In Historic 9-0 Decision, Supreme Court Just Shredded Democrats: Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circumstances. :sm02: TODAY NEWS Published on Aug 31, 2018 Sometimes the...

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circumstances.

TODAY NEWS

Published on Aug 31, 2018

Sometimes the Supreme Court gets it right and in a rarity, leveling a historic 9-0 decision, SCOTUS just sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering. This allows controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns just the way they are. That’s great news for Republicans and Democrats are incensed over it. They had their hearts set on redistricting v****g districts… i.e. partisan gerrymandering. They will literally do anything to steal an e******n which includes gerrymandering, having the dead v**e and recruiting i*****l a***ns and refugees to v**e. Those are just a few of their favorite tricks.

You have to ask yourself if Dems are willing to illegally and unethically unseat a sitting president simply because he is a Republican and they don’t like him, how far will they go to rig an e******n? As far as they can possibly get away with, sometimes with the help of government agencies. They bend the rules just as far as they can and had planned to do so in the midterms as well. Their blue wave is more of a drip and now this. Things are just not looking good for l*****ts in the upcoming e******ns.

This decision is a huge one from SCOTUS. CNN reported: “The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering, allowing controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns. The 9-0 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in a Wisconsin case is a blow to Democrats who argued the Republican-drawn maps prevented fair and effective representation by diluting v**ers’ influence and penalizing v**ers based on their political beliefs.”

Democrats won a challenge in a lower court, but the Supreme Court’s decision on the Wisconsin case Monday would limit who can bring such cases in the future. A second case from Maryland involved the Republicans challenging a district map drawn by Democrats. The justices said that a lower court did not act improperly in leaving the map in place. In an unsigned opinion with no dissents, the justices said that the challengers failed to reach the high bar of showing “irreparable harm” that would be necessary for a preliminary injunction to block the map. “Even if we assume — contrary to the findings of the District Court — that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, the balance of equities and the public interest tilted against their request for a preliminary injunction,” the court said.

The court’s opinion in the Maryland case means that for now, the justices will leave having to answer whether the court can set a standard for when politicians go too far in drawing lines to benefit one party over another for another day. But it also makes it harder to bring it before the high court. This issue is sure to come before the court again, however, and it is one of the reasons it is so important that President Trump select another constitutional originalist to sit on the court when the next vacancy comes up. For instance, Kennedy was seen as the swing v**e on this case. Rumor has it he will retire sometime this summer and President Trump will fill his spot. This could solidly weigh the Supreme Court in favor of conservatives for the first time in many years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfT3tLchr2o

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

BigMike wrote:

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circumstances.

TODAY NEWS

Published on Aug 31, 2018

Sometimes the Supreme Court gets it right and in a rarity, leveling a historic 9-0 decision, SCOTUS just sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering. This allows controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns just the way they are. That’s great news for Republicans and Democrats are incensed over it. They had their hearts set on redistricting v****g districts… i.e. partisan gerrymandering. They will literally do anything to steal an e******n which includes gerrymandering, having the dead v**e and recruiting i*****l a***ns and refugees to v**e. Those are just a few of their favorite tricks.

You have to ask yourself if Dems are willing to illegally and unethically unseat a sitting president simply because he is a Republican and they don’t like him, how far will they go to rig an e******n? As far as they can possibly get away with, sometimes with the help of government agencies. They bend the rules just as far as they can and had planned to do so in the midterms as well. Their blue wave is more of a drip and now this. Things are just not looking good for l*****ts in the upcoming e******ns.

This decision is a huge one from SCOTUS. CNN reported: “The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering, allowing controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns. The 9-0 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in a Wisconsin case is a blow to Democrats who argued the Republican-drawn maps prevented fair and effective representation by diluting v**ers’ influence and penalizing v**ers based on their political beliefs.”

Democrats won a challenge in a lower court, but the Supreme Court’s decision on the Wisconsin case Monday would limit who can bring such cases in the future. A second case from Maryland involved the Republicans challenging a district map drawn by Democrats. The justices said that a lower court did not act improperly in leaving the map in place. In an unsigned opinion with no dissents, the justices said that the challengers failed to reach the high bar of showing “irreparable harm” that would be necessary for a preliminary injunction to block the map. “Even if we assume — contrary to the findings of the District Court — that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, the balance of equities and the public interest tilted against their request for a preliminary injunction,” the court said.

The court’s opinion in the Maryland case means that for now, the justices will leave having to answer whether the court can set a standard for when politicians go too far in drawing lines to benefit one party over another for another day. But it also makes it harder to bring it before the high court. This issue is sure to come before the court again, however, and it is one of the reasons it is so important that President Trump select another constitutional originalist to sit on the court when the next vacancy comes up. For instance, Kennedy was seen as the swing v**e on this case. Rumor has it he will retire sometime this summer and President Trump will fill his spot. This could solidly weigh the Supreme Court in favor of conservatives for the first time in many years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfT3tLchr2o

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circ... (show quote)

Yay!!!!!How come i didnt hear that on TV????Its a huuuge news,but i havent heard anything about it!!!

Sicilianthing

BigMike wrote:

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circumstances.

TODAY NEWS

Published on Aug 31, 2018

Sometimes the Supreme Court gets it right and in a rarity, leveling a historic 9-0 decision, SCOTUS just sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering. This allows controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns just the way they are. That’s great news for Republicans and Democrats are incensed over it. They had their hearts set on redistricting v****g districts… i.e. partisan gerrymandering. They will literally do anything to steal an e******n which includes gerrymandering, having the dead v**e and recruiting i*****l a***ns and refugees to v**e. Those are just a few of their favorite tricks.

You have to ask yourself if Dems are willing to illegally and unethically unseat a sitting president simply because he is a Republican and they don’t like him, how far will they go to rig an e******n? As far as they can possibly get away with, sometimes with the help of government agencies. They bend the rules just as far as they can and had planned to do so in the midterms as well. Their blue wave is more of a drip and now this. Things are just not looking good for l*****ts in the upcoming e******ns.

This decision is a huge one from SCOTUS. CNN reported: “The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering, allowing controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns. The 9-0 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in a Wisconsin case is a blow to Democrats who argued the Republican-drawn maps prevented fair and effective representation by diluting v**ers’ influence and penalizing v**ers based on their political beliefs.”

Democrats won a challenge in a lower court, but the Supreme Court’s decision on the Wisconsin case Monday would limit who can bring such cases in the future. A second case from Maryland involved the Republicans challenging a district map drawn by Democrats. The justices said that a lower court did not act improperly in leaving the map in place. In an unsigned opinion with no dissents, the justices said that the challengers failed to reach the high bar of showing “irreparable harm” that would be necessary for a preliminary injunction to block the map. “Even if we assume — contrary to the findings of the District Court — that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, the balance of equities and the public interest tilted against their request for a preliminary injunction,” the court said.

The court’s opinion in the Maryland case means that for now, the justices will leave having to answer whether the court can set a standard for when politicians go too far in drawing lines to benefit one party over another for another day. But it also makes it harder to bring it before the high court. This issue is sure to come before the court again, however, and it is one of the reasons it is so important that President Trump select another constitutional originalist to sit on the court when the next vacancy comes up. For instance, Kennedy was seen as the swing v**e on this case. Rumor has it he will retire sometime this summer and President Trump will fill his spot. This could solidly weigh the Supreme Court in favor of conservatives for the first time in many years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfT3tLchr2o

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circ... (show quote)

>>>>

Well it’s a good start but I’m more concerned about the 10million Illegal scumbags they gave v***r r**********n cards to with Driver License applications etc...

This sh*t seriously pisses me the Ph**K OFF !

Lonewolf

The only way thay can win is don't let the other party v**e

BigMike wrote:

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circumstances.

TODAY NEWS

Published on Aug 31, 2018

Sometimes the Supreme Court gets it right and in a rarity, leveling a historic 9-0 decision, SCOTUS just sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering. This allows controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns just the way they are. That’s great news for Republicans and Democrats are incensed over it. They had their hearts set on redistricting v****g districts… i.e. partisan gerrymandering. They will literally do anything to steal an e******n which includes gerrymandering, having the dead v**e and recruiting i*****l a***ns and refugees to v**e. Those are just a few of their favorite tricks.

You have to ask yourself if Dems are willing to illegally and unethically unseat a sitting president simply because he is a Republican and they don’t like him, how far will they go to rig an e******n? As far as they can possibly get away with, sometimes with the help of government agencies. They bend the rules just as far as they can and had planned to do so in the midterms as well. Their blue wave is more of a drip and now this. Things are just not looking good for l*****ts in the upcoming e******ns.

This decision is a huge one from SCOTUS. CNN reported: “The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering, allowing controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns. The 9-0 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in a Wisconsin case is a blow to Democrats who argued the Republican-drawn maps prevented fair and effective representation by diluting v**ers’ influence and penalizing v**ers based on their political beliefs.”

Democrats won a challenge in a lower court, but the Supreme Court’s decision on the Wisconsin case Monday would limit who can bring such cases in the future. A second case from Maryland involved the Republicans challenging a district map drawn by Democrats. The justices said that a lower court did not act improperly in leaving the map in place. In an unsigned opinion with no dissents, the justices said that the challengers failed to reach the high bar of showing “irreparable harm” that would be necessary for a preliminary injunction to block the map. “Even if we assume — contrary to the findings of the District Court — that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, the balance of equities and the public interest tilted against their request for a preliminary injunction,” the court said.

The court’s opinion in the Maryland case means that for now, the justices will leave having to answer whether the court can set a standard for when politicians go too far in drawing lines to benefit one party over another for another day. But it also makes it harder to bring it before the high court. This issue is sure to come before the court again, however, and it is one of the reasons it is so important that President Trump select another constitutional originalist to sit on the court when the next vacancy comes up. For instance, Kennedy was seen as the swing v**e on this case. Rumor has it he will retire sometime this summer and President Trump will fill his spot. This could solidly weigh the Supreme Court in favor of conservatives for the first time in many years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfT3tLchr2o

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circ... (show quote)

debeda

proud republican wrote:

Yay!!!!!How come i didnt hear that on TV????Its a huuuge news,but i havent heard anything about it!!!

Of course not, Lori, it doesn't fit their silly ads narrative!

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

proud republican wrote:

Yay!!!!!How come i didnt hear that on TV????Its a huuuge news,but i havent heard anything about it!!!

They don't have time...literally, because they dev**e 24 hours to the same 4 or 5 issues.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Sicilianthing wrote:

>>>>

Well it’s a good start but I’m more concerned about the 10million Illegal scumbags they gave v***r r**********n cards to with Driver License applications etc...

This sh*t seriously pisses me the Ph**K OFF !

CA will come around, but not unless we continue to beat them.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Lonewolf wrote:

The only way thay can win is don't let the other party v**e

The only way the Dems win anything is to c***t. Gloves are off now. You guys wanted a whuppin' and you'll get it.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

debeda wrote:

Of course not, Lori, it doesn't fit their silly ads narrative!

9 to 0 and LW is snivelling about being c***ted.

debeda

BigMike wrote:

b 9 to 0 /b and LW is snivelling about being c**... (show quote)

It is kinda funny innit?

maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee

Lonewolf wrote:

The only way thay can win is don't let the other party v**e

But I thought Hillary got 3,000,000 more v**es in the popular race. You said so yourself. Is that not called a reversal?

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

debeda wrote:

It is kinda funny innit?

9-0! How often have you heard of that?

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

debeda wrote:

Of course not, Lori, it doesn't fit their silly ads narrative!

Not even FOX????

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

proud republican wrote:

Not even FOX????

Maybe once...then back to business as usual.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

BigMike wrote:

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circumstances.

TODAY NEWS

Published on Aug 31, 2018

Sometimes the Supreme Court gets it right and in a rarity, leveling a historic 9-0 decision, SCOTUS just sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering. This allows controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns just the way they are. That’s great news for Republicans and Democrats are incensed over it. They had their hearts set on redistricting v****g districts… i.e. partisan gerrymandering. They will literally do anything to steal an e******n which includes gerrymandering, having the dead v**e and recruiting i*****l a***ns and refugees to v**e. Those are just a few of their favorite tricks.

You have to ask yourself if Dems are willing to illegally and unethically unseat a sitting president simply because he is a Republican and they don’t like him, how far will they go to rig an e******n? As far as they can possibly get away with, sometimes with the help of government agencies. They bend the rules just as far as they can and had planned to do so in the midterms as well. Their blue wave is more of a drip and now this. Things are just not looking good for l*****ts in the upcoming e******ns.

This decision is a huge one from SCOTUS. CNN reported: “The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering, allowing controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm e******ns. The 9-0 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in a Wisconsin case is a blow to Democrats who argued the Republican-drawn maps prevented fair and effective representation by diluting v**ers’ influence and penalizing v**ers based on their political beliefs.”

Democrats won a challenge in a lower court, but the Supreme Court’s decision on the Wisconsin case Monday would limit who can bring such cases in the future. A second case from Maryland involved the Republicans challenging a district map drawn by Democrats. The justices said that a lower court did not act improperly in leaving the map in place. In an unsigned opinion with no dissents, the justices said that the challengers failed to reach the high bar of showing “irreparable harm” that would be necessary for a preliminary injunction to block the map. “Even if we assume — contrary to the findings of the District Court — that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, the balance of equities and the public interest tilted against their request for a preliminary injunction,” the court said.

The court’s opinion in the Maryland case means that for now, the justices will leave having to answer whether the court can set a standard for when politicians go too far in drawing lines to benefit one party over another for another day. But it also makes it harder to bring it before the high court. This issue is sure to come before the court again, however, and it is one of the reasons it is so important that President Trump select another constitutional originalist to sit on the court when the next vacancy comes up. For instance, Kennedy was seen as the swing v**e on this case. Rumor has it he will retire sometime this summer and President Trump will fill his spot. This could solidly weigh the Supreme Court in favor of conservatives for the first time in many years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfT3tLchr2o

Dems may find their c***ting plans stymied by circ... (show quote)