Cost of I*****l I*********n vs Cost of the Wall (Page 4): are they citizens? Edited: We welcome with open arms LEAGL immigrants. We Love you..we want you here just like our ancestors.

EmilyD

Iamdjchrys wrote:

Having relatives there does not in any way equal actually living there!

are they citizens?

Edited: We welcome with open arms LEAGL immigrants. We Love you..we want you here just like our ancestors. We will help you come here legally!

Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas

EmilyD wrote:

are they citizens?

Edited: We welcome with open arms LEAGL immigrants. We Love you..we want you here just like our ancestors. We will help you come here legally!

And what of the 4th (and more) generation descendants whose predecessors arrived to work California and Texas farms (among other states) when citizenship wasn't an issue? Because it really wasn't, we in the Southern and Central California zip codes thought nothing of the Hispanics we grew up with. I'm sure that the good people of Texas border towns had the same experiences I did. We went to school together. We were boyfriends and girlfriends. We played and ate with each other. We respected each other. This applies to Filipinos, too, in my family. We cried together at loved ones' funerals, and celebrated births, birthdays, quinceanerias (I know, I probably spelled that wrong), christenings and weddings together. All of this d******eness is nauseating.

tbutkovich

Iamdjchrys wrote:

And what of the 4th (and more) generation descenda... (show quote)

Your totally missing the point. Sign up for a membership in the deranged democrat party which is where you belong, you Kumbaya socialist! You seem to imply that those who support the wall are r****ts and it appears from your comments an “ardent supporter of open borders.” You seem to think that open borders would be a solution. So Sad! Taking care of Americans should be the first priority! Wouldn’t it be nice if the “wall went up” and the $17.7 Billion earmarked for the care, education, legal support, medical aid, shelters provisioned for the i*****l i*******ts was t***sferred to helping the homeless find shelter in their communities. People could have government funded shelters rather than tents on the streets. They could have toilet facilities in lieu of using the street as their toilet. The law passed charging the homeless people defecating on the street could be rescinded. You need to exchange your “myopic eyeballs” so you can see the “big picture.” Money spent on the i*****l i*******t problem is preventing us from solving other forms of social injustice.

moldyoldy

EmilyD wrote:

Really?

How do you know that? crystal ball?

Here's a hint: I have family there.

You, moldyoldy, don't know how to legitimately participate in a conversation. Think on that for a minute.

You make ignorant statements about Calif. I live there and know what you say is a blatant lie heard on some right wing h**e site. That is the same way trump gets his info, never based on facts.

SilentGeneration Loc: Michigan

Iamdjchrys wrote:

When Americans are willing to pay $5 or more for a head of lettuce, and/or to work the fields, we can talk. I double-dog-dare you.

That's just it. There's a benefit to us that provides an impetus for cheaper labor.

tbutkovich

A head of lettuce picked in Central or South America will cost less than a head of lettuce picked in the United State especially when you factor in the costs of welfare, schooling, medical care, shelter, legal assistance, incarceration of illegal criminals, drugs treatment centers for Americans who were victims of the drug cartels. I could go on and on. Your argument about the cost of lettuce is a very lame argument! Open you eyes, you fool!

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

moldyoldy wrote:

You make ignorant statements about Calif. I live there and know what you say is a blatant lie heard on some right wing h**e site. That is the same way trump gets his info, never based on facts.

I live in California too, that is for a few more hours. To damn bad the left has turned such a beautiful state into such a toilet. Cali laws and regs, the reason I'm out.
And the statements were not ignorant, is there another California or perhaps living in your five mile radius the last decade or so.
Funny that you try to claim conservatives hang on every word of conservative news sites, if you ever informed yourself of these sites then you would know, unlike the left conservatives are actually critical of opinion "news", whereas all conservatives hear from the left is parroting of the Salon, CNN, MSNBC ect, etc.

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

tbutkovich wrote:

A head of lettuce picked in Central or South America will cost less than a head of lettuce picked in the United State especially when you factor in the costs of welfare, schooling, medical care, shelter, legal assistance, incarceration of illegal criminals, drugs treatment centers for Americans who were victims of the drug cartels. I could go on and on. Your argument about the cost of lettuce is a very lame argument! Open you eyes, you fool!

Apparently there is ignorance to farm automation and Americans are not beneath farm work. It's not the farm jobs that are a concern that the liberals default every argument towards. Our entry level jobs have been taken from young Americans in the food industry, hotel and many others. Where do young kids get their start when the Locust flooded our country taking these jobs, while the balance live on the tax payer dollar.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Iamdjchrys wrote:

When Americans are willing to pay $5 or more for a head of lettuce, and/or to work the fields, we can talk. I double-dog-dare you.

Then let the two percent of i******s who are actually involved in harvesting crops stay and deport the other 98%. Problem solved.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Loki wrote:

Then let the two percent of i******s who are actually involved in harvesting crops stay and deport the other 98%. Problem solved.

But Loki the other 98% are doctors, lawyers, engineers, and such, they are a great benefit to America.

Loki Loc: Georgia

byronglimish wrote:

But Loki the other 98% are doctors, lawyers, engineers, and such, they are a great benefit to America.

Not unless they were from India or Nigeria before they were from Mexico.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

Loki wrote:

Not unless they were from India or Nigeria before they were from Mexico.

Yep. The i*****l a***ns from Mexico invading our country are the uneducated, illiterate moochers and takers welcomed here by the dimocrats. They will allow this flood of i******s simply to increase their v**er base at the detriment of our citizens ans country!

moldyoldy

Jakebrake wrote:

Yep. The i*****l a***ns from Mexico invading our country are the uneducated, illiterate moochers and takers welcomed here by the dimocrats. They will allow this flood of i******s simply to increase their v**er base at the detriment of our citizens ans country!

Those farmers and business owners using cheap labor are usually republican. That is why Reagan gave them amnesty.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

moldyoldy wrote:

Those farmers and business owners using cheap labor are usually republican. That is why Reagan gave them amnesty.

For once you are right Mold. Dimocrats aren't intelligent enough, or have the work ethic to be a farmer. Most illegal Mexicans aren't in the fields lil fella.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Jakebrake wrote:

For once you are right Mold. Dimocrats aren't intelligent enough, or have the work ethic to be a farmer. Most illegal Mexicans aren't in the fields lil fella.

Exactly!