RkSergent

Number 9 "l 97 percent of scientists with specific expertise in climate science agree that c*****e c****e is real and humans are causing it." Didn't come from NASA Scientist, it came from a study that has been debunked completely. Did you read the study? I did. If a scientist didn't have at least 20 papers published on c*****e c****e then they didn't meet the criteria and couldn't be counted as a scientist in this field. Here's a list of over 30,000 Scientist that don't believe in Man made G****l w*****g. http://www.petitionproject.org/index.php

Loki Loc: Georgia

Thank you. You realize even this won't convince the true believers. Good job.

RkSergent

I know Loki, you're right. Just have to remind people of what they should have learned in seventh grade.

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Not less than 46 states have prosecuted v***r f***d!!
Over 28,000,000 invalid names are on v***r r**********n, yet remain!

Massive country wide v***r f***d exist.
We show (proof) id to buy a plane ticket, purchase auto insurance, casha check, buy liquor, cigarettes and so on, so why the big whirl Wind to be required to v**e? Its not race! War on women! Just maybe id to v**e is keeping in step with the actual winner being elected.

Peace be with you

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

That's weak. Of course all your responses are extremely weak.

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

Not really, you can question it's validity all you want but your source is no better. And your source uses two "liars" to support it's story. So as I said in my earlier post. I've shown you the t***h, you refuse to believe it, so ergo we have nothing to debate. You're wrong and I'm right. Can't get any clearer than that. And btw, the story I referenced, is not "opinion". And your so-called "national news" source is no more valid than the National Enquirer. This really is too easy.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Obamaphile, you are too funny for words.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Liberty Tree

We all know by now he lacks the moral fiber to ever admit he is wrong, no matter what evidence is presented. He will always say it is not valid because he is self delusional about the t***h and cannot accept it if it goes against the way he wants things to be.

votenoobama Loc: Texas

Bo, always gives all of us a good laugh. Bo, is one of those Democrat C*******t Party guy's.
It won't be long and Obama is going to invite Bo to the White House for some beer and some down low fun with Obama.

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

That is choice, you loons deny facts and then have the hypocrisy to call others who present evidence to support their position delusional. Obviously, you're the delusional ones. Try reading the posts between "banjojack" and myself. His theory of "v***r f***d" is based on two liars and a mythical 177 convictions of "v***r f***d", in Minnesota, in the 2008 Senatorial race. "banjojack" can't prove there were 177 convictions of v***r f***d, because they don't exist. Look, it's real simple, even for intellectually challenged individuals, such as yourself. List the names of the 177 individuals who were tried and convicted, in Minnesota, in the 2008 Senatorial race. And if these 177 convictions, of "v***r f***d" can be verified, I'll completely admit I am wrong and personally back efforts for state "v***r r**********n" laws. It's just that simple. If the two "liars", Fund and von Spakovsky can claim there were 177 convictions of "v***r f***d", in Minnesota, in 2008, then the names of these individuals are obviously accessible. Now remember my source said their were 10 cases of "v***r f***d" reported in Minnesota, since 2000, so you'll need to come up with at least, 40 verifiable cases of convictions, of "v***r f***d", in Minnesota, in the Senatorial e******n, of 2008. I should require you to list all 177 mythical cases "banjojack" cites, as his evidence of "wide spread" v***r f***d. Happy hunting. And of course this may be the last time any of you loons address this subject, because I doubt seriously you'll come up with even one verifiable case of "v***r f***d". Yet who knows. But most of all please don't start with all the excuses on why you can't name the 177 individuals, who were convicted of "v***r f***d", in Minnesota, in the 2008 Senatorial race. We'll take a page from Bill O'Reilly, this is the "No Excuses Zone". It is fools like you who accept these lies as facts, so it is you who must produce the evidence confirming your allegations.

Food for thought..."John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky are ideologues whose assertions about widespread fraudulent v****g have not just been debunked by scholars, but by George W. Bush’s Justice Department itself—where in 2006, von Spakovsky, a lawyer, led the firing of seven U.S. attorneys for not zealously pursuing v***r f***d."...AlterNet, Aug. 8, 2012, by Steven Rosenfeld.

Also this..."The problem with this assertion—from a new book by The Wall Street Journal’s John Fund and George W. Bush Justice Department attorney Hans von Spakovsky—is that it is not just factually wrong, according to Minnesota Supreme Court records, the Minnesota prosecutor who investigated most of the cases, and some of the country’s top e******n scholars..." Ibid

Loki Loc: Georgia

MPR is hardly a bastion of conservative thought. According to them, there have been about 113 convictions for v***r f***d. While not 177, this is a liberal source, and confirms a large number, especially in an e******n decided by a little over 300 v**es in a blue state. Fraudulent v**ers are like cockroaches, if you see one, there are a hundred you did not see. Perhaps an ass is too kind a mascot for the Liberals. Something with more legs might be more appropriate.




http://blogs.mprnews.org/capitol-view/2011/10/poligraph_v**er/

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Tell me another one :lol: Seriously, though, most of that article is half-t***hs designed to bring about in you, the same reaction that right-wing propaganda is designed to bring out in the audience that they pander to and manipulate. Great liars always put enough t***h in their lies to make them believable. Politicians, actors and the media are as good as they get.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

Well here we go. The information you've provided is the exact same source that was originally reported, the Minnesota Majority. Just a different news outlet, MPR, reporting the same story. I've had a chance to read
the report the Minnesota Majority put out in defense of their research into the allegations of "v***r f***d". It's kind of like Chris Christie investigating himself, for wrong doing. And at the end of this report it lists 113 names of individuals who are suspected of being convicted, of "v***r f***d", in connection with the 2008 Minnesota Senatorial race. I had a chance to check out the very first name listed, a Ms. Dettle from Anoka county. I checked on her criminal history and she was convicted on September 17, 2008 of a misdemeanor traffic violation. Now I have neither the time, nor the inclination to check all 113 names. But if the first name listed is a bogus lie, (because I'm pretty sure that if you are convicted of a "misdemeanor" you are still elgible to v**e, legally, in the state of Minnesota), then I have no doubt that many more, if not all, names listed, are bogus. And her conviction of a traffic violation is not really the point now, is it? We're after "v***r f***d" convictions, aren't we? Yet, as I have previously stated, these allegations, of "v***r f***d" convictions, must be verifiable. And so far none of cases have been verified. And already we've gone from an accusation of 177 convicted "v***r f***d" cases down to 113, without me doing a thing. So as far as I am concerned the BS continues to flow.