One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Al-ien
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 49 next>>
May 5, 2015 03:24:30   #
LAPhil wrote:
That's great. I didn't expect to actually see the fight this soon. Thanks.


You guy's all used the same access and they all did the same thing,nothing. If any of you really get the fight let us know. Thank's.
Go to
May 4, 2015 03:26:40   #
Char4Dew wrote:
Not sure of all the details, been sick and did not follow all the pieces...but a man does not end up with a busted spin on the floor of a cell ... he ends up in a hospital if unresponsive for a few hours, not day/s. I am sure the cops here look guilty as sin. And why is President Obama only coming out when a black kid gets hurt???? Wish a nice citezen would have video snaped this one too.




How come no one has come out on that 61 year white guy that was tyin to stop 2 girls from fighting and was attacked by a mob of black school kids and destroyed so bad that they had to put him into an induced coma to try to save his life. Also the black man that was trying to help a white older woman get to her car because she was afraid and he was attacked by a mob of high school black kids. No one want's to mention these.
Go to
May 4, 2015 02:44:01   #
Pennylynn wrote:
The three grids could be repaired, modified, and upgraded with 2 billion extra dollars from the federal budget. But, states would need to pony up funds to upgrade their systems. Otherwise their state would not be containable with the new grid technology. So local distribution points would require additional funding. And that would require the states to increase taxes. This then would require property taxes to be raised. In the end, 2 billion for the grids, and then state would have to upgrade. If the state is only minimally compliant now, then the cost would be a burden. Most states would not be compliant. Final, the cost would be more like 8 billion excluding federal funds. Does this make more sense to you?
The three grids could be repaired, modified, and u... (show quote)




Thank's Penny. That might make some sense except for the fact that the figures don't add up to the risk. If there is a risk of 90million deaths from this failure, than I don't think 8billion or 100billion should stop in securing the grid. How much did Ketrina or the mideast wars cost. There were many less lives at risk there yet the funds were made available and don't forget the stimulius plan that proved to be a waste. Where am I going wrong in my thinking?
Go to
May 3, 2015 23:54:00   #
Pennylynn wrote:
Sorry I have not watched her and do not know if she may be talking about a temporary problem or a protracted issue say from an EMT.

CONSEQUENCES OF POWER FAILURE,

TEMPORAY. Not much. A dirty house and dirty people. But, most people will do fine. This is a loss of 10 or fewer days. As the circumstance goes on, then there are big problems.

Protracted grid failure = Mass death
Hospitalized on life support
Premature babies
People in need of immediate surgery
Some elderly, depending on their need for medications
Inner-city dwellers
Stupid people (not intending to be unkind)
Then the spread of disease from unsanitary conditions. Dysentery, Typhus, TB, Cholera, Measles, and a host of others
Starvation would claim billions in the US alone
People would freeze to death or die from the heat
Very young babies
Elderly, those that were healthy after the initial culling
Infections would claim anyone with depressed i****e s****m (which is the vast majority of Americans)

What would be lost
Ability to make chemicals used in medicine and equipment
T***sportation, including private cars
Toilets that flush
Refrigeration
Heating and cooling
Grocery stores
Fresh water
Petrol, both oil and gas
Communications
Large farms

Both of the above lists are incomplete. These are just the first things that came to mind.

Life would become a bitter, brutal struggle for survival. We would not and cannot just go retro and go back to the 1800s. Society thrived in the 1800s for four very simple reasons: 1) a non-electric infrastructure already existed; 2) people had the sk**ls, knowledge and tools to make do; 3) our population levels were far lower, and most people lived rural and raised a significant portion of their own food; and 4) there were relatively few people who didn’t earn their way. To be blunt, if you didn’t work, you seldom ate. Those who couldn’t work (the disabled, the elderly, etc.) were cared for by family members or charitable institutions.
Sorry I have not watched her and do not know if sh... (show quote)




I've read the responses to my post but the only thing I got was the possible result's of the grid going down. My concern was not discussed which is, what is being said that it would only take about 2 billion to secure the grid. That sound's like a complete fabrication, but why? It sound's like a very irresponsible or misiforming statement. (Obama probably spent that much on his golf)
Go to
May 3, 2015 02:48:21   #
Pennylynn wrote:
Sorry I have not watched her and do not know if she may be talking about a temporary problem or a protracted issue say from an EMT.

CONSEQUENCES OF POWER FAILURE,

TEMPORAY. Not much. A dirty house and dirty people. But, most people will do fine. This is a loss of 10 or fewer days. As the circumstance goes on, then there are big problems.

Protracted grid failure = Mass death
Hospitalized on life support
Premature babies
People in need of immediate surgery
Some elderly, depending on their need for medications
Inner-city dwellers
Stupid people (not intending to be unkind)
Then the spread of disease from unsanitary conditions. Dysentery, Typhus, TB, Cholera, Measles, and a host of others
Starvation would claim billions in the US alone
People would freeze to death or die from the heat
Very young babies
Elderly, those that were healthy after the initial culling
Infections would claim anyone with depressed i****e s****m (which is the vast majority of Americans)

What would be lost
Ability to make chemicals used in medicine and equipment
T***sportation, including private cars
Toilets that flush
Refrigeration
Heating and cooling
Grocery stores
Fresh water
Petrol, both oil and gas
Communications
Large farms

Both of the above lists are incomplete. These are just the first things that came to mind.

Life would become a bitter, brutal struggle for survival. We would not and cannot just go retro and go back to the 1800s. Society thrived in the 1800s for four very simple reasons: 1) a non-electric infrastructure already existed; 2) people had the sk**ls, knowledge and tools to make do; 3) our population levels were far lower, and most people lived rural and raised a significant portion of their own food; and 4) there were relatively few people who didn’t earn their way. To be blunt, if you didn’t work, you seldom ate. Those who couldn’t work (the disabled, the elderly, etc.) were cared for by family members or charitable institutions.
Sorry I have not watched her and do not know if sh... (show quote)




Thank's Penny. What you say is precisely why I question it. There would be such a loss of life. Her explanation doesn't support any reasoning.
Go to
May 3, 2015 01:45:48   #
I follow Fox pretty religiously and I agree with them probably 90+ most of the time but something has been troubling me for some time. I'd like to know what some of you feel about this.
As most of you know, that watch, Judge Jeannine has been on a crusade to fix the electric grid, which is fine. I can't understand though when she says that if the grid goes down, it can put millions of life at risk, I believe she said 9 million or 90 million which is irrelevant but the cost to secure it would only cost in the neighborhood of 2 billion dollars which is chicken feed in the realm of the federal spending. I find this to be a false premise. by any measure of the imagination, I can't think of any reason that ANY politician would not try to solve this despite party affiliation. They made excuses that there is an energy lobby of some sort that is the problem. That sounds farfetched because the government could force them to comply if it concerned national security. What am I missing? I tried to contact the judge by Face book but got no reply, which I didn't expect but I am annoyed by her poor explanation.
Go to
May 1, 2015 03:48:51   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
JOKE:

A vacationing penguin is driving his car through Arizona when he notices that the oil pressure light is on. He gets out to look and sees oil dripping out of the motor. He drives to the nearest town and stops at the first gas station.

After dropping the car off, the penguin goes for a walk around town. He sees an ice-cream shop and, being a penguin in Arizona, decides that something cold would really hit the spot.

He gets a big dish of ice cream and sits down to eat. Having no hands he makes a real mess trying to eat with his flippers.

After finishing his ice cream, he goes back to the gas station and asks the mechanic if he's found the problem. The mechanic looks up and says "It looks like you blew a seal."

"No no," the penguin replies, "it's just ice cream."
JOKE: br br A vacationing penguin is driving his ... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Good un, Don.
Go to
Apr 30, 2015 03:26:17   #
Yankee Clipper wrote:
A lot of what is said on this site is just plain BS splattered all over every topic and respondent just to see what sticks or arouses rancor. I venture to say most on here would be very civil if they were having these conversations face to face rather than pushing for an altercation. It's easy to hide behind the computer screen and be obnoxious and we all do that here to varying degrees.

I find it amusing to read the stupid obnoxious comments made by most of the Marxist/democrats on this site. However those on the reactionary right are many times just as bad if not worse. I sometimes go over the top just to further agitate the situation even further just for the fun of it. I know others on here that do the same. I do however try to be honest with my facts which is more than I can say about the l*****t on this site.
b A lot of what is said on this site is just plai... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


Do you mind adding me to your post? I feel just about the same way.
Go to
Apr 30, 2015 03:06:27   #
America Only wrote:
Message of the day from KHH1.....




:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Apr 30, 2015 03:04:04   #
working class stiff wrote:
Is she a good witch or a bad witch?




I don't know if she is a good witch or a bad witch but I do know that she is one obnoxious, arrogant lying b***h.
Go to
Apr 27, 2015 14:30:40   #
peter11937 wrote:
Why any sane person would consider her a viable candidate for president is simply beyond my understanding.




That's what we said about Obama. Anything is possible. There are so many people that v**e that don't have a clue. It's really a sick society we live in.
Go to
Apr 26, 2015 04:18:05   #
grumbledog wrote:
Where are you been hiding she will be the next president and democrats will probably take the Senate in 2016 and the house in 2020

You ask how can be? Because all these personally attacks won't work. She is talking about the future of America while all the republican have is let's attack Hillary and Boll even going as far as bringing Bill and Monica.

They have no plan less see repeal the ACA, put US troops on the ground to fight ISIS, under the negotiations with Iran so they can continue to develop their nuclear weapons and of course more tax breaks for the weathly

Not one idea to help the middle class
Where are you been hiding she will be the next pre... (show quote)




You know, after reading all your s**t. I must confess my true feelings, You are one stupid M&&%*$r. I have never in my life given that title to any one else. You truly deserve it. You kind of people will defend these treasonous actions and think no one is wise enough to see through it. What ass holes! One of these day's I'll really write what I think.
Go to
Apr 26, 2015 04:05:01   #
Jeffh****r wrote:
Most charities are a huge s**m and they only give tiny percentages to "the causes" they represent. The accountability of the Clinton foundation is unknown to me but I think it's probably one of the better organizations. But then again you don't know what really goes on.


Come on Jeff and you other people. If you take in 600+ million and spend 67million, I would say that is one hell of an organization for the operators of that orginization. Come to think of it, any public corporation would love to be in that situation.
Go to
Apr 26, 2015 03:44:04   #
peter11937 wrote:
Selling Uranium One to the Russians thru Canada required that Hill as sec of state, approve. She did. Bill got FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS for an hour lecture in Russia. Is there anything that Bill could say that's worth 500k? No , in my opinion, unless was a payoff for the Uranium One deal.




Yes he could say " OK so it was sex with Monica, so what?"
That might be worth a half mil. LOL
Go to
Apr 20, 2015 00:24:31   #
agaynor68 wrote:
Hello, What a pleasure it is to "discover" this particular website. I immediately felt "at home!" the moment this site was stumbled upon. Nonetheless, I look forward to the many, many years of professional communication with my fellow "One Political Plaza" family members. At various times, I can be extremely long-winded. However, I will spare each of you with my "length-of-speech" at this time and simply conclude by saying, "Glad to be a member of the OPP family!"
:thumbup:
Hello, What a pleasure it is to "discover&quo... (show quote)




Welcome, hope you can keep your composure. Lot of nut jobs here.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 49 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.