buffalo wrote:
From the Confederacy of Drones:
In an era of name calling elevated to heights not seen since the New York Times called Robert E. Lee a flapdoodle foozler, one name we didn’t expect to hear in 2019 was “baby k**ler” yet there you are Democrats.
You’ve got to imagine they woke up the day after blocking a bill to protect a born person – otherwise known as, well, a person – thinking “#$%@, I just had the weirdest dream that I threw away my moral compass, stomped on the constitution and pandered to the fartherest of the farthest left we could go.” Otherwise known as a Tuesday.
From the Confederacy of Drones: br br In an era o... (
show quote)
So you're saying that if the infant is developing without proper kidneys or a brain the mother has to carry it until birth so the decision has to be made after bonding has occurred?
old marine wrote:
As an ex-marine Captain and combat veteran I must disagree with females being drafted.
There are many that have volunteered to serve in our various military. Many are fine officers.
I do not agree with putting them in harm's way but there have been some female airforce pilots who have been in actual combat.
I feel they would be best utilized as office personel, nurses and doctors serving stateside this would free up men for combat rolls.
Loyal American Patriots are not Comrades.
As an ex-marine Captain and combat veteran I must ... (
show quote)
Argreed the female members should be stateside. Those roles aren't necessarily only stateside. The women military I've worked with surprised me to the point of realizing that some of the members work out better then some male members of the service. Then again with the way the front can move you can't keep the safe areas from becoming involved. By allowing the women's draft at least you can train with the above in mind.
buffalo wrote:
Comrades, in a great leap for cis-womyns and those who identify as having a pair (XX c********es, of course), another bastion of male privilege is dashed on the rocks!
With women in combat roles, a federal court rules the male-only draft unconstitutional
What this means to our "female" comrades is that they will be paid for doing the same crappy dangerous work, provided you check the correct answer on the application where it says "if over 18, have you registered for selective service?"
At long last, the e******y you've been waiting for! Be inconvenienced and subject to the same laws as men, Ladies, register for the draft!
Finally! Glorious e******y! Now Males AND Females can go off to die in the upcoming totally-not-imperial grow-the-size-of-our-glorious-state war! Now, what to do about the pang****red, multig****red, g****rq***r, f*ggots and attack helicopter-g****red persons...
Comrades, in a great leap for cis-womyns and those... (
show quote)
What did you expect after World War 2 , have women leave home and support the war effort. After it ends send them home to resume the wife and motherly duties. Isn't that the reason why Adam and Eve were throw out of the garden.
The apple of knowledge, when you find out that there is something else it's human nature to what it ,It's called change.
ACP45 wrote:
Politicians lies and equivocate.... they are very good at that. You notice that he refused to answer the question, because there really was no good answer that he could have given. The real question is why someone with that track record was appointed in the first place.
The real question about appointment should have been answered prior to the appointment, now Omar is setting up a foundation for removal while doing damage control.
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
She has every right to ask the questions...
But should do so civily and with proper decorum...
Her method was wrong...
I have to agree she does have the right, on the other hand there are times when after setting up your foundation for the question a yes or no answer is the only one needed. Life is made up of grey areas if you are good and practiced you can hide your real reasons why something was done. The main idea was to find out if he is willing to follow the same procedures as before for the same reasons.
77Reaganite wrote:
I'm not talking about you I'm talking about the leaders that you v**ed for they're the ones that are calling for open borders and no walls just because you think the wall is stupid now you tell me that is your wall keep you safe at night when you sleep does it keep people from entering your home think about that for all these people that I say that don't want a wall well then let these i*****l a***ns come and live at your place but you're not going to do that you want to sit there and virtue signal to everybody about look at me look how open and t***sparent I am look how diverse I am in forced diversity always k**ls look what it's doing to Europe you know what the Muslim migration yeah these people are forced upon the European people and the European people are getting k**led because of it why because a lot of these people coming in to Europe are military-aged men very few women and children are in these groups so what do you think's going to happen what do you think about the g***ming of young children in London were there being g********* at the age of 9 by Muslim men yeah I say that to a forced measure by the EU nobody likes forced diversity and I'm going to tell you right now collectivism k**ls it always does look what happened in N**i Germany look what happened in Soviet Russia all of it collectivism and it k**ls people okay more people have died under socialism and c*******m than any other form of governance known to man okay socialism has never worked anywhere where it's been tried just take a look at Venezuela and that's all you need to know and you really want to bring that here I don't think so Over My Dead Body we're not here to make ya'll happy so y'all can get a new v****g block cuz that's really what it the Democratic party is doing is using the i******s as a new v****g block so they can stay in power because it's all about power to them they don't care anything about their constituents they don't care anything about you they don't care anything about the minorities they don't care about nothing you don't believe me just go to a few of these s**tholes states Illinois California Oregon Washington all of the Northeast and all of New England every last one of them s**tholes oh yeah at least I forget Detroit take a look at Detroit that's what 60 years of democratic rule did to a city and you really want to bring that to the rest of America I got news for you it ain't happening thank God we have a damn president that wants us to have a country wants us to have borders and wants us to be a sovereign country so we're no longer under the rule of the g*******ts you need to get with the program man globalism is a k**ler it's k*****g people everyday all you got to do is just turn on your TV set and just look at all the upheaval going on in Europe cuz people are tired of 70 years of rule and people finally figuring out they no longer have a country in that their country sold them out to bureaucrats bankers and lawmakers and why do you think there's so much upheaval in Europe now is because people are rising up and saying the hell with the European Union and our elected officials want to bring that to America. I don't want no socialism of any kind yes I know we have it with Social Security but I wasn't alive to v**e for it and neither were you so I say the hell with it I don't want free health care cuz free healthcare doesn't give Healthcare to everybody I don't want free school because there is no such thing as free school I don't want any freebies from the Democratic party because that means higher taxes and you know that too that's the last thing we need right now in a recovery is higher taxes I'm sorry but we're not going to give any more money to the Democrats so they can just flounder It All Away by giving it to people that don't want to work yeah I'm saying it 85% of the people that are on welfare and food stamps or game in the system we all know that the poverty level in this country is 15% so that means only 15% of the population should get welfare of some sort the other 85% who are on it need to stop doing drugs and go back to work and let the people who really need to be on it have it that's my take on that and it's the god honest t***h 85% of the people that are on welfare and food stamps or gaming the system the other 15% are the 15% that are falling below the poverty line and those are the people who really need it I'm tired of handing out money to Laquisha and every other American woman who wants to spread her legs and have many kids and expects us to pay for them neither you nor I made that lady spread her legs and my question to where are the fathers oh I forgot what year was 1994 Super Predators bill guarantee you the father is in jail if he's not in jail for failing to pay for child support which there seems to be a lot of that going on these days between men and women sickens me to watch how kids live today when you got parents that don't even care about their kids but yet we have a group of people that stand up everyday and say they care for the American people but when you give them what they want they leave you with nothing they leave your city's boarded-up your jobs have been all sucked out and going to other states and you have what we have in the s******* States today mentioned
I'm not talking about you I'm talking about the le... (
show quote)
Social Security is not socialism you payed into with the FICA TAX,
The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) is the federal law that requires you to withhold three separate taxes from the wages you pay your employees. FICA is comprised of the following taxes:
6.2 percent Social Security tax;
1.45 percent Medicare tax (the “regular” Medicare tax); and
Since 2013, a 0.9 percent Medicare surtax when the employee earns over $200,000.
You must withhold these amounts from an employee's wages.
The law also requires you to pay the employer's portion of two of these taxes:
6.2 percent Social Security tax
1.45 percent Medicare tax (the “regular” Medicare tax).
As you can see, the employer’s portion for the Social security tax and the regular Medicare tax is the same amount that you're required to withhold from your employees' wages. (Different rules apply for employees who receive tips.) There is no employer portion for the 0.9 percent Medicare surtax on high-earning employees.
Now an example of socialism are the services provided by the govenment are fire , police, schools and maintained infrastructure , which everyone knows has really not been kept up. Unless of course if you were able to give dontations to the right people. We the people allowed the money into govenment by not keeping those in office accountable.
Gatsby wrote:
Read Article I. Sections 7 & 8, before responding!
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
He didn't close it but he is being blamed because of his statement that he will be proud to own the closing, he ether doesn't understand the actual powers that President has or is actually using it to gain points with his base. Everyone who dosen't have an understanding about the limits of members of govenment are willing to give more credit to those members. Which allows the same to exercise more power then the office may have. Which in turn allows people to attach blame the individuals in the office.
slatten49 wrote:
An ability to deal with others thoughts & actions as you would have them deal with yours.
Any resemblance to The Golden Rule is intentional.
Also agree with the definition
old marine wrote:
It makes one wonder how many Beethoven, Einstines, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and possiable other great persons have been murdered by a******n.
Forgive them Father for they know not what they do.
MERRY CHRISTMAS AMERICA
AND A PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR
Ying and Yang , good and evil it could have stopped mass murders also
Timothy McVeigh, Jack Gilbert Graham, Adam Lanza,Devin Patrick Kelley, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold,You are right it just depends.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays
Peewee wrote:
Duh, why didn't I think of that? I have a pretty good BS detector and what I have detected is this, the liars on the left and right are working together. Jon McCain was a perfect example, Ryan, Flake, are two more. Yes, even Fox blows it from time to time, especially when Shep Smith is on. I'll make up my own mind thank you. God gave me a good one and I'll use it until I can't. I'll never accept a chip or merge with AI for an upgrade. By the way a Fed. judge has ruled the ACA is unconstitutional a few hours ago. Now no one is forced to buy something they don't want. Also, the yellow vest revolt has spread to Brussels, the home of the EU. Have a great weekend. Obama legacy is now dead. The swamp is being drained. The g*******t are on life-support. And I'm a happy camper. My weekend is starting off great. Judicial Watch has been given the right to discovery and to question Hillary about her e-mails, and the CF whistleblowers are singing like canaries. Looking forward to 2019. Can't wait for the tribunals to start and for Trump to take down the Federal Reserve and put us back on the gold standard. The Federal Reserve has one last weapon, to raise interest rates, which they never did under Obama. The deep state was weaponizing our entire gov't against us. Hope you didn't miss all the signs with your fair and balanced listening to both sides of the MSM which is owned by just six companies. Oh, one last thing the MSM didn't tell you, Anthony Weiner's arrest documents said little Carlos Danger was "producing" child porn. I promise this is the last one, Congress just passed a bill that they will now pay for their own sexual harassment cases instead of taxpayers.
Duh, why didn't I think of that? I have a pretty g... (
show quote)
The tone of your response sounded like you no longer want conversation , so this just to put a response in. The yellow jackets you mentioned are comprised of three groups. The first group was pissed because of the taxes. This group got upset because of the direction taxes were leaning to benefit business and the wealthy. When Macron offered the concessions this group stopped because they knew any more could possibly destroy the country. The second group are the ones who want to change to street level government decisions made at the bottom then sent up. The last group lower taxes and increased payout with more government involvement. On ACA judgement it more or less was a wasted decsion because the mandatory rule require that payment be made which caused it to be unconstitutional is not going to be enforced 2019. Finally when I mentioned balance infomation it deals with the six and left ; right leaning ,when needed the conspiracy media . BS indicators need information so it can be used
Peewee wrote:
Okay, so they ID keywords or phrases, then a left-leaning Silicon Valley human looks at it and makes a decision and your site is taken down w/o an explanation. Sounds pretty f*****t to me and a lot of like censorship. I see dead or broken up MSM and social media companies in the near future.
Censorship goes both ways left or right leaning it doesn't matter. Both have done their share of controlling what is being reported. The only way you can get away from it is listen to both sides and then make your decision.
Peewee wrote:
Algorithms are man-made, humans are biased, therefore algorithms are biased.
Didn't say that it wasn't possible to be biased just said that the explanation was correct. The algorithms can be set to give you what you want as easy as you can remember your name. Being that it has go though 200 different what if's it can be considered to be fairly unbiased. So every time people respond to the statements all it does is make it more possible for it to be brought up.
maximus wrote:
It's like the old joke, "I looked in the dictionary under ugly and there was your picture". Even if Trump is an i***t and Obama was the worst ever, it should not be google posting these pages.
Here's google's lame excuse;
The search for the word “i***t” on Google apparently saw a jump after it was found a few months ago that it threw up images of US President Donald Trump. On Tuesday, American lawmakers attempted to understand how Google search algorithms worked and asked the tech company’s CEO Sundar Pichai about this particular case.
Republican congresswoman Zoe Lofgren posed the question during a grilling of the Google executive by the House judiciary committee. Pichai replied that the search results are based on ranks that takes into account over 200 factors, including relevance and popularity, to find the best results for a query. The questioning came after Trump’s multiple tweets accusing Google’s search engine of promoting negative news articles about him.
The Google chief was also asked if it was an example of political bias in algorithms, which he denied. Still, some Republican lawmakers on the panel refused to believe an individual or a group of people at Google could not change the algorithms and manipulate the search results arbitrarily.
That's what we get for Obama giving the internet away.
It's like the old joke, "I looked in the dict... (
show quote)
May sound lame but that is how algorithms work. If you have used excel there is a conditional command that can be used. It works the same as the algorithms, and like them you can control the outcome. The same with the algorithms but it would also effect other results. At least Obama is also being effected so the treatment is the same.
proud republican wrote:
If you type up the word ""i***t" u... (
show quote)
I can explain it without reading anything the word i***t and Trump have been used in the same sentence to the point of being popular, the same with Obama and the word worst they are also linked. People should just accept it and move on. Instead of making it into a federal case. But the right to voice opinions belong to everyone.
crazylibertarian wrote:
And whether you care about it or not, the number of a******ns annually have soared since Roe vs. Wade. And whether it's legal or not, it ends a human life, and sometimes two, including the mother's. And irrespective of legality, it's a moral question. Segregation was immoral while it was legal, in case you hadn't noticed, which you likely never did.
And FYI, there was counting before Roe vs. Wade. The president (the president, mind you) of Planned Parenthood at the time, stated that the nimber of maternal deaths from illegal a******ns in the mid 1960s was about 250 per year.
Like I wrote PeterS, you're no match for me.
And whether you care about it or not, the number o... (
show quote)
My thoughts goes like this the people who want availability of aboptions want to enjoy the fun but not the results. Unless they belong to the responsible. The ones who want abotion stopped are correct it is murder, the main sticking point is the definition. When Roe vs Wade was introduced it allowed the mother a better chance of survival. As with all decisions there is going to be a loser. The main point is that the decision should be kept between the two people who are directly effected. I know if the baby is kept then the mother has a good chance of becoming a drain on everyone. There are also enough childless couples who would love a child. All options should be present when the decision is being made by both.
