One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rational1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14 next>>
Jul 4, 2018 20:27:55   #
Far too early, 27 months before the 2008 E******n Nobody would have mentioned Obama..same was true in 1992 with Clinton.
eagleye13 wrote:
Hilarious: Dems Poll on Whom They Want To Run in 2020, Here Comes Another Term for Trump
https://www.teaparty.org/category/politics/

(Conservative Tribune) – You may as well start planning the victory party for the Republican Party in 2020 now. Whether Donald Trump wants another term or it’s Nikki Haley or Mike Pence — or heck, even Joe the Plumber — just order the balloons and the big, paper-mache elephant, because it’s hilariously close to in the books already.

How do I know? Am I clairvoyant? Just a betting genius? Well, close. All I had to do was look at the candidates the Democrat Party wants to run in 2020.

A new poll from Harvard CAPS/Harris is out, according to The Hill, and it’s yet more proof that those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it on CNN for yet another e******n cycle. The top four v**e-getters — encompassing the first choice of 76 percent of those polled — are wholly unelectable. Five through 10 aren’t much better.

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Let’s review and have a laugh together, shall we?

First place: Joe Biden, 32 percent.

Biden might appear to be the most electable of the bunch. After all, he’s a throwback to the halcyon days when people thought giving Barack Obama a Nobel Peace Prize wasn’t that insane. The problem is that Biden wasn’t picked as Barack’s running mate for his clarity of thought or his unimpeachable ideals. He was a clarion signal from candidate Obama to Wall Street that they were safe if he were to be elected — by way of picking a politician so thoroughly lousy with banking money that he was derisively called “the senator from MBNA.”

Oh, and the one thing that the Democrats want to make the most hay out of in 2020 — President Trump’s tendency to speak off the cuff — gets thrown completely off of the hayride if they pick Biden. In between his ignominious 1988 primary loss over plagiarizing an entire section from a speech by British Labour leader Neal Kinnock and his 2016 threat to beat Trump up, Biden has managed to say plenty of stupid things with an occasional detour into outright bigotry.

Here’s a playlist of some of Uncle Joe’s greatest hits:

“You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent … I’m not joking.” — Biden to an Indian-American man in 2006.
“(Mitt Romney) said in the first 100 days, he’s going to let the big banks write their own rules — unchain Wall Street. They’re going to put y’all back in chains.” — Biden, speaking to a mostly African-American audience, during the 2012 e******n cycle.
“Stand up, Chuck, let ’em see ya.” — Biden to a Missouri state senator confined to a wheelchair, 2008.
“If we do everything right, if we do it with absolute certainty, there’s still a 30% chance we’re going to get it wrong.” — Biden to congressional Democrats, 2009.
“When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He said, ‘Look, here’s what happened.’” — Biden back in 2008, speaking about a president who never got on television because it wasn’t in wide use until after his death.
But perhaps the most telling quote was from 2012: “My mother believed and my father believed that if I wanted to be president of the United States, I could be, I could be vice president!” Exactly.

Second place: Hillary Clinton, 18 percent.

Oh for the love of… really? I just checked the calendar. Not February. Not Groundhog Day.

We hear over and over again how Hillary Clinton won the popular v**e, which probably makes her an attractive choice to Democrats. The thing is, that’s not what makes you president, which is why Donald Trump wasn’t campaigning in places like California and New York and Hillary Clinton is now writing memoirs and periodically “coming out of the woods” to tell us all how much better things would have been if she had won.

Not even the media liberals seem to particularly believe this anymore. This was also before Trump was president, back when Americans in general and conservatives in particular were far more skeptical about how he would perform in the office. We’ve seen the results and while Democrats may not like it, Americans as a whole seem far more amenable.

In 2016, The Donald also had a paucity of resources compared to Hillary, having less than half the money at his disposal than she did. In 2020, Trump will have far more, Hillary will have far less. America will also have four years of a very sore loser moping around, blaming her defeat on sexism and r****m and James Comey and Judge Crater, probably publishing another book nobody will bother to read and convincing herself that Vladimir Putin made Donald Trump president. This is the past you want to build a bridge back to, Democrats? Be Trump’s guest.

Third place: Bernie Sanders, 16 percent.

Just in case you’re a Democrat and think that re-nominating the person who lost to Trump in 2016 may not be the best idea, how about nominating the person who lost to the person who lost to Trump? Sixteen percent of respondents to the poll thought that was sound logic.

Look, I get it. Socialism is very hot in 2018. It’s like how “Despacito” was back in 2017 — sure, it’s crap, but everyone’s listening to it. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has become the biggest name in politics this summer simply by winning a Democrat primary for the House, all because she’s an avowed socialist and beat an establishment figure all with a shoestring budget.

This is all very impressive at a political level, and socialism may fly in places like Sanders’ native Vermont or Ocasio-Cortez’s NYC-area district. Nationwide, most people are still in possession of their senses and would prefer the occasionally unequal sharing of wealth to the very equal sharing of poverty. Even Barack Obama, not an avowed socialist, had to fight the fact that he was too far left for most of the e*****rate. He did this with carefully manufactured charisma, soaring (if empty) rhetoric and a projection of youthful energy.

Bernie Sanders has the charisma of the lukewarm oatmeal he assumedly shoves down his gaping maw every morning. His speaking style is the literal personification of what Woody Allen was talking about in “Annie Hall” when he discussed his fear of being “one of those guys with saliva dribbling out of his mouth who wanders into a cafeteria with a shopping bag screaming about socialism.” As for energy, the 76-year-old Sanders is a man whose campaign slogan probably should have been “It’s Naptime Again in America.” Novelty propelled him within spitting distance of the Democrat nomination, the same way it did for Eugene McCarthy in 1968. Those with longer memories will remember how that worked out for McCarthy in subsequent runs for the presidency. Those with shorter memories, here’s the TL;DR version: Not well.

Fourth place: Elizabeth Warren, 10 percent.

If a socialist is too far left for the Democrats, how about a f**e socialist? America’s favorite f**e Native American is also one of those, too, having spent a career cozying up to financial giants when she needed money and to the same far-left millennials Sanders attracts when she needs v**es.

The problem with Warren can be summed up with one neologism: Fauxcahontas. It isn’t just that she lied about her ethnic background to get a high-paying job at Harvard. It’s that this one fact pretty much acts as a synecdoche for her entire career. Wh**ever foundation of her political house hath not been laid upon the sandy soil of convenient unt***h has instead been built upon the shifting ground of identity politics. She managed to turn “nevertheless, she persisted” — a throwaway quote from Mitch McConnell about why Warren was being removed from the Senate floor because she wouldn’t stop making ad hominem attacks against attorney general nominee Jeff Sessions in spite of numerous warnings — into a feminist rallying line that was then appropriated by Chelsea Clinton for the title of a children’s book. (No, seriously.)

Most of this has wallpapered over the fact that Warren isn’t particularly charismatic and hasn’t shown any significant aptitude at the gamesmanship aspect of politics. One would assume, given those facts, that she’s reached the Peter Principle point of her competence and probably ought to stay put in her current office, where she has a lifetime sinecure as one of the senators from the People’s Republic of Taxachusetts. Nevertheless, if one were to judge by her media profile since Trump’s taken office, she’s persisting.....
Hilarious: Dems Poll on Whom They Want To Run in 2... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 20:24:38   #
Interesting how court has changed, before 1932, all Justices were Protestants. If trump appoints one of several on his list the Court will 2 Jews , 6 Roman Catholics.Most people don't know this, the change in sex and color is obvious.
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 20:20:56   #
When black men k**l somebody it is almost always another black man. Gangs etc.
Richard94611 wrote:
154 Mass Shootings This Year to Date

Not one was committed by a Black Man or an I*****l A***n

The most common demographics among the shooters ? Male, Caucasian, with a history of abusing women
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 20:18:52   #
People are saying Putin has the return. Trump was thinking of appointing Putin to the Supreme COURT, then found our all justices must be US Citizens, dang that Constitution.
Chocura750 wrote:
I haven't. He above having to disclose such things, although I have no doubt he was born and I do commend his sobriety.
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 12:51:43   #
It was added in the 1950's during the McCarthy "ERA" of h**e & suspicion. You had no specifics what in the Constitution is being t***sformed/ encroached..a disagreement with the Founding Fathers( who supported S***ery , Women's subjugation, v****g limited only to white/male Property Owners.), Are these the things we "have lost"?
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 12:47:20   #
That is not an answer, like so many on this blog, when stumped, you/they resort to trash talk. At this rate, the next Pres debate will go like this: Rep: Thank you for inviting me, my opponent is a f...... A/Hole who sucks >>>> from Pigs asses, don't elect him/her. Demo: I also thank you, reminding you that everything HE says is Trash, junk, we will investigate and prove he is a slime. Thank you. That will add real value to our political discourse. SHAME on all of you.
byronglimish wrote:
Dearest Rash1..The first lady doesn't have to answer to any Swamp Prog fool.
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 12:41:52   #
The Country was founded by Deists, what in the Declaration of Independence is specifically Christian, ditto the Constitution. God, not a specific religions is noted. Oh, when was 'Under God" added to the Oath Of Allegiance? Founding Fathers?? I'll be surprised if you know??

Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

I’m talking about Strict Constitutionality
Christianity what this nation was built on not Islam and Sharia encroachments
A Republic not a democracy for t***sforming it
Not a Taxation ens***ement for Foreign Regime change and nation building by the Bankster Families
NOt s***e to the queen and Rothschilds...

I can go on and on...
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 12:25:40   #
Under which of these does the current Ms. Trump Qualify??
EmilyD wrote:
It's astonishing to me that you can sit there and say that I am having a hard time verifying my post. This from you, who obviously does not verify your own posts! Why do you want me to do the googling. It's all you have to do to find the answers. Here you go:

http://www.cohenlawfirm.com/notable-eb1 (This includes a Classical Music Whistler, A colored pencil artist, an instructor of Magicians and numerous models) Here's the snip about models: "Case 11 - Models ( numerous) - We obtained Green Cards for numerous male and female models from around the world, who have appeared on Covers of major magazines, on billboards and in runway shows."

http://www.maxlawinc.com/u-s-immigration-options-for-international-models-working-in-the-united-states/ Here's a snip from this link: "EB-1 Green Card - Some models may be eligible for EB-1 permanent residency if they can demonstrate that they possess an ability that is “extraordinary” through sustained national or international acclaim. The achievements must be recognized in his/her field through extensive documentation and no offer of employment is required.

Similar to the O-1 visa, the model must meet 3 out of the 10 listed criteria below to prove extraordinary ability:

Evidence of receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
Evidence of membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members
Evidence of published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Evidence that the applicant have been asked to judge the work of others, either individually or on a panel
Evidence of original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field
Evidence of authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Evidence that the applicant’s work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Evidence of performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations
Evidence that the applicant commands a high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Evidence of commercial successes in the performing arts
It's astonishing to me that you can sit there and ... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 12:23:34   #
"Preserve What We Have!! So, bring back I Love Lucy, Eisenhower, in general the 1950's. School Segregation, Jim Crow Laws, no Women's or L**T Rights, on & on it would be such a wonderful World. Most people have always h**ed progress, In England they burned down factories in the 1700's because machines replaced human labor..If only things would stay constant..
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

No, because their ideologies and intentions are non compatible with our Ethos and how the Framers built this Republic.

We are in the Propaganda phase of the war now, about half way through it...
It picks up speed from here...
next comes the chaos
The educating and awakening
The divisions grow between those who choose to preserve what we have and those who wish to T***sform it out of sheer ignorance and wh**ever else...
Then we spiral into the running street battles and
Then we Fight !
>>>> br br No, because their ideologi... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 11:23:52   #
This is DAFT! How did a progressive income tax widen the gap between rich & poor? Just as the penny is more valuable than the $? .Suggest you go back to Wonderland..as in Alice. Yes KKK was founded by Demos of those days,, party positions change, the South was Demo till LBJ signed the V****g Rights Bill, then it flipped to Republican.


CounterRevolutionary wrote:
PeterS, there is an old saying that goes like this: "People believe what they want to believe."
I think you share this mindblock.

The KKK was founded by the Democrat Party and raised to a crisis under Progressive president Woodrow Wilson.
If you have an opportunity, pull up Dinesh D'Souza's film: "Hillary's America" for an entertaining freakout on the t***h.

Our Declaration of Independence and Constitution are based on EXODUS, the end of human s***ery, God as the author of Nature's laws granting all men born free. Nature's laws are spelled out in Genesis, Exodus and Leviticus, where man may rule over animals but man may not rule over man, only God may rule over man, all equal in the eyes of the Lord since we are made in his image.

It is the socialist who have designed our downfall, widening the gap between rich nd poor by Woodrow Wilson introducing Marx's progressive tax and a central banking system, the Federal Reserve System which FDR nationalized for all practical purposes under the National Emergency Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagal Act) and the 1935 Banking Act. This is a government central bank that has never fully been audited, making unknown bailouts and "loans" with unknow "collateral" to unknown nations, dictators, foreign central banks and national and international corporations.


One can only conclude that the Democrats and socialists of our nation are their own worst enemy, running around in circles like mad dogs chasing their own tails. Ruff ruff ruff, PeterS.
PeterS, there is an old saying that goes like this... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 11:19:30   #
This topic went everywhere, but no where. Lost everyone.
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 11:16:03   #
No, I think I am the wrong sex, for him. A man wouldn't be docile enough.
byronglimish wrote:
Why are you hoping for an opportunity?
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 11:13:51   #
Because their skin color isn't white?
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

What part ? The i******s or the CFR a**holes that shape our bad policies that create these problems...?

As for immigrants back then ?
the Industrial Revolution required millions of i******s from anywhere in Europe really this was by design by the Oligarchs back then...

They get credit for building the nation... but not what scumbag i******s and muslims are doing to the world today...

They can not be put into the same box, No Deal.

For the record, Immigration has run it’s course in America and now we’re going to spiral into full blown civil war to stop it.

Do you understand what’s coming ?
>>>> br br What part ? The i******s o... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 11:06:20   #
Republicans will never allow PR to be a State, they don't want two additional Demo Senators. Repub. wanted to block Hawaii , but it was balanced by Alaska, which would be Repub. .
Pennylynn wrote:
Actually, 93% of the Hawaiian v**ers approved the proposition that the territory should be admitted as a state. As for PR, In June, 2018, Puerto Rico v**ed to join the United States as the 51st state. It’s the fifth time the island has held a referendum on whether to join the republic. So, it would seem that they would love to be our next addition.
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 10:59:01   #
Will you say such nice things about the NEXT Ms Trump?
Radiance3 wrote:
====================
Melania Trump is the kind of person the United States want to have. Smart, beautiful, refined culture, Christian, classy, and I am so proud of our First Lady Melania Trump. She speaks 5 languages, and very smart. She has beautiful heart and body. She deserves to be a First Lady, and America is very proud of her. Thank you president Trump.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.