One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: UncleJesse
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 213 next>>
Aug 28, 2016 14:23:42   #
If held today, I'd v**e Hillary bc I know her and I've heard all the bs many times over and over about criminality and socialism and such and such. Yet, time and again, over and over, none of the accusations have held up.

I never know where that other guy Trump stands and it looks more each day like he has a mental illness. He won't show his tax returns which is a very easy tell of being afraid to show his cards.

After seeing Clinton's emails, she'll do fine as president. Everything they're calling 'classified' was 'not classified' until after she got or sent them. So I have no problem with that. Then, WikiLeaks got all of them and made a website where anyone can search her emails. Media and political opponents have been pouring over them for months now and no one can find diddly squat. In fact, her campaign has been making positive spin stories showing her commitment, dedication and patriotism to public service from the content of the emails. Like I wrote above, I think she'll be fine and all the gripe over her is bs. Look at how long the accusations have been out there and no one can give any evidence. It's all hyped up bs just like we saw with B******i. They kept promising me time and again that now that Gowdy was in charge, the t***h would come out. I believed them and was ready to see justice be served with the indicting evidence against her. Well, the t***h did come out and it wasn't at all what was promised. It was the opposite. It made her look good, if you listened and read any of it.

She put up with all that bs and kept cool and was feisty and laughed about a lot of it too. She'll do fine despite all the whiners out there that are upset average folks don't love the loud mouth guy like they do. But they still have some time and are trying to remake him as likeable but he can't help himself. They keep saying that one-on-one he is much better and more likeable but the Hillary lovers say the exact same thing about her so, they're not really making a case for Trump's frequent embarrassing moments.

tommymore wrote:
I thoroughly detest The Donald...but he has my v**e in November. There is no other choice, I feel. Hillary is the same old same old plus socialism on a scale that will overwhelm America as a Republic. The Donald could be our introduction to a f*****t dictatorship and all out race war, but the Right under him will finally get to see--in vivid and, probably, bloody detail--how wrong-headed they are on so many issues. The Tea Party is an enemy of the State. The Donald, if elected, will prove this to be true.

Yet this is not cut and dry. He could be great. Just what this country needs at this time. We need something right now, and that's for sure. A radical change. How are you handling who to v**e for in November? Any hints as how best to whittle down the choice?
I thoroughly detest The Donald...but he has my v**... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 25, 2016 21:55:27   #
Kevyn wrote:
Looking at many many different polling organizations it looks as if Clinton has if not an absolute landslide at least a comfortable win in e*******l v**es. Reading here many of you seem to think Trump will win big. My question to you is do you honestly think Trump will win and what are your further political plans when he looses? Do you think Trump has harmed the republican party?


I don't and after his loss, the goal will be as usual, to make HRC a one-termer and unify the party by being anti-HRC. I just don't see a chance especially now after the immigrant deportation policy change. He's sacrificing his base in attempt to attract independents. He's savvy in marketing but I wonder if he bit off more than he can chew? You figure independents are aware of the tactic and won't buy it. Meanwhile, base feels betrayed. Maybe not bc base mostly white male who are loyal no matter what change he makes bc unified by social media. While social media brought together the young and minorities to an e******n in '08 and '12, it has tapped the sleeping giant of white male who connect with the Trump message. Trump has been making new rules and standards in p**********l campaigning. Like I wrote earlier, I don't think the loyal base will be enough to get him elected. While vast, the white male group don't go around knocking on doors or making phone calls or organizing rallies like the young and minority do for the libs.

If he loses like I think, HRC may not act like BHO no-drama to the one-term strategy of oppose everything. If the economy does ok, she could persist another round. BHO showed the economy did worse and he went another round anyway. Also, she could react in kind to the anti-HRC strategy with anti-gop and that would be an interesting political test. She seems more the fighter than BHO who prefers to jest and joke about the criticisms rather than call out names and go after it. I could see HRC saying she doesn't give a s**t if she hurts the feelings of the house or senate leader. She will see what happened to BHO agenda's that basically became EO's that then got tied up in court. There could end up being budget and debt ceiling hostage taking year after year to force her. Another thing is Obamacare and remember when that happened, the gop got stronger. It could be similar because if libs take senate and enough of house she will increase Obamacare and that would be a unifier for a gop return.

It kind of seems like he's hurt the party with so many diehard, lifelong party leaders in the dumps over him. They have a lot of admirers and you figure they'd combine their energies to make sure he never happens again. There's also the chance of splintering bc hurt like that takes a long time to forget and elephants never forget. But it's too soon to tell if it is permanent damage or recoverable damage and it all could depend if he stays in or becomes invisible like Mitt, McCain, Dole, etc.
Go to
Aug 22, 2016 21:56:52   #
...they're called v**ers. Whether or not they'll be able to show up in November ...
Go to
Aug 19, 2016 22:24:45   #
In a May 2013 speech on the Senate floor the bill's sponsor, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, argued that despite the recent spate of tragic tornado strikes in Oklahoma, disaster relief shouldn't be the federal government's business.

"FEMA is just one more example of Big Government run amok," he explained. "Sure it sounds good. Who wouldn't be against so-called disaster relief? But we're paying for this program with money borrowed from China, driving our country deeper into debt. That's the real disaster.

That is how the GOP thinks: Government is the problem.

But the Democrats won me over on this debate, especially observing what is going on in Louisiana flooding presently.

"Rand Paul is a f*****g i***t," says Delaware Gov. Jack Markell, whose tiny state sits astride a hurricane zone. "The federal government, by pooling resources and exploiting economies of scale, can do disaster relief more efficiently the the individual states alone.

"If this arrogant douchebag got his head out of Ayn Rand's ass long enough to see two feet in front of him, maybe he'd understand how important this work is."
Go to
Jul 11, 2016 00:28:38   #
Jesus is resurrected and prophesized of the tribulation and it occurred in 70 AD with the destruction of Jerusalem's Temple by Rome (the harlot or the power that seduces/controls). Notice the Revelation connection. The rapture (whether or not you believe it) occurred during the siege on Masada where the last hold outs of Judaism existed. Judaism is the old covenant and Jesus came to fulfill the old covenant and begin the new covenant and is why Judas/Judaism betrayed and crucified Jesus for it did not recognize Him as the Messiah.

The Kingdom God is post-70 AD (which is constantly being mentioned in the Gospels as being "Nigh" or "Near" or "At Hand"). The bulk of the believers were from Jews who saw the destruction of their Temple and their religious state. They were now a part of the Roman Empire and recognized the writings of John from Revelation as distinctly toward them and they noticed a continuity from the Gospels. Their belief grew and became integral to the Legion of Rome (the new Jerusalem - - old Jerusalem is destroyed) and was spread around the world but only for those that believe and recognize it and live it, spiritually. That which was destroyed became new again by Rome that destroyed it. Those still looking for and believing in a physical Kingdom of God will never be satisfied, just as there was never a Gospel of Jesus yet they continue to believe God wrote it rather than inspire it, and the difference is like the difference of an interpreted representation versus an original.

The Second Coming of Jesus will be at passing and we ascend to a state of infinite time and space of heaven where we are amazed that despite a moment ago we were in a particular space and time and now somehow, we are present with all souls past, present and future in the great judgement.

ziggy88 wrote:
Why the Rapture Comes Before the Tribulation………..
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd


I hold to the view that ALL tribulation Christians, those that come to recognize Christ as Lord and Savior after the Rapture during the Great Tribulation, would be sure to perish.
I hold to that view, and here are my reasons.

We even ask: Why would any Christian want to survive through the Tribulation in the first place? Though tribulation Christians do not have the special position of raptured Christians, they nevertheless are promised a reward at the start of the Millennium, as the Bible clearly states. They will experience the First Resurrection at that point.

As I will show, a literal reading of the Bible clearly and plainly supports the understanding that there will be no Christians that will physically survive the Tribulation period.
Readers, however, may well ask: Why even concern ourselves with this point? Is it not true that Christians will be removed from the earth at the Rapture before the time of God’s wrath begins? And if so, why would we even care about the course of prophesied earthly developments after that point?

Answer: All Scripture is profitable for teaching (2 Timothy 3:16), and this Biblical issue is no exception. As it turns out, the question regarding the fate of Christians during the Tribulation is a critical one in the defense of the Rapture Doctrine, as we will show.

Perhaps only a minority of Christians today believe in the Pretribulational Rapture Doctrine. They believe that all Christians will go through the Tribulation … presuming that any apocalyptic Scriptures are believed at all. Also, numerous inventive variations of Rapture teachings have emerged—Pre-Wrath, Mid- and Post-tribulation … etc.

The tales that the Christian dead tell us in Scripture, in this respect refute all these other beliefs regarding the Rapture. If ALL Christians indeed die in the Tribulation, then some glaring inconsistencies are exposed in these variant views, thus giving credence to the Rapture Doctrine.

Positional Differences of Pre- and Post-Rapture Christians

Do all Christians die in the Apocalypse … and can we prove it? To answer, we must begin by noting the positional distinctions between ALL tribulation Christians, and those of the pre-Tribulation period who are ALL raptured. During the Tribulation, the Holy Spirit is no longer an unction (the Lord's anointed) upon earth as during the Church Age. The Comforter (Holy Spirit) has been removed along with the Church, and the Antichrist has been revealed. Those who come to Christ during the Tribulation are not spared suffering and physical death (the First Death), as are the raptured saints (who are alive at the time).

Pre-tribulational Christians of the Church Age are t***slated (physically changed into the eternal state at the Rapture) to be in Christ’s presence. Tribulation Christians are not t***slated to new eternal bodies … at least, not until after the Millennium. The raptured Christians do not experience the First Death; the Tribulation Saints do. Tribulation Christians ALL must face a physical death. ALL are certain to become martyrs. Graciously, tribulation Christians are promised the First Resurrection at the start of the Millennium.

While both groups of Christians are given eternal life (one at the Rapture) and the Tribulation Saints at the end of the millennium kingdom, both share a common eternal fate after the Millennium (neither experience the Second Death), their paths, experiences and positions are very different, however.

Christians During the Time of Wrath

Without a doubt, people will become believers in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, during the Tribulation Period who are called the Tribulation Saints. As the terror of this time erupts, earth dwellers will come to the recognition that Jesus Christ was who He said He was—the Messiah … the Savior … the Son of God. The state of evil in the world, as well as the appearance of the Antichrist, will be obvious to all. The timing of remaining prophetic events is then no longer entirely speculative. These are clearly seen to be unfolding.

By the time of the 6th seal (this the most apocalyptic and shaking to that time), it will be clearly obvious to all that the world is facing God’s wrath. In fact, they openly acknowledge this fact, saying, “The great day of their wrath has come” (Revelation 6:17).

As such, many people do become Christians during the Tribulation. In fact, there are so many that the Bible calls them a “great multitude” (Revelation 7:9).

However, we may be getting ahead of ourselves. Where does this “multitude” of saints come from, and what is their fate?

The Great Winnowing

The great winnowing of tribulation Christians from earth is described in Revelation 13:11-17. The verb was used of winnowing out the chaff and then of grinding to powder. The False Prophet (the Second Beast) orders all to worship an image of the First Beast, and presses all to take upon themselves the mark of the First Beast, so that they can buy and sell. Those that DO worship the image of the beast and take this mark will be eternally damned (Revelation 14:11).

What happens to those who DO NOT take the mark of the False Prophet and refuse to worship the image of the beast? The good news: They are redeemed and therefore will not be condemned to the lake of fire. Nevertheless, they will not be spared suffering. These Christians will be k**led.
The Bible clearly says that “ all those who refused to worship the image WILL be k**led” (Revelation 13:15). Revelation 20:4 confirms this, saying: “ I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands.”

Again, the goods news amidst the terrors? The tribulation Christians who refuse the “mark” are spared the Second Death which is destruction in hell. Yet, they must face the First Death before being rewarded with the First Resurrection at the start of the Millennium.

Two Phases of Slain Saints

We place the aforementioned events shown in Revelation 13, as occurring sometime between/during the fifth and sixth seals. Events that the Bible describes during these seal judgments closely align with the Great Winnowing.

To be sure, Christians are already being slain before the fifth seal. We see these first tribulation Christians that are k**led shown in Revelation 6:9-11. The Bible says: “When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. They called out in a loud voice, ‘How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?’ Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the full number of their fellow servants, their brothers and sisters, were k**led just as they had been.”

Presented here are the souls of the Christians who have been slaughtered between the Rapture and the time of the 5th seal. They are shown under the altar in heaven and are told to stay there “until the full number of their fellow servants” (Revelation 6:11) are k**led as they had been. These earlier Christians are waiting until the rest of the martyrs arrive.

A little later (at the time of the sixth seal), we now see that the “full number” has arrived. As already mentioned, there are so many martyrs at this point that they are called a “great multitude.” John the Revelator says “ there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands” (Revelation 7:9). These souls are identified as coming out of the “tribulation” (Revelation 7:14). They are tribulation martyrs … a very large number. The fact that they now all hold palm branches signifies that they have attained victory and eternal life.

Just what event or development could have caused such a large influx of Christian souls, to have arrived in front of the throne in such a short space of time? According to our understanding, the great winnowing of Revelation 13:11-17 occurred. It is the final “dividing line,” I think. A large number of earth dwellers have refused to take the “mark” and are martyred. By the end of the 6th seal, these souls end up in front of the throne.

Envisioning both phases of the slain saints, says the Bible of them: “This calls for patient endurance on the part of the people of God who keep his commands and remain faithful to Jesus. Then I heard a voice from heaven say, ‘Write this: Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on.’ ‘Yes,’ says the Spirit, ‘they will rest from their labor, for their deeds will follow them’ (Revelation 14:12-13).

Why Christian Dead Tell Tales

The view that all tribulation Christians will be martyred is problematic for many. For one, it nullifies the case for a Rapture occurring any other time than before the Tribulation. If, for example, there were no Christians alive on earth as of the early stages of the second half of the Tribulation, there could be no Mid- or Post-tribulation Rapture. What would be the point? There is no one—or perhaps only an insignificant number—to be raptured.

Or, let’s assume that the Rapture naysayers are right in that there is no Rapture of any kind. To take this position means that All Christians will go into the Tribulation period. And, more Christians may be added to their number through conversions during the earlier stages of the Tribulation (though this is immaterial to the issue here). However, the question then arises: Why would God allow that ALL Christians in the world be k**led during the Tribulation?

Critically, why would God allow some non-Christians and Jews to survive … but no Christians?

My reasoning is because God must focus on saving the remnant out of Israel who have fled to the desert fortress of Petra. He must gather his saintly forces & fierce angels in heaven to come to the earth to fight Satan and his minions at the battle of Armageddon. The number of saints will all have been called to heaven by then to power up and join in this last huge confrontation as Jesus returns in all his glory to defeat Satan’s 200 million man army in the valley of Jehosaphat. Please come soon my sweet Lord………….
Why the Rapture Comes Before the Tribulation……….. ... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 9, 2016 16:57:25   #
The reason for all of this is because the saying, "White P***e" is predominantly coined by those who believe non-w****s are inferior.
In all the points mentioned here, the non-white organizations mentioned does not invoke w****s losing rights yet, at the end of the text, it implies that most of the rights of w****s have been lost and based on the text above it, it implies those rights are lost because there are minority organizations.

No where can anyone make the case that because there is a MLK Day, the rights of white people have been lost; rather, non-w****s and w****s are lifted up to remember the non-violent activism.
No where can anyone make the case that because there is a NAACP, the rights of white people have been lost; rather, the rights of non-w****s are defended.
No where can anyone make the case that because there is a BET, the rights of white people have been lost; rather, non-w****s have tv shows they can relate to better.
No where can anyone make the case that because there is a UNCF, the rights of white people have been lost; rather, qualified non-w****s can get an advanced education they would not be able to afford since non-white poverty rate is the highest and non-Hispanic white poverty rate is the lowest.
No where can anyone make the case that because there is a Miss Black America, the rights of white people have been lost; rather, have you seen the Miss America pageant? Minorities rarely win their state -- the odds are against them because they are a minority.

BTW, adding Michael Richards name to article is a h**x: there was no defense speech because there was no court case. It's all made up after the 2006 Michael Richards shame from the Laugh Factory performance where he lashed out at hecklers. Later, Richards made a public apology on the Late Show with David Letterman, when Jerry Seinfeld was the guest, saying, "For me to be at a comedy club and to flip out and say this crap, I'm deeply, deeply sorry. I'm not a r****t, that's what's so insane about this."

So in 2008 or so, this "Be Proud to be White" blog added Michael Richards name but it's all a h**x because there he never wrote this nor was there even a trial over the incident.


cold iron wrote:
Be Proud to be White!

Ever wonder why W****s are r****ts, and no other race is......
Proud to be White

Michael Richards makes his point..................

Michael Richards better known as Kramer from TV's Seinfeld does make a good point.
This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act.
He makes some very interesting points..
Someone finally said it.

How many are actually paying attention to this?
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc.
And then there are just Americans..
You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.

You call me 'White boy,' 'C*****r,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman'... And that's OK...
But when I call you, N****r, Kike, Towel head, Sand-n****r, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink ..
You call me a r****t.

You say that w****s commit a lot of violence against you....
So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?

You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.

You have Black History Month.
You have Cesar Chavez Day.
You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.
You have the NAACP.
You have BET....

If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we'd be r****ts.
If we had a White P***e Day, you would call us r****ts.
If we had White History Month, we'd be r****ts.
If we had any organization for only w****s to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be r****ts.

We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the
plain Chamber of Commerce.
Wonder who pays for that??

A white woman could not be in the Miss B***k A******n pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.
If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships... You know we'd be r****ts.
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US .
Yet if there were just one 'White colleges', that would be a r****t college.
In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights.
If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us r****ts.

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it.
But when we announce our white p***e, you call us r****ts.

You rob us, car jack us, and shoot at us.
But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running
from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a r****t.

I am proud..... But you call me a r****t.
Why is it that only w****s can be r****ts??
There is nothing improper about this e-mail..

Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on.
I sadly don't think many will.

That's why we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country.

We won't stand up for ourselves!
BE PROUD TO BE WHITE!
It's not a crime YET... But getting very close!
It is estimated that ONLY 5% of those reaching this point in this e-mail, will pass it on.

I DID!!

I have very thick skin, so calling be names will have zero effect.
Be Proud to be White! br br Ever wonder why W***... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 9, 2016 16:03:38   #
It is workable but I think you mean that it is not readily available and would take many years to implement.

CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Do you have a workable solution as well?
Go to
Jul 9, 2016 15:53:32   #
First, we need to have a police force that reflects the community and set goals to limit white police response to a black suspect. In the case of traffic stops, if the suspect is black and the officer is white, the officer should remain in the car until a black officer can respond. In non-traffic cases, the white officers should follow the suspect until a black officer can respond. If at anytime the suspect has a gun in their hand pointing it at anyone, deadly force by the white officer is permitted. Otherwise, only a black officer can use deadly force.

Second, if a death penalty deters crime, it should deter police error too. A death penalty for police error would make the police err on the side of the suspect.
The problem is, the police are shooting when they feel they or the public are in fatal danger when neither they nor the public is in danger. That is an error in judgement.
Judgement errors will go away if it was known to a policeman that instead of them being protected by rules, regulations and laws that allows them to be the judge in these split second situations, and instead, they can be sent to death row if the evidence shows, after the fact, that there was not a threat.

saltwind 78 wrote:
Two African- American men were shot and k**led by the police in the past two days. From what I can determine from videos, neither of these two men were threatening the police. The second incident was even more disturbing than the first. This young person was a young man that had no police record. He worked as a supervisor of a school cafeteria. He had a CWP and followed all the regulations required by the law.
Neither of the men that were k**led by the police did anything to warrant being shot, from the videos I saw on the TV news.
The question must be asked, what is broken in local police departments that causes these kinds of incidents from happening over and over again, and what can be done to stop them?
Two African- American men were shot and k**led by ... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 8, 2016 22:42:01   #
A joke is that there is some big deal over classified briefings. We learn from the FBI investigation that emails that were sent to thousands of people, were retroactively defined as classified. What a joke! It's called classified after it had already been sent to at least a thousand folks. Who knows who they sent it to? Another joke is Bush and Libby over classified Valerie Plame.

I just think when Ryan speaks for the GOP saying, "It ain't over" then, it is classified code to the GOP congress that actually, this is a failure and it is over.

Glaucon wrote:
Paul Ryan Becomes A National Joke By Suggesting Trump Not Clinton Should Have Classified Info

Paul Ryan suggested at his weekly news conference that Hillary Clinton should not be given classified briefings because of her emails, but that it was perfectly fine for Sadaam Hussein fan Donald Trump to have access to classified information.
Go to
Jul 8, 2016 22:18:32   #
Hemiman wrote:
First he showed there is no longer any law in America except what Obama says is law.Second,by letting the obviously guilty Clinton off he immediately went from asset to liability,the second his speech ended.Mr.Comey turned himself into a loose end and I think everyone knows what happens to loose ends in the Clinton world.Now Comey can spend the rest of his life wondering when someone in government will feel threatened because he may talk about what pressures were used to get him too forgive her criminal actions.The fool painted a target on his back that will never wash off.lt's only a matter of time before Comey's name and natural causes appear in the same sentence.
First he showed there is no longer any law in Amer... (show quote)


http://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/766f812/2147483647/resize/1200x%3E/format/png/quality/85/?url=%2Fcmsmedia%2F40%2F20%2Ffe7d2ba6492b9f5994eefb6e968f%2F20160707edhoc-a.tif
Go to
Jul 6, 2016 00:07:59   #
It always cracks me up to learn what many people believe. So many believe you need a license or need to register one to own one. I guess it's their perception about a car and I guess they figure its the same.

oldroy wrote:
This indicates that the people of southern California aren't too smart if they are like these i***ts. After speaking to all kinds of that class of people Dice finally finds one who has enough sense to back off. Notice how many of those people agree that we of the gun owner class should be locked up in FEMA camps. He really gets a crowd of them this time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYlHbDN-DNU
Go to
Jun 19, 2016 01:03:44   #
Any way it is spun, it comes down to the fact the words are written to that the part about, "a well regulated m*****a" has nothing to do with "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" yet at the same time, they both shall NOT be "infringed" upon.

Even the liberals know they ain't going to win the constitutional test with a weapons ban. Best option is the information age and technology for security to block AR semi-auto style high capacity sales particularly if the purchaser has any history of a mental case or FBI suspicion.

That may not be so bad after all and after looking at all the mass shooter profiles, it could work but just need to include direct relatives like Sandy Hook.

Also don't have a problem with placing them in an institution. Maybe that needs to be done in the Federal authority to make it work. On release, they shall also give up their 2nd amendment rights because they are a small percentage of the overall population and are vulnerable to using the right for massacre fantasies rather than protecting the security of a free state.

Meister wrote:
Why is this part of the Second Amendment scrupulously overlooked? The 2nd Amendment clearly does not say that all citizens have the right to bear arms. Maintaining a well regulated m*****a should not be infringed--and there is just cause for that. But nearly no gun owner is part of a well regulated m*****a. But "well regulated" and "shall not be infringed" seem to butt-heads. Yet not really. Allowing for a group of authorized citizens under an individual state to maintain a standing army following strict military protocol in the practice and use of its weapons "shall not be infringed." YOU CANNOT OVERLOOK "a well regulated m*****a."
Why is this part of the Second Amendment scrupulou... (show quote)
Go to
Jun 19, 2016 00:42:27   #
She is speaking to the rogue base for Trump because lately, when he reaches out to them, republican politicians get in line to tell reporters how they don't agree with what he said. Having Palin speak instead, allows the message to get to the rogue base without media fanfare of criticism.

Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
If only she had been running for president rather than McCain, the t***h would have come out about Obama and his C*******t & Muslim views and our history would be so different... Don D.

NEWSMAX

Palin Rips Obama's Orlando Speech: 'A Special Kind of Stupid'

By Todd Beamon | Friday, 17 Jun 2016


Sarah Palin said Friday that President Barack Obama was "a special kind of stupid" because of his calls for tighter gun restrictions in light of the Orlando terrorist shootings.

"Enough is enough, Mr. President," the former Alaska governor and 2008 vice p**********l candidate, said on Facebook. "There's no 'due respect' due after pulling this stunt.

"Exploiting a sick, evil, ideological-driven attack on Americans to further your twisted anti-Second Amendment mission is d********g," Palin continued. "Today, you're demanding an 'explanation' from law-abiding gun owners, but not demanding the same from followers of Islam, the religion behind this terror?"

In his speech Thursday outside the Amway Center in downtown Orlando, President Obama said that tougher gun laws were necessary because "our politics have conspired" to make it easy for possible terrorists or "disturbed" individuals to buy powerful guns.

The Orlando shooter, Omar Mateen, 29, of Fort Pierce, Florida, shot 49 people dead and injured as many as 53 others Sunday with an AR-15 assault rifle inside the Pulse gay nightclub.

He had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State during the assaults. Mateen was k**led in a gun battle with Orlando SWAT team officers.

"If the demented Orlando terrorist doesn't represent all Islamic followers, then why do you insinuate he represents all gun owners?" Palin asked in her post.

"And why, after any shooting, do you always want to take away firearms from the innocent people who didn't do it?

"Forget your asinine gun control, do your job and engage in Islamic terrorist control," she said. "Yes, it's a special kind of stupid to demand we explain ourselves."

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/palin-rips-obama-orlando/2016/06/17/id/734455/#ixzz4Bw7o1qJg
If only she had been running for president rather ... (show quote)
Go to
Jun 11, 2016 22:59:12   #
I've heard both sides for many years now explain a financial benefit or a cost to the i******s. It doesn't matter if there is a financial benefit to those opposed due to the principal of the whole thing being illegal. it doesn't matter if there is a financial cost to those for it due to the principal of the whole thing being American tradition.

Obviously, calling out illegal activity has the law on it's side yet, the practical matter of it is it costs far more to enforce the law than to ignore it.

I think there is a ring of t***h to the point that undocumented pay billions more than they'll ever receive in benefits but I find it so sad that the statistic is used to justify the continuance of the behavior.

It is also so sad to relinquish the problem to the least common denominator of taxpayer cost. I don't care if it costs more, I want people to be treated with dignity and honor and I want the law to be upheld.

Either change the law and allow the undocumented to stay and contribute to our society as non-citizen participants who benefit
OR
Enforce the law and take the poison pill of the costs to send them back.

I prefer the more compassionate embracement of undocumented immigrants where they have to pay a fee and make amends for being illegal and if any i******s are found that have not declared their illegal, undocumented status, then they should have a more stringent penalty. But under no condition do I foresee it to be ethical to deport any otherwise legal citizen (minor traffic violations excluded) without a process because they our laws and processes have allowed them here and I think there is a ring of t***h they have found a niche in the American Dream and are contributing. For that reason, give them a path toward legal status if not citizenship.




Go to
Jun 3, 2016 23:37:09   #
You're right and I need to remember and focus on the good times and the blessings and how the things we could control, we excelled and fought together as a team; we had cheers we'd do with fist-pump and a kiss to celebrate victories everyday as well as those special times. And I look forward to an end too because it is very exhausting and I cry at the dumbest, sappiest things or like today a clerk who knew my loss asked how it was going and my throat closed and I lost it, whew it is exhausting. I love her so much and I know she doesn't want me to be miserable so I am starting grieving counseling next week offered by the hospice I had her with and hopefully that will help me pass it better than I'm doing. But just reading these posts has been a big big help more than you'll ever know. Thank you.

Super Dave wrote:
Sometimes it's hard to count your blessings, and often those are the time you need to do so the most.

I've not known the love of my life 5 years to date, but if I've already been blessed way, way more than I've earned.

I hope your grieving passes quickly. We're praying for you.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 213 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.