t was asked the question "Are you a legal citizen of the USA?" just how many do you think would answer "No?" Even an illegal Elite like Obama would lie and say yes, just as he did in order to get elected.

Radiance3

Abel wrote:

Reading through these comments has been interesting to say the least. IMHO the questioning of citizenship should be on the census; however, I'm not sure what difference it would make in these days of Progressive fraud, h**e and discontent? If an i*****l m*****t was asked the question "Are you a legal citizen of the USA?" just how many do you think would answer "No?" Even an illegal Elite like Obama would lie and say yes, just as he did in order to get elected.

================
Obama's person was mysterious to begin with. No records of who he is except a f**e BC.

Few would probably lie. But they will be caught and punished.
But I think majority would be telling the t***h. There is no question whether they are illegal or not.

EconomistDon

PeterS wrote:

The only reason for the citizenship question is to force an undercount of minorities living in the United States. It is a question directed at race and why it was squashed by the Supreme Court. It would seem not all of the Conservatives on the court are as r****t as those in the remainder of the country...thank god!

It has nothing to do with race, F*****t Pete. It has everything to do with getting the proper representation in Congress and in our e*******l v****g process. The numbers of "citizens" in states and areas determine the number of Representatives that a state sends to Congress. And it determines the number of e*******l v**es that a state has in P**********l e******ns. Please remember that non-citizens are not eligible to v**e. They must become naturalized citizens to be allowed to v**e. With this basic premise, you can surmise why California officials are fighting the citizenship question. California has about 4 million non-citizens. So they currently have Congressional Representatives for those 4 million people and they have e*******l v**es for those 4 million people that they don't deserve. California has 53 seats in the House of Representatives, while 23 states have fewer than 4 million total residents and have from one to five seats in the House. So California has more Representative and e*******l v**es based on their non-citizen population than each of 23 states totals. Do you think that is fair, Pete?????? It isn't fair, it is unconstitutional.

I recognize your desire to support all Democrat causes, legal or not. So you must toe the Democrat line by condemning the census question. And you have no defense for your opposition, so you resort to the standard tactic of calling it R****T!!!!!!

elledee

thanks for pulling the mask off that fraud limp peters

Bcon

[quote=Mr. Rogers]Will undocumented individuals be penalized for admitting the t***h in the census? The purpose of the census is to get an accurate count of the number of people residing in America. Including the citizenship question in the survey will save time, money and the effort to acquire this information from other sources. Responses to this question should be limited to and only used for the purpose of data.[/quote

Non citizens should not be counted as part of the population as far as how much money is allocated or for v****g purposes. If a district has an abundance of i******s, they should not be getting money for these people. When money is tight, maybe,jut maybe, the districts themselves would help to get rid of the i******s. Only eligible people should be allowed to v**e.

Bcon

Abel wrote:

Reading through these comments has been interesting to say the least. IMHO the questioning of citizenship should be on the census; however, I'm not sure what difference it would make in these days of Progressive fraud, h**e and discontent? If an i*****l m*****t was asked the question "Are you a legal citizen of the USA?" just how many do you think would answer "No?" Even an illegal Elite like Obama would lie and say yes, just as he did in order to get elected.

The citizen question was on the census form for many years. I am unsure when it was removed, but I believe it was under Obama. If it was legal before, why not now?

Carol Kelly

DaWg44 wrote:

Government at every level needs accurate figures f... (show quote)

Been there, seen that.

Carol Kelly

EconomistDon wrote:

It has nothing to do with race, F*****t Pete. It ... (show quote)

By the way, the race question is on there. So it isn’t r****t to ask for citizenship.

Radiance3

Carol Kelly wrote:

By the way, the race question is on there. So it isn’t r****t to ask for citizenship.

==============
Race, race, race! I am tired of that. Since Obama came in "race" has been the predominant factor that brought him to the top.

Even Pelosi thinks that including citizenship question at the Census will make America white again. What a stupid brain!

herbie

Liberty Tree wrote:

Democrats are the real r****ts. They oppose the citizenship question just so they can use i******s and non citizens to increase their v****g block and representation in Congress. That is all they care about them.

WOW you are so far off with that statement, republicans are the r****ts. well actually both parties have r****ts in them, but the republicans are the real r****ts.