One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Liberals. What is wrong with Trumps proposal to send illegal aliens to Sanctuary cities?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 next>>
Apr 13, 2019 21:24:58   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 21:29:57   #
Canuckus Deploracus (a regular here)
 
Segregation...

Sending folk to where they are welcome prevents those who don't welcome them from enjoying their presence...

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 21:35:13   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Segregation...

Sending folk to where they are welcome prevents those who don't welcome them from enjoying their presence...


Exactly the plan.

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 21:41:24   #
Liberty Tree (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.


Liberals are only generous with other people's money, homes, and resources.

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 21:47:51   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Liberals are only generous with other people's money, homes, and resources.


Amen. Pretty bad when you freak because they might send some refugees to your city which you have told the world is a safe space and how magnanimous you are.

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:06:17   #
badbob85037 (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.


It would make more sense to deport these freeloaders and have federal troops invade these states and jail it's leaders for not following federal laws. That way no part of the Constitution would be broken and these Socialist M Fers would be jailed. It would be less effort and give better results.

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:14:39   #
Seth (a regular here)
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Segregation...

Sending folk to where they are welcome prevents those who don't welcome them from enjoying their presence...




Well said!

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:16:15   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
badbob85037 wrote:
It would make more sense to deport these freeloaders and have federal troops invade these states and jail it's leaders for not following federal laws. That way no part of the Constitution would be broken and these Socialist M Fers would be jailed. It would be less effort and give better results.


Couldn’t agree more.

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:16:48   #
Seth (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.


They can't, because they are.

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:30:10   #
teabag09 (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
Amen. Pretty bad when you freak because they might send some refugees to your city which you have told the world is a safe space and how magnanimous you are.


And as was stated were being sent where they weren't wanted out of vindictiveness. FU ovomit, chuckU S, Nancy polousy and the rest of you shite dems. That includes you kevyn, with a y. Mike

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 23:42:53   #
kankune (a regular here)
 
teabag09 wrote:
And as was stated were being sent where they weren't wanted out of vindictiveness. FU ovomit, chuckU S, Nancy polousy and the rest of you shite dems. That includes you kevyn, with a y. Mike


Geeeze....not seeing any Dems on this thread..wonder why...lol

| Reply
Apr 13, 2019 23:52:59   #
proud republican (a regular here)
 
kankune wrote:
Geeeze....not seeing any Dems on this thread..wonder why...lol


Hey Kan...Where have you been???..Its good to read from you again!!!

| Reply
Apr 14, 2019 01:53:43   #
grace scott
 
kankune wrote:
Geeeze....not seeing any Dems on this thread..wonder why...lol


Beats me. I'm a democrat, and I think it's a good idea. So does the mayor of Chicago.

| Reply
Apr 14, 2019 02:24:54   #
rumitoid (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
How can liberals be against this policy? It’s exactly what the Sanctuary designation is for. Come on liberals show us on OPP you're not the hypocrites we know you are.


If they are illegal, it is breaking the Law. Pretty simple. The government cannot conspire in such a blatantly criminal action. Duh.

| Reply
Apr 14, 2019 03:56:48   #
Seth (a regular here)
 
rumitoid wrote:
If they are illegal, it is breaking the Law. Pretty simple. The government cannot conspire in such a blatantly criminal action. Duh.


So what do you call it when local politicians break the law by establishing sanctuary cities? Isn't that government conspiring to break the law "in a blatantly criminal fashion"?

If so, shouldn't the governors and other elected officials involved be liable to criminal prosecution?

| Reply
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.