10 more conservative lies revealed
Mar 27, 2014 13:01:42 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
The discrepancy lies in the fact that you can't read.
Nothing wrong with my reading skills. Must be on your end. Why don't you toodle on up to Minnesota and file a brief on behalf of those 177 felons convicted of voter fraud? Tell the judge that these nice fellas automatically got their voting rights restored upon their release from prison because YOU said so. What? You still here, peckerhead?
Mar 27, 2014 13:01:43 #
Loki wrote:
Describing your behavior is exactly what I was doing, peckerhead.
Please you're showing off your inability to comprehend even the simplest forms of knowledge. You really aren't really that dense, are you?
Mar 27, 2014 13:03:10 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Please you're showing off your inability to comprehend even the simplest forms of knowledge. You really aren't really that dense, are you?
Of course not. I am trying to lower myself to your level, and that is quite a stoop.
Mar 27, 2014 14:09:22 #
Loki wrote:
Nothing wrong with my reading skills. Must be on your end. Why don't you toodle on up to Minnesota and file a brief on behalf of those 177 felons convicted of voter fraud? Tell the judge that these nice fellas automatically got their voting rights restored upon their release from prison because YOU said so. What? You still here, peckerhead?
This article comes from... MINNPOST ...www.minnpost.com/‎MinnPost is a nonprofit news organization, providing high quality journalism for news-intense Minnesotans.
"Cases of voter-ID election fraud found 'virtually non-existent'...By Natasha Khan and Corbin Carson, News21 | 08/13/12"
"In Minnesota, there have been 10 total cases of reported fraud and no cases of voter impersonation reported since 2000". This is a direct quote from the aforementioned article. Look the article up. You'll see the article was written one week after the article, you referenced. Your source was an article, in the Washington Examiner, written by Byron York, on Aug. 6, 2012. In that bogus article two "Right Wing" loons, John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky, claim and I quote...
"177 people have been convicted -- not just accused, but convicted -- of voting fraudulently..."
This bogus information is at direct odds with the article I presented. Surely, even you can comprehend, that 10 cases of "voter fraud", reported in Minnesota, since 2000, is nowhere near the imaginary 177 cases, alleged by Fund and von Spakovsky. Now I know what bogus source of information you choose to believe; and I know which source of information is the correct and true source of information. And let's not pretend it's the article featured in the Washington Examiner citing two "Right Wing" nuts, with an agenda to push.
Your inability to read, not withstanding, you really should learn how to research a topic.
Here's a little more debunking information about the two "Right Wing" loons, John Fund and Han von Spakovsky. It seems now they are proven liars. Maybe you should read the truth "Loki", your head might explode.
http://mediamatters.org/mobile/research/2012/08/16/a-counting-fraud-new-book-by-john-fund-amp-hans/189395#voter-fraud-scare
Are these loons related to you "banjo...uh...er....Loki"? Quite frankly, this is too easy.
Mar 27, 2014 14:19:34 #
Loki wrote:
Describing your behavior is exactly what I was doing, peckerhead.
:lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 27, 2014 14:31:02 #
saloopo
Loc: Colorado
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Please dolt, a convicted felon who is discharged is automatically eligible to vote in Minnesota elections. So until you have proof to the contrary, your weak ass attempt at trying to alter the facts to support your imaginary "voter fraud" crisis doesn't fly. Go back to "Grammar Police", you were so much better at it than you are in reporting facts. You realize the BS you give to support your views are so bias and discredited it makes you look like a partisan.
177 felons vote for Al 'bananas' Franken speaks highly of the character of the modern democrat party and their voters.
Mar 27, 2014 14:36:59 #
saloopo wrote:
177 felons vote for Al 'bananas' Franken speaks highly of the character of the modern democrat party and their voters.
How "high" is none? That constitutes the "character" of the lefty Democratic Party.
Mar 27, 2014 14:40:03 #
saloopo
Loc: Colorado
3jack wrote:
Your post, linked to an opinion page, is just that.....an opinion.
Here are the facts without the right wing hype.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/07/13/conservative-media-hype-not-accurate-report-to/185985
Here are the facts without the right wing hype.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/07/13/conservative-media-hype-not-accurate-report-to/185985
Using an opinion page to discredit an opinion page? Uuh Duh..
Mar 27, 2014 14:43:04 #
saloopo wrote:
Using an opinion page to discredit an opinion page? Uuh Duh..
:lol: :thumbup:
Mar 27, 2014 15:07:17 #
Old_Gringo wrote:
:lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Old_Gringo I expected much better from you, :cry:. But alas, you're just as sleazy as "banjojack". Aww, who am I kidding? I didn't really expect anything better from you, I knew better. :-)
Mar 27, 2014 15:17:42 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Old_Gringo I expected much better from you, :cry:. But alas, you're just as sleazy as "banjojack". Aww, who am I kidding? I didn't really expect anything better from you, I knew better. :-)
Minnpost.com. An online newpaper in Minnesota with a shoe string budget and a left-of-center slant to much of it's reporting. You must be getting desperate, with an attempt to use Podunk for Debunk. How is this small little paper's opinion more valid than national news agencies?
Mar 27, 2014 15:20:07 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
This article comes from... MINNPOST ...www.minnpos... (show quote)
You are too easy. How using left wing source opinions to "debunk" things reported on national news is valid is a new one.
Mar 27, 2014 15:28:14 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Old_Gringo I expected much better from you, :cry:. But alas, you're just as sleazy as "banjojack". Aww, who am I kidding? I didn't really expect anything better from you, I knew better. :-)
If your latest postings are any indication, you know far more about sleazy than is good for you. I am still trying to discover from which stagnant backwater of the gene pool you slithered.
Mar 27, 2014 15:37:58 #
Loki wrote:
If your latest postings are any indication, you know far more about sleazy than is good for you. I am still trying to discover from which stagnant backwater of the gene pool you slithered.
Unfortunately that gene pool is still operational, as evidenced by the number of like posters on these sites.
Mar 27, 2014 16:02:16 #
4430 wrote:
Thanks for my first laugh of the day :thumbup:
:roll: :roll: Why do demo's fight so hard to stop voter ID ?
What do trees and a all other plants do with Co2 ??
Sorry I don't have the time to debunk the debunk :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:roll: :roll: Why do demo's fight so hard to stop voter ID ?
What do trees and a all other plants do with Co2 ??
Sorry I don't have the time to debunk the debunk :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Well 4430, Dems fight to stop voter ID because it's a waste of your tax dollars - makes a too big government even bigger. The claims for voter fraud have been proved false. Got it :?:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.