One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Judge Titus Rips Obama's Contrived Racial attack
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Aug 22, 2013 08:28:10   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
Hat Tip, WND (World Net Daily) News, 22 Aug. 2013


WND EXCLUSIVE
Judge warns Obama on 'worthless' race complaints
EEOC claims background checks discriminate against b****s
Published: 19 hours ago Bob Unruh About | Email | Archive
Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.

Federal judge has described Obama administration claims that corporations use background checks to target b****s “worthless,” describing the allegations from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as a “theory is search of facts” as he granted a motion for summary judgment, which is an immediate dismissal of the case.

“There are simply no facts here to support a theory of disparate impact resulting from any identified, specific practice of the defendant,” wrote Judge Roger W. Titus in the case brought by the Obama administration against Freeman Inc., a company that provides services for expositions, conventions, corporate events, meetings and programs.

WallStreetDaily.com/Free-ReportIts revenues exceed $1.3 billion annually and it employs 3,500 fulltime workers and tens of thousands of part-time workers.

The EEOC alleged that the company, by checking the backgrounds of prospective employees, was illegally discriminating against b****s. But the Obama administration failed to provide any evidence of that, the judge ruled.

“While some specific uses of criminal and credit background checks may be discriminatory and violate the provision of Title VII, the EEOC bears the burden of supplying reliable expert testimony and statistical analysis that demonstrates disparate impact stemming from a specific employment practice before a violation can be found …. the EEOC has failed to do so.”

<P>The emphasis was in the original document from the judge.

Officials with Judicial Watch, the Washington watchdog that seeks out corruption and reports on it, noted the judge’s description of the Obama administration’s case as “laughable,” “distorted,” “cherry-picked,” “worthless” and “an egregious example of scientific dishonesty.”

“That kind of whipping from a federal judge has got to hurt though it’s unlikely to deter the administration from spending more taxpayer dollars to file frivolous lawsuits against employers who use the checks to screen job applicants,” the organization reported Wednesday.

“Of interesting note is that the EEOC conducts criminal background checks as a condition of employment and credit background checks for most of its positions. For some reason, it’s not discriminatory against minorities when the agency does it,” the group reported. “But it is when private businesses utilize the tool because information about prior convictions is being used to discriminate against a racial or ethnic group, according to the EEOC. ”

Obama’s EEOC claimed the business “unlawfully relied upon credit and criminal background checks that caused a disparate impact against African-American, Hispanic, and male job applicants.”

“To support this absurd argument, the agency presented the court with ‘expert’ data, including a detailed statistical analysis, supposedly proving its disparate impact claims,” Judicial Watch said.

But Titus found the government argument “based on unreliable data,” “rife with analytical error,” with “a plethora of errors and analytical fallacies” and a “mind-boggling number of errors.”

Further, it was “completely unreliable,” “so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded” and “distorted.”

The judge said, “By bringing actions of this nature, the EEOC has placed many employers in the ‘Hobson’s choice’ of ignoring criminal history and credit background, thus exposing themselves to potential liability for criminal and fraudulent acts committed by employees, on the one hand, or incurring the wrath of the EEOC for having utilized information deemed fundamental by most employers.”

The judge noted there are legitimate reasons for background checks.

“For many employers, conducting a criminal history or credit record background check on a potential employee is a rational and legitimate component of a reasonable hiring process. The reasons for conducting such checks are obvious. Employers have a clear incentive to avoid hiring employees who have a proven tendency to defraud or steal from their employers, engage in workplace violence, or who otherwise appear to be untrustworthy and unreliable.”

The Obama administration alleged that the company, by doing background checks, had created a “pattern or practice” of “discrimination against African-American job applicants by using poor credit history as a hiring criterion … and against African-American, Hispanic, and male job applicants by using criminal history as a hiring criterion.”

The judge went even further, blasting the EEOC for making a “mockery” of court standards by “continually offering new expert reports … well past the applicable deadline.

In fact, they were “poorly disguised attempts to counter defendant’s arguments with new expert analysis.”


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/judge-warns-obama-on-worthless-race-complaints/#PHo05H4p0FTuY4Ad.99

Hey Obama toady, there you have it. Now go to snopes and see if they can contrive an excuse for why Judge Titus didn't say what he said. Come on toady, give us your best shot.

Criminals at large - Using the Government to Foster Contrived Racial Litigation
Criminals at large - Using the Government to Foste...

This kind of Issue results in how the Germans see the Obama Administration - Dusseldorf Parade
This kind of Issue results in how the Germans see ...

Just another OIllegal weekly scandal
Just another OIllegal weekly scandal...

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 09:41:23   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Hat Tip, WND (World Net Daily) News, 22 Aug. 2013


WND EXCLUSIVE
Judge warns Obama on 'worthless' race complaints
EEOC claims background checks discriminate against b****s
Published: 19 hours ago Bob Unruh About | Email | Archive
Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.

Federal judge has described Obama administration claims that corporations use background checks to target b****s “worthless,” describing the allegations from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as a “theory is search of facts” as he granted a motion for summary judgment, which is an immediate dismissal of the case.

“There are simply no facts here to support a theory of disparate impact resulting from any identified, specific practice of the defendant,” wrote Judge Roger W. Titus in the case brought by the Obama administration against Freeman Inc., a company that provides services for expositions, conventions, corporate events, meetings and programs.

WallStreetDaily.com/Free-ReportIts revenues exceed $1.3 billion annually and it employs 3,500 fulltime workers and tens of thousands of part-time workers.

The EEOC alleged that the company, by checking the backgrounds of prospective employees, was illegally discriminating against b****s. But the Obama administration failed to provide any evidence of that, the judge ruled.

“While some specific uses of criminal and credit background checks may be discriminatory and violate the provision of Title VII, the EEOC bears the burden of supplying reliable expert testimony and statistical analysis that demonstrates disparate impact stemming from a specific employment practice before a violation can be found …. the EEOC has failed to do so.”

<P>The emphasis was in the original document from the judge.

Officials with Judicial Watch, the Washington watchdog that seeks out corruption and reports on it, noted the judge’s description of the Obama administration’s case as “laughable,” “distorted,” “cherry-picked,” “worthless” and “an egregious example of scientific dishonesty.”

“That kind of whipping from a federal judge has got to hurt though it’s unlikely to deter the administration from spending more taxpayer dollars to file frivolous lawsuits against employers who use the checks to screen job applicants,” the organization reported Wednesday.

“Of interesting note is that the EEOC conducts criminal background checks as a condition of employment and credit background checks for most of its positions. For some reason, it’s not discriminatory against minorities when the agency does it,” the group reported. “But it is when private businesses utilize the tool because information about prior convictions is being used to discriminate against a racial or ethnic group, according to the EEOC. ”

Obama’s EEOC claimed the business “unlawfully relied upon credit and criminal background checks that caused a disparate impact against African-American, Hispanic, and male job applicants.”

“To support this absurd argument, the agency presented the court with ‘expert’ data, including a detailed statistical analysis, supposedly proving its disparate impact claims,” Judicial Watch said.

But Titus found the government argument “based on unreliable data,” “rife with analytical error,” with “a plethora of errors and analytical fallacies” and a “mind-boggling number of errors.”

Further, it was “completely unreliable,” “so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded” and “distorted.”

The judge said, “By bringing actions of this nature, the EEOC has placed many employers in the ‘Hobson’s choice’ of ignoring criminal history and credit background, thus exposing themselves to potential liability for criminal and fraudulent acts committed by employees, on the one hand, or incurring the wrath of the EEOC for having utilized information deemed fundamental by most employers.”

The judge noted there are legitimate reasons for background checks.

“For many employers, conducting a criminal history or credit record background check on a potential employee is a rational and legitimate component of a reasonable hiring process. The reasons for conducting such checks are obvious. Employers have a clear incentive to avoid hiring employees who have a proven tendency to defraud or steal from their employers, engage in workplace violence, or who otherwise appear to be untrustworthy and unreliable.”

The Obama administration alleged that the company, by doing background checks, had created a “pattern or practice” of “discrimination against African-American job applicants by using poor credit history as a hiring criterion … and against African-American, Hispanic, and male job applicants by using criminal history as a hiring criterion.”

The judge went even further, blasting the EEOC for making a “mockery” of court standards by “continually offering new expert reports … well past the applicable deadline.

In fact, they were “poorly disguised attempts to counter defendant’s arguments with new expert analysis.”


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/judge-warns-obama-on-worthless-race-complaints/#PHo05H4p0FTuY4Ad.99

Hey Obama toady, there you have it. Now go to snopes and see if they can contrive an excuse for why Judge Titus didn't say what he said. Come on toady, give us your best shot.
Hat Tip, WND (World Net Daily) News, 22 Aug. 2013 ... (show quote)


If I am to expect a "best shot" from Holder and Co., the safest place to be is standing in front of wh**ever they are aiming at.

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 11:29:48   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Hat Tip, WND (World Net Daily) News, 22 Aug. 2013

WND EXCLUSIVE
Judge warns Obama on 'worthless' race complaints
EEOC claims background checks discriminate against b****s

Federal judge has described Obama administration claims that corporations use background checks to target b****s “worthless,” describing the allegations from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as a “theory is search of facts” as he granted a motion for summary judgment, which is an immediate dismissal of the case.

“There are simply no facts here to support a theory of disparate impact resulting from any identified, specific practice of the defendant,” wrote Judge Roger W. Titus in the case brought by the Obama administration against Freeman Inc., a company that provides services for expositions, conventions, corporate events, meetings and programs.

The judge said, “By bringing actions of this nature, the EEOC has placed many employers in the ‘Hobson’s choice’ of ignoring criminal history and credit background, thus exposing themselves to potential liability for criminal and fraudulent acts committed by employees, on the one hand, or incurring the wrath of the EEOC for having utilized information deemed fundamental by most employers.”
Hat Tip, WND (World Net Daily) News, 22 Aug. 2013 ... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What a refreshing piece of news - a real judge, one who can actually use judgement instead of political platitudes, finds exactly as any honest person of integrity and honesty would find. Amazing!

Time to defund EEOC - actually WAAAAY past time to defund that evil piece of control. Also way past time to shut down Obama and Holder and all their minions who prey on innocent Americans.

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2013 11:48:55   #
Inyourface Loc: East Coast
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Hat Tip, WND (World Net Daily) News, 22 Aug. 2013


WND EXCLUSIVE
Judge warns Obama on 'worthless' race complaints
EEOC claims background checks discriminate against b****s
Published: 19 hours ago Bob Unruh About | Email | Archive
Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.

Federal judge has described Obama administration claims that corporations use background checks to target b****s “worthless,” describing the allegations from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as a “theory is search of facts” as he granted a motion for summary judgment, which is an immediate dismissal of the case.

“There are simply no facts here to support a theory of disparate impact resulting from any identified, specific practice of the defendant,” wrote Judge Roger W. Titus in the case brought by the Obama administration against Freeman Inc., a company that provides services for expositions, conventions, corporate events, meetings and programs.

WallStreetDaily.com/Free-ReportIts revenues exceed $1.3 billion annually and it employs 3,500 fulltime workers and tens of thousands of part-time workers.

The EEOC alleged that the company, by checking the backgrounds of prospective employees, was illegally discriminating against b****s. But the Obama administration failed to provide any evidence of that, the judge ruled.

“While some specific uses of criminal and credit background checks may be discriminatory and violate the provision of Title VII, the EEOC bears the burden of supplying reliable expert testimony and statistical analysis that demonstrates disparate impact stemming from a specific employment practice before a violation can be found …. the EEOC has failed to do so.”

<P>The emphasis was in the original document from the judge.

Officials with Judicial Watch, the Washington watchdog that seeks out corruption and reports on it, noted the judge’s description of the Obama administration’s case as “laughable,” “distorted,” “cherry-picked,” “worthless” and “an egregious example of scientific dishonesty.”

“That kind of whipping from a federal judge has got to hurt though it’s unlikely to deter the administration from spending more taxpayer dollars to file frivolous lawsuits against employers who use the checks to screen job applicants,” the organization reported Wednesday.

“Of interesting note is that the EEOC conducts criminal background checks as a condition of employment and credit background checks for most of its positions. For some reason, it’s not discriminatory against minorities when the agency does it,” the group reported. “But it is when private businesses utilize the tool because information about prior convictions is being used to discriminate against a racial or ethnic group, according to the EEOC. ”

Obama’s EEOC claimed the business “unlawfully relied upon credit and criminal background checks that caused a disparate impact against African-American, Hispanic, and male job applicants.”

“To support this absurd argument, the agency presented the court with ‘expert’ data, including a detailed statistical analysis, supposedly proving its disparate impact claims,” Judicial Watch said.

But Titus found the government argument “based on unreliable data,” “rife with analytical error,” with “a plethora of errors and analytical fallacies” and a “mind-boggling number of errors.”

Further, it was “completely unreliable,” “so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded” and “distorted.”

The judge said, “By bringing actions of this nature, the EEOC has placed many employers in the ‘Hobson’s choice’ of ignoring criminal history and credit background, thus exposing themselves to potential liability for criminal and fraudulent acts committed by employees, on the one hand, or incurring the wrath of the EEOC for having utilized information deemed fundamental by most employers.”

The judge noted there are legitimate reasons for background checks.

“For many employers, conducting a criminal history or credit record background check on a potential employee is a rational and legitimate component of a reasonable hiring process. The reasons for conducting such checks are obvious. Employers have a clear incentive to avoid hiring employees who have a proven tendency to defraud or steal from their employers, engage in workplace violence, or who otherwise appear to be untrustworthy and unreliable.”

The Obama administration alleged that the company, by doing background checks, had created a “pattern or practice” of “discrimination against African-American job applicants by using poor credit history as a hiring criterion … and against African-American, Hispanic, and male job applicants by using criminal history as a hiring criterion.”

The judge went even further, blasting the EEOC for making a “mockery” of court standards by “continually offering new expert reports … well past the applicable deadline.

In fact, they were “poorly disguised attempts to counter defendant’s arguments with new expert analysis.”


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/judge-warns-obama-on-worthless-race-complaints/#PHo05H4p0FTuY4Ad.99

Hey Obama toady, there you have it. Now go to snopes and see if they can contrive an excuse for why Judge Titus didn't say what he said. Come on toady, give us your best shot.
Hat Tip, WND (World Net Daily) News, 22 Aug. 2013 ... (show quote)


This is the kind of nonsense you find on fringe web sites. Folks like Drudge,FOX,etc., feed this crap to the intellectually,challenged and the hard core,r****ts.

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 11:53:54   #
Anncaste
 
He is a dismal failure. If it wasn't for Hollywood and the press he would be the most h**ed president we ever had! And for the first time I am ashamed of a First Lady who isn't one!

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 12:16:48   #
Inyourface Loc: East Coast
 
More r****t nonsense from the mean,shrinking nest of vipers found here. MOVE ALONG FOLKS ,NOTHING TO SEE HERE. Just some angry,bitter w****s venting their toxic ,bile.

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 12:20:53   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Anncaste wrote:
He is a dismal failure. If it wasn't for Hollywood and the press he would be the most h**ed president we ever had! And for the first time I am ashamed of a First Lady who isn't one!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's altogether possible that regardless of Hollywood and the press he is the most h**ed President we have ever had. He works hard enough at it to own that title, that's for sure.

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2013 18:17:19   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
Inyourface wrote:
This is the kind of nonsense you find on fringe web sites. Folks like Drudge,FOX,etc., feed this crap to the intellectually,challenged and the hard core,r****ts.


Quid Pro Quo, Inyourface: You are the kind of fringe nonsense we find on this website. Your comment is horse dou'vers. You might have noticed in your serious study of the information of the article, that it was a WND (World Net Daily) News source article; a very respected source. You can't handle the t***h, so you just call it crap and spew insulting names at folks. An absolute obstructionist Alinskyite tactic. Moreover, you have adequately demonstrated in your past posts you are just another brain dead lemming drone chigger. How is it do you like name calling chigger! Now run your mouth with your best sycophant drivel. Even your name is a give-a-way to your CHE obstructionist Alinskyite approach.

Inyourface's palaver is:
Inyourface's palaver is:...



Crawl back into your Jersey drag queen hole, you CHE sycophant dirt dog
Crawl back into your Jersey drag queen hole, you C...

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 18:31:11   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, Inyourface: You are the kind of fringe nonsense we find on this website. Your comment is horse dou'vers. You might have noticed in your serious study of the information of the article, that it was a WND (World Net Daily) News source article; a very respected source. You can't handle the t***h, so you just call it crap and spew insulting names at folks. An absolute obstructionist Alinskyite tactic. Moreover, you have adequately demonstrated in your past posts you are just another brain dead lemming drone chigger. How is it do you like name calling chigger! Now run your mouth with your best sycophant drivel. Even you name is a give-a-way to your CHE obstructionist Alinskyite approach.
Quid Pro Quo, Inyourface: You are the kind of fri... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 21:38:05   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, Inyourface: You are the kind of fringe nonsense we find on this website. Your comment is horse dou'vers. You might have noticed in your serious study of the information of the article, that it was a WND (World Net Daily) News source article; a very respected source. You can't handle the t***h, so you just call it crap and spew insulting names at folks. An absolute obstructionist Alinskyite tactic. Moreover, you have adequately demonstrated in your past posts you are just another brain dead lemming drone chigger. How is it do you like name calling chigger! Now run your mouth with your best sycophant drivel. Even your name is a give-a-way to your CHE obstructionist Alinskyite approach.
Quid Pro Quo, Inyourface: You are the kind of fri... (show quote)


Your description lacks flair. "Dou'vers" is not the word I would have chosen to follow horse. I can think of one that is far more accurate when describing this specimen.

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 21:42:03   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
banjojack wrote:
Your description lacks flair. "Dou'vers" is not the word I would have chosen to follow horse. I can think of one that is far more accurate when describing this specimen.


Feces, dung, defecation, sarjne?

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2013 22:03:11   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
AuntiE wrote:
Feces, dung, defecation, sarjne?


Crap. The most common end product of a horse's ass.

Reply
Aug 22, 2013 23:23:14   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
AuntiE wrote:
Feces, dung, defecation, sarjne?


Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: Oh my; my ribs are hurting. :thumbup:







Reply
Aug 22, 2013 23:26:18   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: Oh my; my ribs are hurting. :thumbup:


If you want a major laugh, go the forum A Citizens Tax Plan. Rollicking good fun is being had. Banjojack and I are fighting over nomination for President.

Reply
Aug 23, 2013 03:51:04   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
You may recall I tried to advise "mud-Inyourface" that he hadn't the intellectual fortitude to play any kind of game with this group. It seems some really need to touch fire more than once to realize it burns. Poor thing, I wonder just how many fingers this "chigger" has left.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.