Sorry I have not watched her and do not know if she may be talking about a temporary problem or a protracted issue say from an EMT.
CONSEQUENCES OF POWER FAILURE,
TEMPORAY. Not much. A dirty house and dirty people. But, most people will do fine. This is a loss of 10 or fewer days. As the circumstance goes on, then there are big problems.
Protracted grid failure = Mass death
Hospitalized on life support
Premature babies
People in need of immediate surgery
Some elderly, depending on their need for medications
Inner-city dwellers
Stupid people (not intending to be unkind)
Then the spread of disease from unsanitary conditions. Dysentery, Typhus, TB, Cholera, Measles, and a host of others
Starvation would claim billions in the US alone
People would freeze to death or die from the heat
Very young babies
Elderly, those that were healthy after the initial culling
Infections would claim anyone with depressed i****e s****m (which is the vast majority of Americans)
What would be lost
Ability to make chemicals used in medicine and equipment
T***sportation, including private cars
Toilets that flush
Refrigeration
Heating and cooling
Grocery stores
Fresh water
Petrol, both oil and gas
Communications
Large farms
Both of the above lists are incomplete. These are just the first things that came to mind.
Life would become a bitter, brutal struggle for survival. We would not and cannot just go retro and go back to the 1800s. Society thrived in the 1800s for four very simple reasons: 1) a non-electric infrastructure already existed; 2) people had the sk**ls, knowledge and tools to make do; 3) our population levels were far lower, and most people lived rural and raised a significant portion of their own food; and 4) there were relatively few people who didnt earn their way. To be blunt, if you didnt work, you seldom ate. Those who couldnt work (the disabled, the elderly, etc.) were cared for by family members or charitable institutions.
Al-ien wrote:
I follow Fox pretty religiously and I agree with them probably 90+ most of the time but something has been troubling me for some time. I'd like to know what some of you feel about this.
As most of you know, that watch, Judge Jeannine has been on a crusade to fix the electric grid, which is fine. I can't understand though when she says that if the grid goes down, it can put millions of life at risk, I believe she said 9 million or 90 million which is irrelevant but the cost to secure it would only cost in the neighborhood of 2 billion dollars which is chicken feed in the realm of the federal spending. I find this to be a false premise. by any measure of the imagination, I can't think of any reason that ANY politician would not try to solve this despite party affiliation. They made excuses that there is an energy lobby of some sort that is the problem. That sounds farfetched because the government could force them to comply if it concerned national security. What am I missing? I tried to contact the judge by Face book but got no reply, which I didn't expect but I am annoyed by her poor explanation.
I follow Fox pretty religiously and I agree with t... (
show quote)