10 more conservative lies revealed
Mar 27, 2014 11:28:15 #
Had enough wrote:
Loki is over on political hotwire too spewing his hatred !!
That is news to me; I have never heard of "political hotwire." You might want to do a little fact checking there, slick. You might also want to consider that there is a difference between "hatred," and "amused contempt."
Mar 27, 2014 11:38:25 #
I say let's support any entity that wants to impeach him. The Tea Party is a good place to start. They uphold the original constitution.
You do realize, Deb, that the original constitution allowed s***ery as well as allowing the disenfranchisement of non-w****s, women, and renters???
Many of us actually suspect that you are right and that the Koch brothers a.k.a. tea party would be more than ok with going back to the original. They would however like to add one amendment, the right to pollute their fellow citizens' air, land, and water.
You do realize, Deb, that the original constitution allowed s***ery as well as allowing the disenfranchisement of non-w****s, women, and renters???
Many of us actually suspect that you are right and that the Koch brothers a.k.a. tea party would be more than ok with going back to the original. They would however like to add one amendment, the right to pollute their fellow citizens' air, land, and water.
Mar 27, 2014 11:55:29 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
You accuse others of only using name calling and then you use terms like, simple minded, naive, infantile, and sophomoric. Why not take your hypocrisy somewhere else, which would raise the integrity of this forum twenty fold?
Describing someone's behavior is not "name calling", "peckerhead" is name calling. I suggest you go back to school and learn what "hypocrisy" means.
Mar 27, 2014 11:57:22 #
Loki wrote:
You appear to have conceded your point regarding the original topic, peckerhead. This means you are either
a). an i***t
b). a liar.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt, given your own room temperature intelligence quotient. Now be a nice boy and go play in traffic.
a). an i***t
b). a liar.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt, given your own room temperature intelligence quotient. Now be a nice boy and go play in traffic.
I haven't conceded anything. I've given you the facts, you refuse to believe them, what's left to argue?
Mar 27, 2014 12:13:11 #
BoJester wrote:
Some are the same old rhetoric that conservatives ... (show quote)
:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
LOL, HUFFINGTON POST. That's a Huffington Post reprinted article. Oh yeah, who could possibly doubt ANYTHING that the Huffington Post prints? Just because they're the most h**eful Far Left rag on the Internet, hey, what does that mean? Surely we can swallow whole everything they say as the absolute t***h? I mean, they would NEVER be one-sided, right?
Wow. The crap that Libs post on here and expect us to go for.
:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
Mar 27, 2014 12:21:20 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Actually I only speak "gutterese" to gutter snipes, such as yourself. You know "When in Rome...."
Oh, btw, I know you wish you could be as "cool" as I am. But keep dreaming, and shoot for the stars. Although everyone, who has ever read your posts, knows you'll never be as "cool" as I am.
Oh, btw, I know you wish you could be as "cool" as I am. But keep dreaming, and shoot for the stars. Although everyone, who has ever read your posts, knows you'll never be as "cool" as I am.
Sorry my friend, but I cannot fathom anyone wishing to emulate you, in any fashion, especially me. So just amble along with your like minded, foul mouthed, gutter dwellers. You defile these sites.
Mar 27, 2014 12:31:15 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Describing someone's behavior is not "name calling", "peckerhead" is name calling. I suggest you go back to school and learn what "hypocrisy" means.
I do not have to go back to school to learn about hypocrisy. All I have to do is read your posts, which is all they teach.
Mar 27, 2014 12:33:01 #
Old_Gringo wrote:
Sorry my friend, but I cannot fathom anyone wishing to emulate you, in any fashion, especially me. So just amble along with your like minded, foul mouthed, gutter dwellers. You defile these sites.
Who said anything about emulating anyone, surely you're hallucinating? I certainly wouldn't want you to emulate me, someone may get the wrong impression and think that I am somehow associated with you. Please stick to your own inane side of the political fence. Just one question, do you hallucinate often?
Mar 27, 2014 12:36:02 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Who said anything about emulating anyone, surely you're hallucinating? I certainly wouldn't want you to emulate me, someone may get the wrong impression and think that I am somehow associated with you. Please stick to your own inane side of the political fence. Just one question, do you hallucinate often?
The question is, Do you ever stop hallucinating?
Mar 27, 2014 12:39:57 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
The question is, Do you ever stop hallucinating?
Never have hallucinated. I don't do drugs, like many of you seem to be doing.
Mar 27, 2014 12:42:09 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Never have hallucinated. I don't do drugs, like many of you seem to be doing.
You do not have to do drugs to hallucinate. All you have to do is continue on your self exalting, egotistical path and you will continue to be self hallucinating.
Mar 27, 2014 12:55:49 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
I haven't conceded anything. I've given you the facts, you refuse to believe them, what's left to argue?
There appears to be a discrepancy between "the facts," and your version of them. You should go back and play in traffic some more.
Mar 27, 2014 12:57:18 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
You do not have to do drugs to hallucinate. All you have to do is continue on your self exalting, egotistical path and you will continue to be self hallucinating.
Now you're hallucinating. Are you speaking from experience? Because I've never hallucinated.
Mar 27, 2014 12:58:01 #
Loki wrote:
There appears to be a discrepancy between "the facts," and your version of them. You should go back and play in traffic some more.
The discrepancy lies in the fact that you can't read.
Mar 27, 2014 12:58:09 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Describing someone's behavior is not "name calling", "peckerhead" is name calling. I suggest you go back to school and learn what "hypocrisy" means.
Describing your behavior is exactly what I was doing, peckerhead.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.