One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Roe v Wade
Page <<first <prev 7 of 21 next> last>>
Jul 10, 2018 18:23:29   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
lindajoy wrote:
She is longer impartial or objective, she should retire or be put out..

She does have health issues, I believe cancer ?? Was talking about retiring but when T***p w*n, she said she’ll die before giving him another opportunity to appoint...

She will more than likely give President Trump the opportunity to appoint another SCOTUS in the next six years.

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 18:37:47   #
EmilyD
 
old marine wrote:
She will more than likely give President Trump the opportunity to appoint another SCOTUS in the next six years.


The oldest Supreme Court Justice so far was Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who was 90 when he retired. However, he lived to be 94, so if Ginsburg doesn't want to give Trump the opportunity to nominate another Justice, she could break Holmes' record and stay on the court until Trump is done. I wouldn't be surprised if she does this, as she has made it clear she does not like Trump. Too bad she didn't go to New Zealand when he won...

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 18:39:49   #
EL Loc: Massachusetts
 
JoyV wrote:
Where do you live that women have no control over whether or not they can get pregnant? Is rape legal where you live? Yes, when you make a choice it either opens new doors for other choices, or closes doors to other choices. This is the same for many choices, not just pregnancy. The bigger the choice, the bigger the impact on other choices.


In the case of rape, immediate medical care will insure that there is not a pregnancy.
Women have no control if they don't use their brain first.

Reply
 
 
Jul 10, 2018 18:43:33   #
Nickolai
 
TrueAmerican wrote:
If she does not wish to practice protection against pregnancy, and becomes pregnant, and decides to abort, and does so as soon as possible after learning she is pregnant, then I have no problem with it, as long as she and her playmate pay for it themselves, and not require taxpayers to do so through an organization such as planned parenthood (the irony in the name always sickens me). I did not participate in the act of creating the pregnancy, and for the life of me do not why myself or any other taxpayer shold help pay for said a******n. It's like the old sayin goes "you gotta pay to play" Nuff said !!!!!!
If she does not wish to practice protection agains... (show quote)






Public money to plan parenthood cannot be used for performing a******ns. Public money is used for poor peoples women's health purposes cancer screenings and such

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 19:10:47   #
Carol Kelly
 
EL wrote:
A woman has no control over her life is she gets pregnant when she doesn't want to.


Can’t pay, don’t play.

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 19:11:12   #
Carol Kelly
 
Nickolai wrote:
Public money to plan parenthood cannot be used for performing a******ns. Public money is used for poor peoples women's health purposes cancer screenings and such


Would that were true.

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 19:11:37   #
Carol Kelly
 
EL wrote:
In the case of rape, immediate medical care will insure that there is not a pregnancy.
Women have no control if they don't use their brain first.


Amen!

Reply
 
 
Jul 10, 2018 20:22:35   #
Morgan
 
JoyV wrote:
Yes. A woman has the right to decide whether or not to have a child. Once that decision is made, it is her responsibility to see to the child's needs, or see that the child is given to someone else who will do so. She should not have the right to change her mind by eliminating the child from her body once the child exists. The choice was already made before she got pregnant. She CHOSE to engage in pregnancy causing activity without preventing herself getting pregnant (unless she was raped). That choice was hers to make and she made it. One made she could still change her mind on raising a child, but should not have the right to decide on whether or not that child has the right to live. She chose to start a baby inside her body, by not preventing it. That was her choice. To end its life is no different than ending its life after birth. Would you feel the same about a private individual who decides to eliminate a baby after 11 months from the start of her pregnancy? No one should force her to raise a child she does not want. She could choose not to raise a child by giving it up for adopting. But should her right to live her life without being saddled by a child mean she should be legally allowed to commit infanticide? Now maybe some feel infanticide should be legal. Aborting an unborn baby is also infanticide which is legal because of the age of the infant, counting from the start of pregnancy.
Yes. A woman has the right to decide whether or no... (show quote)


I see your point, but having sex does not automatically determine you will become pregnant. There are only about six days the women can become pregnant which is including the life of a sperm. If a woman/girl took the time to know when she can become fertile that would help, with that being said aside from pregnancy unprotected sex is risky and dangerous to being vulnerable to std's.

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 20:44:22   #
Morgan
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Do you even know what are our unalienable rights and in what document they are defined?

Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness Did you get that? LIFE! This includes the Life of a living baby in the womb.

The Founders believed that natural rights are inherent in all people by virtue of their being human and that certain of these rights are unalienable, meaning they cannot be surrendered to government under any circumstances. The fundamental freedoms of the American people are alluded to in the Declaration of Independence, implicit in the Constitution, and enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

There is no unalienable right implicit in the constitution that protects the act of taking a life, whether in or out of the womb.
Do you even know what are our unalienable rights a... (show quote)


YesI do, now are those not our individual rights? What makes an individual? Yeah I know don't flip out, but that is what it has to do with, individual rights and our unalienable rights which are more than in our constitution, only three are mentioned there, Life, yes of the individual, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I would call forcing someone to grow a child who doesn't want to, not fit into that description. I personally am not for a******n but the larger picture is the government needs to stay the ** out of it.

To make matters worse now people are going to argue over conception, how thick do you want to make this soup? An embryo or a fetus is in the making, not a baby yet. I agree if a woman has to get one it should not go past the first trimester, personally, I would say not past the first eight weeks before it is considered a fetus.

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 20:48:12   #
Morgan
 
old marine wrote:
JoyV, I am obviously a man and I have never in almost eighty years heard of a eleven months pregnant woman.

Maybe my dear wife had our son two months early in her nineth month.
JoyV, I am obviously a man and I have never in alm... (show quote)


TOOOOOOOOO Funny ROFLMAO

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 20:50:23   #
Morgan
 
Bug58 wrote:
That's a LOW opinion of women saying she has NO control over her life if she gets pregnant when she doesn't want to, who the hell has control over her life???

I'm curious do you also think a woman has no control over her life if she gets pregnant WHEN SHE actually WANTS too???


Say Whaaaaat

Reply
 
 
Jul 10, 2018 21:00:03   #
Morgan
 
Lady Laughs Alot wrote:
So don't go around telling everyone that a woman is a private being with the right to destroy new souls.

But I know I'll never find another YOU---after you have been aborted:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmactMIhrRM




A soul, like energy, is never destroyed, it is only housed in a body, when the body dies the soul returns home. Many believe in reincarnation and they come back and are reborn over and over learning lessons.

People also believe the do meet others again in their next life, a belief I like to embrace.

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 21:12:16   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Morgan wrote:

To make matters worse now people are going to argue over conception, how thick do you want to make this soup? An embryo or a fetus is in the making, not a baby yet. I agree if a woman has to get one it should not go past the first trimester, personally, I would say not past the first eight weeks before it is considered a fetus.
Doesn't matter if the embryo or fetus is not a baby yet, it is still the beginning of a human's life. Never seen a human female give birth to a frog.

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 21:13:41   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Morgan wrote:
A soul, like energy, is never destroyed, it is only housed in a body, when the body dies the soul returns home. Many believe in reincarnation and they come back and are reborn over and over learning lessons.

People also believe the do meet others again in their next life, a belief I like to embrace.
What makes you think a soul cannot be destroyed?

Reply
Jul 10, 2018 21:44:29   #
Morgan
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
What makes you think a soul cannot be destroyed?


Like I said it's like energy, “Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be changed from one form to another. JMO

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 21 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.