One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: donald41
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 40 next>>
Aug 20, 2018 12:58:59   #
BigMike wrote:
What does "do" mean?


You realy that dense.?
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 12:09:50   #
BigMike wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

"richo8181
3 hours ago (edited)
HAHA I'm Australian and even I know if they start a civil war Trumps supporters will have it finnished before morning smoko - one side has all the guns and the ammo, the other side can't even figure out what bathrooms and pronouns they should be using."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVKsx0J6myI


Hope that you are right.
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 12:06:51   #
JFlorio wrote:
Yesterday about two dozen supposed i***t white supremests showed up in Washington DC. The MSM made a big deal out of this.
They completely ignore that hundreds of A****A were chanting no borders, no USA, r****t police, murder Trump and other wonderful slogans.
The topper, NBC’s own camera crew got assaulted and they didn’t report it.
We are officially a Republic with a banana Republic press.


It is lying by ommision
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 11:59:29   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
Another Scumbag FED loser, misled, anti American and a T*****r to the Republic.

Still, Trump needs to dismantle the FBI, CIA and other like Unconstitutional agencies Flat OUT !



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>



ALLNEWSIMAGESMAPSVIDEOSSHOPPINGBOOKSFLIGHTSSEARCH TOOLS
TOP STORIES
FBI agent Peter Strzok fired over anti-Trump texts
Washington Post - 23 mins ago
Peter Strzok, F.B.I. Agent Who Criticized Trump in Texts, Is Fired
The New York Times - 15 mins ago
New York Post

FBI agent Peter Strzok fired over anti-Trump texts
5 mins ago
CNBC.com

FBI fires Peter Strzok over anti-Trump texts
19 mins ago
Washington Post

FBI agent Peter Strzok fired over anti-Trump texts
23 mins ago
CNN.com

See Strzok hit back at Gowdy
1 month ago
Feedback
FBI agent Peter Strzok fired over anti-Trump texts - The Washington ...
Washington Post › world › 2018/08/13
23 minutes ago · The FBI has fired Agent Peter Strzok, who helped lead the bureau's investigation into Russian ...
FBI fires Peter Strzok over anti-Trump texts, report says - CNBC.com
CNBC › 2018/08/13 › fbi-fires-peter-strz...
19 minutes ago · The FBI has fired Peter Strzok over anti-Trump text messages he exchanged with his lover during the 2016 p**********l campaign, Strzok's lawyer Aitan Goelman confirmed Monday. Strzok, who led the FBI's investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 e******n, was fired on ...
Another Scumbag FED loser, misled, anti American a... (show quote)


They are trying to do damage control.
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 11:55:30   #
permafrost wrote:
Biggest error in you thread is that of the little that the orange thing has accomplished, none of it is good for the nation..


How long is your nose?
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 11:52:53   #
Fit2BTied wrote:
(Note: I'm posting no facts or no URLs to open this post - just my opinion and my thoughts)
I v**ed for Donald Trump in the 2016 e******n. But it wasn't "My God, where has this guy been - he's the perfect candidate to turn things around in America" at the beginning. In all honesty it was my way of giving the middle finger to Washington DC and the federal government establishment. You know - those wonderful folks who told us they were running for office because they saw what we needed and knew how to make it happen. Then after e******n day they introduced themselves to the lobbyists and started feeding at the trough of graft and corruption like so many of their peers. They built powerful, well-funded organizations that helped to insure they were reelected time and again and faced no accountability to the people who v**ed for them.

And then a series of unexpected things happened. He clawed his way through the primaries, surviving Jeb and Ted and Marco. Then he beat Hillary Clinton in the face of withering mainstream media h**e and despite hundreds of polls that would have discouraged lesser men. Then, and this was the real shocker, he actually was able to accomplish much of what he told us he would. And that was in the face of a vehemently biased press, an activist Hollywood mob, a lock-step bunch of Democrats, and many establishment Republicans who never wanted President Trump to be elected, much less succeed - since it would rock their safe little worlds they'd spent so much effort putting together.

And so we're here now (pre-midterms), getting ready to see whether or not we can reinforce his ability to get Congress to actually pass some decent legislation and the legions of h**e, who were already at 11 on the dial are red-lining their efforts to derail this President. Despite cries of "there's no prejudice in the news media - we're not F**e News!", over 120 newspapers will begin editorially attacking the President on 16 August. Many in the media and sports entertainment world are going non-stop against him. Some lead demonstrations, while others just need an open mike to toss their verbal grenades.

Think about what is actually going on for a minute. They are convinced that they just need to be a little louder, a little more destructive, a little more "in your face" with their h**e. And he's still there. And he's still trying to push through the things he promised us that he would. And he's made mistakes. But be honest. If you faced the $#!+ storm he faces every day - would your performance be impeccable? I know mine wouldn't be close.

So I said all that to say this - it all started for me thinking "if we could just throw a wrench into the workings of that mess that is our government, maybe they'd understand just how much we thought they'd been failing us". And now I'm thankful that what may have started out as a joke to many (remember Seth Meyers saying "Donald Trump said that he was running for president as a Republican. That's funny, because I thought he was running as a joke.") has gotten to this point.

I think it's about time the rest of us grabbed hold of the rope and started pulling in the same direction so that we could not only keep our majorities in both houses, but maybe add a few seats in each of them. I think the President has earned it.
(Note: I'm posting no facts or no URLs to open thi... (show quote)

Iam with you. I was for Trump after the 1st guestion in the 1st debate, His answer to it was NO.
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 11:39:47   #
Lonewolf wrote:
It's about time to rein in the crook his wealth has let him live a life above the law now karma is catching up, no one to pay off now!

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/judge-emoluments-lawsuit-against-trump-can-go-forward.html


Boy are you clutching at straws.
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 11:35:51   #
Kevyn wrote:
55% disapprove of how Trump is handling the "investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 e******n." Just 34% approve.
47% approve of how Mueller is handling the probe as opposed to 39% who disapprove, an improvement from the 41% approve/29% disapprove in CNN's last poll in June.
Almost six in 10 think Russia's attempted interference in the 2016 campaign is a "serious matter that should be fully investigated."
56% think Trump has attempted to interfere in the investigation.
Just more than one in three (37%) of respondents say Trump's public statements about the Russia probe have been completely or mostly true. By contrast, 56% believe what Trump has said about the investigation is either mostly or completely false.
Almost 80% of Democrats say that the investigation into Russian interference will be either extremely or very important to their v**es for Congress this fall.
55% disapprove of how Trump is handling the "... (show quote)


Do you know that I do not believe a word of what I just Read?
Go to
Aug 13, 2018 12:27:05   #
Airforceone wrote:
You are without a doubt just as ignorant as Alex Jones. What a damm disgrace


I bet you even think that 9 11 was not a inside job.
Go to
Aug 13, 2018 12:11:12   #
dongreen76 wrote:
Spoken by a people whom has historically shown contempt and disdain for any type of life[ including animals] other than their own white,aryan,Anglo,ass,spoken by a people whom produced a man like Hitler,spoken by a people whom repeatedly gun down other peoples children at the proverbial drop of a hat [Brown,Trevon and so many others to numerous to enumerate] and expect others to grieve and mourn and moan when theirs meet with such the same fate,probably a fate befitting them in their never ending maniacal quest to subjectgate and emasculate the world under false pretenses.
Spoken by a people whom has historically shown con... (show quote)


You should seek help.
Go to
Aug 8, 2018 14:20:19   #
Chocura750 wrote:
He wants reporters k**led and disposed of. Hillary was considered extreme when she suggested that Trump would get reporters and news personalities k**led. She was scoffed at. Not any more.
Trump is cozy with some of the most authoritarian state rulers on the planet, Putin, Dutarte, Erdegan. Kim Un Jong. He is on record praising a country like Russia where the top dog makes a decision and all the others follow his tail.
Brave news gatherers in those dictatorial countries reporters are routinely k**led for publicly writing the t***h. 54 in 2017: 34 already in 2018. In those countries Trump's equivalent head of state also believes the press is "very dangerous and sick" and "enemies of the people".
Anyone who v**es for a Republican in November is v****g for the destruction of our democracy and the abolition of the Constitution.
He wants reporters k**led and disposed of. Hillar... (show quote)


Man are you stretching.
Go to
Aug 8, 2018 13:58:48   #
woodguru wrote:
https://dennismichaellynch.com/report-poll-reveals-percentage-of-republicans-that-want-to-give-trump-the-power-to-shut-down-media/

This is appalling that the party that supposedly has all of the regard for the constitution would let Trump have the power to shut down the media that he says is f**e news...

This is straight out of dictatorship 101, how to be a dictator. This is one of the most fundamental things that separates a democracy and free people from authoritarian dictatorships. The president/dictator does not get to decide which news sources they approve of.

I can't believe a question like this can be asked with a straight face, but then the party of patriotic supporters of the constitution is ignorantly willing to give this power away to a president?

This can be put in a context that would horrify the right, chill them to the bone. Let's say the left that supported Obama had felt it was okay to give Obama this right, and he could shut down FOX, Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones, Breitbart. Look at the about face on whether it's okay for a democratic president to have the power to decide which news sources they approve of, and shut down those they think are f**e news.
https://dennismichaellynch.com/report-poll-reveals... (show quote)


Your right , but the internet is doing this same thing,, Tit for tat I guess.
Go to
Aug 8, 2018 13:57:15   #
Airforceone wrote:
Trump has come to believe that he can operate in a fact free zone comfortably and without consequences. ( Just day f**e news)

Just follow the string of lies with the Trump tower meeting that Trump has told you all f**e news, no Collusion and no Obstruction.


I still have trouble seeing these lies your talking about.
Go to
Aug 7, 2018 12:21:51   #
woodguru wrote:
Personally I think it is more important to those who identify with the right to make it known that this is not okay. Being silent is a form of approval by default.

The party that is being associated with r****m needs to say it's not okay


Depends on whether they deserve being taken down a notch or two.
Go to
Jul 31, 2018 14:08:10   #
thebigp wrote:
58jH.,b58
President Trump is against their GRAVY TRAIN! That is why so many of the Congress are retiring. They hope to keep their Retirement as it stands now.

The Trump Rule’s Congressional Reform Act of 2018:
1 – NO TENURE / NO PENSION. A Congressman/Woman, collects a salary while in office and receives No Pay when they’re Out Of Office. No More Perks Go With Them.
2 – Congressman/Woman (Past, Present & Future) participate in Social Security. All Funds in the Congressional Retirement Fund Move To The Social Security System Immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security System and Congress participates with the American People. It may not be used for any other purposes.
3 – Congress must purchase their own Retirement Plan, just as all Americans do.

4 – Congress will No Longer V**e Themselves a Pay Increase. Congressional Pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
5 – Congress loses their current Healthcare System and participates in the same Healthcare System as the American People.
6 – Congress must equally abide by all the Laws they impose on the American People.
7 – All contracts with Past and Present Congressman/Woman are Void. The American People did not make this Contract with Congressmen/Women. Congress made all these Contracts For Themselves. Serving in Congress is an Honor, Not a Career. The Founding Fathers envisioned Citizen Legislators should serve their Terms, then go home and go back to work and not get all kinds of Freebies!
NO WONDER THEY’RE FIGHTING EVERYTHING HE TRIES!

SOURCE- Rule’s Congressional Reform Act of 2018:
58jH.,b58 br President Trump is against their GRAV... (show quote)


Sounds good to me.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 40 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.