The latest Time magazine cover features an illustration of President Donald Trump gazing at a reflection of himself in which he's dressed up as a monarch, complete with jeweled crown and fur cape.
The picture is accompanied by the text: "KING ME."

In a piece about the cover posted online Thursday, Time said that it's meant to address "the political attacks launched by the White House on Robert Mueller."

Mueller is the special counsel appointed to investigate potential meddling by Russia in the 2016 p**********l e******n. It's long been a sore spot for the president.

SO thrilled about my first @TIME cover story, written with the wonderful @mollyesque . Read it to learn about Trump's war on Robert Mueller -- and why it may be working

289 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Trump has repeatedly called the probe a "witch hunt." This week, Trump also referred to the investigation as "unconstitutional" and insisted that he can pardon himself.

Related: Giuliani says shifting Trump Tower story was 'a mistake. I swear to God.'

"As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?" Trump wrote on Twitter Monday.

http://money.cnn.com/2018/06/07/media/time-magazine-cover-president-trump/index.html

Today i have read that Americans have tears on their cheeks because of i*****l a***ns at the border...So let me ask you, you dont have tears for American parents that are PERMANENTLY separated from their kids by illegal criminals???PERMANENTLY...Do you know what that means??They will NEVER see their kids again!!! EVER!!!!..The only time they can talk to their loved ones is when they visit them at the cemetery..At least these parents who crossed the border illegally will have a chance to actually see their children again!!!....So you worry more about criminals( because its against the law to cross the border illegally) then Americans??/Where the hell is your priority???.....Last night i saw this banner that said"Keep our families together!"..Interesting that what parents of murdered children wanted too....Only their cries are NOT heard!!!...Very sad!!1

...AND the Republican, Conservative, Right-Wingers should stop claiming that the two are the same.

Liberalism is not Socialism, and never will be. There is a great gulf fixed. It is not a gulf of method, it is a gulf of principle... Socialism seeks to pull down wealth; Liberalism seeks to raise up poverty. Socialism would destroy private interests; Liberalism would preserve private interests in the only way in which they can be safely and justly preserved, namely by reconciling them with public right. Socialism would k**l enterprise; Liberalism would rescue enterprise from the trammels of privilege and preference... Socialism exalts the rule; Liberalism exalts the man. Socialism attacks capital; Liberalism attacks monopoly.

- - Winston Churchill on liberalism and socialism, 1908
___________

If God is in control, it means that you are Muslim, not Christian. In Islamic theology, it is called Inshallah: Nothing happens without the direct, intervening hand of Allah willing it so. Such as child abuse, rape, the Twin Towers, Trump, Serial k**lers, and no date for the Prom. Is that a loving God (especially on that last point)?

Nowhere in the Bible does it either state or suggest that God is in control. You can go here https://www.openbible.info/topics/god_is_in_control to find the very best Christian attempt,by scripture, to support the apostasy that God is control, but once you read them, you will see not one asserts that God is control. Yet before I go any further, try to imagine what it means to say God is in control, considering what you think of as control. Let your child be kidnapped, tortured, and murdered if you could prevent it?

Why does the Bible say that God frequently alters his plans, cancels prophecies in the light of changing circumstances, and speaks about the future as a “maybe,” a “perhaps,” or a “possibility”? Why does Scripture describe God as expressing uncertainty about the future, being disappointed in the way things turn out, and even occasionally regretting the outcome of his own decisions?

If you knew what Satan would do, would you have created him? If God foreknew that Adolf Hitler would send six million Jews to their deaths, why did he go ahead and create a man like that? Is he no complicit? How is God not responsible for the behavior of evil people he “unleashes” on the world if, in fact, he is absolutely certain of what they will do once “unleashed”? If God is eternally certain that various individuals will end up being eternally damned, why does he go ahead and create them? And then try to get them to accept what is the lie of his grace throughout their lives—as though there were genuine hope for them? If the future is exhaustively settled in God’s mind, as the classical view holds, why does the Bible repeatedly describe God changing his mind?

Let us not fall into the trap of putting our trust in the static, pagan concept of a bored deity mindlessly watching his pre-planned scenario unfold, and maybe having to wonder what cosmic tragedy he has assigned to us for our "own good." He sees the big picture that we as temporal beings cannot, but He makes it clear that He relates to us according to how we see time. We can understand that from statements such as what He said to Abraham in Genesis 22:12, “Now I know that you fear God.…” If words have meanings, up until that moment God did not absolutely know what Abraham, a free will being, would choose to do.

If a person has genuine free will, then his choices cannot be absolutely known in advance of his decisions to make those choices, even by God—unless, of course, He says differently in His Word, which He does not. Did God have a pretty good idea of what Abraham would do? Certainly. He sovereignly chose to relate to mankind as His Word subsequently declares He does, that is, in a “linear” relationship, experiencing time passing with us.

Think of God more like Bobby Fisher. Bobby Fischer was once the world’s greatest chess player. Suppose you sat down to play him in his prime? Any doubt of the outcome? Would Bobby need to know what your moves were before you did? Nope. Why not? Because it wouldn’t matter at all what you did, he’d have a hundred contingency plans for each move you made. After all, he’s Bobby Fischer, the world’s greatest chess player. Ditto for the world’s greatest God!

Because the census has nothing to do with citizenship and is a count of those who reside within our boarders. The only reason you cons want to change it is because you want to strike fear into i*****l i*******ts and nothing more. I h**e to tell you but whether you count i******s or not they will still be here and still doing all the things you h**e them for. Oh, and if we get i******s to v**e for us how is it Trump is president, and if you listen to him, by a landslide. The proof that i******s don't v**e is that Trump is president and you people hold the majority in the house and senate...

You forgot, anti....Trump
Anti.... Constitutionalist
Anti.....unity
Anti.....freedom and liberty

2018 will be yet another surprise... The dems should be in lline to take more seats since they Lost the hoyse but anything is possible..

Meanwhile another four Federal judges were placed in office by Trump last week..He should get all empty seats placed now, now later..
As of May 17, 2018, the United States Senate has confirmed 39 Article III judges nominated by President Trump, including 1 Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, 21 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, 17 judges for the United States District Courts, and 0 judges for the United States ...

Get it done!!!

Liberal Court Appoints Prosecutor in Bid to Jail Arpaio, Overturn Trump Pardon

Liberal Court Appoints Prosecutor in Bid to Jail Arpaio, Overturn Trump Pardon

The president’s power to pardon is absolute, but that isn’t stopping a coalition of liberal activists and a liberal federal court.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is taking the unusual step of appointing a special prosecutor to argue that former Maricopa County, Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio’s contempt of court conviction should stand, despite being pardoned by Trump.

Arpaio was convicted in 2017 on charges of defying a federal court order to cease patrols of the U.S./Mexico border.

Trump quickly pardoned Arpaio. Liberal activists sued to overturn Arpaio’s pardon, claiming it violated their constitutional rights.

They not only want Arpaio’s conviction to remain on his record, but they also claim they can overturn the pardon in court.

The Justice Department sided with Arpaio, pointing out the president’s power to pardon in the case is unquestionable.

That’s when the court, in a 2-1 ruling, ordered a special prosecutor be appointed to argue against the pardon.

There is no precedent for such a case, and no p**********l pardon has ever been overturned in court. That’s because the Constitution unequivocally states the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”

That means, except in cases of impeachment, the President can pardon anyone for any federal crime, such as Arpaio’s federal conviction for contempt.

While the president could be prosecuted for selling a pardon or using one to obstruct justice, the pardon itself cannot be challenged.

Only one member of the three-judge panel dissented.

Judge Richard C. Tallman, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote, “I fear the majority’s decision will be viewed as judicial imprimatur of the special prosecutor to make inappropriate, unrelated, and undoubtedly political attacks on p**********l authority. We should not be wading into that thicket.”

But that isn’t stopping liberal activists groups from suing to overturn the Constitution and imprison Arpaio in an act of political vengeance.
Source