Liberals. What is wrong with Trumps proposal to send i*****l a***ns to Sanctuary cities? (Page 3): I like people as well.

Singularity

Smedley_buzk**l wrote:

I'm not kind; I just like dogs. I don't donate to feed needy people, but I do donate regularly to the local no-k**l shelter and have done some volunteer work for them.

I like people as well.

Singularity

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Nope...
Wife gave birth almost 20 months ago...
Dog is Old, bute still sees fine...

The pregnant girl gave birth about 13 months ago. She has a 9 year old, a two year old and the now one year old. Sadly, she had a miscarriage this past Fall. They live with me from time to time.

The dog is a white boxer. Cong*****l deafness occurs in about 25% of them, I'm told. Once the owner's Dad found the dog was "defective" it was scheduled for euthanasia. I intervened. No good deed goes unpunished.

debeda

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Segregation...

Sending folk to where they are welcome prevents those who don't welcome them from enjoying their presence...

Lol funny

debeda

Liberty Tree wrote:

Liberals are only generous with other people's money, homes, and resources.

Now THAT'S a true story

debeda

JFlorio wrote:

Amen. Pretty bad when you freak because they might send some refugees to your city which you have told the world is a safe space and how magnanimous you are.

Isn't that what's known as hypocrisy?

debeda

grace scott wrote:

Beats me. I'm a democrat, and I think it's a good idea. So does the mayor of Chicago.

Well in old rahm's case it's cuz he didn't run and he wants to sit back and laugh. Or did you mean the new mayor?

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Singularity wrote:

The pregnant girl gave birth about 13 months ago. She has a 9 year old, a two year old and the now one year old. Sadly, she had a miscarriage this past Fall. They live with me from time to time.

The dog is a white boxer. Cong*****l deafness occurs in about 25% of them, I'm told. Once the owner's Dad found the dog was "defective" it was scheduled for euthanasia. I intervened. No good deed goes unpunished.

You saved the dog? Wow!! Good on you!

I go with Smedley, and chip in for dog food too. I might even throw in a little for vet care. Gotta keep those shots up to date ya know!

Rue

I think sending immigrants to sanctuary states is GREAT ! As does Washington state and at this point so does 13 other states. You do realize approximately 99.9% of Americans are from immigrants, unless you were born to American Indians you to see an immigrant or a son or daughter of immigrants, many of those immigrants came from countries that wanted America destroyed Including Russia, Germany etc. BTW, I am a registered democrats BUT I do not always v**e democratic, or independent or republican, I v**e for who I feel will do the best job for America and her people NOT the ones who are there to get richer by stealing from this once great country.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Singularity wrote:

The pregnant girl gave birth about 13 months ago. She has a 9 year old, a two year old and the now one year old. Sadly, she had a miscarriage this past Fall. They live with me from time to time.

The dog is a white boxer. Cong*****l deafness occurs in about 25% of them, I'm told. Once the owner's Dad found the dog was "defective" it was scheduled for euthanasia. I intervened. No good deed goes unpunished.

God bless and protect them...
And cheers for your kindness...

bahmer

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Segregation...

Sending folk to where they are welcome prevents those who don't welcome them from enjoying their presence...

Amen and Amen and that is the reason for the plan because they are i*****l i*******ts and not legal there is a difference right?

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Rue wrote:

I think sending immigrants to sanctuary states is ... (show quote)

Welcome to the OPP...

Most of us are aware of the difference between legal and i*****l i*******ts and refugees...

Hope you enjoy your time here...

Lots of great folk...

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

bahmer wrote:

Amen and Amen and that is the reason for the plan because they are i*****l i*******ts and not legal there is a difference right?

I******s should be escorted back to the border and forced to build a meter of wall before being released back into their natural habitat...

I think the centers are for those waiting to be processed as refugees...

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

rumitoid wrote:

If they are illegal, it is breaking the Law. Pretty simple. The government cannot conspire in such a blatantly criminal action. Duh.

Unless one of the socialist mayors says so, right?

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

kankune wrote:

Geeeze....not seeing any Dems on this thread..wonder why...lol

They're all out r**ting against this most excellent idea.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Seth wrote:

So what do you call it when local politicians break the law by establishing sanctuary cities? Isn't that government conspiring to break the law "in a blatantly criminal fashion"?

If so, shouldn't the governors and other elected officials involved be liable to criminal prosecution?

Very logical!