One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CrazyHorse
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 114 next>>
Aug 27, 2013 22:40:55   #
bahmer wrote:
It is quite interesting that certain liberals are so upset when a few conservatives get on their posts but think nothing of themselves getting on our posts. I guess this is all part of the liberal mindset and that is everything is a one way street and the only discussion permitted is to praise them for their fine work. Any one who disagrees with them must at once be banished and never heard from again. They definitely do follow their stupid narcissistic leader don't they.


Quid Pro Quo, bahmer: You got it exactly right. There is no living with these brain dead petrified mind libtards. We might as well bag on them, as we sure as hell can't make their life more miserable than it already is. Our country is going to hell with OIllegal's attack on our country and capitalism, and all they can think to do is defend his sorry behind on every issue, t***sgression, misdemeanor, high crime, and morally sick issue of the day. :thumbup:

Our Muslim sheethead's "Who ass to kick" turns out to be his own

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 22:33:43   #
mark401 wrote:
Be Very Careful, you!!! You might HURT Hussein's feelings, that is pres. HUSSEIN!!!!!!!



Quid Pro Quo, mark401: Unless you are making a general post, click on the "Quote reply" button so that your post will show who you are replying to. Welcome to 1PP.
Go to
Aug 27, 2013 22:25:35   #
LurkingTom wrote:
If obummer sends the military into Syria without congressional approval, hopefully, the next day impeachment proceedings will begin.


Quid Pro Quo, LurkingTom: Would it were true. I'm afraid the list of particulars and charges of a bill of Impeachment would take months to accomplish. May God help us.

Long out dated List of High Crimes & Misdemeanors




OIllegal looking for another "Peace" prise for Cruse Missile attack on Syria

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 22:12:32   #
Don Overton wrote:
Little the only one acting like a child, as the right wing usually does, is YOU.


Quid Pro Quo, Over a Ton of crap: You exhibit no substance, so you just spew your subjective drivel as if it mean anything. Because you have exhibited no substantive response, I will assume you can not, and therefore was just running your picayune sycophant Obamaite mouth. You had your multiple chances, and could not respond, and are therefore blown away by your own mouth.

Over a Ton flinging his Horse Dou'vers


Over a Ton's spewing is:


Over a Ton Imploding him self

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 22:01:55   #
usmc4 wrote:
Didn't the Teamsters, SEIU, AFL-CIO, among other unions write a letter to Obama asking to not proceed with Obamacare? If I remember the unions opposed it because insurance would be to expensive for the rank and file and that full time workers hours would be cut to part time 29hrs., so the employers would not have to provide health insurance. Least we forget Congress opposing it also, because their staffers were going to leave do to the fact it would be to expensive for them. Of course we all know what happened there. They said that there would be a "brain drain" in Congress if they left. Talk about an oxymoron.
Didn't the Teamsters, SEIU, AFL-CIO, among other u... (show quote)

Who's ass to kick's Obamacare can't see the forest for the Media's lying snow job

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 21:55:17   #
Navysnipe wrote:
That, is highly likely:]


Quid Pro Quo, ginnyt & Navysnipe: Well maybe. But sycophant libtards are ideologues who do not reason from true facts to opinions and solutions to problems as reasonably suggested by the true facts. That is why they are ideologues.
I would like to now post this without being deleted by the Administration, if you please.
Go to
Aug 27, 2013 21:40:41   #
Navysnipe wrote:
Well yeah. The oval office. Most of the stuff that comes out of his mouth you'd find in the bathroom anyway.


Quid Pro Quio, Navysnipe & emarine: Sorry, but there isn't room in the bathroom door way to set up a teleprompter, so OIllegal couldn't talk.
Go to
Aug 27, 2013 19:54:38   #
jumper wrote:
Wow, does stupidity run through your entire family ?




Quid Pro Quo, jumper: OMG, another chigger libtard for 1PP. Hey jumper, jump back into the weeds chigger, before you get stepped on. You don't exhibit the intellectually ability to post anything of substance.
Go to
Aug 27, 2013 18:50:13   #
Hat Tip, Patriot Update, Aug. 27, 2013


The Race to Blur Obama’s Red Line
Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Share13Tweet12Share2Share1Share30 Now, this Syria business. If you listen to John Kerry, is it true that we’re going to war over the claim that there are weapons of mass destruction in Syria? That’s what chemical weapons are. Haven’t we already seen this movie? Haven’t we all seen it? The very people now thinking of taking us into war in Syria, aren’t they the ones who steadfastly opposed this in Iraq? And then aren’t these the same people that threw a party, practically, when there were no WMDs found?

Now, Obama’s secretary of state, John Kerry, claims there is “undeniable evidence” that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons on its civilians. Undeniable. Now, is that as undeniable as they say g****l w*****g evidence is? How about is it as undeniable as the threat to all of our embassies a couple of weeks ago? Speaking of that, do you remember when we shut down 21 embassies on a Sunday? Al-Qaeda has piped up and said, “We didn’t do it!”

Now, that’s never done. Normally, Al-Qaeda would be out claiming credit for having the power to make us shut down 21 embassies. Al-Qaeda is saying, “We didn’t do anything here,” which is so out of character. You almost have to believe ‘em. I mean, this is really tough. On the one hand, the regime says that Al-Qaeda was planning an attack on oil installations in Yemen, and for that reason we had to close 21 embassies on a Sunday, and then for the following week.


Post Continues on www.rushlimbaugh.com


Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/2013/08/race-blur-obamas-red-line/#huyAL4oHXE4BZvAh.99

Who's ass to kick's Red Line road

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 18:10:02   #
BoJester wrote:
You sound like you are fat limburg in d**g. If you don't like what I post, you are under NO obligation to offer your stupid comments. However, being the dumbass conservatard teabagging i***t that you are, I will overlook your mental deficiencies and churlish whining. After all, your name says it all. CRAZY




Quid Pro Quo, Mr. BoJangles: Hey CHE the Mr. BoJangles clown. Picked off you cover Eh? Be careful you don't overtax your chigger brain with your search for adjectives. Is that the best you can do? You can't hanNNdle having your cover blown. Mr. BoJangles, dance.

Mr. BoJangles the CHE Jersey drag queen, dance

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 17:59:44   #
rumitoid wrote:
CH, snopes.com reports the facts; putting up an anti-anything is not reporting but editorializing. Snopes has reported as true any number of things about Obama that were unfavorable. There was email that you may have seen that had Fifty Lies of Obama. Snopes goes through them one at time, showing where Obama did actually lie and showing where he did not. Snopes is objective, not pro this or anti that.


Quid Pro Quo, rumitoid: I don't have any such high opinion of the man and woman that run snopes. "putting up an anti-anything is not reporting but editorializing." It is if it is reporting on the facts as you claim, and the facts are negative to the subject of the issue. "any number of things", fine, give me just a few cites that I can review. No, I never saw any e-mail with fifty lies of Obama that snopes said were lies. Be so kind as to look up what you are talking about and give me a site. If it appears you are correct, then I will be forced to back off snopes some with my consideration of their bias reviews, that I have seen that seem to always be favorable to and plead the case for OIllegal.
Go to
Aug 27, 2013 17:50:32   #
bahmer wrote:
We all have to remember we didn't build that but then of course OIllegal has never built anything in his entire miserable life except one train wreck after another.

OIllegal hard at work with his White House Muslim Tzars on his next scandal


The OIllegal express train wreck to Hell continues apace

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 17:43:09   #
faithistheword wrote:
WTH? How did she get that job in the first place? Oh, yeah, she's got "I love barry" syndrome. Only deluded democrats would fall for that POS--TWICE!!
And where is Darryl Issa? He was supposed to recall her for further questioning.

The sheethead still hard at work with IRS

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 17:39:15   #
[quote=AuntiE]
BoJester wrote:
Maybe all of the whining, sniveling, greedy ceo'and owners should learn the lesson from Starbucks' CEO. Howard Schultz understands the value of employees, even part-timers and the spouses of employees. If the greedy, the mis-informed and the utterly stupid conservatard/teabag mental midgets quit being so obstructionist, and actually demonstrated leadship instead of whining and crying for political purpose, then the implementation of the ACA would less problematic.
Of course, fat limburg, the fools at faux and certain i***ts in the senate and house are striving to gain political advantage



Your contention is the President of UPS, Papa John's, and the airline cutting insurance are all "stupid conservatard/teabag mental midgets"? Your contention that any company President who has a fiduciary responsibility to the company as a whole and cuts hours or insurance because of the ACA is a "stupid conservatard/teabag mental midget"? It is a good thing you are not a company President.
Maybe all of the whining, sniveling, greedy ceo'an... (show quote)


Quid Pro Quo, BoJester the clown: Hey BoJangles, dance. You sound more and more like CHE the Jersey d**g q***n ever post. Be careful or you will give your self away sycophant OIllegalite.

Mr. BoJangles the CHE Jersey drag queen, Eh?


SheetHead him self


Mr. BoJangles, dance

Go to
Aug 27, 2013 17:13:01   #
Don Overton wrote:
And poor little and old white man there Asking for proof of my statement when you don't ask proof of his statement which is the beginning to this thread or are you both to dense to realize what you are even saying.


Quid Pro Quo, Don Overton: One is not an excuse for the other. You both can put up some examples if you want to have a discussion rather than just a rant. And, as to calling names like dense, get off your sorry behind, or shut the h--- up, with your childish: well he didn't do it either lack of substantive rationale.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 114 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.