Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

It is impossible to know which post you are answering, or which poster you are addressing unless you use the "Quote Reply"" button, instead of "Reply" at the bottom of the post to which you are responding.

If you have a Bible verse indicating the UK, USA or Queen Elizabeth in prophesy, please quote Bible book, chapter and verse.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

Sabath - The throne of David is NOT with ElizabethII as she is part of the cabal. The man who should've been King of England recently died in Australia.

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

Jesus received all authority to reign on the Messianic Throne following his Death and Resurrection - Psalm 2:6-9; Psalm 110:1. Two key messianic psalms portray the ideal king who is destined to sit on the Throne of David. In the New Testament, both passages are applied consistently to Jesus.

The God of Israel had promised that his anointed king would rule for him on the throne of David. The New Testament applies this promise to the present status of Jesus. Moreover, it places the commencement of this reign after his death and resurrection.

Preaching at a synagogue, Paul declared that God had promised to raise up from David’s seed a man who would be the king of Israel, a promise fulfilled in a “Savior, Jesus.” Though the Temple leaders in Jerusalem had conspired to destroy him, “God raised him from the dead,” just as it is “written in the second psalm, YOU ARE MY SON, THIS DAY HAVE I BEGOTTEN YOU.”

As promised, Yahweh gave him “the holy and sure blessings of David.” Jesus is the promised Lord and Messiah from the line of David. According to the Apostle, the event that marked the start of his reign was his resurrection - (Acts 13:22-40, Romans 1:1-4).

He is the long-promised Davidic king who “SHEPHERDS THE NATIONS,” the “living one who became dead but is now alive forevermore and has the keys of death and of Hades.” Consistently, John the Revelator connects his reign to his past Death and Resurrection - (Revelation 1:4-6, 2:26-27, 3:21, 5:10).

So you associate this man, Abney-Hastings, with the Biblical throne of King David in Jerusalem, the throne from which Jesus Christ will reign for 1,000 years in fulfillment of God's promise to David?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/9376442/The-Earl-of-Loudoun.html

04 July 2012 • 5:28pm

The Earl of Loudoun

The 14th Earl of Loudoun, who has died aged 69, was a beer-swilling, rotund Australian rice farmer and former jackaroo who was amazed to discover, in 2004, that he might be the rightful King of England.

That year a Channel 4 documentary crew led by the actor Tony Robinson appeared at his modest single-story weatherboard house in the small New South Wales township of Jerilderie (population: 768) with news that he was royalty.

Alternative successions of the English crown

In 2004, Britain's Real Monarch, a documentary broadcast on Channel 4 in the United Kingdom, repeated the claim that Abney-Hastings, as the senior descendant of George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence, is the rightful King of England. This argument involves two disputed claims: first, that Edward IV of England was illegitimate, based on the accusation that his supposed father, Richard, Duke of York, was absent at the time when Edward is thought to have been conceived; and second, that the Plantagenet crown should have descended by male-preference cognatic primogeniture instead of agnatic primogeniture and conquest. Also, Henry VI had placed an attainder on Edward after he was restored to the throne, and named George, Duke of Clarence, as heir to the throne after Henry VI and his legitimate issue.

Abney-Hastings was a committed Australian republican and expressed no interest in pursuing his claim to the throne, although he was amused by it.[7] He refrained from using his title publicly.

Abney-Hastings had two sons and three daughters with his wife, Noelene Margaret (née McCormick; married 1969). His eldest son, Simon, held the courtesy title Lord Mauchline until his father's death on 30 June 2012.Until his death, the 14th Earl was one of the seven co-heirs to the Barony of Grey de Ruthyn.



The verse (placed in its Biblical context) of 1st Thessalonians 2:11-13, the exhortation of the Apostle Paul, inspired by the Holy Spirit, to new believers in Jesus Christ in Thessalonia, accompanying your signature says this:

11 "For you know that we treated each of you as a father treats his own children -
12 encouraging you, comforting you, and urging you to walk in a manner worthy of God, who calls you into His own kingdom and glory.
13 And we continually thank God because, when you received the word of God that you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men, but as the true word of God - the word which is now at work in you who believe."

sabath

I did not say Jesus was not a Jew! Someone else said that.

Rose42

Please use the Quote Reply button so we know who you are addressing

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

He was addressing Zemirah...

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

Q. "So you associate this man, Abney-Hastings, with the Biblical throne of King David in Jerusalem, the throne from which Jesus Christ will reign for 1,000 years in fulfillment of God's promise to David?"

A. No, I do NOT associate the man with the throne of David! I said he was the king of England. Jesus is the rightful heir to David's throne. But why did God create Adam and Eve in the first place? Why did God allow Satan to seduce Eve?

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

I’m confused! Why do you think he is addressing Zemirah?

The discussion of Jesus being a Jew or not was between Rose and Ginny! I can’t find anyone accusing sabbath of stating that Jesus was not a Jew, unless I missed it! 🤷🏻‍♀️

It’s a guessing game to know who he was responding to without using quote reply…..…IMO!

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

You are right. I said Jesus was NOT a Jew. the Bible now says that the Jews killed Jesus.
=======

"Christians have been duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon."

"This 'big lie' technique is brainwashing United States Christians into believing that Jesus Christ was "King of the Jews", in the sense that so-called 'Jews' today call themselves 'Jews'. This reference was first made in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the so-called Jews highjacked the word 'Jew' in the 18th century A.D. to palm themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus Christ. This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with the so-called 'Jews' of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction based on fable."

"American Christians little suspect they are being brainwashed twenty-four hours of every day over television and radio, by newspapers and magazines, by motion pictures and plays, by books, by political leaders in office and seeking office, by religious leaders in their pulpits and outside their churches, by leaders in the field of education inside and outside their curricular activities, and by all leaders in business, professions and finance, whose economic security demands that they curry the favor of so-called "Jews" of historic Khazar ancestry. Unsuspecting Christians are subjected to this barrage from sources they have little reason to suspect. Incontestable facts supply the unchallengeable proof of the historic accuracy that so-called "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European origin are unquestionably the historic descendants of the Khazars, a pagan Turko-Finn ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia, according to history, who battled their way in bloody wars about the 1st century B.C. into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar kingdom. For some mysterious reason the history of the Khazar kingdom is conspicuous by its absence from history courses in the schools and colleges.

"The historic existence of the Khazar kingdom of so-called "Jews", their rise and fall, the permanent disappearance of the Khazar kingdom as a nation from the map of Europe, and how King Bulan and the Khazar nation in about 740 A.D. became so-called "Jews" by conversion, were concealed from American Christians by censorship imposed by so-called "Jews", of historic Khazar ancestry, upon all U.S.A. media of mass communications directed by them. Then in 1945 this author gave nation-wide publicity to his many years intensive research into the "facts of life" concerning Khazars. The disclosures were sensational and very effective but apparently angered so-called "Jews" who have continued to vent their spleen upon this author since then solely for that reason. Since 1946 they have conducted a vicious smear campaign against him, seeking thus to further conceal these facts, for obvious reasons. What have they to fear from the truth?

"In an original 1903 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia in New York's Public Library, and in the Library of Congress, Volume IV, pages 1 to 5 inclusive, appears a most comprehensive history of the Khazars. Also in the New York Public Library are 327 books by the world's greatest historians and other sources of reference, in addition to the Jewish Encyclopedia, dealing with Khazar history, and written between the 3rd A.D. and 20th centuries by contemporaries of the Khazars and by modern historians on that subject."

Jesus was a 'Judean', not a Jew.

During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere. That fact is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style themselves "Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time in Asia, their "homeland", and were known as Khazars. In none of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or referred to as a "Jew". The term originated in the late eighteenth century as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of Judea without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Texan" signifies a person living in Texas.

In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews", they have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one record, prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as "Jew". The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as "Pharisees". "Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.

Jesus abhorred and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers".

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm

con't

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

You can post this BS till the cows come home and it will still be nothing more than Jew hating lies!

sabath

What I am saying is Jesus was and is not a jew! He said they were of Saten.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

That's right. Jesus said the Jews were of their father the devil. John 8:44 But He was probably talking to the Scribes and Pharisees because there were no "Jews" in those days.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

Rose42

I have heard many odd things but this is the first I’ve heard of this.

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

I haven’t read much on this subject and what I have read, I don’t believe. I didn’t read past the first couple of lines. I’ve read some of Ginny’s posts and I disagree……Jesus is a Jew and replacement theology is a lie. There was no need to read any further for me.