One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: maximus
Page: <<prev 1 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 ... 237 next>>
Apr 20, 2019 07:08:04   #
eden wrote:
On that basis you could say that Catholics have no business in this country much less in our government because of the worldwide epidemic of sexual abuse perpetrated by Catholic clergy. Clearly these people (Catholics) can’t be trusted and are all closet p*******es.


Not really, because there is no more sexual abuse in the RCC than in any other denomination. I too held your viewpoint until I was challenged to do some research and found out that some other denominations had MORE sexual abuse the the RCC. Since the abuse story came into light, the Vatican has enacted new rules to see that it never happens again.

No, I'm not Catholic. No, I'm not defending Catholicism. The t***h is the t***h and I do my very best to tell the t***h.
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 06:57:42   #
Carol Kelly wrote:
Thank you for allowing me to participate. I hope Easter will bring a grand and glorious reconciliation of our political powers that be. Not much chance but we can still hope.


...and pray!!!

Happy Easter


Go to
Apr 20, 2019 06:49:34   #
eden wrote:
If you are so enamored of authoritarian thugs you have several choices:

Russia
China
...and that cute little pudding faced dictator Trump “fell in love” with has a nice cozy condo waiting for you in Pyongyang. Buh bye. 😊


Yeah...you're right! Trump should have increased sanctions. Those increased sanctions would have done the job...I mean, look at how well they worked for all those years.

I suppose you would have preferred that Obama apologize for America.
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 06:26:55   #
America 1 wrote:
Well, Eden, the d**gging down has been rather a treat so far.
And just how has this affected you?
No work.
No food.
No freedom.
Or is it the confusion as to what bathroom to use?


(applauding)
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 06:24:52   #
eden wrote:
Problem is it’s really no laughing matter. The portrait that has emerged from the Mueller Report is a rudderless administration that veers erratically at the hand of an unpatriotic,
dishonest and impulsive adolescent. We should be grateful to some of those around him who have managed to corral his potentially illegal and destructive demands.
Pray that these advisors keep us from some unimaginable calamity for the rest of his term.
The Republic has never been in such jeopardy.


For Trump to be so bad, the country is doing pretty great. Oh...wait! That's not Trump, that's Obama isn't? It only took 2 terms and 2 years for the Obama policies to work, didn't it? Oh...wait! That's not Obama, that s LBJ...no, it must be Truman! no...it must be.............yada, yada, yada. No matter what you say, Trump is running the country as it should have been run for the last 16 years ( at least 16).

Bitterness and hatred does not give you the t***h.
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 06:15:26   #
proud republican wrote:
To all my friends on OPP...May blessings of God bring warmth and tranquility to your hearts.....


Thank you.
On the day that Jesus died, he gave us the gift of eternal life. On the day he arose, he showed us that his gift was real.

Joy to you all and I pray for the healing of our country.
Go to
Apr 19, 2019 05:01:36   #
JW wrote:
Since it is now 20+ pages long, I will summarize here.

There were four basic responses that were presented.

1 – God’s gonna git ya fer that.
2 – Who do you think you are to question God.
3 – I know you would believe if you just…
4 – Well, let’s take a look at that.

I am grateful for all of the responses but was primarily looking for type four.

It’s difficult to broach any subject revolving around God without opening up a religious debate. That was not my intent. I am agnostic. That means, literally, I do ‘not know’. My interest is not in becoming religious, denying the efficacy of religion, nor is it to be judgmental of religious people. I am simply looking for answers to things that confound me. I have experienced and learned a great deal in my 72 years and still have questions without answers.

I understand the draw of religion and of the sense of certainty a belief can provide. Religion is probably the single best motivation to self discipline society has at its disposal. Unfortunately, in evil hands, it remains a powerful motivator.

In any case, I am going to study your responses for some time to come. I will look into the links and suggestions you have provided and once more, Thank you!

JW
Since it is now 20+ pages long, I will summarize h... (show quote)


Good day, sir.
My good friend, Canuckus Deploracus, asked if I reviewed you post and I confess, for wh**ever reason i was flooded with topics from OPP and I missed yours.
So, I've looked at it now and I've thought about it. Here we go....
First off, you say you don't object to one's personal beliefs as long as they remain personal. I'm thinking logically here...you want people to keep their beliefs personal, which to me means keep it to yourself, but you have put you beliefs, (or lack of) right out there in the public eye of OPP. Also, the title is somewhat of a challenge seemingly, though your post caused no drama in my faith at all.

That said, now, for the meat of your post. Born Catholic, raised Baptist, took part in church. All very good but why did you tell us this? Was it to say that your religious background failed you? That your background was of no value? You also didn't say how long you have been agnostic.
Next, you you don't say that there IS NO God, but that there MAY be a God, and that mankind's views of Him are inaccurate. I can agree with you on that one.
Further, you "asked" (not said) that IF God can do anything, then why make a universe that destroys itself?

Well,I have an answer for you and it is that I don't believe that God created the universe in the state of turmoil that it's in today. God created a perfect universe. The brightest star in the heavens was not Jesus, but was Lucifer. Lucifer is obviously greater than we are ( the Bible says we are made a little lower than the angels, and Lucifer and his demons were angels.

My point is that angels had free will, just as we do today. That's why Lucifer was allowed to decide that HE wanted to be in the place of God, to be the most high. Lucifer was in fellowship with God until he took this view. Lucifer was kicked out of heaven along with 1/3 of all the angels in existence. (Free will). Lucifer got angry when God gave d******n of the earth to man, instead of him. That's why he h**es mankind and wants to take every man to hell, to spite God. I believe the universe was perfect until Lucifer committed his great wrong doing. Adam and Eve had the same chance, but they sinned also.

Until that time, there were no carnivorous animals anywhere. But once they committed sin, the earth was cursed for man's sake. Until they committed sin, there was no disease, no growing old, and no dying.

Lucifer had free will, his demons had free will, Adam had free will, and Eve had free will, but every one of them committed acts against the will of God. To me, that is why the earth is wrought with disease and pestilence. It's why things die and why things rot. Only when Jesus comes to claim his bride will God start to put the universe right again.

Lastly, you say that IF God is omniscient, that he knew of all the agony, pain, torture and death, and since he lives outside of our linear time line, he DOES see past present and future all at once. But the "blame" is not His. THAT belongs to Lucifer, his angels, and mankind, all who sinned one right after the other. Your aware, I'm sure, that when things go well, God is never mentioned, but when things go bad, it's always why did God do this to me? or why did God let this happen?

Finally, you said you wanted to present an argument for open mindedness, but to me, the question is, do YOU have that open mind? You have entertained the notion that there is no God because you don't like the way things are going in the world, and it seems so unfair. Did God make it that way? No, man did all that. God doesn't like it either, but he gave us our choice and we MUST live by it.

And there's this point also, you went to church so you know that God offers us eternal life...never ending life with no pain, no sorrow, no hunger, and no death...our earthly existence is only a wink, a puff of smoke and it's over. But if one has salvation, it is only beginning!

Can you answer me this...what takes more of an open mind to believe... that there IS NO God when so many today agree with you? But keep this in mind. Science only deals with what can be tried and proven. Because God gives us salvation through faith, He can't be proven, and even if He could, then faith would be null. So, I believe that it takes much more of an open mind to believe that there IS a God and that He is responsible for everything that is, but not for the condition that everything is in.

Please, keep in mind. that I am not arguing with you, nor am I scolding you. I'm not preaching, or trying to be persuasive. I am merely presenting an open minded view that is becoming more and more objectionable and unacceptable as time marches on, i.e., that there IS a God, that He IS the God of the Bible. It takes a strong belief and a strong faith to believe in God when the world seems to have forgotten Him.

I hope I'm not too late in responding to you, and my reply requires no answer, just thought.
Go to
Apr 18, 2019 05:12:49   #
jimpack123 wrote:
There are Democrats and then there are democrat socialist just as there are GOP conserivative's and far right Trumpster's . can not group all together as DEM's and GOP's


No...I think you have it wrong. It should be, conservative Trumpster's, and THEN the far right.
Go to
Apr 18, 2019 04:13:45   #
dtucker300 wrote:
When the Second Amendment was ratified, and earlier under English law, every able-bodied man was expected to take up arms to protect his home, community, and state when needed and necessary; this was the definition of m*****a because security and personal safety was a god-given right.

http://constitution.com/declaration-causes-necessity-taking-arms/


I agree.
Go to
Apr 18, 2019 00:52:18   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Well, first of all, most people don't realize that there are more words in the 2nd amendment than just "the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon". Complete sentences and complete paragraphs are what communicates ideas and intent. That being said, what does the first part of the 2nd "being necessary for the security of the States" and " a well regulated m*****a " mean?
Well, first of all, most people don't realize that... (show quote)


You are correct except for this from Legal Information Institute;

In the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the "Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a m*****a, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."

A well regulated m*****a...a m*****a is voluntary service, and the volunteer MUST have their own arms in order to participate.

"A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Just say it backward...The right of the people (that's us) to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE
INFRINGED, in order to man a well regulated m*****a, when necessary for the security of a free state.

This makes it pretty easy to understand and in almost identical wording.
Go to
Apr 17, 2019 07:17:58   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Ever notice that when the federal government requires States to do stuff we don't like, we're all about the independence of States and against Federal overreach, but when States do stuff we don't like - we want the federal government to step in and put a stop to it? You know, like whining about how the Fed required Title ix stuff to be applied - but wanted the Fed to tell States how to handle i******s. Yeah, like that. Either we want the Federal Government to stay out of our business, or we want them in our business (or should I say in YOUR business), it can't be both.

Ever notice that we pretend that our justice system is blind to color, race, religion or political party, only when we agree with the courts decisions? When we don't like their rulings, we accuse the judges of being activists if they're a member of the "other" party, or t*****rs if they belong to ours. Then, we crow like mad when we think our courts are full of folks who think like we do. We don't really want judges to follow the Constitution, we want them to interpret it to say what we want it to say.

Ever notice that we clamor about following the Constitution, as long as it agrees with what we want? To ensure that it always says what we want it to say, we do our level best to make sure that the highest courts in the land have partisans on the bench. We don't let the Constitution determine our ideology, we try to force the Constitution to conform to our ideology. Personally, I think that is indicative of a mental illness.

Ever notice that when v**es go how we like, our polling system is perfect, but when they don't, it MUST be due to v***r f***d and/or a messed up system? I've seen people react both ways.............in the same e******n cycle. How can we have 100% legitimate v**es...............and................v***r f***d occurring on the same b****t? This is just more evidence of a mental malady.
Ever notice that when the federal government requi... (show quote)




Yes...I have noticed. I think it's just human nature.
What I've really noticed that I've never seen before, and this may also reflect my own human nature, is that the most powerful man in the world, the US president, is not very powerful. Anything he wants to do can be stopped not by the other two equally powerful branches of of the federal government, or by a federal judge, but by a state judge.
Go to
Apr 16, 2019 21:39:03   #


Great photos. I felt sorry for the German kids. And the steel workers? No no no no no no no no...not no way, not no how!
Thanks for posting!
Go to
Apr 15, 2019 04:41:07   #
Radiance3 wrote:
=====================
Melania is the most beautiful and regal First Lady at the WH, second to First Lady Jackie Kennedy.

Alex Jones claims he has 'proof' Michelle Obama is a man.
In his latest attack on Michelle Obama, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones claims he has "the final proof" the former First Lady is a man.

In a 12-minute video, the Info wars host analyses footage and photos which he believes prove Ms Obama has a penis.

"Since the early days of the Obama administration, citizens across the board have studied videos and photos of Michelle Obama and said that she is a man," the shock jock said.

"And even [Barack] Obama has called her over and over again Michael. But new shock footage has emerged that is being censored off the internet as fast as you can upload it."

In the video, Mr Jones shows a series a pictures of Ms. Obama and points out to pleats in her dresses and trousers he says is evidence she has a penis.

The "shock" footage is a short clip showing someone saying: "Michelle is t*********r, we all know it".
Mr Jones added: "Now I'm not saying that Michelle Obama is a tran and I don't h**e t******s. I'm a libertarian but we have famous photos of her where it appears she has a large bulge in her pants.
"Michelle appears in photos and videos to have a very large penis in her pants, her shoulders are wide, her face is very, very masculine. She looks like a t****y.

"And so you ask yourself are the children a beard for Obama and of course Michelle Obama or Michael Obama as he has called her."

Mr Jones then shows a video of Mr Obama making a speech at a military base in Arlington, Virginia, during which he says "Michael and I".

Is that true?
===================== br Melania is the most beau... (show quote)


Look at glamour photos of t****ys. They go to great lengths to hide any bulge so that they look more like women. Not taking up for Michelle, but I don't think she is a man. My dad used to call my mother Frank.
Go to
Apr 15, 2019 04:19:14   #
Nickolai wrote:
Well I am a very proud liberal and have little respect for conservatives. If they had ever accomplished anything in history It would be different. They claim to know it all are not interested in considering learning anything because it would risk admitting they might be wrong about something


I believe you're right this time. Democrats created s***ery in America. After being defeated they passed Jim Crow laws. They promoted segregation in the early 20th century through mid century. Democrats fought against Civil Rights in the 60's.Do you remember George Wallace in Mississippi? Yep. he was a good ole' southern democrat. In fact, all the things you accuse conservatives of doing, your party was the ones actually committing the acts.
Don't believe me? Tell me one republican that owned a s***e in 1860. Bet cha' can't. Why? Because there were NONE. All s***e owners in 1860 were democrats.
Go to
Apr 15, 2019 04:03:19   #
Richard Rowland wrote:
The more I read, the more I'm convinced that we humans who are supposed to be of the highest order, occupying the most enlighted age, can be convinced of just about anything. A poor heifer was sacrificed for what! Ignorance was responsible for that type of nonsense, in those times, there is no excuse for practicing that junk now.

I'm aware that practice is being considered. And how will this individual that is to have the benefit of the ashes, receive them? Will they be sprinkled on him/ her, or will they be rolled in 'em, as rolling flour for a pie crust?

By the way, what t***spired to cause this ritual performance to be applied to the recipient, did someone copulate with a corpse? Inquiring minds want to know.
The more I read, the more I'm convinced that we hu... (show quote)


I find reading the law boring to my mind, but the Jews had 613 laws and one of them was ; If a man touch a corpse, he is unclean and must be purified by a clean person. Water and the ashes of the red heifer was sprinkled on the unclean person with a hyssop branch. The ashes were kept for these ceremonies, meaning that the red heifer only was k**led and burned occasionally as needed.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 ... 237 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.