One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Search | Login | Register | Help
The Most Active Discussions Today
Let's get this straight about Hillary Clinton and her email problem
As much as the Clinton campaign, and Hillary herself, as denied any wrongdoing in this situation, it is a big deal.
There has been no other presidential candidate that has shown a propensity for corruption.
There is a reason why she set up her own server. And, it is apparent. She wanted total control over communications.
As the slow drip comes forth, the very least that could happen would be a denial of any security clearance........And, can you have a president who can't be vetted for a total security clearance?

At the worst, she knowingly set up a system, ordered others to sustain the system, and knew it was against the laws regarding sensitive communications.

Those that choose to say, "It doesn't matter, Powell did it, Condoleeza Rice did it", completely avoid the obvious. No....previous Sec. States didn't do what Hillary did. But, the Dems go there to minimize and compare...

There is no comparison.

For those on the left, they will say, "It's a Republican witch hunt...Nothing to see here.....Waste of money.." ..Waste of money? Funny!..Coming from the Dems..
The truth is, any investigations done under this administration have been protected FROM facts and evidence. Stonewalling, obfuscation and criminal behavior have been the norm to protect the administration. Any logical person could see this.

Did Hillary delete some 30,000 emails because they were a 20% off coupon from Kohls, or BevMo? Or Bill's? Bill said he only has sent a couple emails.....Yoga classes? Chelsea's wedding?

No, my friends, put the pieces together....Clinton, Sec.State, donations to the Clinton foundation, huge speaking fees......Do you need to be a rocket scientist to see the big picture?

It was designed and maintained because she knew that having the power as Sec. State and a complicit administration was a ripe environment for corruption. Who has your back? The President.

They are thick as thieves.

Yes, the real lynchpin is the Clinton foundation as the essence of the corruption and the wealth of the Clinton's. If you don't see this, then you are blind.

But, I would like to think the American people are smart enough to see all this and put the pieces together. The fact that it is even coming out, as slow as it is, is a indicator that the corruption is more massive than we think. I mean, the mainstream media is loath to show this, yet, quick to jump on any GOP discretions......

It is clear that the American people look at the violence at Trump rallies and see that it isn't Trump...Yet, the pundits try to imply Trump as causing this. Real people know it is the leftist democrats funded by George Soros and his many surrogate organizations that want to riot to blame Trump...Yes..They are afraid of him.

But, the real thing America should be afraid of is the dispatching of the rule of law. And Hillary deserves being judged by this rule of law.
Lesser crimes have been adjudicated and convictions have resulted.

make no mistake, I do not think this current quest for the presidency has been pretty or what we expect......But here is what I do know....A Trump presidency will be the most scrutinized presidency we have ever seen, by both the left and the right....Trump knows this.......A Hillary presidency?......same old lies and coverups, because, that is her. That is the Democrats.

Just let me ask one question...Why are you so scared of a Trump presidency when you have seen the decline of America under an Obama presidency, who was supposed to bring "Hope and Change"? I do think he did this, we hope things change form his "leadership".

Hillary is a felon. She is tied to the worst. And you think she should be president?
...continue reading this topic >>
Trump Is Worse Than Obama!

The Donald is destroying America and he hasn't been elected POTUS yet. If you think Obama was terrible Trump will make him look like Mr. Rogers! Be careful of what you pray for. You might get it!

...continue reading this topic >>
Obama Must Be Censured For Hiroshima Speech...
BREAKING NEWS! Congress Must Censure President Obama Over Hiroshima Speech

Tea Party - May 27, 2016

(Breitbart) – President Barack Obama told the world on Friday in Hiroshima that the American decision to drop nuclear bombs on Japan in 1945 arose from humanity’s worst instincts, including “nationalist fervor or religious zeal.”

The war that ended in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he said, “grew out of the same base instinct for domination or conquest that had caused conflicts among the simplest tribes, an old pattern amplified by new capabilities and without new constraints.”

The speech — delivered on the eve of Memorial Day weekend — was billed by the White House as anything but an apology, but Obama’s words betrayed his true sentiments.

Obama, a native of Honolulu who grew up near Pearl Harbor, said nothing about the fact that Japan started the war; nothing about the fact that the Japanese were responsible for the slaughter of millions of civilians throughout Asia and the Pacific; nothing about the fact that the Japanese refused to surrender after hundreds of thousands had already been killed in conventional bombing.

Obama implied that Americans had not yet considered the human cost of the atomic bomb: we had to “force ourselves to imagine the moment the bomb fell” and “force ourselves to feel the dread of children confused by what they see,” he said.

He described the moral dilemmas of nuclear warfare as if no president, and no American, had considered them before. But he left out the moral case for ending the war, and the hundreds of thousands of deaths avoided because of Hiroshima.

The contrast to President Harry S. Truman could not have been clearer.

Reflecting on the decision to bomb Japan years later, Truman declared: “That bomb caused the Japanese to surrender, and it stopped the war. I don’t care what the crybabies say now, because they didn’t have to make the decision.”

As he has done before, Obama cast a moral equivalence between different civilizations, implying that Americans were just as bad as the Imperial Japanese, or anyone else.

But he went further, casting doubt on the American effort in World War II itself: “Nations arise telling a story that binds people together in sacrifice and cooperation, allowing for remarkable feats. But those same stories have so often been used to oppress and dehumanize those who are different.”

There is really only one response to Obama’s gesture, and it goes beyond media disputation and moral condemnation.

It must be made clear that at Hiroshima, Obama represented no one but himself — not the Greatest Generation who fought the war, and not the generations of Americans who have grown up enjoying the freedom that victory over Japan secured.

The U.S. Congress declared war on Japan the day after Pearl Harbor. Millions of Americans fought to save the country, and civilization. Hundreds of thousands died, often in brutal hand-to-hand combat against a fanatically determined Japanese enemy.

It is the inescapable duty of the Congress of the United States today to censure President Barack Obama for casting doubt on the sacrifices and motivations of the Americans who fought the Second World War — on the eve of Memorial Day, no less.
...continue reading this topic >>
Obama has destroyed the US Navy and Captains are concerned
Naval Captains meeting in the Pentagon agree that the Navy of the US has been seriously depleted and will have trouble fighting anyway but defensively on our coast. I bet it is very embarrassing to have been part of the strongest navy in the world and now seeing themselves having to take parts from one fighting machine to another to keep one of them going. I believe that Obama and his friends have almost reached the plateau they wanted to get to.
...continue reading this topic >>
Why are we racists?
Michael Richards,better known as "kramer"on TV's "Steinfeld" makes his point.
This was his speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act.

He makes some interesting points

Someone finally said it.How many are actually paying attention to this?

"There are African Americans,Mexican Americans,Asian Americans,Arab Americans etc
and then there are just Americans.
You pass me on the street ,you sneer in my direction and call me "whitey","cracker","cave man","honkey"
and that's ok.But if I call you "nigger","kike","towel head","sand nigger","camel jockey","beaner,"gook" or "chink"
you call me RACIST
You say whites commit a lot of violence against you.then why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?
You have the United Negro. College Fund .You have Martin Luther King day.You have Black History month.You have Cesar Chavez day.
You have Yom HasHoah.You have Ma-uled Al -Nabi.You have the NAACP.You have (BET)Black entertainment television.
If we had (WET),we would be RACISTS
If we had a white pride day,we would be RACISTS
If we had White History month,we would be RACISTS
If we had any organization ,for only whites to "advance our lives",we'd be RACISTS

there is a Black Chamber of Commerce.There is an HIspanic Chamber of Commerce,and then just the Chamber of Commerce

A white woman can't be in the Miss Black American pageant ,but any color can be in the Miss America pageant
If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships,you know we'd be RACISTS
There are over 60 openly proclaimed black colleges in the USA.Yet if there were a white only college,that would be a RACIST college

In the Million Man March,you believed that you were marching for your race and rights
If we marched for our race and rights,you would call us RACISTS
You are proud to be black,brown,yellow or orange and you're not afraid to announce it.
But when we announce our pride,you call us Racists

You rob us ,carjack us and shoot at us.
But when a white police officer shoots a black gang member,or beats up a black drug dealer,running from the law and posing a threat to society
you call him a RACIST

Maybe these are some of the reasons we have lost most of OUR RIGHTS in this nation.
We don't stand up for ourselves
Be proud to be white????
It's not a crime yet,but it's getting very close
...continue reading this topic >>
The Bigot's Hero
Trump’s Record of Hate to Date
...continue reading this topic >>
When will society say, enough?
I read in my local paper that a call went out to the police at around 1:30 am on Thursday that an unwanted person was on the property. When the police arrived the culprit was gone but soon spotted. The police gave chase but(surprise) the suspect wouldn't stop. Deputies deployed stop sticks but he kept on going. Finally stopping, he ditched the car and took off running. However, he was caught and now faces a variety of charges.

A few days ago the call went out for a white woman and child that were missing. She was found dead. Killed by her husband.

This evening I watched as the news showed a motorcycle riding police officer attempting to stop a driver who, also, wouldn't stop. The officer climbed up on the hood of the car to get the driver to stop. (not a smart move) When the driver wouldn't stop, the officer pulled his gun and shot through the windshield. The officer was thrown from the hood of the car, but was unhurt, the suspect later apprehended.

What do all these incidents have in common? They were all committed by niggers. It's unfortunate that this attractive white woman was foolish enough to get hooked up with this guy; I have trouble finding sympathy for these women who are foolish and get involved with these morons.

One could go on listing the trouble these ignorant baboons cause. And, why wouldn't the police shoot first and question later, when confronting these savages. Unfortunately, we've seen, due to federal intervention, good police departments lose their Chiefs of Police and other good officers because they see these black idiots for what they are, the trouble they cause, and act accordingly.

My word of advice to any and all police departments: Suggest, the fed's find something else to do when they come snooping around. Common sense indicates: When dealing with an animal predator that's dangerous, it's, usually, eliminated. Society should apply that logic to niggers.

Yeah! I know I'm not being politically correct when using some of the terms expressed here. And you know what? I'm presently considering what could be the consequences for speaking my mind in this manner. The fact that I'm concerned is an indication that America and the ideals of free speech and other amendments protecting us, all, aren't what they used to be.
...continue reading this topic >>
Trump's tax returns
Do you think Trump should follow the tradition that candidates for president release their tax returns?

Do you think Donald Trump should make his tax returns public? Trump says he will release them but only after the election and his tax returns are no one’s business and there is no law that requires him to make his tax returns public and his returns wouldn’t reveal anything new.

However, many are asking him to make his tax returns public because it is a tradition that previous presidential candidates have followed and that the voters have a right to know his tax deductions, overseas tax shelters, and his other business dealings.

Do you think your decision is influenced by your decision to vote for him or not or by your political party influence your decision?
...continue reading this topic >>
The end of the American Era- Donald "pea-brain" Trump. A fraud,liar, and cheater!
By Adam Gopnik , May 20, 2016
Columnists and magazines that a month ago were saying #NeverTrump are now vibrating with the frisson of his audacity.
Columnists and magazines that a month ago were saying #NeverTrump are now vibrating with the frisson of his audacity.
œVice is a monster of so frightful mien, / As, to be hated, needs but to be seen,the poet Alexander Pope wrote, in lines that were once, as they said back in the day, imprinted on the mind of every schoolboy. Pope continued, Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face, / we first endure, then pity, then embrace.The three-part process by which the gross becomes the taken for granted has been on matchlessly grim view this past week in the ascent of Donald Trump. First merely endured by those in the Republican Party, with pained grimaces and faint bleats of reluctance, bare toleration passed quickly over into blind, partisan allegiance he going to be the nominee, after all, and so is our boy. Then a weird kind of pity arose, directed not so much at him (he supplies his own self-pity) as at his supporters, on the premise that their existence somehow makes him a champion for the dispossessed, although the evidence indicates that his followers are mostly stirred by familiar racial and cultural resentments, of which Trump has been a single-minded spokesperson.

Now for the embrace. One by one, people who had not merely resisted him before but called him by his proper name who, until a month ago, were determined to oppose a man they rightly described as a con artist and a pathological liar are suddenly getting on board. Columnists and magazines that a month ago were saying #NeverTrump are now vibrating with the frisson of his audacity, fawning over him or at least thrilling to his rising poll numbers and telling one another, We can control him.

No, you can. One can argue about whether to call him a fascist or an authoritarian populist or a grotesque joke made in a nightmare shared between Philip K. Dick and Tom Wolfe, but under any label Trump is a declared enemy of the liberal constitutional order of the United States the order that has made it, in fact, the great and plural country that it already is. He announces his enmity to America by word and action every day. It is articulated in his insistence on the rightness of torture and the acceptable murder of noncombatants. It is self-evident in the threats he makes daily to destroy his political enemies, made only worse by the frivolity and transience of the tone of those threats. He makes his enmity to American values clear when he suggests that the Presidency holds absolute power, through which he will be able to end opposition whether by questioning the ownership of newspapers or talking about changing libel laws or threatening to take away F.C.C. licenses. To say Well, he would not really have the power to accomplish that is to misunderstand the nature of thin-skinned authoritarians in power. They do not arrive in office and discover, as constitutionalists do, that their capabilities are more limited than they imagined. They arrive, and then make their power as large as they can.

And Trump announces his enmity in the choice of his companions. The Murdoch media conglomerate has been ordered to acquiesce; it is no surprise that it has. But Trumps other fellow-travellers include Roger Stone, the Republican political operative and dirty-tricks maven, while his venues have included the broadcasts of Alex Jones, a ranting conspiracy theorist who believes in a Globalist plot wherein an alien force not of this world is attacking humanity not to mention Jones marketing of the theory that Michelle Obama is a transvestite who murdered Joan Rivers. These are not harmless oddballs Trump is flirting with. This is not the lunatic fringe. These are the lunatics.

Ted Cruz called Trump a pathological liar, the kind who does not know the difference between lies and truth. Whatever the clinical diagnosis, we do appear to be getting, in place of the once famous Big Lie of the nineteen-thirties, a sordid blizzard of lies. The Big Lie was fit for a time of processionals and nighttime rallies, and films that featured them. The blizzard of lies is made for Twitter and the quick hit of an impulse culture. TrumpÃlies arrive with such rapidity that before one can be refuted a new one comes to take its place. It wasn't his voice on that tape of pitiful self-promotion. O.K., it was but he never mocked the handicapped reporter, he was merely imitating an obsequious one. The media eventually moves on, shrugging helplessly, to the next lie. Then the next lie, and the next. If the lies are bizarre enough and frequent enough, they provoke little more than a nervous giggle and a cry of Well, guess hes changed the rules!

Hes not Hitler, as his wife recently said? Well, of course he isn't. But then Hitler wasn'tHitler until he was. At each step of the way, the shock was tempered by acceptance. It depended on conservatives pretending he wasn't so bad, compared with the Communists, while at the same time the militant left decided that their real enemies were the moderate leftists, who were really indistinguishable from the Nazis. The radical progressives decided that there was no difference between the democratic left and the totalitarian right and that an explosion of institutions was exactly the most thrilling thing imaginable.

The American Republic stands threatened by the first overtly anti-democratic leader of a large party in its modern history an authoritarian with no grasp of history, no impulse control, and no apparent barriers on his will to power. The right thing to do, for everyone who believes in liberal democracy, is to gather around and work to defeat him on Election Day. Instead, we seem to be either engaged in parochial feuding or caught by habits of tribal hatred so ingrained that they have become impossible to escape even at moments of maximum danger. Bernie Sanders wouldn't mind bringing down the Democratic Party to prevent it from surrendering to corporate forces and yet he may be increasing the possibility of rule-by-billionaire.

There is a difference between major and minor issues, and between primary and secondary values. Many of us think that it would be terrible if the radical-revisionist reading of the Second Amendment created by the Heller decision eight years ago was kept in place in a constitutional court; many on the other side think it would be terrible if that other radical decision, Roe v. Wade, continued to be found to be compatible with the constitutional order. What we all should agree on is that the one thing worse would be to have no constitutional order left to argue about.

If Trump came to power, there is a decent chance that the American experiment would be over. This is not a hyperbolic prediction; it is not a hysterical prediction; it is simply a candid reading of what history tells us happens in countries with leaders like Trump. Countries don't really recover from being taken over by unstable authoritarian nationalists of any political bent, left or right not by Peron or Castros or Putins or Francos or Lenins or fill in the blanks. The nation may survive, but the wound to hope and order will never fully heal. Ask Argentinians or Chileans or Venezuelans or Russians or Italians or Germans. The national psyche never gets over learning that its institutions are that fragile and their ability to resist a dictator that weak. If he can rout the Republican Party in a week by having effectively secured the nomination, ask yourself what Trump could do with the American government if he had a mandate. Before those famous schoolroom lines, Pope made another observation, which was that even as you recognize that the world is a mixed-up place, you still can't fool yourself about the difference between the acceptable and the unacceptable: Fools! who from hence into the notion fall / That vice or virtue there is none at all,he wrote. Is there no black or white? / Ask your own heart, and nothing is so plain; / Tis to mistake them, costs the time and pain.The pain of not seeing that black is black soon enough will be ours, and the time to recognize this is now.
Since the shoe fits- he must be wearing it

Which one will be the new trumpity?

The only thing trumpity is after is trumpity

...continue reading this topic >>
Al Franken admits to being warned to avoid the Twin Towers on 9/11.
Jewish Senator Al Franken says he was warned by Jewish ex-NYC mayor Ed Koch not to go to his office in the World Trade Center on 9/11.

...continue reading this topic >>
For more, check out Active Topics page.
Forum Sections
This is where we talk about politics, economics, and life in general.
Topics: 62265
Posts: 1344805
Subscribed users: 14644
Introduce Yourself
New to the forum? Jump in, say hello, and introduce yourself here.
Topics: 789
Posts: 16840
Subscribed users: 14622
General Chit-Chat (non-political talk)
A place to talk about anything else (discussions not related to politics or the economy).
Topics: 6649
Posts: 163632
Subscribed users: 14653
All Sections
List of all sections on the forum.
Forum Statistics
Total number of users: 14784
Total number of posts: 1534142
Posts in the last 7 days: 8455
Posts in the last 24 hours: 1304
Top 5 users in the last 24 hours: Docadhoc(66)   A Democrat In 2016(64)   Hemiman(39)   bilordinary(37)   payne1000(34)  
Users currently on the forum (15): A Democrat In 2016   Alicia   BigJim   bilordinary   buffalo   Cool Breeze   EconomistDon   jelun   JW   Nickolai   nwtk2007   PeterS   samtheyank   Steve700   whole2th  
(guest visitors aren't counted)
Today's Birthdays: bayman   DONC1935   flood47738   Kamaraaq6  
(users who are currently online are marked bold)
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use - Forum
Copyright 2012-2016 IDF International Technologies, Inc.