Liberals. What is wrong with Trumps proposal to send i*****l a***ns to Sanctuary cities? (Page 2): Liberals are like Conservatives in one respect. They don't like being hoist on their...

Smedley_buzkill

JFlorio wrote:

How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.

Liberals are like Conservatives in one respect. They don't like being hoist on their own petard. Sending i******s to Sanctuary Cities does just that; it makes Libs put their own money, (rather than someone else's money) where their mouths are. Liberals are willing to spend your last dime to achieve their goals. They are more circumspect with their own funds.

Singularity

Smedley_buzk**l wrote:

Liberals are like Conservatives in one respect. They don't like being hoist on their own petard. Sending i******s to Sanctuary Cities does just that; it makes Libs put their own money, (rather than someone else's money) where their mouths are. Liberals are willing to spend your last dime to achieve their goals. They are more circumspect with their own funds.

"Don't throw us in that that briar patch, please, anything but that, Senors!"

Was wondering how to get some of them to my house... It was recently declared that I must care for thousands of immigrant children, personally, at my house. Ample supply of toilet paper was promised, but has not materialized.

I presume this offer of t***sportation will turn out to be another conservative lie!

S'okay.

The pregnant girl might be having twins this time, the deaf dog takes up a lot of time and I'm getting old enough to have to slow down some.....

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Singularity wrote:

"Don't throw us in that that briar patch, ple... (show quote)

Pregnant girl and deaf dog

Singularity

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Pregnant girl and deaf dog

You, too?

What a coincidence! Amazing.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Singularity wrote:

You, too?

What a coincidence! Amazing.

Nope...
Wife gave birth almost 20 months ago...
Dog is Old, bute still sees fine...

Smedley_buzkill

Singularity wrote:

"Don't throw us in that that briar patch, ple... (show quote)

Where did you get the idea I promised you toilet paper? I simply wondered where you were going to obtain it.
I might chip in for dog food.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

kankune wrote:

Geeeze....not seeing any Dems on this thread..wonder why...lol

They're allergic to the t***h.

Singularity

Smedley_buzk**l wrote:

Where did you get the idea I promised you toilet paper? I simply wondered where you were going to obtain it.
I might chip in for dog food.

Reliance upon the kindness of strangers necessitates the cultivation of a sort of grim optimism.

fullspinzoo

JFlorio wrote:

How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.

Some mucky-muck in San Fran says that's fine ~ bring them in ~ the more the merrier. I think Trump should take him up on it. Put most of them in Pelosi's neighborhood....especially the ones with the infectious diseases. Let's see how long she likes this plan.

fullspinzoo

Smedley_buzk**l wrote:

Liberals are like Conservatives in one respect. They don't like being hoist on their own petard. Sending i******s to Sanctuary Cities does just that; it makes Libs put their own money, (rather than someone else's money) where their mouths are. Liberals are willing to spend your last dime to achieve their goals. They are more circumspect with their own funds.

They've never put their own money where their mouth is. It's either OPM or forget it. You'd be thrown out of the S/M/C (socialist/Marxist/c*******t) camp is you used your own money.

Idaho

rumitoid wrote:

If they are illegal, it is breaking the Law. Pretty simple. The government cannot conspire in such a blatantly criminal action. Duh.

So it’s illegal to send them to sanctuary cities but not illegal to send them to red state cities, which Obama did in spades, or let them wander to the bus station and disappear?

How does that work?

Smedley_buzkill

Singularity wrote:

Reliance upon the kindness of strangers necessitates the cultivation of a sort of grim optimism.

I'm not kind; I just like dogs. I don't donate to feed needy people, but I do donate regularly to the local no-k**l shelter and have done some volunteer work for them.

Gatsby

JFlorio wrote:

How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.

Walk a mile in his shoes.

If fate conspired to made you and your family refugees in a foreign land,

would you prefer to be settled in a community that has publicly declared you welcome,

or a community that has chosen not to extend such a welcome?

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

JFlorio wrote:

How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.

The plan is childish, vindictive and probably illegal. That being said, those cities should seize the opportunity to show the world that not all Americans are assholes.

fullspinzoo

teabag09 wrote:

And as was stated were being sent where they weren't wanted out of vindictiveness. FU ovomit, chuckU S, Nancy polousy and the rest of you s**te dems. That includes you kevyn, with a y. Mike

They all loved it (the Dems) when Obama was flooding the town of Murietta a few years back. A good time to flood Pelosi's neighborhood. I'm sure she welcome them with open arms. At least that's what her comments are saying, (probably the ones without the infectious diseases).