Ever notice that when the federal government requires States to do stuff we don't like, we're all about the independence of States and against Federal overreach, but when States do stuff we don't like - we want the federal government to step in and put a stop to it? You know, like whining about how the Fed required Title ix stuff to be applied - but wanted the Fed to tell States how to handle i******s. Yeah, like that. Either we want the Federal Government to stay out of our business, or we want them in our business (or should I say in YOUR business), it can't be both.

Ever notice that we pretend that our justice system is blind to color, race, religion or political party, only when we agree with the courts decisions? When we don't like their rulings, we accuse the judges of being activists if they're a member of the "other" party, or t*****rs if they belong to ours. Then, we crow like mad when we think our courts are full of folks who think like we do. We don't really want judges to follow the Constitution, we want them to interpret it to say what we want it to say.

Ever notice that we clamor about following the Constitution, as long as it agrees with what we want? To ensure that it always says what we want it to say, we do our level best to make sure that the highest courts in the land have partisans on the bench. We don't let the Constitution determine our ideology, we try to force the Constitution to conform to our ideology. Personally, I think that is indicative of a mental illness.

Ever notice that when v**es go how we like, our polling system is perfect, but when they don't, it MUST be due to v***r f***d and/or a messed up system? I've seen people react both ways.............in the same e******n cycle. How can we have 100% legitimate v**es...............and................v***r f***d occurring on the same b****t? This is just more evidence of a mental malady.

Ever notice that when the federal government requires States to do stuff we don't like, we're all about the independence of States and against Federal overreach, but when States do stuff we don't like - we want the federal government to step in and put a stop to it? You know, like whining about how the Fed required Title ix stuff to be applied - but wanted the Fed to tell States how to handle i******s. Yeah, like that. Either we want the Federal Government to stay out of our business, or we want them in our business (or should I say in YOUR business), it can't be both.

Ever notice that we pretend that our justice system is blind to color, race, religion or political party, only when we agree with the courts decisions? When we don't like their rulings, we accuse the judges of being activists if they're a member of the "other" party, or t*****rs if they belong to ours. Then, we crow like mad when we think our courts are full of folks who think like we do. We don't really want judges to follow the Constitution, we want them to interpret it to say what we want it to say.

Ever notice that we clamor about following the Constitution, as long as it agrees with what we want? To ensure that it always says what we want it to say, we do our level best to make sure that the highest courts in the land have partisans on the bench. We don't let the Constitution determine our ideology, we try to force the Constitution to conform to our ideology. Personally, I think that is indicative of a mental illness.

Ever notice that when v**es go how we like, our polling system is perfect, but when they don't, it MUST be due to v***r f***d and/or a messed up system? I've seen people react both ways.............in the same e******n cycle. How can we have 100% legitimate v**es...............and................v***r f***d occurring on the same b****t? This is just more evidence of a mental malady.

Ever notice that when the federal government requires States to do stuff we don't like, we're all about the independence of States and against Federal overreach, but when States do stuff we don't like - we want the federal government to step in and put a stop to it? You know, like whining about how the Fed required Title ix stuff to be applied - but wanted the Fed to tell States how to handle i******s. Yeah, like that. Either we want the Federal Government to stay out of our business, or we want them in our business (or should I say in YOUR business), it can't be both.

Ever notice that we pretend that our justice system is blind to color, race, religion or political party, only when we agree with the courts decisions? When we don't like their rulings, we accuse the judges of being activists if they're a member of the "other" party, or t*****rs if they belong to ours. Then, we crow like mad when we think our courts are full of folks who think like we do. We don't really want judges to follow the Constitution, we want them to interpret it to say what we want it to say.

Ever notice that we clamor about following the Constitution, as long as it agrees with what we want? To ensure that it always says what we want it to say, we do our level best to make sure that the highest courts in the land have partisans on the bench. We don't let the Constitution determine our ideology, we try to force the Constitution to conform to our ideology. Personally, I think that is indicative of a mental illness.

Ever notice that when v**es go how we like, our polling system is perfect, but when they don't, it MUST be due to v***r f***d and/or a messed up system? I've seen people react both ways.............in the same e******n cycle. How can we have 100% legitimate v**es...............and................v***r f***d occurring on the same b****t? This is just more evidence of a mental malady.

Ever notice that when the federal government requires States to do stuff we don't like, we're all about the independence of States and against Federal overreach, but when States do stuff we don't like - we want the federal government to step in and put a stop to it? You know, like whining about how the Fed required Title ix stuff to be applied - but wanted the Fed to tell States how to handle i******s. Yeah, like that. Either we want the Federal Government to stay out of our business, or we want them in our business (or should I say in YOUR business), it can't be both.

Ever notice that we pretend that our justice system is blind to color, race, religion or political party, only when we agree with the courts decisions? When we don't like their rulings, we accuse the judges of being activists if they're a member of the "other" party, or t*****rs if they belong to ours. Then, we crow like mad when we think our courts are full of folks who think like we do. We don't really want judges to follow the Constitution, we want them to interpret it to say what we want it to say.

Ever notice that we clamor about following the Constitution, as long as it agrees with what we want? To ensure that it always says what we want it to say, we do our level best to make sure that the highest courts in the land have partisans on the bench. We don't let the Constitution determine our ideology, we try to force the Constitution to conform to our ideology. Personally, I think that is indicative of a mental illness.

Ever notice that when v**es go how we like, our polling system is perfect, but when they don't, it MUST be due to v***r f***d and/or a messed up system? I've seen people react both ways.............in the same e******n cycle. How can we have 100% legitimate v**es...............and................v***r f***d occurring on the same b****t? This is just more evidence of a mental malady.

Ever notice that when the federal government requires States to do stuff we don't like, we're all about the independence of States and against Federal overreach, but when States do stuff we don't like - we want the federal government to step in and put a stop to it? You know, like whining about how the Fed required Title ix stuff to be applied - but wanted the Fed to tell States how to handle i******s. Yeah, like that. Either we want the Federal Government to stay out of our business, or we want them in our business (or should I say in YOUR business), it can't be both.

Ever notice that we pretend that our justice system is blind to color, race, religion or political party, only when we agree with the courts decisions? When we don't like their rulings, we accuse the judges of being activists if they're a member of the "other" party, or t*****rs if they belong to ours. Then, we crow like mad when we think our courts are full of folks who think like we do. We don't really want judges to follow the Constitution, we want them to interpret it to say what we want it to say.

Ever notice that we clamor about following the Constitution, as long as it agrees with what we want? To ensure that it always says what we want it to say, we do our level best to make sure that the highest courts in the land have partisans on the bench. We don't let the Constitution determine our ideology, we try to force the Constitution to conform to our ideology. Personally, I think that is indicative of a mental illness.

Ever notice that when v**es go how we like, our polling system is perfect, but when they don'tt, it MUST be due to v***r f***d and/or a messed up system? I've seen people react both ways.............in the same e******n cycle. How can we have 100% legitimate v**es...............and................v***r f***d occurring on the same b****t? This is just more evidence of a mental malady.

Ever notice that when the federal government requires States to do stuff we don't like, we're all about the independence of States and against Federal overreach, but when States do stuff we don't like - we want the federal government to step in and put a stop to it? You know, like whining about how the Fed required Title ix stuff to be applied - but wanted the Fed to tell States how to handle i******s. Yeah, like that. Either we want the Federal Government to stay out of our business, or we want them in our business (or should I say in YOUR business), it can't be both.

Ever notice that we pretend that our justice system is blind to color, race, religion or political party, only when we agree with the courts decisions? When we don't like their rulings, we accuse the judges of being activists if they're a member of the "other" party, or t*****rs if they belong to ours. Then, we crow like mad when we think our courts are full of folks who think like we do. We don't really want judges to follow the Constitution, we want them to interpret it to say what we want it to say.

Ever notice that we clamor about following the Constitution, as long as it agrees with what we want? To ensure that it always says what we want it to say, we do our level best to make sure that the highest courts in the land have partisans on the bench. We don't let the Constitution determine our ideology, we try to force the Constitution to conform to our ideology. Personally, I think that is indicative of a mental illness.

Ever notice that when v**es go how we like, our polling system is perfect, but when they don't, it MUST be due to v***r f***d and/or a messed up system? I've seen people react both ways.............in the same e******n cycle. How can we have 100% legitimate v**es...............and................v***r f***d occurring on the same b****t? This is just more evidence of a mental malady.

Well, first of all, most people don't realize that there are more words in the 2nd amendment than just "the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon". Complete sentences and complete paragraphs are what communicates ideas and intent. That being said, what does the first part of the 2nd "being necessary for the security of the States" and " a well regulated m*****a " mean?