One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Kevyn
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 ... 1961 next>>
Feb 18, 2014 05:54:02   #
Here is a brief article explaining how a discharge petition works, how the nutjob who writes for the site you linked to thinks this is unconstitutional is beyond me.

A discharge petition is a means of bringing a bill out of committee and to the floor for consideration without a report from the committee and usually without cooperation of the leadership by "discharging" the committee from further consideration of a bill or resolution. Discharge petitions are most often associated with the U.S. House of Representatives, though many state legislatures have similar procedures. They are used when the chair of a committee refuses to place a bill or resolution on the Committee's agenda; by never reporting a bill, the matter will never leave the committee, and the full House will not be able to consider it. The discharge petition, and the threat of one, gives more power to individual members of the House and usurps a small amount of power from the leadership and committee chairs. The modern discharge petition requires the signature of an absolute majority of House members (218 members). Only twice has it been used successfully on major legislation in recent history.[1]
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 05:44:42   #
Borrowing money at Historicaly low interest rates and using it to improve infrastructure help struggling community's and schools while in the process putting several million people back to work undoubtedly kept us from falling into a second great depression. If the program was twice as big our economy would be better today and the cost would be more than made up by the increased revenue to the feds produced by that better economy.
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 05:37:42   #
Thease were not gaffs or jokes this is exactly how people think and feel about the issues. Do you notice no one here has chimed in to say that any of the stuff this group of commentators said was misunderstood or taken out of context? The views expressed represent pretty exactly the country the majority of teabaggers want us to. become. This is why the republican party is split, they need to appear loyal to the nut jobs who buy into that sort of crap while hiding from the people in the center that if they v**e republican they are supporting this crazy hatred stuff. The real Rino's are the quasi n**i nut jobs the teabaggers elected to take over the party, at first they were welcomed for their numbers now the real republicans see them for the cancer on the party they really are.
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 05:19:34   #
Why on earth would it be worth it to be toting a heater if you arn't allowed to threaten and blast people who annoy you?
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 15:19:24   #
The folks the teabaggers really need to look out for is the Mexican Muslums
they are heavily armed,into narco trafficking, have built tunnels under the border big enough to drive an Escalades full of dope and jihadists through (a sk**l learned in training camps in the Gaza strip when they were there for vest bomb making lessons). The most terrifying thing is that they are lurking all around us waiting to strike when Obama gives the order. It is part of a secret global conspiracy arranged by then Senator Obama, President Bush, Arafat and Desante Fox over a decade ago.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 12:18:25   #
Although in my opinion FDR would be better suited for Rushmore, as our first Black President and the man to lead us against great odds out of the second great depression Obama is a more likely candidate.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 12:14:37   #
jay-are wrote:
You can't be against Bush and for getting Bin Laden. Bush was for getting Bin Laden, and if you are for getting Bin Laden, you agree with Bush. Are you sure which side you are on?


Rumsfeld wasted US resources in Iraq rather than go in heavy in Afganistan where Bin Laden was hiding. as a result the entire region is a big mess with little hope of much improvement in the near future.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 12:09:12   #
If we doubled the food stamp program and cut corporate wellfare in half the average taxpayer would save $ 365.00 a year. If that happened they could allow people to buy liquor and cigarettes with food stamps and I would not give a damn!
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 12:04:05   #
I have always liked the basic tenants of the libertarian view but it never deals very well with the grey areas the majority of our policy disputes fall under. For instance if I own a small piece of property should the government never be allowed to take it for the greater good even if I am well compensated for the land? Should I be allowed to burn old tires to heat my garage even though my neighbors don't like the smell, how about cigars in an eleavator if I own the building? I should be able to do business with only those I choose to but what if the Walton family dosn't like B****s or Asians and bans them from all Wallmart and Sam club stores. This philosophy ion the abstract is appealing but is often useless in application.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 11:50:11   #
SchoonerPete wrote:
Yeah, this worked real well on 9/11. Yep, ignore them, and when they get their hands on a nuke, and put it on a boat/ship off shore...???? They eventually destroy Israel, then control the world's oil distribution, etc. etc....tell me how's that gonna work out? Yeah, you libs just keep thinking this way.

The point is, under Bush, we had them whipped! And, then you low information v**ers elected Obozo, and now the Al Qaeda is thriving. Way to go libtards!


Yup, Bush was so busy avenging his dads screw up in Iraq he missed the oppertunity to get Bin Laden in Afganistan.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 06:15:13   #
If your faith protected you from venomous snakes that you were handling wouldn't it make sense that it would also protect you from putting a loaded gun against your head and pulling the trigger? Or guzzling poison or running across the freeway?
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 06:06:52   #
Brian Devon wrote:
If you are having a problem securing condoms, I have a recommendation. Go to your nearest "99 cent" store. Go to the party section and look for extra small party balloons. I'm sure they will work just fine for you.


With his poor attitude this guy can't be getting much action other than from his right hand.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 01:21:37   #
banjojack wrote:
Could be Reagan didn't protect his scoundrels. Grant was probably the worst for that.


This is a good point, Ronald Reagan was loyal to no one but himself.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 00:37:11   #
When I lived in Montana this six and a half foot tall loudmouth from Texas got a job in town, all he did was brag about Texas. One day he dropped dead of a heart attack. At the undertakers the morticians assistant was worried because the biggest coffin they had was only 6 feet tall voicing his concern to the undertaker he was supprised when the man was not concerned, asked what he should do to fit the huge man in an undersized coffin the undertaker replied "he's a Texan, just give him an enema and put him in a shoebox."

Do any of you have funny jokes about Texas and Texans? my Brother in Law is from Texas and I love to give him a good ribbing.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 22:14:32   #
AuntiE wrote:
You may get a major disagreement from teachers in the State of Maryland, whose union leadership heavily (a number of years ago) financed political ads for approval of gambling, in direct opposition to their memberships's wishes. Such would be only one representation of NOT determining the wishes of union membership wishes.

There are teachers in New York who do NOT approve of the union supporting teachers who have been found to have acted inappropriately (physically) with students, yet the union continues on it's path.

I will not even cover the Chicago Teacher's Union nor the District of Columbia.
You may get a major disagreement from teachers in ... (show quote)


If the majority of your brothers and sisters are dissatisfied with your elected union leaders v**e to change them! My guess is that the majority are satisfied with the leadership and you are in the minority.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 ... 1961 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.