Posts for: theotts
Dec 13, 2018 11:28:59 #
(Main)
no propaganda please wrote:
The war on Christmas reached new heights with this... (show quote)
You're clearly confused. The First Article, incorrectly called the first amendment, says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." It's hysterical and absurd to claim the action by FFRF in any way constrains anyone's practice of religion. Just as the Westboro Baptist Church was imposing their interpretation of religion on military families, so a creche is an imposition on Jews, Muslims, a half-dozen sects of Christianity and atheists. The right to hold beliefs is not license to run roughshod over the beliefs of others. The display at issue was
sanctioned by government. It is not the same as a display on private property.
Further, the free exercise of religion is moderated; would a sect practicing human sacrifice be condoned? How about bigamy, are the CLDS still concupiscent? Auto da fe for 'heretics?'
Calm down. The boogey man is not coming.
Sep 6, 2018 23:05:17 #
(Main)
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
In a normal world that would be correct Nick but that’s not what’s been happening.
Please leave me alone about it... you guys figure it out.
I’m already preparing for the next phase.
In a normal world that would be correct Nick but that’s not what’s been happening.
Please leave me alone about it... you guys figure it out.
I’m already preparing for the next phase.
Twaddle.
You cannot cite a study, report, inquiry, hearing, commission, agency, department or fence post that supports the barking mad notion that there are any significant number of illegal v**es. The last attempt to document illegal v****g turned up two in my state. Both by registered Repugnicans.
The "next phase" is the marginalization of the Republican hyper-partisan lunatic fringe. Hope your roomie at the Institution isn't too bad.
Take your meds and quit baying at the moon.
Sep 6, 2018 21:59:32 #
(Main)
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
Trump needs to shut all that down Flat OUT
Use the Trump Card Nuclear Option
Trump needs to shut all that down Flat OUT
Use the Trump Card Nuclear Option
Maybe he could grab the Wicked Witch's pussy and think of his dozens of supporters. Or maybe just the couple up for parole.
Sep 6, 2018 20:15:22 #
(Main)
proud republican wrote:
Who are you talking to???...Use Quote Reply...You have been here long enough to know about Quote Replies...
Someone posted a link to a CNN story.
How long have I been here?
Sep 6, 2018 20:13:46 #
(Main)
BigMike wrote:
Try expressing yourself sans the vitriol and you'll be more understood. 
Sez the Trumpie.
Sep 6, 2018 19:35:32 #
(Main)
Thanks for that. It says what I said.
Did you miss the phrase "for now" in the lede?
Try reading slower.
Did you miss the phrase "for now" in the lede?
Try reading slower.
Sep 6, 2018 18:38:42 #
(Main)
And you wonder why everyone calls you ignorant.
The article you reproduced (without attribution - one small step shy of plagiarism) is riddled with inaccuracies.
First, the v**e; Justice Kennedy's retirement was effective July 31st.of this year. There therefor cannot be nine v**es on a decision.
Second, the decision. A lower court found the districts were illegally drawn to the advantage of the Repugnicans who drew it. The SC decision does not, repeat, NOT, vacate that decision. It merely states that there is not enough time before the e******n to complete a redrawing in a legal and orderly fashion.
Third, the law. There is no law against gerrymandering. The finding is that the equal protection clause of the Constitution is violated when classes of people (such as Democrats) are given circumstances in which their v**e carries less weight than some other group.
Even more scurrilous, the logic of the article suggests the law applies to Democrats, but not to Repugnicans. If you "think" that's as it should be, you're anti-democracy, to say nothing of unspeakably obtuse. Again, the court did not strike down the appellate court finding that the districts were illegally drawn.
Trumpies are astounding. They have no redeeming qualities, no souls, no hearts, no brains, no education, no clue, yet they don't wink out of existence. Eventually though, Darwin will out.
The article you reproduced (without attribution - one small step shy of plagiarism) is riddled with inaccuracies.
First, the v**e; Justice Kennedy's retirement was effective July 31st.of this year. There therefor cannot be nine v**es on a decision.
Second, the decision. A lower court found the districts were illegally drawn to the advantage of the Repugnicans who drew it. The SC decision does not, repeat, NOT, vacate that decision. It merely states that there is not enough time before the e******n to complete a redrawing in a legal and orderly fashion.
Third, the law. There is no law against gerrymandering. The finding is that the equal protection clause of the Constitution is violated when classes of people (such as Democrats) are given circumstances in which their v**e carries less weight than some other group.
Even more scurrilous, the logic of the article suggests the law applies to Democrats, but not to Repugnicans. If you "think" that's as it should be, you're anti-democracy, to say nothing of unspeakably obtuse. Again, the court did not strike down the appellate court finding that the districts were illegally drawn.
Trumpies are astounding. They have no redeeming qualities, no souls, no hearts, no brains, no education, no clue, yet they don't wink out of existence. Eventually though, Darwin will out.
Sep 6, 2018 15:43:08 #
(Main)
A notion that has been exhaustively and repeatedly refuted. The only support for your lunatic maudering is invented of whole cloth.
If you think you have some substantiation for this inane notion, post it.
Your failure to do so will stand as proof of your foolishness.
Now go play in traffic.
If you think you have some substantiation for this inane notion, post it.
Your failure to do so will stand as proof of your foolishness.
Now go play in traffic.
Sep 6, 2018 13:50:00 #
(Main)
In fact, it was on pg 1 of the Post, where it was reported correctly. The lower Court finding that the districts were illegally drawn to favor Republicans stands. The SC merely held that there wasn't enough time to redraw the lines before the e******n.
You should apologize for your toxic ignorance.
You should apologize for your toxic ignorance.
Sep 6, 2018 08:44:26 #
(Main)
A) At this moment, there are 8 SCOTUS justices, so 9-0 isn't possible.
B) The decision explicitly stated that, despite the earlier finding that districts were ILLEGALLY drawn to the advantage of one party-Republicans-there wasn't time to redraw the districts. They WILL be redrawn subject to court supervisionn
C) The party of lies and gutter politics, your crypto-f*****t Repugnicans, are staring at the abyss. Trump will resign, unless he's too stupid to see that his house of cards will be swept away by Articles of Impeachment, and Pence will lose in a landslide.
D) Your post stands as proof that none of your fellow travelers has so much as a nodding acquaintance with reality.
B) The decision explicitly stated that, despite the earlier finding that districts were ILLEGALLY drawn to the advantage of one party-Republicans-there wasn't time to redraw the districts. They WILL be redrawn subject to court supervisionn
C) The party of lies and gutter politics, your crypto-f*****t Repugnicans, are staring at the abyss. Trump will resign, unless he's too stupid to see that his house of cards will be swept away by Articles of Impeachment, and Pence will lose in a landslide.
D) Your post stands as proof that none of your fellow travelers has so much as a nodding acquaintance with reality.
Apr 12, 2018 16:20:27 #
(Main)
JRumeryjr wrote:
Then some people v**ed for the biggest swamp rat of all...Donnie!
Name one crime you can document, liar.
I'll give you two documented crimes committed by the Orange Menace; lodging of foreign dignitaries at Trump properties is incontrovertibly a violation of the emoluments clause in the Constitution, and is grounds for impeachment; the memo written on Air Force One for Kushner by Trump was IN FACT subornation of perjury, and is almost certainly misprision of felony.
I can name numerous other well-documented crimes committed by Trump. You can cite NO documented crimes by Mrs. Clinton, and only the cobbled up perjury charge against Bill Clinton.
You cannot explain why Clinton can have been compelled to testify under oath when no crime had been cited for investigation, now can you, you silly ass.
Apr 12, 2018 15:42:12 #
(Main)
eagleye13 wrote:
"So long as the affiant has a critical mass o... (show quote)
It isn't relevant whether I'm affluent.
Nothing I said has anything to do with my credibility. It was a recital of facts accepted by all but the most robustly Trump-besotted fools.
Mrs. Clinton (you show your coarseness by using the faux-ironic caritative) said she didn't remember, while Trump spun fables out of the very air. That you seem to prefer the latter to the former speaks to your credibility, no-one else's.
And it remains true that neither of the Clinton's broke the law, or lied. Trump has done nothing but flaunt the law and spit on the t***h. Just as Nixon, Reagan and Bush II did. You are thrown in with the shabby, intellectually bankrupt party of hypocrisy and corruption.
Apr 12, 2018 13:40:48 #
(Main)
eagleye13 wrote:
"Attorney-client privilege doesn't apply if there's "a serious allegation of illegal activity."
So who made the allegation?
One of Mueller's crew?
The Hillary foundation?
Comey?
So who made the allegation?
One of Mueller's crew?
The Hillary foundation?
Comey?
So long as the affiant has a critical mass of evidence for probable cause, the source is immaterial as you would know if you read an actual newspaper.
Apr 12, 2018 12:46:03 #
(Main)
byronglimish wrote:
Close, it would you not being able to articulate as a intellectual like, say,..Loki for instance..but keep trying Mr Clumps..hope is a good idea..the only pearls..would be the ZZ Top..pearl necklace that you wear often.. right?
Loko an intellectual? Lordy sweet jesus you're a tool.
I posted facts. You and yours have been jumping up and down and screeching like chimps, not meeting my post with anything with even a passing resemblance to intellectual.
And I embarrassed Loko so thoroughly it blocked me.
Apr 12, 2018 12:03:37 #
(Main)
kankune wrote:
Wow Morgan....if that's not calling the kettle black I don't know what is!
Meaty reply dipshlt. The difference is that neither Clinton nor Obama broke the law, or behaved unethically, nor grabbed pussies, nor endorsed r****t, murdering scum (Charlottesville), nor violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution, nor committed misprision, subornation, obstruction of justice, or free-floating prickiness. They didn't lie about EVERYTHING, defraud people with an ersatz "university," pay off porn stars, employ known felons, give aid and comfort to our enemies, sexually molest dozens of women and girls, screw literally thousands of workers out of their wages, take credit for someone else's accomplishment, employ a self-avowed f*****t and a legion of his clones (clowns), or vacation on the taxpayer's dime fully one-third of their time in office. They didn't leave US citizens to starve, denigrate KIA soldiers, or lie, lie, lie...