One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: fiatlux
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 199 next>>
Apr 16, 2016 23:55:45   #
Cool Breeze wrote:
Would The Donald stoop so low to nominate this Allen West toady for VP to procure the black v**e? NEVER!

One-term Congressman and twice-failed candidate Allen West went on the radio this week to demurely agree that as a good patriotic American, he will serve if called to do so.

When Kuhner asked West if he would every consider running for president himself, West responded that it’s “just not my nature as a soldier” to go out “seeking political office” (an odd statement coming from someone who has run for Congress three times), but “my nature as a soldier is to serve and to step up when my country needs me, so I’m standing by.”

“I’m always ready to, if the American people need me back, I’m here, I’m ready to go,” he said.

Kuhner asked if that means he’d be willing to run for vice president if the Republican nominee asked him; West responded that if God and his wife were okay with it, he was in. http://crooksandliars.com/2016/04/former-congressman-allen-west-standing-vp Rotten to the core!
Would The Donald stoop so low to nominate this All... (show quote)


Allen West? Really? He is nuts and vacuous.
Go to
Apr 16, 2016 23:51:26   #
No enemy from without. The demonizing of whichever party would end or severely damage our nation. The Tea Party is oblivious. The left does not have the eyes to see. Patriotism for America is a loaded gun to the head of our Republic.
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 03:10:47   #
All demonizing of either party must end if our nation is to survive. Who cares who started it or is the one party most responsible for it. We are a house divided...and a house divided will fall. The end of this country is not going to be because of Right of Left policies--or ISIS or anything else--but because of the childish inability to listen and compromise. Our nation is done thanks to the ideologues and partisans of both parties.
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 03:00:34   #
Belief is a third of truth. Having all the right doctrine and dogma alone means you are two-thirds away from being a Christian. Love of enemy is the line in the sand. Love of enemy is the only qualifier to being Christian. Jesus will not know you even if you perform miracles. Without this love, you have nothing and are nothing. A clanging cymbal. Belief betrays what Christ has asked of us. Belief is what Jesus found wrong with the Pharisees and Priests. Belief is nothing, even a sin, without becoming.
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 02:52:45   #
Loki wrote:
How fortunate that I am not a Christian. You go ahead and love your enemies. I will do unto mine before they do unto me.


...and the cycle of violence is perpetuated.
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 02:49:53   #
sweetlips wrote:
all you lefties keep calling conservatives judgemental when we call same-sex marriage wrong, engaging in the gay life-style, etc, fact is these things were judged 2000 years ago and we are just repeating that judgment


You need to make a choice between being a citizen of America, a Republic that recognizes e******y, and Christianity, which does not.
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 02:46:30   #
Steve700 wrote:
Truly, liberals reside in opposite land. Marxist propaganda has induced Perception Deception in them and their fellow comrades & consequently they suffer from Defiant Opposition Disorder. They have an aversion to t***h & an immunity to education. For that reason America is Screwed, glued & about to be tattooed. We are past the tipping point & the swing of the pendulum is no more than midway through its swing of the direction in which it is going. When we have the economic collapse or the America h**ers create sufficient chaos to enable Obama to declare martial law he will assume the powers of a dictator and complete his promised fundamental t***sformation of America. When that is completed those who dissent will be eliminated as always happens in Marxist revolutions. Then harsh laws will come into place & call this fairness and e******y that made you think leftism was so noble will go right out the window. Gays will have to go back into the closet, the homeless will be taken off to FEMA camps, the unproductive will made to be productive or be eliminated, everyone's standard of living will go down for the sake of environmentalism & "The Greater Good". Those who orchestrate everything will never thank the "Useful I***ts" who gave them their power.

This very minute as I sit in my recliner, with laptop on my lap, completing this post, the TV is showing a big unruly liberal anarchist crowd on the verge of r**ting, trying to disrupt another Donald Trump rally. So many Liberals really are such entitlement mentality, malcontent scum. Do you see conservatives taking such action at Hillary rallies, even though Hillary is so rotten that if I called her evil, evil would be likely to sue me for slander.

When something that you read or hear says or implies that conservatives (or Christians for that matter) are h**eful, controlling, selfish, mean-spirited, r****t, bigoted, warmongering or h**e women & Muslims (rather than the intolerant, totalitarian, s*********t ideology of Islam), calls their prejudices their principles & want a theocracy or are out to to control you, it's Marxist propaganda designed to dumb you down & make you feel narcissistically & arrogantly enlightened as well as making you feel that you are better, finer, more caring & noble, while at the same time instilling in you, contempt for conservatives & hatred for their values. -- That is Marxist propaganda & it's no wonder with that kind of perception programming that the liberals have "Defiant Oppositional Disorder". If you already believe conservatives to be all those things, that indicates that you have been programed & are a testament to the ,of Marxist propaganda. 'Cuz it's all BS and comes straight out of opposite land. As noble as they may appear, Political correctness, Social Justice, Economic Justice and even Environmentalism is all Marxist propaganda designed to make you feel disgruntled, feel contempt for the existing system and ready you for revolution. (Which will only give power to the real totalitarians who want to control you with their social engineering)
Truly, liberals reside in opposite land. Marxist p... (show quote)


I will give a post, though nobody else will. Do you ever wonder why no one replies to your threads?
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 02:44:11   #
Onelostdog wrote:
A different type of president then.

When Jefferson saw there was no negotiating with Muslims, he formed what is now the Marines (sea going soldiers). These Marines were attached to U.S. merchant vessels. When the Muslims attacked U.S. merchant vessels they were repulsed by armed soldiers, but there is more. The Marines followed the Muslims back to their villages and k**led every man, woman, and child in the village. It didn't take long for the Muslims to leave U.S. merchant vessels alone. English and French merchant vessels started running up the U.S. f**g when entering the Mediterranean to secure safe travel.
Why the Marine Hymn contains the verse "To the Shores of Tripoli"
This is very interesting and a must read piece of our history. It points out where we may be heading.

Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam and Thomas Jefferson led the charge!

At the height of the 18th century, Muslim pirates (the “Barbary Pirates”) were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic.

They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart-breaking letters home, begging their government and family members to pay wh**ever their Mohammedan captors demanded.

These extortionists of the high seas represented the North African Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers - collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast - and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic.

Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain. When the U.S. declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France. However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets.

Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy. Beginning in 1784, 17 years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America's Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States rather than engaging them in war.

In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments. Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.

In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli's ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and ens***ed American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not acknowledge their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make s***es of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise."

Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over 20 percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming. That changed everything.

Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the f**gpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit. Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough, decided that it was finally time to meet force with force.

He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to "cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify".

When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli. The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years, and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line "to the shores of Tripoli" in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as "leathernecks" for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.
Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply.

America had a tradition of religious tolerance. In fact Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen. A religion based on supremacy, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers, was unacceptable to him. His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.

This should concern every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged; Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities; ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah; public schools are pulling pork from their menus; on and on and on and on….

It's death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our own culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further the Islamists agenda.
Sadly, it appears that today America's STUPID leaders would rather be politically correct than victorious!

If you have any doubts about the above information, Google "Thomas Jefferson vs. the Muslim World."
A different type of president then. br br When J... (show quote)


You have to be one of the ugliest and sickest person I have ever met, here or in person or in history. You are what is wrong with humanity.
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 02:40:55   #
oldroy wrote:
I have to wonder how "The Boss" would answer the questions in this letter. I have never been crazy about him but now I am just against him and Obama.

http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2016/04/11/an-open-letter-to-bruce-springsteen-and-his-band-n2146123/page/full


The Bill is prejudice. Simple answer. If you want a Republic, then shut up about these anti-democracy so-called "freedom of religion" bills.
Go to
Apr 13, 2016 05:17:20   #
Loki wrote:
George Romney did not drop out of the race because of eligibility issues, he dropped out because his numbers were in the tank. The same reason that 14 members of the GOP pack this e******n dropped out. (Your "Marshall Report" is a completely one-sided Trump propaganda publication ). There were no court cases against Romney. As a matter of fact, the Congressional Research Service, which vets mostly Congressmen, came down on the side of Romney. They also ruled that John McCain was eligible.You ask why Romney never used these defenses? Because he never went to court. There was such a preponderance of legal opinion in his favor it never came to that.
Do you ACTUALLY think that all fifty of the state e*******l authorities, who all have standing to sue Cruz on his eligibility have been co-opted? None have filed suit against Cruz. The few private suits have been thrown out of Court.
I have repeatedly heard the claim that "Congress and the Court cannot define "natural born citizen," yet, since there is no definition given, who the fuck defines it? "Common Knowledge," which also references law that recognizes foreign born to a citizen as natural born also. Congress defined natural born with the Indian citizenship act of 1924. It has never been found unconstitutional. No successful suit has ever been filed against a p**********l candidate on grounds of eligibility due to lack of natural born status. You will doubtless continue to believe that the "Trump Report," (I mean Marshall Report ) carries more weight than Supreme Court decisions and US Law because it fits your pre-conceived notions. There is nothing I can do about that except present facts as they are, not as you and some off-the-wall Trump Campaign gospel shouter wishes they were.

The Founders also referred to B****stone, who held the position that birth to citizen parents temporarily abroad also qualified for natural born.
George Romney did not drop out of the race because... (show quote)


Just for the record, Romney was a pure scumbag and probably still is. He should be considered an enemy of the state besides a dips**t.
Go to
Apr 13, 2016 05:13:18   #
cold iron wrote:
Obama Orders Phrase Under God to be Banned on all Government Property
In a flurry of executive orders signed by President Obama this week,one order will edit the Pledge of Allegiance to remove the phrase “Under God”
For several years, Atheist and Muslim activists have put pressure on The White House for the move citing religious freedom regulations.
This order will help ensure religious diversity the President said in a press release Saturday.
The separation of church and state outlined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution is an important founding principle of our nation. Our nation’s Bill of Rights guarantees not only that the government cannot establish an official religion, but also guarantees citizens rights to practice the religion of their choosing or no religion at all. White House spokesman Josh Earnest told Fox News.
According to Earnst, neither Children attending Public School nor Military personnel will obligated to recite the Pledge is they choose not to .While the Pledge is Voluntary it Amounts to Coercion When Young Children are Required to Recite it in Schools according to White House spokesmen.
The measure will undoubtedly meet stiff criticism from Republicans and the Christian Right who believe Christianity should be the State Religion of The United States.

http://departed.co/obama-orders-phrase-under-god-to-be-banned-on-all-government-property

Obama should be banned from the United States.
Obama Orders Phrase Under God to be Banned on all ... (show quote)


Like the Constitution? Not now, right? "Under God" has no place on anything in America, by our Bill of Rights. Like your guns? Then like that "under God" has no place on anything in this country.

When you get married, do you pledge fidelity everyday? If you sign an agreement or contract, is it necessary to pledge you will abide everyday?
Go to
Apr 13, 2016 05:06:29   #
cold iron wrote:
Obama Orders Phrase Under God to be Banned on all Government Property
In a flurry of executive orders signed by President Obama this week,one order will edit the Pledge of Allegiance to remove the phrase “Under God”
For several years, Atheist and Muslim activists have put pressure on The White House for the move citing religious freedom regulations.
This order will help ensure religious diversity the President said in a press release Saturday.
The separation of church and state outlined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution is an important founding principle of our nation. Our nation’s Bill of Rights guarantees not only that the government cannot establish an official religion, but also guarantees citizens rights to practice the religion of their choosing or no religion at all. White House spokesman Josh Earnest told Fox News.
According to Earnst, neither Children attending Public School nor Military personnel will obligated to recite the Pledge is they choose not to .While the Pledge is Voluntary it Amounts to Coercion When Young Children are Required to Recite it in Schools according to White House spokesmen.
The measure will undoubtedly meet stiff criticism from Republicans and the Christian Right who believe Christianity should be the State Religion of The United States.

http://departed.co/obama-orders-phrase-under-god-to-be-banned-on-all-government-property

Obama should be banned from the United States.
Obama Orders Phrase Under God to be Banned on all ... (show quote)


Do some homework. The phrase "under God" was added to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1956. "E pluribus unum" was our motto until the 50s, when, like the Pledge, "In God we trust" came into vogue. It was adopted as our motto in 1956. What was happening in the 50s to bring about these changes?
Go to
Apr 13, 2016 04:57:36   #
RETW wrote:
http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/n-j-court-declares-cruz-eligible-for-white-house/


Well now, how about that Mr. Trump? I'll bet he so wants to fire that judge. You ant ruler of the world yet Trump.

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)


English is not required for h**e, but you, like many others of your ilk, will require it of immigrants.
Go to
Apr 13, 2016 04:54:37   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
Here’s Why The GOP Wants to Stop Trump by Cancelling E******ns

Kit Daniels - April 11, 2016


The GOP establishment sees themselves as part of the “specialized class” responsible for making political decisions because they believe the public’s “too stupid” to make decisions for themselves.

This “spectator democracy,” first described by political insider Walter Lippmann in the 1920s, reduces v**ers into mere spectators – not participants – in public policy managed by a tiny elite, in this case the GOP establishment.

“The compelling moral principle [behind it] is that the mass of the public are just too stupid to be able to understand things,”Noam Chomsky wrote in describing Lippmann’s views.

This is the core principle of the GOP establishment: to them, only the elite have the intellect and rationality to decide the public’s best interests.

The public at large, on the other hand, cannot manage their own affairs and therefore must be lead like cattle towards the future world envisioned by those in control.

Not considered the decision-makers, the American people are meant to be mere bystanders in society, only participating on occasion during political “e******ns” to decide which one of the elites will “represent” them, such as Hillary Clinton or Ted Cruz.

Populist candidates like Donald Trump are not allowed because they’re not c*********d and controlled by the establishment.

The mainstream media serves the elite by fueling racial tensions, such as using straw man arguments to declare Trump “r****t,” which encourages in-fighting amongst the public while the establishment gains more power without adversity.

And the media and the elite both want to keep the public locked into the false left-right paradigm which oversimplifies the public’s perception of the world so that they falsely believe that everything is simply black and white, one extreme against the other, conservative vs. liberal, red vs. blue.

While stuck in the paradigm, people are led to believe their opponents only exist on the opposite side of this two-dimensional spectrum and are completely unaware of the real power towering above.

But during this p**********l race, Trump has successfully exposed the real power behind the throne – and that’s why the establishment wants to stop him.
Here’s Why The GOP Wants to Stop Trump by Cancelli... (show quote)


Here cue this up as one of your few comments. No one listens or cares what you say. You post soliloquys.
Go to
Apr 13, 2016 04:51:39   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
'Kelly File' Fact-Check: Obama Claims Hillary Did Not 'Jeopardize' Nat'l Security

Fox News Insider - April 11, 2016


In an interview on Fox News Sunday yesterday, Chris Wallace asked President Obama to weigh in on the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

Though Obama said that Clinton had exhibited "a carelessness" in managing her emails, he defended his former Secretary of State, saying, “I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security.”

“There’s stuff that’s really top-secret, top-secret … And then there’s stuff … that you could basically get in open sources,” Obama added.

Tonight on The Kelly File, chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge fact-checked the president’s defense of Clinton.

Fox News asked Dale Meyerrose, former CIO of the U.S. Intel Community, about the suggestion that some classified information is more deserving than other documents of the “top-secret” label.

He responded that even if highly classified information shows up in public sources, officials are still obligated to protect it.

“If I see what has been deemed classified information, no matter what level it is, in open media, it is my responsibility not to acknowledge it,” said Meyerrose.

In addition, Fox News learned that President Obama himself exchanged about 19 emails with then-Secretary Clinton using her personal email account, raising questions of a personal conflict.

“The emails don’t contain classified information, but still aren’t public because they involve executive branch discussions,” said Herridge.

Thomas Dupree, a former DOJ official, said that if there is any possibility Obama was “involved in what happened, he shouldn’t be making public statements prejudging the outcome of something he could have involvement in.”

Judge Napolitano: Obama Was 'a Little Reckless' in His Defense of Hillary

Wallace Presses Obama: How Can You Say Hillary Didn't Jeopardize Nat'l Security?

-----

Newt: Hillary as Prez Would Be 'Most Corrupt White House in U.S. History'

Fox News Sunday - April 3rd, 2016


Newt: Hillary as Prez Would Be 'Most Corrupt White House in U.S. History'
Newt Gingrich sounded an optimistic tone about Republican prospects in November, while comparing Donald Trump to Ronald Reagan.

He said that in early September of 1980, Reagan had made a "couple of boo-boos in a row, and there was a real worry," but Reagan was ultimately able to overcome Jimmy Carter in the general e******n.

"I think in the end, whether it's Trump or Cruz or Kasich, we're going to beat the Democratic nominee, and I ultimately like our position a lot better than theirs."

He also talked about what he saw as the consequences of a Hillary Clinton presidency, saying she would bring the "corruption" from the Clinton Foundation into the White House.

"This will be the most corrupt White House in American history," Gingrich said.

He said he doesn't imagine many conservatives would stand by and let Clinton get elected because of their opposition to Trump.

"You're really prepared to do that to America because you don't like Donald Trump?"
'Kelly File' Fact-Check: Obama Claims Hillary Did ... (show quote)


Are you really prepared to do that to America because you like that scum-sucking, h**eful, misogynistic, i***tic, narcissistic a**hole?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 199 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.