One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: SilentGeneration
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 26 next>>
Aug 21, 2020 22:27:41   #
Liberty Tree wrote:
One of the problems with the medical experts is that they have constantly changed positions on what to do. I would also insist on a uniform standard of reporting cases so there would be more valid statistics.


Medical positions were changed as doctors learned more about the v***s and how it's spread.
Go to
Aug 21, 2020 22:26:01   #
Simple Sam wrote:
WOW! Shut everything down? Talk about breaking a nation! But, perhaps that is what C***D was designed to do.


Other nations who shut down and mandated wearing masks were able to reopen successfully.
Go to
Aug 21, 2020 22:24:50   #
JFlorio wrote:
This will happen. CDC says mortality rate is between .2 and 1.5%. Pretty low all things considered and even less for kids. What’s the alternative? Millions of small businesses gone. Kids who aren’t socially experienced. Millions out of work and a broke govt. tracing Americans as to where they go and who they interact with. Not for me.


Death isn't the only concern. The overall death rate in comparison to the number of cases is low. A bigger concern is long term side effects. Another concern is spreading the v***s among more at risk groups.
Go to
Aug 20, 2020 09:10:48   #
Tug484 wrote:
Wrong.
California and Nevada have sent them to everyone.


That's 2 states out of 50 states. Besides, if absentee v****g is good enough for the President and his family, it's good enough for us.
Go to
Sep 27, 2019 08:07:19   #
Sonny Magoo wrote:
Trump will be president in 2021 and beyond.
All the grandstanding is what it is. But hey, America is the land of opportunity. Let them try. A fight wouldn't be fun without some "resistance " lol


The Constitution has term limits for the office of President. "And beyond" ends in 2024.
Go to
May 30, 2019 16:19:46   #
maximus wrote:
Kevyn, this is exactly what I'm talking about. In this paragraph, I counted 13 derogatory names and states of being. This is the way "I" would like to see a debate go;

Kevyn,
When I read your statement, I see that your words seem to mean...you hoped for everybody believing the same as you. As OPP is a forum, meaning that people of differing beliefs can come together and present their beliefs and engage in a spirited debate, you, no insult intended, seem to have chosen to call those of other beliefs and opinions names and to post questionable pictures( I admit my own guilt...iI posted 3 pictures the other day in response to you posting several). My response was NOT the adult intelligent way to approach a forum. In fact, it destroys the whole atmosphere of a forum and turns it into a mudslinging contest. If you remember the Three Stooges where at the end of the short, they got into food fights, then that is what OPP is starting to look like. I will take the first step right now;
I vow to never call anybody a name or throw insults at them, OR post any more questionable photos and cartoons. Whether you do this or not, I will. Who ever started it, when we call names and throw insults, we turn from adults acting reasonably into children who have not learned the niceties of polite society.
If only a few of us (both sides)stick together and when someone calls out a name, we ask them to please refrain, and then just let it go.
So, Kevyn, will you make the same vow?

OK...now this being a debate, that my opinion and now it is Keyvns turn to respond with his opinion. To me, this is not hard to do.
Kevyn, this is exactly what I'm talking about. In ... (show quote)


Go to
May 30, 2019 10:34:44   #
maximus wrote:
Good morning all. I would like to suggest something for both sides here on OPP. I would like to see name calling stop. Just stop doing it. It doesn't help any debate and it only brings emotion into what could be a good debate.
I have found that when called a name, just ignoring it goes a long was, because I hardly ever get called a name anymore. by the same token, I don't call anybody names.
OPP would be a more dignified place to present our beliefs and debate our differences if we do just this one thing.
What will we ever change by being on OPP anyway? Nothing.
Good morning all. I would like to suggest somethin... (show quote)


Go to
May 25, 2019 09:26:56   #
rafterman wrote:
During my 20 year career, I would say that about 15% of the people in the Navy - officer and enlisted - where gay. Yes, and everyone could identify the gay guys. NOBODY CARED! I repeat - NOBODY CARED! Gays knew not to stray to a straight guy and the straights never bothered the gays. It was not until the politicians got their nose involved in it that it became an issue. But here's the bottom line - If you where injured - say in an automobile accident - would you ask the person who is saving your life what his (or her) sexual preferences are before they provided you with life saving procedures? No, of course not.
During my 20 year career, I would say that about 1... (show quote)


Go to
May 24, 2019 19:35:51   #
Big dog wrote:
Obviously you didn’t serve.


No I didn't. My father, brother, husband, 2 stepsons, and a granddaughter are vets going back to WWI.
I will say that when I asked the question I was thinking more about gays than t*********rs. There have been gays who have served honorably.
Go to
May 24, 2019 16:30:39   #
Squiddiddler wrote:
Trey Gowdy , South Carolina Congressman, recently responded to a reporter about the military in response to a question from a CNN reporter about the DoD ban of t*********rs from joining the U.S. armed forces. As Trey typically does so very well, he nailed it rather succinctly.

Question: How can President Trump claim to represent all U.S citizens, regardless of sexual orientation, when he banned t*********rs from joining the military? Isn't that discrimination?

Trey Gowdy's Response: " Nobody has a right to serve in the Military. Nobody! What makes you people think the Military is an equal opportunity employer? It is very far from it - and for good reasons - let me cite a few."

"The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for being too old or too young, too fat or too skinny, too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, or for missing or additional fingers." he went on to explain: "By the way, poor eyesight will disqualify you, as well as bad teeth. Malnourished? Drug addiction? Bad back? Criminal history? Low IQ? Anxiety? Phobias? Hearing damage? Six arms? Hear voices in your head?

Self-identification as a Unicorn? Need a special access ramp for your wheelchair? Can't run the required course in the required time? Can't do the required number of push-ups? Not really a morning person? and refuse to get out of bed before noon? All can be legitimate reasons for denial"

"The Military has one job: Winning War. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. Did someone just scream? That isn't Fair? War is VERY unfair, there are no exceptions made for being special or challenged or socially wonderful."

"YOU must change yourself to meet Military standards and not the other way around."

"I say again: You don't change the Military - you must change yourself. The Military is not about being fair, it is about taking advantage of others and about winning.

The Military doesn't need to accommodate anyone with special issues. The Military needs to Win Wars and keep our Country safe - PERIOD!"

"If any of your personal issues are a liability that detract from readiness or lethality... Thank you for applying and good luck in future endeavors."



"...any other questions?"
Trey Gowdy , South Carolina Congressman, recently ... (show quote)


What if your personal issue doesn't detract from readiness or lethality?
Go to
May 17, 2019 11:59:41   #
We have fundamentalist Christians and more moderate Christians. Is the same true for Islam?
Go to
May 17, 2019 11:42:46   #
Iliamna1 wrote:
The biggest problem I see here is the total lack of moral restrictions.. I am a realist and know this will never happen, but how about being abstinent until you marry?
This would solve the issues of so many children without fathers, a******n (for the most part) and sexually t***smitted diseases and much of the childhood poverty. It would end up with decreased incarceration for the parents as well as their offspring.
I am seriously afraid for our nation and pray a lot for a spiritual awakening. We're nearly to the point of cataclysmic no return and Divine justice.
The biggest problem I see here is the total lack o... (show quote)


There are still people who are abstinent until marriage.
Go to
May 17, 2019 11:40:58   #
[quote=Bcon]I see no reason for anyone to provide any type of protection that can be acquired by the person that would use the protection. This includes the money going to planned parenthood. What a person does with his personal life is just that. Personal. If people were trained to be responsible for themselves, we would have very few needs for a******n.[/quot

Planned Parenthood provides other health services for women in addition to providing birth control. They are a medical provider as are doctors and pharmacists.
Go to
May 15, 2019 07:03:38   #
archie bunker wrote:
Don't play that card on me! I was talking about recreational sex for pleasure, and you damn well know it!!
Your flip failed!!!!


No, I didn't know that. I wasn't trying to be flip. I think both parties need to behave responsibly. If women need to keep their legs closed, men need to keep their pants zipped.
Go to
May 14, 2019 11:04:47   #
archie bunker wrote:
How bout they decide to keep their damn legs closed?
Oh! But that's complicated, right?


Apparently you've been lucky enough to not have been raped. If someone is being raped forcibly with the threat of physical harm or death for non-compliance, the "decision " is out of the victim's control.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 26 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.