One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: "We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11" #3
This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it here.
Page <<first <prev 6 of 69 next> last>>
Oct 22, 2017 20:40:24   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Nickolai wrote:
I see debris ejecting up and out by some kind of force. Concrete, gyp board, furniture, computers door knobs. Ceramic toilet bowls every thing turning into dust in mid air. Only some Kind of force could accomplish such things. If the collapse were gravitational there could have been some chunks of concrete especially the 3,000 toilet bowels should not have been turned into dust
Yeah, usually when a couple hundred thousand tons of concrete and steel collides with something beneath it, you will see a lot of broken pieces of stuff flying in all directions. It ain't rocket science. The "some kind of force" is called "impact force." There are actually mathematical equations for determining the magnitude of that force.

You wouldn't believe what happens when 62 million kilograms of falling concrete and steel collides with 4 million tons of concrete and steel just sitting there minding its own business. All hell breaks loose, things get smashed, broken, pulverized, bent, twisted, shredded, and turned to dust. This includes commodes.

Reply
Oct 22, 2017 22:58:53   #
Steve700
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Yeah, usually when a couple hundred thousand tons of concrete and steel collides with something beneath it, you will see a lot of broken pieces of stuff flying in all directions. It ain't rocket science. The "some kind of force" is called "impact force." There are actually mathematical equations for determining the magnitude of that force.

You wouldn't believe what happens when 62 million kilograms of falling concrete and steel collides with 4 million tons of concrete and steel just sitting there minding its own business. All hell breaks loose, things get smashed, broken, pulverized, bent, twisted, shredded, and turned to dust. This includes commodes.
Yeah, usually when a couple hundred thousand tons ... (show quote)

You have never said a single thing that proves or even indicates that explosives were not used, (mathematical equations that indicate that the building might have come down without explosives prove NOTHING, but you continue to prove your a mental case by going on and on and on and on and on and with such nonsense for hundreds upon hundreds of pages. Give it up. You lost a long time ago when you were shown hundreds and hundreds of things that strongly indicate that 911 was an inside job and that demolition explosives were used. In spite of many repeated requests,you have yet to show any pictures of a halfway adequate amount of airline wreckage at either the Pentagon or out in that field. A sane person cannot possibly be that firmly stuck on stupid.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 09:04:26   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Anyone who believes they see explosive detonations in those photos needs to check in with a shrink.


Anyone who knows the force of gravity does not move sideways, yet claims it does in order to defend the lies of mass murderers, is an accomplice to mass murder.



Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2017 09:08:02   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Now you're killing me buddy... it's a good thing I'm off the tractor ... the Empire State building is a cage frame structure...it has no center core... You must be having a bad day... think before you post...


Why don't you count the number of columns in the Empire state building?
I'll bet there is not even half the number as there were in the twin towers.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 09:14:24   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
I'm @ 20/20 vision... maybe you should check yours?...


If your vision does not allow you to recognize skyscrapers being blown up, it must be your proclivity to defend mass murderers for profit which is the reason for your blindness.



Reply
Oct 23, 2017 09:16:47   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
Why don't you count the number of columns in the Empire state building?
I'll bet there is not even half the number as there were in the twin towers.



That sounds more like something right up your alley... Don't forget about the "massive" core now ... Look the peels are blowing out "sideways"... where do you suspect the evil "perps" hid the explosives?...



Reply
Oct 23, 2017 09:36:21   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
That sounds more like something right up your alley... Don't forget about the "massive" core now ... Look the peels are blowing out "sideways"... where do you suspect the evil "perps" hid the explosives?...


It's not so important to know where the explosives were hidden, it's much more important to know who was responsible for them being there.



Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2017 10:10:13   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
It's not so important to know where the explosives were hidden, it's much more important to know who was responsible for them being there.




"It's not so important to know where the explosives were hidden",... Good point... You still can't come up with this explanation after 16 years... or one ounce of explosive evidence out of the 100's of tons of high explosives necessary to do the job... you have to even create explosive scenarios never seen before that are physically impossible... when F=M*A fits the scientific method as written following the 2nd law of motion exactly... you troofers are going to have a real hard time selling this nonsense to a Judge that understands there is gravity on planet earth...



Reply
Oct 23, 2017 11:43:33   #
whole2th
 
Israel did 9-11.

This presentation identifies the evidence that the 'ideation' (conception) of the 9-11 plot goes back at least to 1978. Israelis worked to gain control of the World Trade Center security. At every juncture of planning, execution, and cover-up there are zionist operatives.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s0A_rutyxo

9-11 was not investigated as a crime. It was a foregone conclusion--without evidence--that 9-11 was an act of war.

Commendable work by Christopher Bollyn.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 15:08:31   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
Anyone who knows the force of gravity does not move sideways, yet claims it does in order to defend the lies of mass murderers, is an accomplice to mass murder.
Who said gravity moves sideways? Gravity has magnitude and direction, but it has no mass so it doesn't move anywhere.

Gravity is one of the four fundamental forces in the universe. Gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces, acting together, hold this entire shebang together. Every physical object (mass) in the universe exerts the force of gravity on every other object.

Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force directed along a line of centers of the two objects and is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. Put simply the force of gravity between two objects is dependent on the masses of the two objects and the distance between them. Gravity is why the earth orbits the sun, and the moon orbits the earth. The moon's gravitational force causes the tides in the earth's oceans.

Now that we know gravity is a force of mutual attraction between all physical objects in the universe, we can move on to the forces that act on objects in motion, particularly the forces in play when two objects collide with each other, and in the case of the collapse of the twin towers, when a mass in motion collides with a mass at rest.

Without rehashing the details and calculations of Newton's laws of motion, understanding their applications to mass and momentum is critical to understanding why when a mass of say 62 million kgs of concrete, steel and office contents accelerating at 9.8m/s collides with a similar mass of 4 million kgs at rest, the resulting unbalanced forces--such as impact, tension, torque, spring, friction--can easily exceed the force of gravity and will not only cause disintegration or destruction but will also impart changes in direction, velocity, and momentum of the resulting debris.

This is why we see sections of perimeter wall, flooring, dust and other debris being ejected away from the the collapsing towers.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 15:19:21   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
"It's not so important to know where the explosives were hidden",... Good point... You still can't come up with this explanation after 16 years... or one ounce of explosive evidence out of the 100's of tons of high explosives necessary to do the job... you have to even create explosive scenarios never seen before that are physically impossible... when F=M*A fits the scientific method as written following the 2nd law of motion exactly... you troofers are going to have a real hard time selling this nonsense to a Judge that understands there is gravity on planet earth...
"It's not so important to know where the expl... (show quote)


Aren't all the photos and videos of the twin towers turning into explosive debris clouds which are ejected hundreds of feet in all directions while accompanied by the sound of huge explosions enough proof for you? How much more do you need? https://youtu.be/VwjRaadx-QU









Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2017 15:25:26   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
Aren't all the photos and videos of the twin towers turning into explosive debris clouds which are ejected hundreds of feet in all directions while accompanied by the sound of huge explosions enough proof for you? How much more do you need?
The truth would work.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 15:32:49   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Who said gravity moves sideways? Gravity has magnitude and direction, but it has no mass so it doesn't move anywhere.

Gravity is one of the four fundamental forces in the universe. Gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces, acting together, hold this entire shebang together. Every physical object (mass) in the universe exerts the force of gravity on every other object.

Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force directed along a line of centers of the two objects and is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. Put simply the force of gravity between two objects is dependent on the masses of the two objects and the distance between them. Gravity is why the earth orbits the sun, and the moon orbits the earth. The moon's gravitational force causes the tides in the earth's oceans.

Now that we know gravity is a force of mutual attraction between all physical objects in the universe, we can move on to the forces that act on objects in motion, particularly the forces in play when two objects collide with each other, and in the case of the collapse of the twin towers, when a mass in motion collides with a mass at rest.

Without rehashing the details and calculations of Newton's laws of motion, understanding their applications to mass and momentum is critical to understanding why when a mass of say 62 million kgs of concrete, steel and office contents accelerating at 9.8m/s collides with a similar mass of 4 million kgs at rest, the resulting unbalanced forces--such as impact, tension, torque, spring, friction--can easily exceed the force of gravity and will not only cause disintegration or destruction but will also impart changes in direction, velocity, and momentum of the resulting debris.

This is why we see sections of perimeter wall, flooring, dust and other debris being ejected away from the the collapsing towers.
Who said gravity moves sideways? Gravity has magni... (show quote)


Newton's third law calls for an equal and opposite reaction when a falling mass contacts a solid object. The equal and opposite reaction exerted on the falling mass of floors by the undamaged lower floors would prevent the falling mass from gaining any momentum. The falling mass would slow down and stop quickly when contacting the much heavier steel framework of the lower floors.
All the resistance of the lower floors was removed by powerful explosives. That's the only way the towers could fall so fast, at 2/3rds free fall speed.

The resistance of the undamaged lower floors was causing the top of the South Tower to topple off to the side. The only way that top section could be made to fall downward instead was to remove all the resistance of the solid lower floors with explosives. The explosive detonation is just starting in this photo . . .



Reply
Oct 23, 2017 15:35:03   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
The truth would work.


Shills such as you and emarine who find it necessary to hide your identities are not truth tellers.
If you posted the truth you wouldn't have to hide behind gutless anonymity.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 15:44:29   #
TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!
 
payne1000 wrote:
Shills such as you and emarine who find it necessary to hide your identities are not truth tellers.
If you posted the truth you wouldn't have to hide behind gutless anonymity.


You do realize that after two years that your bs is not working?!! Right!?? Has anyone ever revealed their name to you? Didn’t think so. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 69 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.