Don't know if the author is writing as a liberal Democrat or a RINO Republican! (Oh wait, the WHOLE ReDUMBlican Party are RINOs now). ReDUMBlicans h**e men like Cruz and Ron Paul because they actually know what's wrong with this country and propose positive measures to actually do something about it. Yeah God forbid we actually have someone out there doing something right!

ReDUMBlicans keep asking us true conservatives to support your (mediocre) candidates who talk a lot of talk about standing up against the Democrats during e******n time, but whenever one of your own actually start doing that then they turn against them saying things like they "don't have the best interests of Americans" and "are an embarrassment to the entire nation"

Then again, if you're a liberal what would you know about the "best interest of Americans" being as how you are the ones who are an embarrassment to the entire nation.

by Charles Hugh-Smith

The U.S. Constitution leaves too many areas open to interpretation; a New Constituion of 2,300 pages (+ 200 redacted secret pages) is the solution.

The Obama Administration has proposed replacing the current U.S. Constitution (4,543 words, including the signatures with a 2,300-page “new Constitution” that in the words of an administration spokesperson, “clears up the gray areas in the current Constitution.”

The proposal was launched after the success of two recent 1,000+ page pieces of legislation, the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank financial reform act.

An additional 200+ pages of the “new Constitution” are redacted due to the sensitive nature of the National Security-related amendments.

Lobbyists from key industries were invited to contribute amendments to the new Constitution;” constitutional legal experts were also invited to submit improvements to the current law of the land.

Some critics who have reviewed the 2,300 pages of the proposed “new Constitution” have stated that the document is impenetrable even to those with law degrees. Average citizens “will be unable to understand the laws that govern their lives.”

Other observers note that the complexity and length of legislation such as the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank financial reform act are already beyond the comprehension of all but a handful of experts.

An administration spokesperson defended the proposed re-write on the grounds that “the new Constitution will provide the clarity that people want in their Constitution.”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There are many reason why well over 65% of the American
people want to replace all of congress. Now the fools want to replace our constitution. NO, NO, No. And as you might expect, Its proposal, comes from the democrats. These bastards want to replace our constitution with one that goes along with the same principle as the Pelosi principle.
(( Don't worry what's in it, just sign it . Then we will tell you what's in it. )) You, the general public, are just to
G** Dam ignorant to understand it in the first place. You don't do as we do, you dam well better do as we tell you to.

So now we have it folks. This is the socialistic plan all
along. Hey, all you sheeple out there. Get your nose rings ready. This is what you all wanted.
I got news for all you socialistic bastards out there. Before
I, our anyone of the people I know well let that happen. Blood will run in the streets. The very reason this country was founded, was to get out from under this same kind of
tyranny, these low life scum, want to impose.
You might note. Not one person in the general population was asked what they think. The general public is just a means to and end. How's that sit with you?

So what do you say folks, you want this to happen?
RETW
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/obama-administration-proposes-2300-page-new-constitution/#GPQpyB7GayT5xSVa.99

Barack Hussein Obama is an eloquently tailored empty suit. No resume, no accomplishments, no experience, no original ideas, no understanding of how the economy works, no understanding of how the world works, no balls, nothing but abstract, empty rhetoric void of real substance.

He has no real identity. He is half-white, which he rejects. The rest of him is mostly Arab, which he hides but is disclosed by his non-African Arabic surname and his Arabic first and middle names as a way to triply proclaim his Arabic parentage to people in Kenya. Only a very small part of him is African Black from his Luo grandmother, which he pretends he is exclusively.

What he isn't, not a genetic drop of, is" African American," the descendant ens***ed Africans brought to America chained in s***e ships. He hasn't a single ancestor who was a s***e. Instead, his Arab ancestors were s***e owners. S***e-trading was the main Arab business in East Africa for centuries until the British ended it.

So let that sink in: Obama is not the descendant of s***es, as he at times has claimed. He is the descendant of s***e owners. Thus he makes the perfect Liberal Messiah.

Well, yes. Of course, the Constitution is relevant today. It's still the law of the land, so that's stating the obvious. Is there really anyone in this country above the age of 8 who doesn't understand the Constitution is the legal framework of the nation? I hope not.

But, no. Equating the Declaration of Independence to anything other that what it was intended to do is simply off base. The colonies were making a case for breaking from the yoke of foreign authority as practiced by King George III. To insinuate that it provides a basis for breaking away from our own system of government is simply wrong-headed or wishful thinking. It does not.

Because, if you were to say the Jeffersonian reasons in the Declaration of Independence give us a foundation to rise against our own government, then you are talking about succession. And the absolute last thing any of those preparing to go to war with England wanted to see was a splintering of the colonies. That would have been suicide.

The same applies later to the delegates to the Constitutional conventions. A fractured nation would have been totally opposite of why they gathered in the first place, which was to replace the Articles of Confederation. They had proven themselves to be disastrous because they did not create a glue strong enough to tie a nation together and put it on an (almost) equal footing with others.

Indeed, the Constitution itself was originally drafted in such a way that splintering would be avoided (hence, no mention of the issue of s***ery, which surely would have driven a wedge between s***e-holding colonies, let alone the delegates themselves, many of whom were s***e-holders.)

Look, Obama is not King George III. Obama is not putting up soldiers in citizen's houses, he is not unilaterally exacting taxes on goods to go to his private treasury, he is not impressing citizens to man his ships. He is not building forts of his own army in cities around the country.

For the most part (although not totally), he's trying to do what he said he would do when he ran for the presidency twice. The majority of people said OK and elected him. When they elected him, they theoretically elected his ideas.

But, two years after his first e******n, the people also elected a House of Representatives with a majority of the members being not of Obama's party or policies. We've had gridlock ever since. That is exactly the way the system was designed to work by dint of the wisdom embodied in the Constitution and the way is balances powers.

Conservatives should rejoice that the provisions of our legal framework of government have not allowed this president nor any other to run amok. The existing system reined in Andrew Johnson when he tried to undo much of what had been accomplished by Union victory in the Civil War. The existing system brought down Richard Nixon for his attempts to use executive agencies for political purposes. The existing system quashed FDR's attempt to pack the Supreme Court.

If Barak Obama oversteps his authority, the same thing will happen to him.

You don't need succession. The system is still rock-solid as it is because the Constitution IS being followed and will continue to be followed.

(BTW, I find it extremely interesting that the libertarian and tea party mantra of Constitutional avoidance is being used ceaselessly against a president who taught constitutional law in one of the most prestigious universities in the world.

Obama's toes probably know more about the Constitution than any poster on this board, including me.)

We have an administration that has weakened our military, destroyed our economy, continually lied and has been deceitful to the American people has shown disrespect to our constitution laughed at the sanctity of marriage only to name a few.
When are we as Americans going to stand up and take our country back?
It's time we start v****g people out of office by v****g with our morals not with our pocket books.
It's time we show Obama and the rest of the d******c t*******ts enough is ENOUGH and we won't let them destroy OUR GREAT COUNTRY without a fight wh**ever that comes to.