Government at every level needs accurate figures for budgeting, not just aid programs, schools, police, emergency services, water, electricity, everything the public expects from the city, county, state.
A prime example is the number of b****ts, v****g machines needed. The left complained loudly about v****g lines in 2018. Just how in the world are local governments supposed to plan for the event?
The people fighting against the question are hurting the very people they are trying to protect just so they can have them v**e. There is no other valid reason.
NPR gets a lot of things wrong. I quit listening to the classical music on it 30 years ago because of their biased reporting of events I saw for myself in Atlanta. What I saw in person was totally different than what they were broadcasting.
ACP45 wrote:
"NPR, quoting the Urban Institute, says the c... (
show quote)
The only reason for the citizenship question is to force an undercount of minorities living in the United States. It is a question directed at race and why it was squashed by the Supreme Court. It would seem not all of the Conservatives on the court are as r****t as those in the remainder of the country...thank god!
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
PeterS wrote:
The only reason for the citizenship question is to force an undercount of minorities living in the United States. It is a question directed at race and why it was squashed by the Supreme Court. It would seem not all of the Conservatives on the court are as r****t as those in the remainder of the country...thank god!
I worked in a hotel turned section 8 housing that had a bit over 200 units. ALL of those people had a photo ID. It was no problem for them to get the ID. In fact, a visitor had to have a photo ID just to get into the building. So, what you say is just not true.
ACP45 wrote:
"NPR, quoting the Urban Institute, says the c... (
show quote)
There are 22 million i******s in the US. That equals to a lot of US Representatives in the House.
badbob85037 wrote:
There are 22 million i******s in the US. That equals to a lot of US Representatives in the House.
Democrats are the real r****ts. They oppose the citizenship question just so they can use i******s and non citizens to increase their v****g block and representation in Congress. That is all they care about them.
Liberty Tree wrote:
Democrats are the real r****ts. They oppose the citizenship question just so they can use i******s and non citizens to increase their v****g block and representation in Congress. That is all they care about them.
That's exactly right. It pads the number of people recorded as living in a given state, and looking at California's non-citizen population alone, well...
PeterS wrote:
The only reason for the citizenship question is to force an undercount of minorities living in the United States. It is a question directed at race and why it was squashed by the Supreme Court. It would seem not all of the Conservatives on the court are as r****t as those in the remainder of the country...thank god!
The reason to exclude the Citizenship question is to take advantage of California's 2.8 million wetbacks to increase Democrap representation in the US House. The question was on the 1950, 1970,1980,1990 and 2000 census with no trouble at all. It was removed under Obama.
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
The reason to exclude the Citizenship question is to take advantage of California's 2.8 million wetbacks to increase Democrap representation in the US House. The question was on the 1950, 1970,1980,1990 and 2000 census with no trouble at all. It was removed under Obama.
you're going to confuse them~~
ACP45 wrote:
"NPR, quoting the Urban Institute, says the census threatens to put “more than 4 million people at risk of being undocumented.”
'Put them at risk'? How is that possible when they're already 'undocumented'? How can they 'risk' being something that they already are?
ACP45 wrote:
The headline warns the addition of the question could lead to “worst undercount of black, Latinx people in 30 years.”
I could hear the heads exploding as I read that. Why would there be an 'undercount' (wh**ever
that is)? Everybody gets counted, regardless of citizenship. And how does being black or 'Latinx' (?) have anything to do with citizenship?
Your slip is showing...
PeterS wrote:
The only reason for the citizenship question is to force an undercount of minorities living in the United States. It is a question directed at race and why it was squashed by the Supreme Court. It would seem not all of the Conservatives on the court are as r****t as those in the remainder of the country...thank god!
Peter - Whether a person is or is not a minority has no bearing on whether they are a US Citizen. So I don't understand your point in linking the two separate and distinct categories of people. Perhaps you misspoke, and meant to say that asking the citizenship question would lead some non-citizens who are here illegally from wanting to complete the census. However, the Supreme Court has already ruled unanimously that i*****l i*******ts and other non-citizens can be counted when states draw their legislative districts.
So the only two remaining issues are 1) whether a non-citizen is afraid that stating that they are a non-citizen will possible f**g them for possible deportation at a later date, or 2) be tied into a central data base that will compare their answer on citizenship to whether or not they v**e in a p**********l e******n. Do you agree?
You do realize that it is already illegal for a non-citizen to v**e in a p**********l e******n, correct? Is that what is really worrying you?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/4/supreme-court-i******s-count-apportionment/
ACP45 wrote:
"NPR, quoting the Urban Institute, says the c... (
show quote)
Interesting, so, the census taken in 2000 doesn't count? Or was the citizenship question being left off the short form Obama's fault as well? I found the 2000 U.S. census form on the census.gov website, it too doesn't include a citizenship question on the short form. Looks as though NPR didn't get it wrong, zerohedge did.
Source:
https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/2000_short_form.pdf
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.