One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Cost of I*****l I*********n vs Cost of the Wall
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Jul 15, 2018 22:49:13   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Oldsailor65 wrote:
*******************************************************
I stole this from someone a few days ago


Nice. and the t***h!

Reply
Jul 15, 2018 22:53:09   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda
Notes: National Economics Editorial (NEE) is a news site that purports to support Economic Nationalism. While NEE does cover some economic issues it is, as the name implies, mainly an editorial site. The opinions expressed in the stories cover current affairs with a pronounced right wing bias. NEE is, on the whole, long on rhetoric and short on factual content and credible sourcing. Due to the overt bias and lack of factual information, NEE is rated Questionable. (D. Kelley 3/29/2017)
Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda br Notes: National... (show quote)



The whole deal of the Progs being weak on our borders issue is, you people need the crooked v****g as a buffer.

Reply
Jul 15, 2018 22:54:47   #
moldyoldy
 
byronglimish wrote:
The whole deal of the Progs being weak on our borders issue is, you people need the crooked v****g as a buffer.


The only crooked v****g was by GOP, and putin.

Reply
 
 
Jul 15, 2018 22:57:10   #
EmilyD
 
tbutkovich wrote:
The cost of dealing with i*****l i*********n is $113 Billion by the states and federal government. Cost for the border wall is budgeted to be $33 Billion. If the American taxpayer was controlling the budget, the choice would be simple. A no brainer! The left and the democrats don’t want the wall because they would rather waste taxpayer monies and have the chaos that goes with it. Yes, another Democrat supported debacle whose cost is laid at the feet of the American taxpayer!


You see, the Democrats don't view it as a waste of taxpayer money - they see it as v**es - at the taxpayer's expense - a win-win for them!! Hillary Clinton was losing the non-existent "popular v**e" until California was counted. Then she got her 3 million illegal v**es. California has NO v**er ID laws - none! There are 17 more states besides California PLUS Washington DC that have NO v**er ID laws! anyone can r******r to v**e there and no one checks their ID. Hellloooooo...Democrats are so panic stricken now that they are advocating for no border - no laws - for anyone to enter our country - just so they can rig the mid-terms and 2020!

Reply
Jul 15, 2018 23:04:39   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
moldyoldy wrote:
The only crooked v****g was by GOP, and putin.


That's a joke.How many v**es did Putin get for the president of the United States...the honorable Donald J Trump?
Give us a number.

Reply
Jul 15, 2018 23:33:44   #
moldyoldy
 
EmilyD wrote:
You see, the Democrats don't view it as a waste of taxpayer money - they see it as v**es - at the taxpayer's expense - a win-win for them!! Hillary Clinton was losing the non-existent "popular v**e" until California was counted. Then she got her 3 million illegal v**es. California has NO v**er ID laws - none! There are 17 more states besides California PLUS Washington DC that have NO v**er ID laws! anyone can r******r to v**e there and no one checks their ID. Hellloooooo...Democrats are so panic stricken now that they are advocating for no border - no laws - for anyone to enter our country - just so they can rig the mid-terms and 2020!
You see, the Democrats don't view it as a waste of... (show quote)


You know nothing about Calif.

Reply
Jul 15, 2018 23:35:22   #
moldyoldy
 
byronglimish wrote:
That's a joke.How many v**es did Putin get for the president of the United States...the honorable Donald J Trump?
Give us a number.


Putin suppressed the v**es by spreading lies about Clinton.

Reply
 
 
Jul 15, 2018 23:48:44   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Putin suppressed the v**es by spreading lies about Clinton.


What lie did ol vlad tell about the most qualified person to ever seek the Oval office?

Reply
Jul 15, 2018 23:49:26   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Putin suppressed the v**es by spreading lies about Clinton.


Wrong Mold, Shillary lost because she's an ignorant liar.

Reply
Jul 15, 2018 23:59:01   #
SilentGeneration Loc: Michigan
 
maryjane wrote:
The t***h is that we need to do all of these things including the wall and sufficient patrols guarding it. Years ago, a message went out to the world that America had become weak, foolish and easily manipulated, that anyone could just cross its southern border and be taken in, given almost all rights/benefits/privileges of citizens, be given FREE such things as education, welfare and medical care, and never made to leave AND if you had a child with you, that was really a guarantee of entrance AND if you birthed a child on USA soil, you were set for life. Nothing will change for us until we change that message. Changing the message is neither complicated nor difficult. It only requires the crazy liberals relinqishing control of the country to conservatives with loyalty and commonsense AND changing congress into citizens actually loyal to and representing ONLY the best interests of the USA and American citizens.
The t***h is that we need to do all of these thing... (show quote)



I just recently read that the largest number of i*****l a***ns fly here on visas and stay here after their visas expire. Deportation of i******s crossing our southern borders has been going on through several administrations. Punishment aimed only at i******s won't work. Employers prefer to be able to pay lower wages and no benefits to guest workers or i******s than to have to pay higher wages and benefits to American citizens.

Reply
Jul 16, 2018 01:23:00   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Yeah, that wall went up from the 10 billion that Trump promised ( don't get me started on "Mexico will pay for it" ), then up from the next estimate of 20 billion to 33 billion......................but that's not counting the cost of manning that wall to keep folks from climbing over or tunneling underneath.

You should know how Government works by now - when they say $1 - add 100 and you'll come close to the actual cost.



Reply
 
 
Jul 16, 2018 01:24:14   #
EmilyD
 
moldyoldy wrote:
You know nothing about Calif.


Really?

How do you know that? crystal ball?

Here's a hint: I have family there.

You, moldyoldy, don't know how to legitimately participate in a conversation. Think on that for a minute.

Reply
Jul 16, 2018 01:31:51   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
The wall would certainly help, however, no one should be fooled into believing it will stop all i*****l i*********n. Better than the wall would be to stop the reasons for coming here illegally. These include:

1, Stiff penalties for hiring i******s, including taking away business license.
2. Similar penalties for renting housing to i******s.
3. No government benefits or licenses to i******s
4. No education for i******s.
5. No citizenship for those born here unless one parent is a citizen.

I am sure others can add to the list, but you get he idea. To stop i*****l i*********n we have to stop any and all benefits that they obtain from coming here illegally. This would apply to those already here and they would deport themselves.
The wall would certainly help, however, no one sho... (show quote)




I doubt MS13 cares about any government benifits, or gaining citizenship.

Muslims seeking to cause terrorism will not stop, but must be stopped.

I'm for the wall, plus everything in your list.

Reply
Jul 16, 2018 01:37:54   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
SilentGeneration wrote:
I just recently read that the largest number of i*****l a***ns fly here on visas and stay here after their visas expire. Deportation of i******s crossing our southern borders has been going on through several administrations. Punishment aimed only at i******s won't work. Employers prefer to be able to pay lower wages and no benefits to guest workers or i******s than to have to pay higher wages and benefits to American citizens.


When Americans are willing to pay $5 or more for a head of lettuce, and/or to work the fields, we can talk. I double-dog-dare you.

Reply
Jul 16, 2018 01:43:57   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
EmilyD wrote:
Really?

How do you know that? crystal ball?

Here's a hint: I have family there.

You, moldyoldy, don't know how to legitimately participate in a conversation. Think on that for a minute.


Having relatives there does not in any way equal actually living there!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.