DAMNING EVIDENCE: 5 Deleted Emails Recovered From Hillary’s Server Show How To K**l Amb. Stevens
Oct 8, 2019 14:12:25 #
Hillary is evil, and whether or not she goes to jail for the horrendous crimes she has committed… SHE IS SURELY GOING TO HELL.
According to an expert on the B******i situation, Hillary Clinton all but murdered Ambassador Stevens herself. “She definitely didn’t do him any favors” said our source.
In an email released regarding Hillary’s B******i investigation, there was one specific message that detailed the exact location of Ambassador Chris Stevens.
Because this email was sent through the unsecured server, it is highly probable that terrorists intercepted the message.
There were five relevant emailsin the cache of Clinton emails that placed Amb. Stevens in harms way:
March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”
March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to B******i.
He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground.
Learn more about RevenueStripe...
The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”
April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in B******i remains quiet.
Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”
April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton marked said, “The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from B******i.
The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout.
April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton: “Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination.
He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”
Read the email closely. It begins at the bottom with Hillary (H) writing in the subject line “Chris Smith.” Yes, Chris Smith was one of the Americans that was also k**led, but it shows that the wrong name remained in the email chain. No one corrected it.
And no one can argue that they were focused on “the situation,” because if they truly were, they would never have revealed his location 5 separate times in unsecured emails.
Clinton claims to have been deeply affected by the death of an American Ambassador, yet she can’t even remember what his name is? Hillary allowed B******i to happen, she placed everyone at risk with her incompetence, and she is to blame for why he cannot go home to his family.
The emails above are from a chain of emails that reveal Ambassador Stevens‘ location was readily available to anyone who could hack into Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private email server.
Which, according to the FBI, was not very hard to do.
It is very possible that these emails were intercepted, but Hillary failed these Americans several times.
She failed them when she declined to adequately supply and arm them when they requested it for months, she never answered their requests for help that night for 13 hours, and she still to this day lies about how she left our Americans exposed to an attack. She didn’t care then, and she never will.
But we do.
According to an expert on the B******i situation, Hillary Clinton all but murdered Ambassador Stevens herself. “She definitely didn’t do him any favors” said our source.
In an email released regarding Hillary’s B******i investigation, there was one specific message that detailed the exact location of Ambassador Chris Stevens.
Because this email was sent through the unsecured server, it is highly probable that terrorists intercepted the message.
There were five relevant emailsin the cache of Clinton emails that placed Amb. Stevens in harms way:
March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”
March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to B******i.
He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground.
Learn more about RevenueStripe...
The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”
April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in B******i remains quiet.
Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”
April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton marked said, “The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from B******i.
The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout.
April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton: “Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination.
He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”
Read the email closely. It begins at the bottom with Hillary (H) writing in the subject line “Chris Smith.” Yes, Chris Smith was one of the Americans that was also k**led, but it shows that the wrong name remained in the email chain. No one corrected it.
And no one can argue that they were focused on “the situation,” because if they truly were, they would never have revealed his location 5 separate times in unsecured emails.
Clinton claims to have been deeply affected by the death of an American Ambassador, yet she can’t even remember what his name is? Hillary allowed B******i to happen, she placed everyone at risk with her incompetence, and she is to blame for why he cannot go home to his family.
The emails above are from a chain of emails that reveal Ambassador Stevens‘ location was readily available to anyone who could hack into Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private email server.
Which, according to the FBI, was not very hard to do.
It is very possible that these emails were intercepted, but Hillary failed these Americans several times.
She failed them when she declined to adequately supply and arm them when they requested it for months, she never answered their requests for help that night for 13 hours, and she still to this day lies about how she left our Americans exposed to an attack. She didn’t care then, and she never will.
But we do.
Oct 8, 2019 15:14:39 #
Bcon wrote:
Hillary is evil, and whether or not she goes to ja... (show quote)
I think we should all agree on her final destination.
Oct 8, 2019 15:29:18 #
Oct 8, 2019 15:42:52 #
Bcon wrote:
Hillary is evil, and whether or not she goes to ja... (show quote)
Sounds like f**e news from fat limbah and alex jones
Where is the link of this revelation?
Oct 8, 2019 16:34:48 #
factnotfiction wrote:
Sounds like f**e news from fat limbah and alex jones
Where is the link of this revelation?
Where is the link of this revelation?
You have to be a dyed in the wool liberal democrat who only believes the bulls**t your party delivers. If I can find this info, you can. But, you may have to work for it and that may be against your principles.
Oct 8, 2019 16:52:12 #
Bcon wrote:
You have to be a dyed in the wool liberal democrat who only believes the bulls**t your party delivers. If I can find this info, you can. But, you may have to work for it and that may be against your principles.
Or it may be sites that aren't worth looking at?
Oct 8, 2019 19:19:01 #
woodguru wrote:
Or it may be sites that aren't worth looking at?
No, they are not liberal sites. They are sites that speak t***h and that is against liberal liars principles.
Oct 8, 2019 21:25:36 #
Bcon wrote:
No, they are not liberal sites. They are sites that speak t***h and that is against liberal liars principles.
Do I need a tinfoil hat to access these sites
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.