This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it
here.
TexaCan wrote:
You do realize that after two years that your bs is not working?!! Right!?? Has anyone ever revealed their name to you? Didn’t think so. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Maybe you should keep up with this debate a little better. There have been a few who identified themselves. I have respect for those who did even though we don't agree politically.
Why do you hide behind cowardly anonymity?
payne1000 wrote:
Maybe you should keep up with this debate a little better. There have been a few who identified themselves. I have respect for those who did even though we don't agree politically.
Why do you hide behind cowardly anonymity?
You’re so cute!!!!!!!!!! This debate was over years ago! You missed it!
TexaCan wrote:
You’re so cute!!!!!!!!!! This debate was over years ago! You missed it!
The debate is alive and well on the truth side.
Cowardly anonymous liars aren't faring so well.
payne1000 wrote:
Newton's third law calls for an equal and opposite reaction when a falling mass contacts a solid object. The equal and opposite reaction exerted on the falling mass of floors by the undamaged lower floors would prevent the falling mass from gaining any momentum. The falling mass would slow down and stop quickly when contacting the much heavier steel framework of the lower floors.
All the resistance of the lower floors was removed by powerful explosives. That's the only way the towers could fall so fast, at 2/3rds free fall speed.
The resistance of the undamaged lower floors was causing the top of the South Tower to topple off to the side. The only way that top section could be made to fall downward instead was to remove all the resistance of the solid lower floors with explosives. The explosive detonation is just starting in this photo . . .
Newton's third law calls for an equal and opposite... (
show quote)
You don't have a clue about the equal and opposite reaction thing, do you? Especially when applied to UNEQUAL MASSES and MOMENTUMS.
You need to study the collapse dynamics carefully, you are missing some critical points about what smashed into what. Here's a hint: the vertical support columns, perimeter and core, presented very little resistance to the falling mass.
whole2th wrote:
Israel did 9-11.
This presentation identifies the evidence that the 'ideation' (conception) of the 9-11 plot goes back at least to 1978. Israelis worked to gain control of the World Trade Center security. At every juncture of planning, execution, and cover-up there are zionist operatives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s0A_rutyxo9-11 was not investigated as a crime. It was a foregone conclusion--without evidence--that 9-11 was an act of war.
Commendable work by Christopher Bollyn.
Israel did 9-11. br br This presentation identifi... (
show quote)
What... you missed another neo Nazi news bulletin...Mosses planned 911.. try & keep up with the program Jr...
payne1000 wrote:
The debate is alive and well on the truth side.
Cowardly anonymous liars aren't faring so well.
Not until you troofers revise the basic law's of motion or find a clueless Judge clueless you're just blowing smoke...
payne1000 wrote:
The debate is alive and well on the truth side.
Cowardly anonymous liars aren't faring so well.
You’re a living testimony to that!
Blade_Runner wrote:
You don't have a clue about the equal and opposite reaction thing, do you? Especially when applied to UNEQUAL MASSES and MOMENTUMS.
You need to study the collapse dynamics carefully, you are missing some critical points about what smashed into what. Here's a hint: the vertical support columns, perimeter and core, presented very little resistance to the falling mass.
Like all anonymous shills, you make impossible claims with nothing to back them up.
Explain to readers why the same columns which had held up the upper floors for over half a century would suddenly not be able to support that load.
Defending lies is tough . . . even for those who are skilled at it . . . and you're not.
emarine wrote:
Not until you troofers revise the basic law's of motion or find a clueless Judge clueless you're just blowing smoke...
To prove to readers that you understand Newton's third law of motion, please define the law.
You can use your own words. Just don't leave out the part about equal and opposite reaction.
That's the part you have shown no knowledge of.
payne1000 wrote:
Actually, you are.
Actually I’m ‘faring’ quite well, thank you! What lie did I tell? Or are you just flirting with me and want my name and number?
What is your purpose for continually rehashing the 9/11 story? You’re not changing anyone’s mind...... I doubt that only a handful of members even read your posts! It’s time to find a new story!
TexaCan wrote:
Actually I’m ‘faring’ quite well, thank you! What lie did I tell? Or are you just flirting with me and want my name and number?
What is your purpose for continually rehashing the 9/11 story? You’re not changing anyone’s mind...... I doubt that only a handful of members even read your posts! It’s time to find a new story!
The fact that you're complaining indicates you know the truth is getting through to some readers.
Intelligent readers already know the truth. Those who are challenged in their ability to think and analyze take a little longer to accept the truth.
Those whose agenda requires them to lie and cover up the truth help keep this topic on the front page.
Thank you for helping as well.
payne1000 wrote:
Like all anonymous shills, you make impossible claims with nothing to back them up.
Explain to readers why the same columns which had held up the upper floors for over half a century would suddenly not be able to support that load.
Defending lies is tough . . . even for those who are skilled at it . . . and you're not.
You quote for the 500th time...Explain to readers why the same columns which had held up the upper floors for over half a century would suddenly not be able to support that load... And once again the simple truth is... drum role please... they suddenly could not bear the weight after all that time because... another drum role please... those same columns were hit by fully loaded big ass jet planes going real fast then exploded & burned... you know the kind of thing that happens to all skyscrapers all the time in the 100 year old history of Skyscrapers... got It yet?...
payne1000 wrote:
Like all anonymous shills, you make impossible claims with nothing to back them up.
Explain to readers why the same columns which had held up the upper floors for over half a century would suddenly not be able to support that load.
Defending lies is tough . . . even for those who are skilled at it . . . and you're not.
OK, because "that load" no longer existed when the support columns failed at the impact zone and "that load", under the force of gravity, came down heavy on the floors below, one floor right after another, all the way down.
Leslie Robertson explained it quite clearly that the perimeter columns and the core columns did not bear the total load independent of each other, they shared the load equally. The floor truss systems tied the vertical support columns together and stabilized the entire system. When the collapsing mass destroyed the floor system connections to the vertical support, either along the perimeter or the core, or both, not only did the floor system join the falling mass and collapse DOWN due to gravity, but the support columns lost stability and fractured or buckled. The videos that show a 70 story section of the North Tower core columns standing for 3 or 4 seconds after the collapsing mass had fallen past them not only confirm that the floor system were destroyed but that the columns could not stand without them.
payne1000 wrote:
The fact that you're complaining indicates you know the truth is getting through to some readers.
Intelligent readers already know the truth. Those who are challenged in their ability to think and analyze take a little longer to accept the truth.
Those whose agenda requires them to lie and cover up the truth help keep this topic on the front page.
Thank you for helping as well.
You confuse complaining for ‘making fun of’!!! You are certifiable 🥜 ‘s!!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.