The Most Active Discussions Today
Do You Believe What the Gadsden Police Say About Roy Moore?
"'It was a known fact: Roy Moore liked young girls,' said Faye Gary, a retired Gadsden police officer. 'It was treated like a joke. That's just the way it was.'"
Civilization worst People
Let’s have a vote the worse people that civilization has to Offer.
1) The Vikings
2) Hitler and Nazi Germany
4) Trump supporters
5) Moore voters
Easy Way To Solve The Kneeling Controversy
My solution would take two years.
1. All pro teams must be on the field/rink/court etc. for the playing of the Anthem or God Bless America.
A letter to each of the professional league home offices would explain that failure to do so should
constitute game forfeiture. The letter would further advise that it wouldn't matter what individual
players or coaches did during the salute to the flag. The protests could continue.
2. That rule in place, it would be a no brainier for the IRS to draw up a list of members of the various sports
teams that should be targeted for an in depth tax audit. The reasoning behind the audit would be that if
no respect is shown for our National Symbol the same disrespect probably would be shown for a tax return.
Like cheating your ass off.
All the snowflakes reading this can now gasp or sigh or cry.
Hey, the IRS routinely goes after suspected mobsters just based on a similar logic.
I'm not saying that protesting athletes and coaches have to love the United States....just display a little respect or they just
might get audited.
This Outrages Me!!
Not one ...and I mean not one of our Veterans should ever be treated like this. These are our Patriots and our Warriors. These men and women gave up things that we couldn't even imagine. This makes my heart sick!!!
I'd like to give this lady in the video some "nuckles"!
Sorry...I couldn't get the vid to post.....
Incredible video has been released that shows Atlanta nurses laughing at a World War II veteran as he struggles to breathe and finally dies.
The video of one of the nurse’s deposition, along with changing her story after she was shown hidden camera video of what actually took place in the veteran’s room is shown courtesy of 11Alive.com.
The incident occurred at the Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation in 2014.
In the video deposition, former nursing supervisor Wanda Nuckles tells Mike Prieto, the attorney for the family of 89-year-old James Dempsey, who was a decorated World War II veteran from Woodstock, Georgia, how she rushed in to Dempsey’s room when she was alerted that he had stopped breathing.
Prieto: “From the time you came in, you took over doing chest compressions…correct?”
Nuckles : “Yes.”
Prieto: “Until the time paramedics arrive, you were giving CPR continuously?”
Nuckles : “Yes.”
However, the undercover video shows no one doing CPR and that Nuckles did not immediately start performing CPR on Mr. Dempsey.
“Sir, that was an honest mistake,” said Nuckles in the deposition. “I was just basing everything on what I normally do.”
The nursing home that Dempsey was living in attempted to stop 11Alive from obtaining the video footage.
89-year-old James Dempsey was a decorated World War II veteran from Woodstock, Georgia. He deserved better far greater care than he got.
They asked a DeKalb County judge to keep the video sealed and then attempted to appeal to the Georgia State Supreme Court. The judge ruled in favor of 11Alive and the nursing home eventually dropped its appeal to the state’s highest court.
The video includes almost six hours of video court deposition from a nursing supervisor explaining how she responded to the patient before she knew the hidden camera video existed. The video shows a completely different response.
The video shows the veteran calling for help six times before he goes unconscious while gasping for air. State records show nursing home staff found Dempsey unresponsive at 5:28 am. It took almost an hour for the staff to call 911 at 6:25a.m.
When a different nurse does respond, she fails to check any of his vital signs. Nuckles says she would have reprimanded the nurse for the way she responded to Dempsey. She called the video “sick.”
When nurses had difficulty getting Dempsey’s oxygen machine operational during, you can hear Nuckles and others laughing.
Seriously, this is a despicable way to treat a veteran, or any other human being for that matter.
Perhaps, in all of our modern technology, industrial society, and the growth of government and the strain on the family to make ends meet, we’ve lost sight of what is most important, taking care of one another.
My own grandfather and one of my grandmothers had to be put into a nursing home after they required 24-hour supervision. While my grandmother was looked after, my grandfather was often neglected, sustaining many injuries while in their “care.”
Frankly, I think he would have been better off at home with his children looking after him than at that place.
James Dempsey deserved far better treatment than he was given at the Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation.
I Have A Serious Question?
CHARLES MANSON IS DEAD AT AGE 83
May he rest in hell for all eternity...AMEN!!
It's time to give thanks to trump for he's done to make America great
part from being racist, sexist and a bully and a thug, here is how:
Withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The trade deal would have established a trade partnership between the United States and countries on the Pacific Rim. HURTS ECONOMIC GROWTH, KILLS JOBS.
Revoked a rule that expanded the number of people who could earn overtime pay. HELPS BIG BUSINESS, HURTS WORKERS.
Reversal of a rule that would mandate that oil and gas companies report payments to foreign governments. The Securities and Exchange Commission will no longer receive this information. HELPS BIG OIL.
Ended limits on the ability of states to drug test those seeking unemployment benefits. OPIOD CRISIS BE DAMNED.
Revoked an executive order that mandated compliance by contractors with laws protecting women in the workplace. Prior to the 2014 order, a report found that companies with federal contracts worth millions of dollars had scores of violations of labor and civil rights laws. HELPS BIG BUSINESS, HURTS WORKERS.
Repeal of a rule allowing states to create retirement savings plans for private-sector workers. HURTS WORKERS.
Cancelled a rule mandating that financial advisers act in the best interests of their clients. HURTS SMALL INVESTORS.
Repeal of a bill that mandated that employers maintain records of workplace injuries. HURTS WORKERS, HELPS BIG BUSINESS.
Killed a rule mandating that government contractors disclose past violations of labor law. HURTS WORKERS, HELPS BIG BUSINESS.
The justice system
Rescinded an Obama effort to reduce mandatory sentences. Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered that prosecutors seek the most stringent penalties possible in criminal cases. OUR JAILS ARE OVERCROWDED. ADDS TO GOVERNMENT DEFICIT.
Cancelled a phase-out of the use of private prisons.
Reversed a ban on civil forfeiture. Law enforcement officials are now once again able to seize assets from suspects who haven’t been convicted of any crime. HURTS PRIVATE CITIZNES.
Reversed the government’s position on a voter ID law in Texas. Under the Obama administration, the Justice Department argued that the law had discriminatory intent. Under Sessions, Justice withdrew that complaint. On Wednesday, a federal court threw out the law. HELPS REPUBLICANS BY DENYING THE VOTE TO MINORITIES.
Reviewed Justice Department efforts to address problematic police departments. An effort to address concerns in the Baltimore Police Department was delayed. HURTS CITIZENS.
On Friday, Politico reported that some representatives of oil and gas companies are worried that Trump’s moving too quickly to reverse regulations on their industry. “[Y]ou don’t need to roll things back so far that it opens an opportunity for outsiders to criticize, or something bad happens,” one analyst said.
Withdrew from the Paris climate agreement. HURTS OUR CHILDREN AND THEIR CHILDREN. USA AND SYRIA IN AGREEMENT AGAINST REST OF WORLD.
Blocked the Clean Power Plan. The plan implemented under Obama focused on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. HURTS OUR PLANET.
Ended a study on the health effects of mountaintop-removal mining. The process involves blasting away the tops of hills and mountains to get at coal seams under the surface. HURTS OUR WORKERS' SAFETY.
Rescinded a rule mandating that rising sea levels be considered when building public infrastructure in flood-prone areas. HURTS OUR PLANET.
Reversed an Obama ban on drilling for oil in the Arctic. HURTS OUR PLANET.
Reviewed the status of national monuments for possible reversal. In April, Trump signed an executive order ordering a review of monuments added in the past 20 years, opening up the possibility that some areas previously set aside would have that status revoked.
Withdrew a rule regulating fracking on public land.
Rejected a proposed ban on the pesticide chlorpyrifos. The month after this decision, a group of farmworkers were sickened by exposure to the chemical. HELPS BIG BUSINESS, HURTS FARMERS.
Reversed a ban on plastic bottles at national parks. HURTS OUR PLANET.
Repealed a ban on lead bullets. The bullets were banned under Obama because the lead can poison wildlife. HURTS OUR PLANET.
Rescinded a limit on the number of sea animals that can be trapped or killed in fishing nets. CRUELTY TO ANIMALS.
Delayed and potentially rolled back automotive fuel efficiency standards. HELPS BIG AUTO, HURTS OUR PLANET.
Repealed the Waters of the United States rule. This rule expanded the definition of water bodies that were protected by the Environmental Protection Agency. HURTS OUR PLANET.
I have to ask myself if it's a waste of my time.
Last week I posted a list of Bubba's Clinton's sexual escapades and the people? running this site deleted it for some odd reason. Seems truth is not on their platform.
What happened to all the concern about the National debt?
About all I hear is tax cuts.
The shutting down of liberal higher education as we have known it.
The sheer public spectacle of near-riots has forced some college administrators to take a stand for free expression and provide massive police protection when controversial speakers like Ben Shapiro come to campus. But when Mr. Shapiro leaves, the conditions that necessitated those extraordinary measures are still there. Administrators will keep having to choose between censoring moderate-to-conservative speakers, exposing their students to the threat of violence, and spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on every speaker. It's an expensive treatment that provides only momentary relief from a symptom.
What then is the disease? We are now close to the end of a half-century process by which the campuses have been emptied of centrist and right-of-center voices. Many scholars have studied the political allegiances of the faculty during this time. There have been some differences of opinion about methodology, but the main outline is not in doubt. In 1969 the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education found that there were overall about twice as many left-of-center as right-of-center faculty. Various studies document the rise of that ratio to 5 to 1 at the century's end, and to 8 to 1 a decade later, until in 2016 Mitchell Langbert, Dan Klein, and Tony Quain find it in the region of 10 to 1 and still rising.
Even these figures understate the matter. The overall campus figures include professional schools and science, technology, business and mathematics departments. In most humanities and social-science departments especially those central to a liberal education, such as history, English and political science the share of left-of-center faculty already approaches 100%.
The imbalance is not only a question of numbers. Well-balanced opposing views act as a corrective for each other: The weaker arguments of one side are pounced on and picked off by the other. Both remain consequently healthier and more intellectually viable. But intellectual dominance promotes stupidity. As one side becomes numerically stronger, its discipline weakens. The greater the imbalance between the two sides, the more incoherent and irrational the majority will become.
What we are now seeing on the campuses illustrates this general principle perfectly. The nearly complete exclusion of one side has led to complete irrationality on the other. With almost no intellectual opponents remaining, campus radicals have lost the ability to engage with arguments and resort instead to the lazy alternative of name-calling: Opponents are all fascists, racists or white supremacists.
In a state of balance between the two sides, leadership flows naturally to those better able to make the case for their side against the other. That takes knowledge and skill. But when one side has the field to itself, leadership flows instead to those who make the most uncompromising and therefore intellectually least defensible case, one that rouses followers to enthusiasm but can't stand up to scrutiny. Extremism and demagoguery win out. Physical violence is the endpoint of this intellectual decay the stage at which academic thought and indeed higher education have ceased to exist.
That is the condition that remains after Mr. Shapiro and the legions of police have left campus: More than half of the spectrum of political and social ideas has been banished from the classrooms, and what remains has degenerated as a result. The treatment of visiting speakers calls attention to that condition but is not itself the problem. No matter how much money is spent on security, no matter how many statements supporting free speech are released, the underlying disease continues to metastasize.
During the long period in which the campus radical left was cleansing the campuses of opposition, it insisted that wasn't what it was doing. Those denials have suddenly been reversed. The exclusion of any last trace of contrary opinion is not only acknowledged but affirmed. Students and faculty even demand safe spaces where there is no danger that they will be exposed to any contrary beliefs.
It is important to understand why the radical left cleared the campuses of opposing voices. It was not to advance higher education, for that must involve learning to evaluate competing ideas, to analyze the pros and cons of rival arguments and concepts. Shutting down all but one viewpoint is done to achieve the opposite: to pre-empt analysis and understanding. Only in the absence of competing ideas can the radical sect that now controls so much of the campuses hope to thrive and increase its numbers, because it can't survive open debate and analysis, and its adherents know it.
Given that treating only symptoms is ultimately pointless, is there any cure for the disease? The radical left won't voluntarily give up the stranglehold on higher education that it has worked unrelentingly to gain. But that can't be the end of the matter: The public pays huge sums, both through tuition and taxation, to educate young people, and except in STEM subjects most of that money is being wasted. Those who pay the bills have the power to stop this abuse of higher education if they organize themselves effectively.
Colleges need to be accredited; state universities answer to governing boards. Accrediting agencies and governing boards are created through a political process. What if voters were to insist that those agencies demand answers to some elementary questions? For example: How can a department of political science that excludes half the spectrum of viable political ideas be competent to offer degrees in the field? How can a history curriculum be taught competently when only one extremist attitude to social and political questions is present in a department? How can a campus humanities faculty with the same limitation teach competently? How can these extraordinary deficiencies deserve either accreditation, or support by state and federal funds?
The campus radical monopoly on political ideas amounts to the shutting down of liberal higher education as we have known it. That, not the increasingly frequent violent flare-ups, is the real crisis.
For more, check out Active Topics
This is where we talk about politics, economics, and life in general.
Subscribed users: 18729
This is an invite-only section, meaning you need to be granted explicit access to post here. If you would like to participate then contact Admin. This section is for political discussions, just like Main, but we won't tolerate insults or profanity.
Subscribed users: 18870
New to the forum? Jump in, say hello, and introduce yourself here.
Subscribed users: 18693
General Chit-Chat (non-political talk)
A place to talk about anything else (discussions not related to politics or the economy).
Subscribed users: 18732
List of all sections on the forum.
Total number of users: 18930
Total number of posts: 2199491
Posts in the last 7 days: 9752
Posts in the last 24 hours: 1363
Top 5 users in the last 24 hours: Bad Bob
(39) archie bunker
(birthday users who are currently online are marked bold, feel free to click on their user name and send them a pm to wish them a happy birthday)