One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bcon
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 258 next>>
Oct 9, 2019 18:40:22   #
proud republican wrote:
Yes,but even Trump's allies think it was a mistake!!


Trump has many f**e allies that would like to see him out. He can trust few of them, they are part of the deep state .
Go to
Oct 9, 2019 18:38:50   #
Liberty Tree wrote:
I do not know. How long do we have to stay in these countries?


We are not the world police force. There are many allies of Syria. Why don’t they step in to defend them. I wouldn’t want my son or daughter in peril in a battle that no one else cares about. They have been fighting in the Middle East for years. What is the UN doing. We give millions to them. They prove they are useless. We don’t belong in any country yesterday does not threaten us. If they do, it is a different situation. Then, go in with everything we have to eliminate them. Nukes, if necessary. The only people who benefit from us going in are the arms manufacturers. They can still make money if other people want to fight.
Go to
Oct 8, 2019 19:19:01   #
woodguru wrote:
Or it may be sites that aren't worth looking at?


No, they are not liberal sites. They are sites that speak t***h and that is against liberal liars principles.
Go to
Oct 8, 2019 16:34:48   #
factnotfiction wrote:
Sounds like f**e news from fat limbah and alex jones

Where is the link of this revelation?


You have to be a dyed in the wool liberal democrat who only believes the bulls**t your party delivers. If I can find this info, you can. But, you may have to work for it and that may be against your principles.
Go to
Oct 8, 2019 14:12:25   #
Hillary is evil, and whether or not she goes to jail for the horrendous crimes she has committed… SHE IS SURELY GOING TO HELL.

According to an expert on the B******i situation, Hillary Clinton all but murdered Ambassador Stevens herself. “She definitely didn’t do him any favors” said our source.

In an email released regarding Hillary’s B******i investigation, there was one specific message that detailed the exact location of Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Because this email was sent through the unsecured server, it is highly probable that terrorists intercepted the message.


There were five relevant emailsin the cache of Clinton emails that placed Amb. Stevens in harms way:

March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”


March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to B******i.

He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground.

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”

April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in B******i remains quiet.

Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”

April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton marked said, “The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from B******i.

The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout.

April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton: “Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination.

He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”

Read the email closely. It begins at the bottom with Hillary (H) writing in the subject line “Chris Smith.” Yes, Chris Smith was one of the Americans that was also k**led, but it shows that the wrong name remained in the email chain. No one corrected it.

And no one can argue that they were focused on “the situation,” because if they truly were, they would never have revealed his location 5 separate times in unsecured emails.

Clinton claims to have been deeply affected by the death of an American Ambassador, yet she can’t even remember what his name is? Hillary allowed B******i to happen, she placed everyone at risk with her incompetence, and she is to blame for why he cannot go home to his family.

The emails above are from a chain of emails that reveal Ambassador Stevens‘ location was readily available to anyone who could hack into Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private email server.

Which, according to the FBI, was not very hard to do.

It is very possible that these emails were intercepted, but Hillary failed these Americans several times.

She failed them when she declined to adequately supply and arm them when they requested it for months, she never answered their requests for help that night for 13 hours, and she still to this day lies about how she left our Americans exposed to an attack. She didn’t care then, and she never will.

But we do.
Go to
Oct 7, 2019 14:32:47   #
This is as real as it gets

by Joe Gilbertson October 7, 2019 in Uncategorized
15
Gilbertson: Hillary is Orchestrating All of This – And She IS Running for President! Part I
Last week I wrote a rather tongue in cheek article suggesting that Trump may have been trolling the Democrats by starting the Ukraine ‘scandal’ himself, just to circulate the word about Biden’s crimes.

But despite wishing it were true, I didn’t really believe it. An op like that is way too hard to control, and would have put President Trump in the crosshairs if it went wrong.

There was an element I was missing, a layer of conspiracy we couldn’t see yet.

You Might Like


Learn more about RevenueStripe...
But it falls into place now that Hillary’s shining face is starting to make news, coincidentally just as Biden’s bid for President is crumbling as an “unintended consequence” of the attack on President Trump regarding the Ukraine.

I am convinced that Hillary intends to re-enter the 2020 P**********l race. I am further convinced that she never gave up on this goal. She has the tools, the allies, the network of leakers and the witting or unwitting cooperation of the liberal media. That is method, motive and opportunity.

I believe this was her intention all along, and, indeed, she has been orchestrating this from the beginning.

Let’s pursue this in reverse chronological order.



Fast Forward to December 2019 – Hillary’s Announcement to Run for President in 2020.

Biden’s campaign crumbles under the weight of scandal, the media and grassroots call for Hillary to re-enter the race for President, who accepts with great humility. Wall Street loves her, she is flush with cash, and her old die-hard supporters have re-emerged.

She is the counter to the far left radicals who threaten the country. Her leading opponent, Elizabeth Warren is easily disposed of, by a yet-uncovered scandal or campaign strategy. Hillary is about to take on a weakened President Trump who has endured apparent scandal after apparent scandal.



Present – Biden’s Fall and the Rise of Hillary

The latest episode if the Impeachment Saga, the Ukraine investigation, appears to be centered on Donald Trump. But Donald Trump has weathered larger storms already, his supporters are with him (he has raised over $15 million just because of this scandal) and have built up an immunity. But every time the media accuses Trump of wrongdoing, their explanation has to mention Biden. Indeed the video of Biden admitting at least part of his alleged crime has been played over and over again.

Clinton is not a Biden ally. A 2015 article in the NY Times noted that Clinton had taken steps to neutralize Biden. She clearly had dirt on him, and has been quoted to have threatened Biden to stay out of the 2016 race, saying to Biden, “I would never leak this to the press, but I can’t control what my staff might do.”

How would she implement this? While Trump’s operatives would not know who the “deep state” leakers were, or the people waiting in the wings for an opportunity to do their part in attacking Trump (thus my previous conspiracy theory, while fun to think about, was not very likely), Hillary certainly would know the leakers. In fact, it’s a standard political move, she almost certainly had hand in placing them.

In the mind of Hillary, knowing Biden’s weaknesses, she would not hesitate to launch this indirect attack. And it was easy enough.

Hillary has an alliance with Congressman Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committe, and the primary Trump antagonist. Schiff has been an outspoken supporter of Clinton since before the 2016 primaries, and carried the ball on the Russia collusion investigations and other Trump attacks ever since.

It was an easy lift to direct one of the network of leakers to wait for any conversation between Trump and the Ukraine. Doesn’t matter which conversation, as we now know the conversation cited had no nefarious quality to it. Just a President doing his job.

But the whistleblower’s actual report, as you now know, contained so much innuendo that it was worthy of the modern CNN. If you compare it with the transcripts of the Trumps conversation, you find little match with reality.

Would you say that the Democrat and media reaction has been disproportionate? Would you say that the call for impeachment, before the whistleblower’s report had been read, was a bit odd?

Also note that if impeachment proceedings were completed by December, the Senate’s proceedings, run by Republicans, would certainly be a campaign commercial for Trump and the right, and would be much closer to the e******n. So the Democrats would be much better off waiting a few months right?

But that wasn’t the point. The goal of the operation was not to take down Trump. It was to take down Biden.

Hillary WILL enter the race.

If Biden, the lone moderate contender, collapses under scandal, it becomes the perfect opportunity for Hillary to enter the race, absorbing all Biden supporters, since they will be oblivous to Hillary’s treachery.

If she were to enter with Biden still in the race, there may be resentment generated, so her timing must be such that she is ‘rescuing’ the Democratic Party from the far left reactionaries.



Russian Collusion – The Hillary Connection

Go back to the beginning and this becomes obvious. As we know from testimony and media reports, the f**e Russian ‘dossier’ (bad and obviously f**es, read here to see more) was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign, and facilitated through the FISA process by Clinton supporters in the FBI. The special prosecutor was assigned and the investigation was launched despite of the lack of evidence.

As mentioned before, the chief antagonist has been Adam Schiff, a declared Hillary supporter who has protected her consistently. I suspect (but cannot know) that Schiff has been promised a huge role in a Hillary Clinton administration. He has plenty of incentive to do Hillary’s bidding, and has been a great help in implementing her strategies.

While you might think that a long drawn out impeachment process would be something the Democrats would do naturally, to set themselves up for the 2020 e******ns, this is not really good strategy. The possibility of unpredicted consequences for the mid-terms would be too great. It was also too early, fatigue has set in, Trump is starting to turn it around. The better strategy would be to wait until the mid-terms had passed, anticipating the anti-incumbent swing that always occurs.

Hillary is the difference.

She didn’t care about the mid-terms, she is focused only on being the most powerful leader in the world.

Not to worry about issue fatigue, she had other surprises for Trump. With her knowledge of the leakers network she has the ability to manufacture new crises at will. With Adam Schiff as her puppet, she can spin the media into a frenzy with official investigations right and left. The liberal media loved her before and share her h**e of Donald Trump, and so don’t care whether the investigations have substance or not.
Go to
Oct 6, 2019 17:50:01   #
How has this scandal gone unnoticed?
Undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt have exposed Planned Parenthood’s criminal conduct in perform- ing partial-birth a******ns and using a labor- inducing drug to intentionally deliver babies alive. Why? So babies’ parts can be removed intact and sold for greater profit, LifeSite- News reported.
In 2015, Daleiden and Merritt released undercover videos recording Planned Par- enthood officials and biotech firm executives discussing how Planned Parenthood cir- cumvents the partial-birth a******n ban and traffics in aborted baby body parts, includ- ing from babies intentionally born alive. The videos are alarming evidence of criminal activity and infanticide by Planned Parent- hood.
However, in an incredible twist of events, instead of criminal charges being filed against Planned Parenthood and the biotech firms that purchased the baby body parts, then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris charged the undercover journalists with 14 counts of conspiracy and wiretap- ping for surreptitiously recording the con- versations.
The videos were introduced at a prelimi- nary hearing held in September to determine if the case has merit.
The primary labor-inducing drug believed to have been used by Planned Parenthood is Misoprostol. In high doses, Misoprostol causes “tumultuous labor” resulting in “fetal expulsion,” i.e. the baby comes out of the mother without using surgical instruments that might dam-
age the baby. The a******nist then does a vivisection, which is the cutting open of a live baby to harvest its beating heart, liver, brain, etc.
According to sworn testimony by long- time a******nist Dr. Forrest Smith, “... it was almost certain that some of the abor- tionists featured in the undercover videos
deliberately altered a******n procedures in a way that both led to the birth of living babies with beating hearts and put women at risk.”
Smith testified that a video presenta- tion of a 2014 Planned Parenthood confer- ence advocated the use of Misoprostol. Smith said the drug expels a living baby whose heart continues to beat for several minutes. Daleiden testified that the high price of living organs created big incentive for Planned Parenthood to use the drug. Testimony revealed that one vial of liver stem cells purchased by biotech firm Stem- Express from Planned Parenthood sold for $17,000.
Dr. Therese Deisher, a Stanford Univer- sity scientist, testified that Smith’s testi- mony “definitely proved that these babies are being deliberately born alive for the purposes of harvesting ... They want those babies coming out with beating hearts,” she said. Deisher said Smith’s testimony made it “very clear that this is intentional.” She also confirmed that a study at Stanford required the use of hearts harvested from living babies.
This is an eye opener. I think most people, myself included, believed that babies born alive during an a******n are accidents of a failed procedure and that such instances are rare. But the Daleiden case is nauseating proof that babies born alive — then k**led for their body parts — may be more the norm than the exception.
It’s clear why Democrats are pushing hard to decriminalize partial-birth a******n and infanticide. Their political campaigns rely on donations from Planned Parenthood which needs political cover from Democrats so the a******n giant can vivisect babies on operating tables without fear of prosecu- tion.
Go to
Oct 5, 2019 17:30:06   #
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Going to Grease, is that to have seen the play? Guys, it's Greece


He is going to grease to cook his turkey. He probably gets lost in his hometown. Street signs may confuse him.World traveler? Sorry, I doubt anything he says. With a lack of command of his own language, I am not sure he could find his way.
Go to
Oct 5, 2019 17:24:23   #
kemmer wrote:
It’s amazing how little trumpies know about what’s going on because they ignore legitimate news orgs. and only listen to Trump’s lies.


Tell me about your legitimate news orgs. CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc.,etc.
You believe any crap that they put out and ignore real facts and also ignore the actual t***h when it does come out. You are a typical liberal who refuses to hear anything that goes against your one world government view of the left wing party of democrats.
Go to
Oct 4, 2019 14:41:53   #
MR Mister wrote:
LOL, see how dumb you are!!! They built a 2nd canal next to the old one for SUPER TANKERS, god you are so stupid.


MR Mister. To try to argue real facts with lone wolf, you first have to educate him in the spelling and pronunciation of the English language. Then you have to be astute enough to realize that lies pour out of his mouth faster than t***h can get to his brain. Then You have to have the uncommon patience of Job to get to the point that he may actually understand you. IF he he is a world traveler and has the same problems with foreign languages that he does with English you have to be willing to accept every lie that he puts in his posts. In The long run, it is much easier to accept his bullcrap for what we all know it is, and ignore him. Anything else is a waste of time. Enjoy life. Let his hatred of anything that isn’t democrat eat him up inside.
Go to
Oct 1, 2019 16:09:28   #
JediKnight wrote:
Eagle: we are in agreement once again - someone better call Ripley's! Yes, the Israelites had to learn the hard way -as do many living in today's times. I think your post is a pretty good and fair description of Trump and the 'f**e' Christians who support him. Thanks for sharing!


I can say that with your attitude, I think you may be a false Christian. You are still throwing stones which in politics may be the norm. When you put a religious slant to your stone throwing, it creates a whole new picture of you being a pawn of Satan.
Go to
Oct 1, 2019 15:53:38   #
JediKnight wrote:
I was actually born with them -as were you - the question is; will we keep them?

I have never claimed to take God's place. I don't 'condemn' Trump or anyone else -only God can condemn. However, I am well within Christian doctrine to point out the flaws in supporting and following one such as Trump. Trump doing dirt before he was in office does not serve as protection against the crimes he did and continues to do. Yes, all politicians are prone to lying -its the unending, deliberate, and totally unnecessary lying that is Trump's flaw. He denigrates Muslims by labeling them all "terrorists".

Many profess to be Christians. Hopefully you know that even Satan believed in God at one point. Yes, the bible teaches that we all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. And the bible also teaches that "when your brother errs, you are to correct him (in love) and try to bring him back into the fold."

So, what you mistake as "religious arrogance" is actually me pointing out the dangerous character flaws of Trump and those who support and defend him. I can 'almost' understand those who support him for wh**ever reason -I believe they think that because he calls democrats, women, and minorities horrible names and fabricates many lies about them that he is somehow worth supporting -which of course couldn't be further from the t***h. However, I cannot understand those who, knowing the t***h, continue to try and defend Trump's deliberate h**eful ways as if that's A-Okay, when it truly isn't okay....no, not okay at all.
Many a sheep is led to the slaughter for simply blindly following the lead lamb.
I was actually born with them -as were you - the q... (show quote)


Who in Gods great universe has bestowed on you the arrogant attitude that you should be the one who points out flaws or sins in anyone. You are prejudiced against Trump so you point to his misgivings. How much do you condemn the sins of Hillary, Bill, Obama and Michelle? Very little,I presume. You are a died in the wool liberal who will do or say anything against conservatives no matter how much good they do. You try to use religion to denigrate any conservative who may cross over the red line that you arbitrarily set to please yourself. That only goes so far and you expose yourself to whom you really are and also to your liberal beliefs.
Go to
Oct 1, 2019 15:08:56   #
JediKnight wrote:
I told you Radiance is delusional. How could she or anyone claim that Trump "supports Christian beliefs" when his actions defy the very basic and fundamental of those beliefs -such as NOT lying, NOT c***ting on your spouse, NOT racially discriminating, NOT sexually assaulting others, NOT stealing -on and on?

People like her actually insult God with their foolishness. But no worries -
"God is not mocked. Wh**ever a man (woman) soweth, that shall he surely reap." -Christ in Galatians 6

Someone should provide Radiance with this present:
I told you Radiance is delusional. How could she o... (show quote)


How long have you had your angel wings? I know of no one that is so pure and sinless that he can take Gods place and condemn anyone for his perceived sins. If you are human, you are a sinner in some respects. Most people who preach are sinners in their own ways. Look at headlines today. Want more proof. No matter what religion you profess to or none at all, you are a sinner. Let he who is sinless cast the first stones. Wh**ever Trump has done, and most of the more egregious actions, were done before he was in office. As for lying, what politician doesn’t lie? He does not denigrate any religion and at least he professes to be a Christian. He never said”God damn America” from a pulpit. I am positive, even if I don’t know you
Go to
Oct 1, 2019 14:17:23   #
eagleye13 wrote:
"a normal person of positive qualities." ?
Jedi!
This guy must be your type?
https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2018/5/10/48785-bmf20.jpg


You really put the picture in place. You know this guy has to be a libtard.
Go to
Sep 30, 2019 20:56:20   #
rumitoid wrote:
Ho-hum.


I am glad that you take criticism so blase’.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 258 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.