One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrats "War on Men"
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 16, 2014 20:34:10   #
AuH2O Jr.
 
Democrats keep talking about Republicans having a "War on Women", but this is another way of them waging their "War on Men".

We all remember that "Sl*t" Sandra Fluke wanting the government to pay for her contraception, and other women's contraception. One of the big things was preventative services for women.

So some of you probably wouldn't be surprised that Democrats don't want to give men these same preventative services. The government isn't giving out free contraception to men, i.e. condoms. This is a clear violation of the 14th & 5th amendments Equal Protection clause. If women are allowed to obtain free contraception, then men must be allowed to obtain free contraception as well.

Here's an example of what I'm talking about.
http://answers.sea1.webmd.com/answers/5040611/does-the-affordable-care-act-cover-condoms-and-other-contraception-for-men-too-or-is-it-just-for-women-

Remember, condoms do what no other contraception does, which is that they prevent the spread of STD's like that of HIV. They also help to prevent pregnancy, which is what contraception means under the CDC's meaning of contraception. So women would be allowed to have pregnancy prevention devices under the law, but men are FORCED to pay for contraception under the law.

Democrats obviously don't want to make sure that men are protected, but women are protected. However, this means that men can contract STD's from women because they aren't protected under the new law.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 22:06:31   #
PhilosophyMan Loc: Washington state.
 
Never thought of that! :thumbup:
Quite a good point.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 22:23:12   #
AuH2O Jr.
 
It is what I first thought of when they talked about free contraception after Sandra Fluke made her appeal.

I did some research and it would cost a male more money than it would a female. Females would only have to buy "the pill" once a month. So we can suppose on the high end that the pill costs 100 dollars. So they buy 12 of them and that would cost 1,200 dollars.

The CDC says that condoms should be used for both anal, oral, and vaginal. So we can suppose that a male has sex once a day. They buy a pack of condoms, which costs around 3.99 where I live at CVS. So a male would have to use all three condoms when they receive oral sex, give anal and vaginal. So now we just multiply 3.99 by 365, and we obtain it would cost a male 1,456.35.

So we immediately see it costs a male more than a female. Not to mention that condoms are the only thing that prevent STDs. So the male has to take responsibility for both themselves and the female to stop the spreading of STDs.

Looks like Democrats want to wage the war on men, and make sure that they don't receive equal protection.

Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2014 22:32:55   #
PhilosophyMan Loc: Washington state.
 
AuH2O Jr. wrote:
It is what I first thought of when they talked about free contraception after Sandra Fluke made her appeal.

I did some research and it would cost a male more money than it would a female. Females would only have to buy "the pill" once a month. So we can suppose on the high end that the pill costs 100 dollars. So they buy 12 of them and that would cost 1,200 dollars.

The CDC says that condoms should be used for both anal, oral, and vaginal. So we can suppose that a male has sex once a day. They buy a pack of condoms, which costs around 3.99 where I live at CVS. So a male would have to use all three condoms when they receive oral sex, give anal and vaginal. So now we just multiply 3.99 by 365, and we obtain it would cost a male 1,456.35.

So we immediately see it costs a male more than a female. Not to mention that condoms are the only thing that prevent STDs. So the male has to take responsibility for both themselves and the female to stop the spreading of STDs.

Looks like Democrats want to wage the war on men, and make sure that they don't receive equal protection.
It is what I first thought of when they talked abo... (show quote)


Assuming this man is single, he is quite the player. :XD:
Completely agree with you btw

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 23:51:23   #
Brian Devon
 
AuH2O Jr. wrote:
It is what I first thought of when they talked about free contraception after Sandra Fluke made her appeal.

I did some research and it would cost a male more money than it would a female. Females would only have to buy "the pill" once a month. So we can suppose on the high end that the pill costs 100 dollars. So they buy 12 of them and that would cost 1,200 dollars.

The CDC says that condoms should be used for both anal, oral, and vaginal. So we can suppose that a male has sex once a day. They buy a pack of condoms, which costs around 3.99 where I live at CVS. So a male would have to use all three condoms when they receive oral sex, give anal and vaginal. So now we just multiply 3.99 by 365, and we obtain it would cost a male 1,456.35.

So we immediately see it costs a male more than a female. Not to mention that condoms are the only thing that prevent STDs. So the male has to take responsibility for both themselves and the female to stop the spreading of STDs.

Looks like Democrats want to wage the war on men, and make sure that they don't receive equal protection.
It is what I first thought of when they talked abo... (show quote)



If you are having a problem securing condoms, I have a recommendation. Go to your nearest "99 cent" store. Go to the party section and look for extra small party balloons. I'm sure they will work just fine for you.

Reply
Feb 17, 2014 01:54:57   #
freeperson
 
Brian Devon wrote:
If you are having a problem securing condoms, I have a recommendation. Go to your nearest "99 cent" store. Go to the party section and look for extra small party balloons. I'm sure they will work just fine for you.


Typical stupid comment with insult tossed in.

Reply
Feb 17, 2014 02:20:19   #
Vacaman
 
AuH2O Jr. wrote:
It is what I first thought of when they talked about free contraception after Sandra Fluke made her appeal.

I did some research and it would cost a male more money than it would a female. Females would only have to buy "the pill" once a month. So we can suppose on the high end that the pill costs 100 dollars. So they buy 12 of them and that would cost 1,200 dollars.

The CDC says that condoms should be used for both anal, oral, and vaginal. So we can suppose that a male has sex once a day. They buy a pack of condoms, which costs around 3.99 where I live at CVS. So a male would have to use all three condoms when they receive oral sex, give anal and vaginal. So now we just multiply 3.99 by 365, and we obtain it would cost a male 1,456.35.

So we immediately see it costs a male more than a female. Not to mention that condoms are the only thing that prevent STDs. So the male has to take responsibility for both themselves and the female to stop the spreading of STDs.

Looks like Democrats want to wage the war on men, and make sure that they don't receive equal protection.
It is what I first thought of when they talked abo... (show quote)


I think it is because 80 % of the working men out there are republicans tired of politicians, particularly democrats. 90 percent of the woman are likely to v**e democrat along with most minorities. So maybe In reality the democrats are just out having a good ol time spending a little less of my money. Monika didn't need contraceptives, remember ? Maybe Sandra Fluke can't ...or maybe she is just a cheap ...? Surely doesn't seem fair based on assumed e******y. If they truley wanted to save money, I suppose the democrats would promote marriage. Even Pelosi won't go that far!!!

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2014 03:47:06   #
Retired669
 
Brian Devon wrote:
If you are having a problem securing condoms, I have a recommendation. Go to your nearest "99 cent" store. Go to the party section and look for extra small party balloons. I'm sure they will work just fine for you.





Brian it appears that the brain dead around here can't recognize sarcasm when they see it. That might help explain why they are so gullible....Eh? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Feb 17, 2014 06:06:52   #
Kevyn
 
Brian Devon wrote:
If you are having a problem securing condoms, I have a recommendation. Go to your nearest "99 cent" store. Go to the party section and look for extra small party balloons. I'm sure they will work just fine for you.


With his poor attitude this guy can't be getting much action other than from his right hand.

Reply
Feb 17, 2014 09:55:45   #
Brian Devon
 
Retired669 wrote:
Brian it appears that the brain dead around here can't recognize sarcasm when they see it. That might help explain why they are so gullible....Eh? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Yeah, I'm guessing most of them don't watch "Saturday Night Live". They prefer "Sunday Morning Comatose". Gullible.......ya think? :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 17, 2014 12:06:29   #
Vacaman
 
PhilosophyMan wrote:
Assuming this man is single, he is quite the player. :XD:
Completely agree with you btw


Player or not at least he is considering the use of a condom, obviously this is a typical over site of law written without intellegence. In California you can go down to any if the hundreds Of planned parenthood centers and get your free condoms and get assitance to schedule a a******n. So why more laws to address human reproduction? It is likely a war against religion is my belief, religion will never be mainstream in a society of humanists full of h**e and self ominence.

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2014 12:08:09   #
Vacaman
 
Kevyn wrote:
With his poor attitude this guy can't be getting much action other than from his right hand.


Why would you speak of Bryan that way, sounds like a very frugal shopper to me, don't cast judgment on him for his wealth of shopping knowledge.

Reply
Feb 17, 2014 12:36:53   #
Brian Devon
 
Kevyn wrote:
With his poor attitude this guy can't be getting much action other than from his right hand.



Well, we all know it won't be from his left hand.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Feb 17, 2014 12:44:58   #
rumitoid
 
AuH2O Jr. wrote:
Democrats keep talking about Republicans having a "War on Women", but this is another way of them waging their "War on Men".

We all remember that "Sl*t" Sandra Fluke wanting the government to pay for her contraception, and other women's contraception. One of the big things was preventative services for women.

So some of you probably wouldn't be surprised that Democrats don't want to give men these same preventative services. The government isn't giving out free contraception to men, i.e. condoms. This is a clear violation of the 14th & 5th amendments Equal Protection clause. If women are allowed to obtain free contraception, then men must be allowed to obtain free contraception as well.

Here's an example of what I'm talking about.
http://answers.sea1.webmd.com/answers/5040611/does-the-affordable-care-act-cover-condoms-and-other-contraception-for-men-too-or-is-it-just-for-women-

Remember, condoms do what no other contraception does, which is that they prevent the spread of STD's like that of HIV. They also help to prevent pregnancy, which is what contraception means under the CDC's meaning of contraception. So women would be allowed to have pregnancy prevention devices under the law, but men are FORCED to pay for contraception under the law.

Democrats obviously don't want to make sure that men are protected, but women are protected. However, this means that men can contract STD's from women because they aren't protected under the new law.
Democrats keep talking about Republicans having a ... (show quote)


Can men get pregnant? More to the point, certain contraceptives for women are not just to protect against pregnancy, and perhaps a later need for an a******n, but for health reasons. A Trojan's only health benefit is a guard against STDs and an unwanted tax deduction.

Reply
Feb 17, 2014 12:56:16   #
AuH2O Jr.
 
Brian Devon wrote:
If you are having a problem securing condoms, I have a recommendation. Go to your nearest "99 cent" store. Go to the party section and look for extra small party balloons. I'm sure they will work just fine for you.


That doesn't get around the violation of the ACA has on the 5th & 14th Amendments Equal Protection Clause, which is non-negotiable, even at 99cents, which any woman can tell you!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.