One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Global temperature has increased 1.7 F° since 1880.
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
May 13, 2017 22:22:10   #
jeff smith
 
Chocura750 wrote:
I've read on the NASA web page that the temperature of the globe has increase 1.7 F° since 1880. How can anyone say that the world isn't getting warmer?.


it is getting warmer. but tere is nothing we can do about it. the earth is a living entity. it goes through changes just like you do. except it takes many years for her to go through her changes. if you were around back in the 70'sand 80's science said we should not eat crispy bacon, it would give you canser , the 70's then in the 80's they said that we were heading into another ice age. now they say global warming. swing of time. it will get even warmer before it starts to swing back. then it will eventually slide towards "normal" and then chilly and colder . but one thing for sure you , I nor anyone living today will see all of this happen. so sit back have a cold one and enjoy your day.

Reply
May 14, 2017 01:12:56   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Chocura750 wrote:
2016 was the warmest year on record and the Trump operatives are trying to remove independent scientists from committees advising the government. Absolutely criminal.


So you live in a closet? You seem to be blithely unaware of many many things.

Reply
May 14, 2017 16:05:01   #
Armagh
 
peter11937 wrote:
Well, son, perhaps we should examine the Sun's energy output. And the Sun's energy cycles. How other planets alter our distance from the Sun. After all, the Monte Python Galaxy Song notes that the Sun is the source of ALL our power. Note so called fossil fuels are simply stored Sun power!


Just had a thought: when the sun runs out of nuclear energy fuel, will mankind be responsible for that as well?

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2017 16:06:04   #
Armagh
 
Nickolai wrote:
https://youtu.be/GDY80PvWA20

Try the truth


How do YOU determine truth from falsehood, Nikki?

Reply
May 14, 2017 16:09:12   #
Armagh
 
Nickolai wrote:
Every body that doesn't think like you huh ?


The problem with the Leftist/Liberal/Unholy Democrats, Nikki, (and I thought you knew this), is not that they think differently, we're ok with that. It is that you are attempting to shove your fantasy universe down the throats of the rest of us, and you are doing it by using lies and falsehood.

You see, your fantasy world, your so-called reality, cannot exist unless everyone else is living it. Ask the Vietnamese, the North Koreans, and Russians who lived in the former Soviet Union.

Reply
May 14, 2017 16:09:57   #
Armagh
 
Nickolai wrote:
https://youtu.be/COdXq2IAxj4

The bad news


Give it up, Nikki. YOU have no way of telling good from bad, right from wrong. Give it up.

Reply
May 14, 2017 16:10:43   #
Armagh
 
Docadhoc wrote:
Another facet to your ignorance is atheism.

You are one sorry critter.


If I were God, I'd certainly want to ignore Nikki.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2017 16:11:06   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
Armagh wrote:
Just had a thought: when the sun runs out of nuclear energy fuel, will mankind be responsible for that as well?


Probably....if the illiberals are still squawking.

Reply
May 14, 2017 17:18:47   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Armagh wrote:
Just had a thought: when the sun runs out of nuclear energy fuel, will mankind be responsible for that as well?


By that time man will either be extinct or somewhere else possibly in the form of lure energy not confined to earth.

I believe the oldest fossil dating man is 2.3 million years. Our sun will go red, meaning an increase in radiant energy not conducive to life on earth, in about 5 billion years.

I'm not real worried about who is blamed.

By that time conservatives will have morphed into a higher life from and liberal progressives will be dusty forgotten museum artifacts. They are in the process of that change as we speak.

Reply
May 14, 2017 17:21:26   #
Armagh
 
Docadhoc wrote:
By that time man will either be extinct or somewhere else possibly in the form of lure energy not confined to earth.

I believe the oldest fossil dating man is 2.3 million years. Our sun will go red, meaning an increase in radiant energy not conducive to life on earth, in about 5 billion years.

I'm not real worried about who is blamed.

By that time conservatives will have morphed into a higher life from and liberal progressives will be dusty forgotten museum artifacts. They are in the process of that change as we speak.
By that time man will either be extinct or somewhe... (show quote)


My question raises as much a sensible problem as that of the global warming hoaxers. It was a "reductio ad absurdem" argument. Jeez, Doc.

Reply
May 14, 2017 17:22:21   #
Armagh
 
Docadhoc wrote:
By that time man will either be extinct or somewhere else possibly in the form of lure energy not confined to earth.

I believe the oldest fossil dating man is 2.3 million years. Our sun will go red, meaning an increase in radiant energy not conducive to life on earth, in about 5 billion years.

I'm not real worried about who is blamed.

By that time conservatives will have morphed into a higher life from and liberal progressives will be dusty forgotten museum artifacts. They are in the process of that change as we speak.
By that time man will either be extinct or somewhe... (show quote)


Conservatives, I believe, are already a higher life form. Higher than the alternative.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2017 20:06:48   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Armagh wrote:
My question raises as much a sensible problem as that of the global warming hoaxers. It was a "reductio ad absurdem" argument. Jeez, Doc.


I know. My comment was for the benefit of our.libprog CC zombies. I was hoping some would want to argue regarding our future appearance.

My bad. Obviously their up line hasn't programmed them in this area so they are struck mute.

Reply
May 15, 2017 12:52:08   #
LiberalLulu
 
Docadhoc wrote:
I know. My comment was for the benefit of our.libprog CC zombies. I was hoping some would want to argue regarding our future appearance.

My bad. Obviously their up line hasn't programmed them in this area so they are struck mute.


I heard through the grapevine that Dr. Hawking has stated the time for man to leave the planet is within the next one hundred years. He downgraded from one thousand years.

Is he part of the hoax?

Reply
May 15, 2017 17:19:34   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
LiberalLulu wrote:
I heard through the grapevine that Dr. Hawking has stated the time for man to leave the planet is within the next one hundred years. He downgraded from one thousand years.

Is he part of the hoax?


It is said there is a fine line between genius and insanity.

Genius in one area does not make one an authority in another.

I believe he is talking about man's propensity for inventing more and more destructive weapons of massive death potential and not related to man's damage to the planet. Or overpopulation of planet earth.

He suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ALS. Or known as Lou Gehrig's Disease. There are multiple forms but it is rare that anyone suffering this disease live as long as he has.

I think his genius at times is directed by his opinions and feelings rather than his intellect. His prediction of man's remaining life expectancy of 100 years is at best just his opinion.

I don't see him so much as being.part of the fake commentary we are being bombarded with as much as him being concerned with the antagonistic posturing by several world factions and leaders.

There was a time when comments that could be considered threatening would be confined to the room in which they were spoken. Today if someone coughs a threat on the.other side of the world, we hear about it from multiple sources. It isn't surprising that many people allow the aggregate of these comments to be frightening.

Hawking may be one of those or he may honestly fear man's self destruction via weaponry or over population.

Either way, if that day arrives, man may cease but planet earth will go on.

Reply
May 15, 2017 17:22:47   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Armagh wrote:
How do YOU determine truth from falsehood, Nikki?


Lol. I don't know about him but I figure that the opposite of what he says must be the truth.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.